T MAT 1402637 Bibliography
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Agus, N. A. (2008). Mudah belajar matematika 2: untuk kelas VIII Sekolah
Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan,
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Arikunto, S (2010). Prosedur penelitian: suatu pendekatan praktik. Edisi Revisi.
Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (Ed.2). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Artami, W, & Kurniasih, N. (2015). Pengaruh strategi REACT setting NHT terhadap
disposisi matematis siswa dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Ekuivale:
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 18 (1), hlm. 80-84.
Ashlock, R. B. (2002). Error patterns in computation: Using error patterns to
improve instruction. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Atallah, F., Bryant, S.L., Dada, R. (2009). A research framework for studying
conceptions and dispositions of mathematics: a dialogue to help students
learn. Research in Higher Education Journal, hlm. 1-8.
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. (2015). KBBI online. [Online].
Diakses dari: http://kbbi.web.id/mampu.
Baharuddin & Wahyuni, E. N. (2008). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Yogyakarta:
Ar-ruzz Media.
Balitbang. (2011). Survei internasional PISA: PISA (Programme for International
Student Assessment). [Online]. Diakses dari:
http://litbang.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/survei-internasional-pisa.
Baroody, A, J. (1993). Problem solving, reasoning, and communicating, (K-8):
helping children think mathematically. New York: Merrill as imprint of
Macmillan Publishing Company.
Beyer, J. (2011). Development and evaluation of an instrument to assess prospective
teachers’ dispositions with respect to mathematics. International Journal of
Business and Social Science, 2 (16), hlm. 20-32.
Beyers, J. E. R. (2012). An examination of the relationship between prospective
teachers’ dispositions and achievement in a mathematics content course for
DELSINA PRAMATA SARI, 2014
PENGARUH STRATEGI REACT TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN REPRESENTASI, PENALARAN, DAN DISPOSISI
MATEMATIS SISWA SMP
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
136
elementary education majors.
10.1177/2158244012462589.
Sage
Open,
pp.
1-15.
DOI:
Bilber, C., Tuna, A., & Korkmaz, S. (2013). The mistakes and the misconceptions of
the eighth grade students on the subject of angles. European Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), hlm. 50-59.
Borg, W. & Gall, M. (1989).Educational research (An introduction fifth edition).
New York: Longman.
BSNP. (2013). Laporan hasil ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2012/2013. Software
Pamer13.
Christensen, L. B. (1997). Experimental methodology (7th Ed.). Boston: Allyn &
Bacon.
Coe, R. (2002). It’s the effect size, stupid1: what effect size is and why it is important.
Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association annual
conference, Exeter, 12-14 September 2002.
CORD. (1999). Teaching mathematics contextually: the cornerstone of tech prep.
Texas: CORD Communications, Inc.
CORD. (2012). The REACT strategy.
[Online].
http://www.cord.org/the-react-learning-strategy/.
Diakses
dari:
Coughlan, S. (2015). Asia tops biggest global school rankings. [Online]. Diakses
dari: http://www.bbc.com/news/business-32608772.
Crawford. (2001). Teaching contextually. Texas: CCI Publishing, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating
quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Dahlan, J. A. (2004). Meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman dan penalaran
matematika siswa sekolah lanjutan tingkat pertama melalui pendekatan Openended. Disertasi SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Darhim. (2015). Media dan alat peraga dalam pendidikan matematika. Bandung:
UPI Press.
De Lange, J. (2006). Mathematical literacy for living from OECD-PISA perspective.
Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Depdiknas. (2004). Petunjuk teknis peraturan Dirjen Dikdasmen Depdiknas Nomor
506/C/PP/2004. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Depdiknas. (2006). Kurikulum satuan tingkat pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
137
Dris, J. & Tasari. (2011). Matematika 2: untuk SMP dan MTs kelas VIII. Jakarta:
Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Fadhila, Trisoni, R., & Afriyani, D. (2014). Pengaruh pembelajaran kontekstual
dengan strategi react terhadap kemampuan koneksi matematika. Edusainstika,
1(1), hlm. 89-91.
Fauziah, A. (2009). Peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman dan pemecahan masalah
matematika siswa SMP melalui strategi REACT (Relating, Experiencing,
Applying, cooperating, Transferring). Tesis SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak
Diterbitkan.
Fortuna, I. K. A. D., Dantes, N. & Sariyasa. (2014). Pengaruh strategi REACT
terhadap hasil belajar matematika ditinjau dari aktivitas belajar siswa kelas V
SD. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Program Studi Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), hlm. 1-12.
Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate reasearch and
education (7th Ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Hake, R. R. (2002). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gain in
mechanics with gender, high school physics, and pretest scores on
mathematics and spatials visualization. Physics Education Research
Conference: Boise, Idaho.
Hanna, R. (2012). Budaya menyontek di kalangan pelajar. [Online]. Diakses dari:
sulut.kemenag.go.id/file/file/BimasIslam/wito1367246119.pdf.
Hergenhahn, B. R.&Olson, M. H. (2010). Theories of learning. Jakarta: Kencana
Prenada Media Grup.
Herringer, N. (2013). Making sense of mathematics through reasoning. [Online].
Diakses
dari:
http://www.3plearning.com/making-sense-mathematicsreasoning-2/.
Jaenudin. (2008). Pengaruh pendekatan kontekstual terhadap kemampuan
representasi matematik beragam siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Skripsi
SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Jansen, A. (2012). Developing productive dispositions during small-group work in
two sixth-grade mathematics classrooms: teachers' facilitation efforts and
students' self-reported benefits. Middle Grades Research Journal, 7(1), hlm.
37-56.
Jha, et al. (2012). Mathematics performance of primary school students in assam
(india): an analysis using newman procedure. International Journal of
Computer Applicationsin Engineering Sciences, Vol II.
138
Karmila, I. (2015). Penerapan strategi pembelajaran everyone is a teacher here
disertai tugas superitem terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan
beliefs matematis siswa SMP. Tesis SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Kemdikbud. (2014). Buku guru: matematika. Jakarta : Kementerian Pendidikan dan
Kebudayaan.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: helping
children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Lesh, R., Posh, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among
representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In Janvier, C.
(Ed.), Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of
Mathematics (hal. 33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
Lie, A. (2005). Cooperative learning. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Lohman, D.F & Lakin, J.M. (2009). Reasoning and intelligence. [Online]. Diakses
dari:
http://faculty.education.uiowa.edu/dlohman/pdf/Reasoning%20and%20Intell_
Lohman%20Lakin%20102709.pdf.
Luitel, B. C. (2001). Multiple representations of mathematical learning. [Online].
Diakses dari: http://www.matedu.cinvestav.mx/adalira.pdf.
Marsigit, Erliani, E., Dhoruri, A., Sugiman. (2011). Matematika 2: untuk SMP/MTs
kelas VIII. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Marthen, T. (2010). Pengembangan kemampuan matematis siswa melalui
pembelajaran kontekstual dengan pendekatan REACT. Jurnal Penelitian
Pendidikan, 11 (2), hlm. 11-20.
Maxwell, K. (2001). Positive learning dispositions in mathematics. [Online]. Diakses
dari: https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/.../ACE_Paper_3_Issue...
Minium, E. W., King, B. M., & Bear, G. (1993). Statistical reasoning in psychology
and education (3rd Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Mudzakir, H. S. (2006). Strategi pembelajaran think talk and write untuk
meningkatkan kemampuan representasi matematik beragam siswa SMP. Tesis
SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Mullis, I. V. S. et al. (2001). TIMSS trends in mathematics and science study:
assessment framework and specifications 2003. Boston: ISC.
NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standard for school mathematics. Reston,
VA: NCTM.
139
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA:
NCTM.
Nugroho, H., Meisaroh, L. (2009). Matematika 2: SMP dan MTs kelas VIII. Jakarta:
Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Nuharini, D. & Wahyuni, T. (2008). Matematika konsep dan aplikasinya: untuk
SMP/MTs kelas VIII. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan
Nasional.
Nyikahadzoyi, M. R., Mapuwei, T., & Chinyoka,
obstacles faced by ‘a’ level mathematics
inequalities: a case study of Bindura Urban
Journal of Academic Research in Progressive
2(2), hlm. 206-221.
M. (2013). Some cognitive
students in understanding
High Schools. International
Education and Development,
OECD. (2013). Draft PISA 2015 mathematics framework. Paris, France: OECD.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: what 15-year-olds know and what they
can do with what they know. Paris, France: OECD.
OECD.(2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework-mathematics, reading, science
and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris, France: OECD.
Oxford. (2015). Oxford advanced learner's dictionary. [Online]. Diakses dari:
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/learner/reasoning.
Ozgun-Koca, S. A. (1998). Students’ use of representations in mathematics
education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American
Chapter of the International Group for thePsychology of Mathematics
Education (Raleigh, NC, October 31-November 2, 1998).
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 32 Tahun 2013 (revisi PP Nomor 19 Tahun 2005)
tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Polking J. (1998). Response to NCTM’s round 4 questions. [Online] Diakses dari:
http://www.ams.org/government/argrpt4.html.
Popham, W. J. (1995). Classroom assessments: what teachers need to know. Toronto:
Allyn Bacon.
Pranoto, I. (2011). UN matematika menyiapkan anak Indonesia menjadi kuli
nirnalar; Republik telah menyerobot kesempatan anak bangsa bernalar.
[Online].
Diakses
dari
http://www.slideshare.net/y0r/un-matematikamenyiapkan-anak-menjadi-kuli-nirnalar.
Pranoto, I. (2013). Kasmaran bermatematika. [Online].
http://www.bincangedukasi.com/kasmaran-bermatematika/.
Diakses
dari:
140
Priatna, N. (2010). Penalaran matematika. [Online]. Diakses dari:
http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPMIPA/JUR._PEND._MATEMATIKA/196303
311988031-NANANG_PRIATNA/Penalaran_Matematika.pdf.
Priatna, N., Sukamto, T., & Sadam, R. (2015). Matematika: untuk kelas VIII
SMP/MTs. Bandung: Grafindo Media Pratama.
Roselizawati. & Shahrill, M. (2014). Understanding students' mathematical errors and
misconceptions: the case of year 11 repeating students. ISPACS: Mathematics
Education Trends and Research, (2014), hlm. 1-10.
Salkind, G. M. (2007). Mathematical representations. EDCI Preparation and
Proffessional Developent of Mathematics Teachers. George Mason
University.
Santi, D. P. D. (2014). Penerapan pendekatan kontekstual dengan strategi REACT
untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep dan representasi
matematis siswa Sekolah Dasar: Studi Kuasi eksperimen pada Siswa Kelas V
Sekolah dasar. [Online]. Diakses dari: http://e-journal.unswagati-crb.ac.id/.
Santrock, J. W. (2010). Psikologi pendidikan (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: Kencana.
Sarwadi, et al. (2014). Understanding students' mathematical errors and
misconceptions: the case of year 11 repeating students. ISPACS, hal. 1-10.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching.
Educational Researcher, 15 (2), hal. 4-14.
Suhandri. (2011). Meningkatkan pemahaman dan penalaran matematis siswa SMP
pada pembelajaran geometri dengan menggunakan strategi REACT. Tesis
SPS UPI: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Suherman, E. (2003). Evaluasi pembelajaran matematika. Dalam Turmudi. (Ed).
Bandung: UPI.
Suherman, E. dan Kusumah, Y. S. (1990). Evaluasi pendidikan matematika.
Bandung: Wijayakusumah.
Sumarmo, U. (2010). Berfikir dan disposisi matematika: apa, mengapa, dan
bagaimana dikembangkan pada peserta didik. [Online]. Diakses dari
http://Math.sps.upi.edu/wp
content/uploads/2010/2/
BERFIKIR-DANDISPOSISI-MATEMATIK-SPS-2010.pdf indikator mtk.
Sumarmo, U. (2015a). Pengembangan dan contoh butir skala nilai, karakter, budaya
dan aspek afektif lain dalam pembelajaran matematika. [Online]. Diakses
dari:
http://utari-sumarmo.dosen.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/materi/soft-skillmatematik-stkip-terbaru-2015/.
141
Sumarmo, U. (2015b). Kumpulan makalah: berpikir dan disposisi matematik serta
pembelajarannya. Bandung: UPI Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika.
Suparlan, A. (2005). Pembelajaran berbasis masalah untuk mengembangkan
kemampuan pemahaman dan representasi matematik siswa Sekolah
Menengah Pertama (studi eksperimen pada siswa salah satu SMP di
Cirebon). Tesis SPS UPI: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Syaban, M. (2009). Menumbuhkan daya dan disposisi siswa SMA melalui
pembelajaran investigasi. Educationist, 3 (2), hlm. 129-136.
TIMSS. (2011). TIMSS 2011 International results in mathematics. [Online]. Diakses
dari: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/international-resultsmathematics.html.
Trimoyo, M. B., et. al. (2009). Materi diklat training of trainer calon tenaga
pengajar/dosen lingkungan badiklat perhubungan: pengembangan bahan ajar.
Magelang: Badan Diklat Departemen Perhubungan.
Turmudi. (2010). Metodologi pembelajaran matematika. [Online]. Diakses dari:
http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPMIPA/JUR._PEND._MATEMATIKA/196101
121987031-TURMUDI/F25Metodologi_dan_Model_PembelajaranMatematika.pdf.
Ultay, N. & Calik, M. (2016). A Comparison of different teaching designs of ‘acids
and bases’ subject. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology
Education, 12(1), hal. 57-86.
Van De Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay‐Williams, J. M. (2009). Elementary And
middle school mathematics teaching developmentally (7th Ed.).New York:
Pearson Education.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (Ed). (1991). Radical contructivism in mathematics education.
Kluwer Akademic Publisher: Dordrecht.
Wilson, P. (2011). Disposition towards engagement in mathematics. Smith, C. (Ed.)
Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics,
31(2) June 2011, hlm. 67-72.
Wiyaka. (2014, 6 Mei). Mencontek dan pendidikan karakter. Suara Merdeka.
[Online].
Diakses
dari:
http://www.suaramerdeka.com/v1/index.php/read/cetak/2014/05/06/260780/
Menyontek-dan-Pendidikan-Karakter.
142
Yuniawatika. (2011). Penerapan pembelajaran matematika dengan strategi REACT
untuk meningkatkan kemampuan koneksi dan representasi matematik siswa
Sekolah Dasar (studi kuasi eksperimen di kelas V Sekolah Dasar kota
Cimahi). Jurnal Edisi Khusus No. 1, hlm. 105-119.
Zhe, L. (2012). Survey of primary student’s mathematical representation status and
study on the teaching model of mathematical representation. Journal of
Mathematics Education. 5 (1), hal. 63-76.
Agus, N. A. (2008). Mudah belajar matematika 2: untuk kelas VIII Sekolah
Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan,
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Arikunto, S (2010). Prosedur penelitian: suatu pendekatan praktik. Edisi Revisi.
Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (Ed.2). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Artami, W, & Kurniasih, N. (2015). Pengaruh strategi REACT setting NHT terhadap
disposisi matematis siswa dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Ekuivale:
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 18 (1), hlm. 80-84.
Ashlock, R. B. (2002). Error patterns in computation: Using error patterns to
improve instruction. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Atallah, F., Bryant, S.L., Dada, R. (2009). A research framework for studying
conceptions and dispositions of mathematics: a dialogue to help students
learn. Research in Higher Education Journal, hlm. 1-8.
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. (2015). KBBI online. [Online].
Diakses dari: http://kbbi.web.id/mampu.
Baharuddin & Wahyuni, E. N. (2008). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Yogyakarta:
Ar-ruzz Media.
Balitbang. (2011). Survei internasional PISA: PISA (Programme for International
Student Assessment). [Online]. Diakses dari:
http://litbang.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/survei-internasional-pisa.
Baroody, A, J. (1993). Problem solving, reasoning, and communicating, (K-8):
helping children think mathematically. New York: Merrill as imprint of
Macmillan Publishing Company.
Beyer, J. (2011). Development and evaluation of an instrument to assess prospective
teachers’ dispositions with respect to mathematics. International Journal of
Business and Social Science, 2 (16), hlm. 20-32.
Beyers, J. E. R. (2012). An examination of the relationship between prospective
teachers’ dispositions and achievement in a mathematics content course for
DELSINA PRAMATA SARI, 2014
PENGARUH STRATEGI REACT TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN REPRESENTASI, PENALARAN, DAN DISPOSISI
MATEMATIS SISWA SMP
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
136
elementary education majors.
10.1177/2158244012462589.
Sage
Open,
pp.
1-15.
DOI:
Bilber, C., Tuna, A., & Korkmaz, S. (2013). The mistakes and the misconceptions of
the eighth grade students on the subject of angles. European Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), hlm. 50-59.
Borg, W. & Gall, M. (1989).Educational research (An introduction fifth edition).
New York: Longman.
BSNP. (2013). Laporan hasil ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2012/2013. Software
Pamer13.
Christensen, L. B. (1997). Experimental methodology (7th Ed.). Boston: Allyn &
Bacon.
Coe, R. (2002). It’s the effect size, stupid1: what effect size is and why it is important.
Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association annual
conference, Exeter, 12-14 September 2002.
CORD. (1999). Teaching mathematics contextually: the cornerstone of tech prep.
Texas: CORD Communications, Inc.
CORD. (2012). The REACT strategy.
[Online].
http://www.cord.org/the-react-learning-strategy/.
Diakses
dari:
Coughlan, S. (2015). Asia tops biggest global school rankings. [Online]. Diakses
dari: http://www.bbc.com/news/business-32608772.
Crawford. (2001). Teaching contextually. Texas: CCI Publishing, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating
quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Dahlan, J. A. (2004). Meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman dan penalaran
matematika siswa sekolah lanjutan tingkat pertama melalui pendekatan Openended. Disertasi SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Darhim. (2015). Media dan alat peraga dalam pendidikan matematika. Bandung:
UPI Press.
De Lange, J. (2006). Mathematical literacy for living from OECD-PISA perspective.
Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Depdiknas. (2004). Petunjuk teknis peraturan Dirjen Dikdasmen Depdiknas Nomor
506/C/PP/2004. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Depdiknas. (2006). Kurikulum satuan tingkat pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
137
Dris, J. & Tasari. (2011). Matematika 2: untuk SMP dan MTs kelas VIII. Jakarta:
Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Fadhila, Trisoni, R., & Afriyani, D. (2014). Pengaruh pembelajaran kontekstual
dengan strategi react terhadap kemampuan koneksi matematika. Edusainstika,
1(1), hlm. 89-91.
Fauziah, A. (2009). Peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman dan pemecahan masalah
matematika siswa SMP melalui strategi REACT (Relating, Experiencing,
Applying, cooperating, Transferring). Tesis SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak
Diterbitkan.
Fortuna, I. K. A. D., Dantes, N. & Sariyasa. (2014). Pengaruh strategi REACT
terhadap hasil belajar matematika ditinjau dari aktivitas belajar siswa kelas V
SD. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Program Studi Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), hlm. 1-12.
Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate reasearch and
education (7th Ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Hake, R. R. (2002). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gain in
mechanics with gender, high school physics, and pretest scores on
mathematics and spatials visualization. Physics Education Research
Conference: Boise, Idaho.
Hanna, R. (2012). Budaya menyontek di kalangan pelajar. [Online]. Diakses dari:
sulut.kemenag.go.id/file/file/BimasIslam/wito1367246119.pdf.
Hergenhahn, B. R.&Olson, M. H. (2010). Theories of learning. Jakarta: Kencana
Prenada Media Grup.
Herringer, N. (2013). Making sense of mathematics through reasoning. [Online].
Diakses
dari:
http://www.3plearning.com/making-sense-mathematicsreasoning-2/.
Jaenudin. (2008). Pengaruh pendekatan kontekstual terhadap kemampuan
representasi matematik beragam siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Skripsi
SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Jansen, A. (2012). Developing productive dispositions during small-group work in
two sixth-grade mathematics classrooms: teachers' facilitation efforts and
students' self-reported benefits. Middle Grades Research Journal, 7(1), hlm.
37-56.
Jha, et al. (2012). Mathematics performance of primary school students in assam
(india): an analysis using newman procedure. International Journal of
Computer Applicationsin Engineering Sciences, Vol II.
138
Karmila, I. (2015). Penerapan strategi pembelajaran everyone is a teacher here
disertai tugas superitem terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan
beliefs matematis siswa SMP. Tesis SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Kemdikbud. (2014). Buku guru: matematika. Jakarta : Kementerian Pendidikan dan
Kebudayaan.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: helping
children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Lesh, R., Posh, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among
representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In Janvier, C.
(Ed.), Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of
Mathematics (hal. 33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
Lie, A. (2005). Cooperative learning. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Lohman, D.F & Lakin, J.M. (2009). Reasoning and intelligence. [Online]. Diakses
dari:
http://faculty.education.uiowa.edu/dlohman/pdf/Reasoning%20and%20Intell_
Lohman%20Lakin%20102709.pdf.
Luitel, B. C. (2001). Multiple representations of mathematical learning. [Online].
Diakses dari: http://www.matedu.cinvestav.mx/adalira.pdf.
Marsigit, Erliani, E., Dhoruri, A., Sugiman. (2011). Matematika 2: untuk SMP/MTs
kelas VIII. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Marthen, T. (2010). Pengembangan kemampuan matematis siswa melalui
pembelajaran kontekstual dengan pendekatan REACT. Jurnal Penelitian
Pendidikan, 11 (2), hlm. 11-20.
Maxwell, K. (2001). Positive learning dispositions in mathematics. [Online]. Diakses
dari: https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/.../ACE_Paper_3_Issue...
Minium, E. W., King, B. M., & Bear, G. (1993). Statistical reasoning in psychology
and education (3rd Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Mudzakir, H. S. (2006). Strategi pembelajaran think talk and write untuk
meningkatkan kemampuan representasi matematik beragam siswa SMP. Tesis
SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Mullis, I. V. S. et al. (2001). TIMSS trends in mathematics and science study:
assessment framework and specifications 2003. Boston: ISC.
NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standard for school mathematics. Reston,
VA: NCTM.
139
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA:
NCTM.
Nugroho, H., Meisaroh, L. (2009). Matematika 2: SMP dan MTs kelas VIII. Jakarta:
Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Nuharini, D. & Wahyuni, T. (2008). Matematika konsep dan aplikasinya: untuk
SMP/MTs kelas VIII. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan
Nasional.
Nyikahadzoyi, M. R., Mapuwei, T., & Chinyoka,
obstacles faced by ‘a’ level mathematics
inequalities: a case study of Bindura Urban
Journal of Academic Research in Progressive
2(2), hlm. 206-221.
M. (2013). Some cognitive
students in understanding
High Schools. International
Education and Development,
OECD. (2013). Draft PISA 2015 mathematics framework. Paris, France: OECD.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: what 15-year-olds know and what they
can do with what they know. Paris, France: OECD.
OECD.(2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework-mathematics, reading, science
and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris, France: OECD.
Oxford. (2015). Oxford advanced learner's dictionary. [Online]. Diakses dari:
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/learner/reasoning.
Ozgun-Koca, S. A. (1998). Students’ use of representations in mathematics
education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American
Chapter of the International Group for thePsychology of Mathematics
Education (Raleigh, NC, October 31-November 2, 1998).
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 32 Tahun 2013 (revisi PP Nomor 19 Tahun 2005)
tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Polking J. (1998). Response to NCTM’s round 4 questions. [Online] Diakses dari:
http://www.ams.org/government/argrpt4.html.
Popham, W. J. (1995). Classroom assessments: what teachers need to know. Toronto:
Allyn Bacon.
Pranoto, I. (2011). UN matematika menyiapkan anak Indonesia menjadi kuli
nirnalar; Republik telah menyerobot kesempatan anak bangsa bernalar.
[Online].
Diakses
dari
http://www.slideshare.net/y0r/un-matematikamenyiapkan-anak-menjadi-kuli-nirnalar.
Pranoto, I. (2013). Kasmaran bermatematika. [Online].
http://www.bincangedukasi.com/kasmaran-bermatematika/.
Diakses
dari:
140
Priatna, N. (2010). Penalaran matematika. [Online]. Diakses dari:
http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPMIPA/JUR._PEND._MATEMATIKA/196303
311988031-NANANG_PRIATNA/Penalaran_Matematika.pdf.
Priatna, N., Sukamto, T., & Sadam, R. (2015). Matematika: untuk kelas VIII
SMP/MTs. Bandung: Grafindo Media Pratama.
Roselizawati. & Shahrill, M. (2014). Understanding students' mathematical errors and
misconceptions: the case of year 11 repeating students. ISPACS: Mathematics
Education Trends and Research, (2014), hlm. 1-10.
Salkind, G. M. (2007). Mathematical representations. EDCI Preparation and
Proffessional Developent of Mathematics Teachers. George Mason
University.
Santi, D. P. D. (2014). Penerapan pendekatan kontekstual dengan strategi REACT
untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep dan representasi
matematis siswa Sekolah Dasar: Studi Kuasi eksperimen pada Siswa Kelas V
Sekolah dasar. [Online]. Diakses dari: http://e-journal.unswagati-crb.ac.id/.
Santrock, J. W. (2010). Psikologi pendidikan (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: Kencana.
Sarwadi, et al. (2014). Understanding students' mathematical errors and
misconceptions: the case of year 11 repeating students. ISPACS, hal. 1-10.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching.
Educational Researcher, 15 (2), hal. 4-14.
Suhandri. (2011). Meningkatkan pemahaman dan penalaran matematis siswa SMP
pada pembelajaran geometri dengan menggunakan strategi REACT. Tesis
SPS UPI: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Suherman, E. (2003). Evaluasi pembelajaran matematika. Dalam Turmudi. (Ed).
Bandung: UPI.
Suherman, E. dan Kusumah, Y. S. (1990). Evaluasi pendidikan matematika.
Bandung: Wijayakusumah.
Sumarmo, U. (2010). Berfikir dan disposisi matematika: apa, mengapa, dan
bagaimana dikembangkan pada peserta didik. [Online]. Diakses dari
http://Math.sps.upi.edu/wp
content/uploads/2010/2/
BERFIKIR-DANDISPOSISI-MATEMATIK-SPS-2010.pdf indikator mtk.
Sumarmo, U. (2015a). Pengembangan dan contoh butir skala nilai, karakter, budaya
dan aspek afektif lain dalam pembelajaran matematika. [Online]. Diakses
dari:
http://utari-sumarmo.dosen.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/materi/soft-skillmatematik-stkip-terbaru-2015/.
141
Sumarmo, U. (2015b). Kumpulan makalah: berpikir dan disposisi matematik serta
pembelajarannya. Bandung: UPI Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika.
Suparlan, A. (2005). Pembelajaran berbasis masalah untuk mengembangkan
kemampuan pemahaman dan representasi matematik siswa Sekolah
Menengah Pertama (studi eksperimen pada siswa salah satu SMP di
Cirebon). Tesis SPS UPI: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Syaban, M. (2009). Menumbuhkan daya dan disposisi siswa SMA melalui
pembelajaran investigasi. Educationist, 3 (2), hlm. 129-136.
TIMSS. (2011). TIMSS 2011 International results in mathematics. [Online]. Diakses
dari: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/international-resultsmathematics.html.
Trimoyo, M. B., et. al. (2009). Materi diklat training of trainer calon tenaga
pengajar/dosen lingkungan badiklat perhubungan: pengembangan bahan ajar.
Magelang: Badan Diklat Departemen Perhubungan.
Turmudi. (2010). Metodologi pembelajaran matematika. [Online]. Diakses dari:
http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPMIPA/JUR._PEND._MATEMATIKA/196101
121987031-TURMUDI/F25Metodologi_dan_Model_PembelajaranMatematika.pdf.
Ultay, N. & Calik, M. (2016). A Comparison of different teaching designs of ‘acids
and bases’ subject. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology
Education, 12(1), hal. 57-86.
Van De Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay‐Williams, J. M. (2009). Elementary And
middle school mathematics teaching developmentally (7th Ed.).New York:
Pearson Education.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (Ed). (1991). Radical contructivism in mathematics education.
Kluwer Akademic Publisher: Dordrecht.
Wilson, P. (2011). Disposition towards engagement in mathematics. Smith, C. (Ed.)
Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics,
31(2) June 2011, hlm. 67-72.
Wiyaka. (2014, 6 Mei). Mencontek dan pendidikan karakter. Suara Merdeka.
[Online].
Diakses
dari:
http://www.suaramerdeka.com/v1/index.php/read/cetak/2014/05/06/260780/
Menyontek-dan-Pendidikan-Karakter.
142
Yuniawatika. (2011). Penerapan pembelajaran matematika dengan strategi REACT
untuk meningkatkan kemampuan koneksi dan representasi matematik siswa
Sekolah Dasar (studi kuasi eksperimen di kelas V Sekolah Dasar kota
Cimahi). Jurnal Edisi Khusus No. 1, hlm. 105-119.
Zhe, L. (2012). Survey of primary student’s mathematical representation status and
study on the teaching model of mathematical representation. Journal of
Mathematics Education. 5 (1), hal. 63-76.