Urban Corinth An Introduction ID
CHAPTERONE
UrbanCorinth:AnIntroduction
G.D.R.Sanders
THEGEOGRAPHYOFCORINTH
Corinthislocated80kmwestofAthensonthesouthsideoftheIsthmus
ofCorinth,anarrowneckoflandconnectingthePeloponnesetomainland
Greece(fig.1.1).TheisthmusseparatestheCorinthianGulffromtheSaronic
Gulf,andthustheIonianSeafromtheAegean.Thelocalgeologyisdominated
bymarineandlacustrinesedimentslaidhorizontallyinbandsofporoussandy
andpebblylimestoneinterbeddedwithimperviousmarlclays.OlderJurassic
limestoneentities,suchasAcrocorinth,extrudethroughthelaterdepositsto
heightsofover570m.Localupliftofthelandrelativetotheseahascreated
aseriesofbroadterracesterminatinginraisedbeachesmarkedbyvertical
clifffaces.Thecityissituatedontwooftheterraces—oneabout60m,the
otherabout90mabovesealevel—atthefootofAcrocorinth,about3km
fromthecoastoftheGulfofCorinth.1Attheexposureoftheinterfacesof
thelimestoneandunderlyingmarlattheedgesoftheterracesareseveral
naturalspringsofabundantfreshwater.2Thesespringsarenotablyabsent
fromtheregionoftheisthmustotheeast,whichtothepresenthasalways
beensparselypopulatedandcultivated.Bycontrast,thelandintheplainto
ChrisL.Hayward,“GeologyofCorinth:theStudyofaBasicResource,”inCorinth,
theCentenary,1896–1996(ed.CharlesK.WilliamsIIandNancyBookidis;CorinthXX;
theCentenary,1896–1996
Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,2003)15–42.
2
MarkE.Landon,“BeyondPeirene:TowardaBroaderViewofCorinthianWaterSupply,”
in Corinth, the Centenary, 1896–1996
1896–1996 (ed. Charles K. Williams II and Nancy Bookidis;
CorinthXX;Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,2003)43–62.
1
2
UrbanReligioninRomanCorinth
thewestisfertileandwellwateredbyspringsandtheseasonalriversthat
descendfromtheAyiosVasiliosvalleyandMountZiriatothesouth.
NotonlydidgeologydeterminewhyCorinthislocatedwhereitis,but
thegeologicalmakeupoftheCorinthiaalsoprovidedthebasicmaterialsfor
thecity’sconstruction.Theooliticlimestonesofthemarinesandbarsextend
fromKenchreaiontheSaronicGulftoSikyonandhavebeenextensively
quarriedforstone.3QuarriescanbeseentotheeastandwestoftheTemple
ofApollo.Thefreshlyexposedportionofthisrockissosoftthatitcanbe
cutwithwoodworkingtools;indeed,thereisevidencethatearlybuilders
usedcarpentrytechniquesinstoneconstructiononthesite.4Onexposure
toair,thestonegraduallyformsahardbutbrittlesurface.Sogoodwasthis
stone, with its rich reddish-yellowish color, that it was exported in bulk
atgreatexpensetoDelphiandEpidaurosanddoubtlesselsewhereforthe
constructionoftemples.
Certainofthemarlbedsarearichsourceofmortarandceramics.The
calcarious marl is easily dug and reduced to a fine powder.A little heat
appliedforashortdurationisallthatisrequiredtocalcinethispowderto
calciumoxide.Theadditionofwaterreducestheoxidetohydroxide,andthe
resultisawhitelimecement.Thesemarlswerealsoexcavated,powdered,
slakedwithwater,anddriedtoamalleableclayeyconsistency.Theclaywas
formedintolightweightvessels,painted,firedinakiln,andthenprobably
dousedinwater.Whetherthesevesselsshouldbecalledceramicorcement
isstillbeinginvestigated.5Incertainperiods,theywereexportedwidelyin
theEasternMediterraneanandasfarasSpaintothewest.
Finally,thetectonicfragmentationoftheregionhasensuredtheperennial
threatofearthquakes.Someofthemoresevereoftheseearthquakeshave
destroyedmajorstructuresandhaveevendisruptedtheflowoflocalsprings.
ScholarshavespicedupthewrittenhistoryofCorinthwithaliberalgarnish
ofrealandimaginaryseismicevents;thesehaveservedtoexplaindisruptions
inthearchaeologicalrecord.OngoingresearchbyNicholasAmbraseys,a
leadingauthorityinseismicengineering,hasshown,however,thatwenow
needtoreconsidereveryseismiceventthathasbeeninvokedtoexplainthe
3
ChrisL.Hayward,“High-ResolutionProvenanceDeterminationofConstruction-Stone:
APreliminaryStudyofCorinthianOoliticLimestoneQuarriesatExamilia,”Geoarchaeology
11(1996)215–34.
4
Robin F. Rhodes, “The Earliest Greek Architecture in Corinth and the 7th-Century
TempleonTempleHill,”inCorinth,theCentenary,1896–1996(ed.CharlesK.WilliamsII
theCentenary,1896–1996
andNancyBookidis;CorinthXX;Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,2003)85–94.
5
ThisresearchisbeingundertakenbyG.D.R.Sanders,LouiseJoyner,andIanWhitbread.
Sanders/UrbanCorinth:AnIntroduction
3
destructionofvariousphasesofthecity.Hisfindings,whichhavebeengenerallyacceptedbygeologistsandseismologistsalike,arethatearthquakesin
Greecerarelyexceededamagnitudeof6.5andneverexceeded7.0onthe
logarithmicRichterscale.AccordingtoAmbraseysandJ.A.Jackson,the
natureoffaultsinGreeceissuchthattherangeofdamagewroughtbyan
earthquakeofsuchamagnitudeislimitedtoafewtensofkilometersfromthe
epicentre.Thus,anearthquakesuchasthe551/52C.E.earthquakerecordedby
ProcopiusatChaironeiaincentralGreececlearlydidnothavethecatastrophic
effectonCorinththatthreegenerationsofscholarshaveclaimed.6
Corinthpossessedfourharbors.SchoenusandPoseidonawerepresumably
fairlysimpledockingfacilitiesthatservedeitherendoftheDiolkos.7TheDiolkoswasapavedportageroadbuiltacrossthe6-kmwidthoftheisthmus,with
anaveragegradientofabout1.5%.Itwasprobablyconstructedbythetyrant
PerianderinthesixthcenturyB.C.E.,andisscoredbythewheelsoftransport
vehicleswhosewheelbaseaveraged1.5macross.Oneithersideofthepaved
portionwereearthenroads.Historicalsourcesmentionsixattempts—fivesuccessfulandoneunsuccessful—toportagewarshipsovertheisthmusbetween
428 and 30 B.C.E. Niketas Oryphas, revealing his familiarity with ancient
literature,effectedasixthsuccessfulcrossingin881C.E.
MostcommentatorsinsistthattheDiolkoswasusedprincipallyformilitary
purposes,butfromthevulgarhumouroftheThesmophoriazousaeofAristophanes,onegetsaverydifferentimpression.8Mnesilochos,aninterloperamong
womenandhimselfdisguisedasawoman,hideshismasculinitybypushing
hishugestageproppenisbackbetweenhislegs.WhenKleisthenesattemptsto
finditfrombehind,Mnesilochuspushesittothefront.Thisactionisrepeated
severaltimes.Finally,Kleisthenescriesinexasperation,“Youhaveasortof
isthmus,bro’,haulingyourprowtoandfromoreoftenthantheCorinthians
[haulshipsacrosstheDiolkos].”WecansurmisethattheDiolkoswasactively
andregularlyusedformerchantships,orelsetherewouldbenohumorin
Kleisthenes’quip.ThetriremesthatcrossedtheDiolkoswerecomparablein
sizeandcapacitytotheKyreniaship(14mlongx4.2mwide,ladenweight
ca.39tons).Mr.Sarris,theshipbuilderoftheKyreniareplica,assuresme
that,properlysupportedbythekeelsom,ashipofthosedimensionscouldbe
6
N.N.AmbraseysandA.Jackson,“SeismicityandAssociatedStrainofCentralGreece
between1890and1988,”GeophysicsJournalInternational101(1990)663–708.
GeophysicsJournalInternational
7
G. Raepsaet, “Le Diolkos de l’isthme à Corinthe: son trace, son fonctionnement,”
BCH
BCH117(1993)233–56.
8
Aristophanes, Thesmophoriazousae (ed. Benjamin Bickley Rogers; LCL; Cambridge,
Mass.:HarvardUniversityPress,1924)line648.SinceRogersdidnottranslatethepassage,
therenditionismine.
4
UrbanReligioninRomanCorinth
movedconsiderabledistances—evenwithitsfullcargoaboard—withoutthe
slightestdamage.9
Suchtrafficmusthavekeptasocietyofwagonersandtheirteamsofoxen
fullyoccupied.Theportageprovedsovaluablethateffortsweremadeto
replaceitwithacanal.TheemperorNeroactuallybeganworkonthecanal
bypersonallydumpingthefirstshovelfulofearthintoagoldenbucket,using
agoldenshovel.Hediedbeforemuchprogresscouldbemade,butnotbefore
hisimageasthegodHerakleshadbeeninscribedinonewallofthecutting.
UnderVespasian,about800yardsofcanalwereexcavatedtoadepthof90
feet,using6,000JewishslavescapturedinthesackofJerusalem,beforethe
projectwasfinallyabandoned.10HerodesAtticus,theAthenianteacherofphilosophyandwealthypatronofextravagantmonuments,brieflycontemplated
thecompletionofNero’sandVespasian’sworkbutdemurredonthegrounds
thatitwashubristictosucceedwhereemperorshadfailed.Bythetimethe
canalwasfinallycompletedin1893,theLevanttradehadwaned.
Kenchreai on the Saronic Gulf and Lechaion on the Corinthian Gulf
were altogether different kinds of harbors. Kenchreai was excavated by
theAmerican School of Classical Studies in the 1960s.11 It consists of a
settlementonthesouthslopesofapromontorywithapairofharbormoles
encirclingaroundbasinfacingsoutheast.Architecture,pottery,andcoins
derivefrommanycenturiesofoccupationandincludeshrinesofthegods
(oneperhapsdedicatedtoIsis)andasmallearlyChristianbasilicaofthe
sixthcentury.Lechaionmustbeconsideredtheprincipalharbor.Locatedon
thecoastnorthofthecity,theharborconsistsofaseriesoflandlockedbasins
accessiblefromtheseabyanarrowchannel.Theouterworksoftheharbor
includedthreelongmoles,twoforasquarebasinandthethirdtoprotectthe
entrancetotheinnerharbor.Sporadicexcavationsintheareaindicatethat
theassociatedsettlementwasextensive.Themostconcentratedcampaign
ofarchaeologicalwork,thatoftheAmericanSchoolinthe1960s,revealed
anenormousearlyChristianbasilicabetweentheinnerharborandthesea.12
M.L.Katzef,“TheKyreniaShip,”inAHistoryofSeafaring(ed.G.F.Bass;London,
1982)50–52;andidemandS.W.Katzef,“BuildingaReplicaofanAncientGreekMerchantman,”inProceedingsofthe1stInternationalSymposiumonShipConstructioninAntiquity
(ed.H.E.Tzalas;Athens:n.p.,1989)163–75.
10
Onthispoint,seetheessaybyDavidGilmanRomanointhisvolume(pp.xxx–xxx,
esp.xxx).
11
RobertL.Scranton,JospehW.Shaw,andLeilaIbrahim,TopographyandArchitecture,
vol.1ofKenchreai,EasternPortofCorinth(Leiden:Brill,1978).
12
D.I.Pallas,“Korinth,”ReallexikonzurByzantinischenKunst(Stuttgart:Hiersemann,
1966–) 4:745–811.
9
Sanders/UrbanCorinth:AnIntroduction
5
TogetherthesefourharborsattestthesheervolumeofCorinth’scommercial
interestsatvarioustimes.
Trafficmovingnorthandsouthacrosstheisthmuswaschanneledinto
narrowcorridorsalongtheKakiaSkalaoroverMountGeraneion.Atoneend
ofthecorridor,routesfannedouttoAthensandtoThebesandbeyond.Atthe
otherend,theroutesledalongthecoastwesttowardsPatras,easttoEpidauros,
andthroughpassesoneithersideofAcrocorinthintothePeloponnese,to
theArgolidandArcadia.Thehistoricalcommunicationsnetworkofsouthern
Greecehasrecentlybeentreatedpurelyasaproblemingraphtheory.This
isanapplicationmostusefultoeconomicgeographersandperhapsfamiliar
tomostofusastheparticulartalentofthetitlecharacterinthefilmGood
WillHunting.Corinthwasunsurprisinglyfoundtobeatthemathematical
andgeographicalcenteroftheRomanprovinceofAchaia.13
Asinmoderncommerce,whetherbuildingacementfactoryoropening
adowntownbar,locationhasalwaysbeenimportanttocommercialsuccess.
ThismuchmayhaveoccurredtotheapostlePaulwhenhechoseCorinth
forhisministry.InthemiddleofthefirstcenturyC.E.,Corinthwasaperfect
placeforthedisseminationofgoodsandideas—amultilingual,polytheistic,
cosmopolitancommunityvisitedbytravelers,merchants,andseamenfromall
overtheMediterranean.Itisnotdifficulttoimaginewhythemoralcondition
ofcommerce-orientedCorinth,itsinhabitants,andvisitorsstillconcerned
PauldeeplysometwohundredyearsaftertheinfamouscultofAphroditeon
Acrocorinthhadcloseditsdoors.14
Well-watered,overlookedbyanimposingacropolis,flankedbyalarge
fertileplaintothenorthandnorthwest,andlocatedbetweentwoseas,Corinth
commandedtheprincipalnodalpointinthelandandseacommunicationsof
southernGreece.Itsstrategicandcommercialpositionwassupplementedby
valuablenaturalresourcesforexport,includingbuildingmaterials,excellent
claysforceramicsandmortars,wood,andagriculturalproduce.Itwasnotso
muchCorinth’sownrichesthatwerebeingmoved,however.Theimportance
ofCorinthwasasanentrepôtthroughwhichtheproduceofotherregions
wasshipped.
G.D.R.SandersandI.K.Whitbread,CentralPlacesandMajorRoadsinthePeloponnese,BSA85(1990)333–61.
14
OnCorinthianAphrodite,seetheessaysbyJohnR.Lanci(pp.xxx–xxx)andCharlesK.
WilliamsII(pp.XXX–XXX)inthisvolume.
13
6
UrbanReligioninRomanCorinth
HISTORYOFTHECORINTHEXCAVATIONS
TheAmericanSchoolofClassicalStudiesatAthenshasbeenexcavating
atCorinthsince1896.Overthecourseofthetwentiethcentury,scholarly
interestshavechangedconsiderably.Theearliestexcavatorswerelargely
concernedwithancienttopographyandplannedtorevealasmuchofthe
centerofthepre-Romancityastheycould.Whiletheyrevealedlargeportions
ofthecenterofCorinth,theirtaskwasmademoredifficultbyMummius’s
sackin146 B.C.E.andbythefoundationofaRomancolonyin44 B.C.E.,
whenthecityplanwasre-engineeredandsettlerscoveredoreventoreout
thecoreoftheClassicalcity.
Theyearsbetween1925and1940sawcontinuedbutrathermoresystematicclearanceofthetheaterandforumareas.Interestshiftedfromtopographic
totaxonomicandchronologicalconcerns.Atthetime,however,itwasstill
generallythepracticetoexcavatewithlargeteamsofnonspecialistlaborers
underlimitedsupervision.Theydugfromtopsoiltoforumlevel,adepthof
3–4m,inasingleseason,andalthoughtherecoveryofdatawasfarsuperiortotheearliercampaigns,itwasnotwhatonewouldnowdemand.The
excavatorsgeneratedalargenumberofbooksandarticlesonurbanhistory,
buildings,inscriptions,sculpture,ceramics,andminorobjects.ThisliteraturehasshapedpresentpopularconceptionsofCorinthandsetmanyofthe
standardsonwhicharchaeologistsintheEasternMediterraneanstillrely.
Fromthemid-1960stothepresent,thearchaeologicalstudyofCorinth
hasundergoneasustainedperiodofideologicalandmethodologicalevolutionifnotrevolution.Duringthisexcitingintellectualpassage,scholarshave
beguntofocusonthehumanratherthanthemonumentalsideofantiquity,
and post-Classical archaeology has come into its own. Despite the sheer
volume of work undertaken in these thirty-five years, the overall plan of
thesitehaschangedremarkablylittle.Ourunderstandingoftheurbanand
historicallandscape,however,hasbeentransformed.Systematicexcavation
bysmallteamsoftrainedtechnicianssupervisedbyarecordingarchaeologist
haspermittedclosecontrolofthestratigraphicsequences.Newprocedures
for the recording of finds were instituted, context materials and not just
remarkableobjectsweresaved,andpreliminaryreportsofworkappeared
annuallyinthejournalHesperia.Itwouldbefairtosaythatnowequalportionsoftheresearcharedonebydescriptivescientistswithhandlensesand
microscopesandbyresearchersengagedinthepainstakingarchaeological
autopsyofearlierrecords.
Sanders/UrbanCorinth:AnIntroduction
7
Coinshavebeensupplantedbypotteryasthecurrencyofchronology.
Coinsarecommonandsurvivewell,andtheyproviderefreshinglyspecific
informationabouttheirdateofissue—buttherightcoinisrarelyfoundin
therightplace.Untilcomparativelyrecently,ceramicsspecialiststendedto
concentrateonfinewaresbecausetheacceptedbiaswasthatcoarsewares
werenotworthstudyingbecausetheywerenotdiagnostic.Coarsewares,
however,comprisethelargemajorityoffindsfromanycontext.Someperiods
wereneglectedsimplybecausetheywereunfashionable,andLateRoman
potteryassemblagesareacaseinpoint.ThestudyofLateRomanCorinth
wasdrivenbycoinsanddisastersuntilthepublicationofaLateRomanfine
potterysurveybyJohnHayesin1972.15Unfortunately,theheroicefforts
ofDemetriosPallasinthebasilicasandJamesWisemanatthegymnasium
cametooearlytobenefitfromHayes’svolume.16
Potteryisubiquitousinarchaeologicalcontextsandcanbeusedtodate
phasesofactivitywithafairdegreeofprecision.KathleenSlane’svolume
on the Demeter sanctuary and her specialist articles have given us some
ideaofwhatCorinthianpotterylookedlikethroughtheRomanperiod.17It
wasonlywiththeexcavationseastofthetheaterinthe1980sthatsufficient
quantitiesofwell-excavateddeposits,manyretainedintheirentirety,enabled
Slane to undertake a thorough diachronic survey of Roman pottery from
thefoundationofthecolonytothebeginningoftheseventhcentury.18This
studyisbasedonstatisticalanalysesofnumberandweightbytypeandon
stratigraphicrelations.19Thefinalpublication,whichiseagerlyanticipated,
willbethefirstcompleteoverviewofRomanpotterytypologyforaGreek
site. It will show how the proportions of different pottery types changed
overtime;also,analysisofimportswillallowresearcherstoidentifyshifts
ineconomiccontacts.Thistoolwillenablescholarstoreassessoldcontexts
and redraft our history of the city. Its impact should be felt well beyond
CorinthandevenGreece.
J.W.Hayes,LateRomanPottery(London:BritishSchoolatRome,1972).
Pallas,“Korinth”;andJamesWiseman,“ExcavationsintheGymnasiumArea.1969–
1970,”Hesperia41(1972)1–42.
17
Slane,KathleenW.TheSanctuaryofDemeterandKore:TheRomanPotteryandLamps
(CorinthXVIII.2;Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,1990).
18
CharlesK.WilliamsIIandOrestesH.Zervos,“Corinth,1988:EastoftheTheater,”
Hesperia58(1989)1–50;forbibliography,seetheessaybyCharlesK.WilliamsIIinthis
volume(pp.xxx–xxx).
19
KathleenW.Slane,“Corinth’sRomanPottery:QuantificationandMeaning,”inCorinth,
theCentenary,1896–1996
theCentenary,1896–1996(ed.CharlesK.WilliamsIIandNancyBookidis;CorinthXX;
Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,2003)321–36.
15
16
8
UrbanReligioninRomanCorinth
ThewayinwhichwelookatdeadCorinthianshasalsochanged.Charles
Williams’sexcavationssouthoftheMuseumencounteredapackedcemetery
datingtotheFrankishperiod.20Tocopewiththeexcavationandanalysis
ofthiscomplicatedmassofevidence,anthropologistsArtRohnandEthne
Barneswereinvitedtoexcavateandstudytheburials.21Rohnhasnotonly
trainedourspecialistpickmentoarticulateburialsandthenremovethem;he
hasalsobeguntoexaminechangesinburialpracticethroughtime.Barnes
isabletodiscerninbonesrepetitivestresspatternsthatbetrayregularheavy
exerciseofdifferentkinds.Shecanalsorecognizetheeffectsofgenetics,
illness, malnutrition, and violence.Although they started with Medieval
andcontinuedwithpost-Medievalburials,RohnandBarnesnowinclude
Romanandearliermaterialintheirresearch.Corinthnowhassucharange
offascinatingpathologiesthataspecialfacilitywasrecentlyopenedtohouse
acomparativecollectionforstudy.
DespitetheexcavationofmanyhundredsofRomantombs,onlyindividual
tombshaveoccasionallybeenpublished.Inthe1960s,HenryRobinsonwas
invitedtoexcavateinadvanceoftheconstructionofadrainagechannelalong
theedgeofthenorthterraceofCorinth,wherehefoundseveralsignificant
gravesdatingfromthefirstthroughfifthcenturies C.E.MaryWalbankand
KathleenSlaneareinthefinalstagesofproducingabook-lengthpublication
ofthesediscoveries.22
ThetopographyoftheCorinthiahasreceivedratherpatchycoverage,but
acomprehensivepictureisgraduallyemerging.JamesWiseman’simportant
extensivesurveyoftheregionputmanysitesonthemap.23Otherinvestigators
addedtopoitothisbasicwork;twonewdoctoralthesesandathirdnearing
completionhaveexaminedthebordersofCorinthwithEpidaurus,Sikyon,
andArgos.24TherecentlycompletedEasternCorinthiaarchaeologicalsurvey
wasanintensivesurveyofamuchsmallerterritorythatwilladdanewdimensiontoourunderstandingofthehistoricalgeography.MaryWalbankwas
CharlesK.WilliamsII,L.M.Snyder,EthneBarnes,andOrestesH.Zervos,“Frankish
Corinth,1997,”Hesperia67(1998)223–81.
21
EthneBarnes,“TheDeaddoTellTales,”inCorinth,theCentenary,1896–1996(ed.
theCentenary,1896–1996
Charles K. Williams II and Nancy Bookidis; Corinth XX; Princeton, N.J.:ASCS, 2003)
435–43.
22
SeetheessaybyMaryE.HoskinsWalbankinthisvolume(pp.xxx–xxx).
23
JamesWiseman,TheLandoftheAncientCorinthians(SIMA50;Göteborg:P.Åström,
1978).
24
Y.A.Lolos,“TheHadrianicAqueductofCorinth,”Hesperia66(1997)271–314;and
M.D.Dixon,“DisputedTerritories:InterstateArbitrationintheNortheastPeloponnese,ca.
250–150 B.C.”(Ph.D.diss.,OhioStateUniversity,2000).
20
Sanders/UrbanCorinth:AnIntroduction
9
thefirsttodiscussRomanlanddivisioninCorinthia.25DavidRomanoand
PanosDoukellishavesinceindependentlyextrapolateddifferentschemes
ofmensurationonthebasisofcropmarks,fieldboundaries,androads.26In
thepastcoupleofyears,resistivitysurveyhasaddedmuchoftopographical
interesttothepicturepresentedbytheexcavatedremains.27
TheAmericanSchoolhasalsobeenactiveinexcavationoutsideofthecity
butwithinitsterritory.ElizabethGebhardandhercolleagueshavecontinued
the excavations and publication program started by Oscar Broneer at the
majorCorinthiansanctuarydedicatedtoPoseidonandPalaimonatIsthmia.28
TimothyGregoryandhiscolleagueshavecontinuedPaulClement’sworkin
theLateRomanfortressandRomanbaths,alsoatIsthmia.29RobertScranton
excavatedaboveandbelowthewaterlineatKenchreai.30Inadditiontothe
Americanwork,theBritishSchoolexcavatedandpublishedthesanctuary
ofHeraatPerachoraunderHumfryPayneandlaterRichardTomlinson.31
Manyofthesediversethreadsofmorerecentresearchhavealreadyappeared
asbooks,asarticlesinHesperia,andelsewhere.Themostimportantnew
synopsis is the volume originating in the 1996 centenary conference.32 It
containstwenty-sevenpapersbyactivestudentsofCorinth’sarchaeology
25
MaryE.HoskinsWalbank,“TheFoundationandPlanningofEarlyRomanCorinth,”
JRA10(1997)95–130.
26
DavidG.Romano,“CityPlanning,Centuriation,andLandDivisioninRomanCorinth:
ColoniaLausIuliaCorinthiensisandColoniaIuliaFlaviaAugustaCorinthiensis,”inCorinth,
theCentenary,1896–1996
theCentenary,1896–1996(ed.CharlesK.WilliamsIIandNancyBookidis;CorinthXX;
Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,2003)279–301;PanagiotisN.Doukellis,“Leterritoiredelacolonie
romainedeCorinthe,”inStructuresruralesetsociétésantiques:actesducolloquedeCorfou,
14–16mai1992(ed.PanagiotisN.DoukellisandLinaG.Mendoni;Paris:Lesbelleslettres,
1994) 359–90; and Mary E. Hoskins Walbank, “What’s in a Name? Corinth Under the
Flavians,”ZPE139(2002)251–64.
ZPE
27
TheresultsofthisongoingsurveywillbepublishedinHesperiabyG.D.R.Sanders
andM.Boyd.
28
Forbibliography,seetheessaybyElizabethR.Gebhardinthisvolume(pp.xxx–xxx).
29
Timothy E. Gregory, The Hexamilion and the Fortress (Isthmia V; Princeton, N.J.:
PrincetonUniversityPress,1993);andTheCorinthiaintheRomanPeriod:IncludingthePapers
GivenataSymposiumHeldatTheOhioStateUniversityon7–9March1991(ed.Timothy
E.Gregory;JRASup8;AnnArbor,Mich.:JournalofRomanArchaeology,1993).
30
Scranton,Shaw,andIbrahim,TopographyandArchitecture.
31
R. Tomlinson, “Perachora,” in Le Sanctuaire Grec (ed. Albert Schachter and Jean
Bingen;Entretienssurl’Antiquitéclassique37;Geneva:FondationHardt,1992)321–51.
ForamorerecentappraisalofthetempleandcultseeB.Menadier,“TheSixthCenturyBC
TempleandtheSanctuaryandCultofHeraAkraia,Perachora”(Ph.D.diss.,Universityof
Cincinnati,1995).
32
CharlesK.WilliamsIIandNancyBookidis,eds.,Corinth,theCentenary,1896–1996
(CorinthXX;Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,2003)
10
UrbanReligioninRomanCorinth
statingtheircurrentideasandfeaturesacompletebibliographyofCorinth
fromtheNeolithictoLateMedievalperiods.
Inhisearlyyearsasdirector,Williamsconcentratedonthereinterpretation
ofsomeseventyyearsofscholarshipbyrestudyingtheearlierexcavation
recordsandbyundertakingnewexcavationsinandaroundtheforum.Over
thecourseoffifteenyearshewasabletodocumenthowthecitydeveloped
overtime,andabriefoverviewofhissynthesisfollowsbelow.33
DEVELOPMENTOFTHEURBANAREA
TheareaofthesiteopenedtodateconcentrateslargelyontheRomanforum
anditssurrounds.Thiszoneisthetransition,markedbyasteepslope(10–20%
gradeover15m)betweenthetwoterracesonwhichCorinthwasbuilt.Here
thenaturaldrainagepatternandspringlinehascreatedafairlybroadvalley
andarelativelyeasytransitionforwheeledandpedestriantrafficbetween
theterraces.Theuppervalleyisoccupiedbytheforumandthelowervalley
bytheLechaionRoad.
ThereisampleevidenceforprehistoricsettlementdatingfromtheNeolithic to sub-Mycenean periods. Corinth is reckoned to have synoecized,
thatis,emergedasapolity,intheeighthcenturyB.C.E.,sendingouttrading
coloniestoSyracuseandCorfu.ArchaeologicallyatCorinththereislittle
evidencefortheformandextentofthecity.TheearliestGeometricperiod
isrepresentedbydomesticdebrisinthevalleyfloor,graves,andawell.In
thesecondhalfoftheeighthcentury,however,burialwaskeptseparatefrom
theresidentialarea.Atthesametime,thefirststonearchitecturebecomes
evidentandthewatercoursesofthespringsareartificiallychannelled.Evidenceofroadssurvives.Theseroadsdirecttrafficfromthesouthandfrom
thesouthwesttowardsthenorthatthemouthofthevalley.
IntheseventhcenturyB.C.E.,thefirsttemplewasbuiltontherisetothe
northoftheforum. 34Thestreetplandevelopedwiththeadditionofroads
parallel to the Geometric streets; these roads also channeled traffic from
the south and west towards the north.The Sacred Spring was elaborated
andperhapsatthispointfirsthadcultassociatedwithit.Inthemid-seventh
33
Afullbibliographycanbefoundinibid.,whichalsoincludesplansillustratingchanges
intheforumareaovertime.Formoredetail,seeWilliams’spublicationsinHesperia.
34
ForasurveyofCorinth’ssanctuarieswithpertinentbibliographyseeNancyBookidis,
“TheSanctuariesofCorinth,”inCorinth,theCentenary,1896–1996(ed.CharlesK.Williams
theCentenary,1896–1996
IIandNancyBookidis;CorinthXX;Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,2003)247–60.
Sanders/UrbanCorinth:AnIntroduction
11
century,asmallhousewithawellwasconstructedtothesouthofthespring.
IntheLechaionRoadvalley,theCyclopeanfountainwasconstructedand
housesnowfacedtheroadtowardsAcrocorinth.Inthesixthandearlyfifth
centuries,theearlytemplewasdestroyed(ca.580C.E.)tobereplacedabout
fortyyearslaterbytheArchaictemplethatstillstandsonthesitetoday.The
formalapproachwasfromthenortheast,butaccesswassupplementedbya
monumentalrampleadingupfromthestreetthatranpasttheSacredSpring
tothesoutheast.Totheeastofthetemple,atthebaseofthecliffseparatingitfromthevalley,asmallstoawasbuilt.Aclusterofproto-Geometric
gravesreceivedatemenos,andasmallundergroundshrinewasestablished
alongsideanewroadtoAcrocorinth.
Thelaterfifthandearlyfourthcenturiessawarapidorganizedandformalizeddevelopmentthatgivestheimpressionofathoroughlyurbanspace.
ThePeireneFountainreceiveddrawbasins,TempleAwasconstructedtothe
north,andtheSacredSpringwasfurtherdevelopedwithatriglyphandmetope
wallandacuriousapsidaltemple.Aracecoursemoreorlessfollowedthe
southernmostArchaicroad,andthehousesthatflankeditwerereplacedby
largercomplexes.Tothewest,thehouseofamerchantdealinginimported
fish fillets was constructed and subsequently removed, and finally a bath
complexwasestablished.Themainchangesinthefollowingperiodwerea
realignmentoftheracetrackandtheconstructionoftheSouthStoa.
Aquestionthathasconstantlyarisenisthelocationoftheagora.ByanalogywiththeAthenianagora,manywouldpointtotheracetrackasevidence
thattheCorinthianagorawasthepredecessoroftheRomanforum.Inthe
Greekperiod,however,thisareahadarelativelysteepandcontinuousslope
fromtheSacredSpringuptotheSouthStoa,interruptedonlybytheracetrack.
Allroadsfoundtodatechanneltrafficinageneralnorthwarddirection,while
thewatersupplyalsosuppliestheareatowardsthenorth.Althoughitmightbe
arguedthatthelackofinscriptionsintheareaoftheforumistobeexpected
inatyranny,andlateranoligarchy,asopposedtoademocracy,itisnotable
thatwhatinscriptionshavebeenfoundareconcentratedatthenortheastside
ofTempleHill.Abetterhypothesis,therefore,isthattheagorawaslocated
immediatelytothenorthoftheexcavatedzone.Ifitwasnotanagora,then
whatwerethemainfunctionsoftheexcavatedareaofthelaterforuminthe
Classical period?According toWilliams, it was largely dedicated to cult
(especiallynon-Olympiancult),housing,andminorindustry.Theevidence
forcultincludesfragmentsofinscriptions,buildings,temenoi,aracetrack,
andtwenty-sixheroreliefs.Thecultsattestedtendtobeofdeitieswithlocal
ratherthanpan-HellenicsignificanceandincludenotonlyHellotis,celebrated
12
UrbanReligioninRomanCorinth
withatorchraceontheracetrack;hersisterKotyto,honoredperhapsin
theSacredSpring;ArtemisKorinthos;andPeirene;butalsoPoseidonand
Aphrodite,andperhapsDionysos,Hermes,andthenymphs.Cultsofheroes
includeZeuxippusandvariousunknowndeadancestors.
In 146 B.C.E., after defeating theAchaian League led by the Corinthians at Lefkopetros on the Isthmus, the Roman general Mummius sacked
Corinth.Hekilledthemalepopulationandsoldthewomenandchildren
intoslavery.ThereafterCorinthwasnolongerapoliticalentitybutatbest
analmost-desertedghosttownoccupiedbyasmallnon-Corinthianpopulationengagedincultivationoftheagriculturalland.Findsidentifiedfrom
this interim period amount to forty-two knidian amphorae stamps, some
Megarianbowls,andoverninetycoins.Theprestigeandincomefromthe
IsthmiangamesdevolvedtoCorinth’snorthwestneighbor,Sikyon,andthe
richagriculturallandwasauctionedoffasagerpublicuseverytwoyearsin
Rome.Thecitywasrefoundedin44B.C.E.byJuliusCaesarasacolonyfor
16,000colonists.Itsterritorywasmeasuredoutintoportionsforthecolonists
andthecitywasredevelopedonanorthogonalplan.Thereislittlereasonto
believethatmanyofCorinth’sreligioustraditionssurvived.NancyBookidis
hasdealtbrieflywiththreeofthecultsthatwereresurrected:thoseofApollo,
Asklepius,andDemeter.35
IntheearlyRomanperiod,theforumwasahugeopenspacemeasuring
about 200 m east-west and 100 m north-south, and taking its orientation
fromthesurvivingSouthStoa,whichdefineditssouthernedge.TheSouth
Stoawasmodified,someofitssmallerspacesbeingconvertedintolarger
rooms,butitretaineditscolonnade.Dominatingtheskylinetothenorth,
theArchaicTempleofApolloonTempleHillwasflankedbycolonnadesto
thenorthandsouth.Thecolonistshadrotateditsorientationby180degrees
tofaceanapproachfromtheroadoutoftheforumtothewest.Itsinterior
colonnadewasremovedandre-erectedinalinerunningnorthfromthewest
endoftheSouthStoaalongtheroadtoAcrocorinth.Alsotothenorthwasa
longbasilicaflankingtheLechaionRoadononesideandthecliffofTemple
Hillontheother.TheLechaionRoad,enteringtheforumfromthenorth,
ascendedabroadstairwaythroughathree-bayedmonumentalarch.Eastof
theLechaionRoad,PeireneFountainhadbeenrefurbishedandextended.
Theformersimplefaçadeofthedrawbasinswaswalledoffwithaseries
ofarches.Arectangulartwo-storycourtenclosingarectangularpoolwas
addedtothenorth.
35
Seeheressayinthisvolume(pp.xxx–xxx).
Sanders/UrbanCorinth:AnIntroduction
13
OntheeastsideoftheforumstoodtheJulianBasilica.Atforumlevel
thiswasacryptoporticusbasement.Thefirststory,approachedbyastaircaseoffourteenstepsleadinguptoaporch,wasanopenrectangularspace
measuring38x24m,withCorinthiancolumnssupportingaclerestoryand
a marble dado. Inside were sculptures of the imperial family, including
AugustusinPentelicmarble,dressedinatogawithafolddrapedoverhis
head,andportrayedengagedinsacrifice.Hewasflankedbyhisadoptedsons
CaiusandLuciusCaesar,eachportrayedinheroicnuditywithachlamys
overtheshoulder,perhapsastheDioscuroi.Clearlythisbuildinghadsome
highcivicfunction.
TothewestoftheforumstoodTempleE,a6x11–columnperipteral
templeonalowbasewithlongstoasflankingittothenorthandsouth.The
identificationofthetemplehasbeenhotlydebated.Somethinkthatitwas
dedicatedtoJoveorZeusbasedonitssizeandlocation,whileothersregarditasthetempleofOctavia.Infrontofthetemplewasarangeofmore
typicallyRomantemplesandmonuments.Twoprostyletemples,FandG,
were dedicated to Venus and to ClarionApollo respectively. Built in the
Romanstyle,theystoodonhighmarble-cladpodiaofconcreteandrubble
thatwereapproachedfromtheeastbyastair.Tothenorthwasafountain
housededicatedtoPoseidon,decoratedwithastatueofthegodanddolphins,
andacircularmonumentdecoratedintheCorinthianorderanddedicated
byGnaiusCorneliusBabbius.Southofcenterintheforumwastherostra,
consideredbymanytobethebemainfrontofwhichPaulwasbroughtby
theeldersoftheJewishcommunity(Acts18:12).Asecondtoposforthose
followingthetravelsofPaulinGreececanbefoundeastofthetheater,also
remodeledtosuitRomantaste.Aninscriptionfoundtherereads:ERASTUS
PROAEDILIT[AT]ES(ua)P(ecunia)STRAVIT(“Erastus,inreturnforhis
aedileship,laidthepavementathisownexpense”).Sincetheofficeofaedile
canbeprettymuchequatedwiththatofoikonomos,itisthoughtthatthis
couldbetheoikonomosErastuswhosegreetingsPaulforwardsinhisletter
totheRomans(16:23).36
Ahundredyearslater,theplanoftheforumremainedmuchthesame,
receivingadditionssuchastheodeion,anothertempleatthewestendof
theforum,shopstothewestoftherostra,andanewbasilicasouthofthe
SouthStoa.
FormoreonErastus,seetheessaysbyHelmutKoester(pp.xxx–xxx),StevenJ.Friesen(pp.xxx–xxx),andJamesA.Walters(pp.xxx–xxx)inthisvolume,aswellasSteven
J. Friesen, “Poverty in Pauline Studies: Beyond the So-called New Consensus,” JSNT 26
(2004)323–61.
36
14
UrbanReligioninRomanCorinth
Finally,intheLateRomanperiodCorinthseemstohavebeenradically
transformed.EarthquakesinthelatefourthcenturyC.E.andasocialcallby
AlaricandhisGothsseemtohavereducedthecity.Thegreatsanctuariesof
theHellenicdeitiesDemeterandAsklepios,alreadyunderlegislativepressure
toclose,apparentlydidnotsurvive.Effortsweremadetorefurbishthearea
oftheforum,however—mostnotablybyreappointingPeireneFountain37
andthewestshops,andbyconvertingthecentralshopsintothebroadest
stairwayintheRomanworld.Intheearlyfifthcentury,acitywallwaslaid
out,encompassingtheheartofthecity.Remote-sensingsurveysuggeststhat
thiswallenclosedonlyabout25%oftheareahithertoenvisioned,andassertionsabouttherelationshipsofcemeteriesandchurchestothecitycenter
willclearlyhavetoberevised.Thesixthcenturysawtheconstructionof
thefirstbuildingstobededicatedtoChristianworship.38Ahugechurch,the
lengthoftw
UrbanCorinth:AnIntroduction
G.D.R.Sanders
THEGEOGRAPHYOFCORINTH
Corinthislocated80kmwestofAthensonthesouthsideoftheIsthmus
ofCorinth,anarrowneckoflandconnectingthePeloponnesetomainland
Greece(fig.1.1).TheisthmusseparatestheCorinthianGulffromtheSaronic
Gulf,andthustheIonianSeafromtheAegean.Thelocalgeologyisdominated
bymarineandlacustrinesedimentslaidhorizontallyinbandsofporoussandy
andpebblylimestoneinterbeddedwithimperviousmarlclays.OlderJurassic
limestoneentities,suchasAcrocorinth,extrudethroughthelaterdepositsto
heightsofover570m.Localupliftofthelandrelativetotheseahascreated
aseriesofbroadterracesterminatinginraisedbeachesmarkedbyvertical
clifffaces.Thecityissituatedontwooftheterraces—oneabout60m,the
otherabout90mabovesealevel—atthefootofAcrocorinth,about3km
fromthecoastoftheGulfofCorinth.1Attheexposureoftheinterfacesof
thelimestoneandunderlyingmarlattheedgesoftheterracesareseveral
naturalspringsofabundantfreshwater.2Thesespringsarenotablyabsent
fromtheregionoftheisthmustotheeast,whichtothepresenthasalways
beensparselypopulatedandcultivated.Bycontrast,thelandintheplainto
ChrisL.Hayward,“GeologyofCorinth:theStudyofaBasicResource,”inCorinth,
theCentenary,1896–1996(ed.CharlesK.WilliamsIIandNancyBookidis;CorinthXX;
theCentenary,1896–1996
Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,2003)15–42.
2
MarkE.Landon,“BeyondPeirene:TowardaBroaderViewofCorinthianWaterSupply,”
in Corinth, the Centenary, 1896–1996
1896–1996 (ed. Charles K. Williams II and Nancy Bookidis;
CorinthXX;Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,2003)43–62.
1
2
UrbanReligioninRomanCorinth
thewestisfertileandwellwateredbyspringsandtheseasonalriversthat
descendfromtheAyiosVasiliosvalleyandMountZiriatothesouth.
NotonlydidgeologydeterminewhyCorinthislocatedwhereitis,but
thegeologicalmakeupoftheCorinthiaalsoprovidedthebasicmaterialsfor
thecity’sconstruction.Theooliticlimestonesofthemarinesandbarsextend
fromKenchreaiontheSaronicGulftoSikyonandhavebeenextensively
quarriedforstone.3QuarriescanbeseentotheeastandwestoftheTemple
ofApollo.Thefreshlyexposedportionofthisrockissosoftthatitcanbe
cutwithwoodworkingtools;indeed,thereisevidencethatearlybuilders
usedcarpentrytechniquesinstoneconstructiononthesite.4Onexposure
toair,thestonegraduallyformsahardbutbrittlesurface.Sogoodwasthis
stone, with its rich reddish-yellowish color, that it was exported in bulk
atgreatexpensetoDelphiandEpidaurosanddoubtlesselsewhereforthe
constructionoftemples.
Certainofthemarlbedsarearichsourceofmortarandceramics.The
calcarious marl is easily dug and reduced to a fine powder.A little heat
appliedforashortdurationisallthatisrequiredtocalcinethispowderto
calciumoxide.Theadditionofwaterreducestheoxidetohydroxide,andthe
resultisawhitelimecement.Thesemarlswerealsoexcavated,powdered,
slakedwithwater,anddriedtoamalleableclayeyconsistency.Theclaywas
formedintolightweightvessels,painted,firedinakiln,andthenprobably
dousedinwater.Whetherthesevesselsshouldbecalledceramicorcement
isstillbeinginvestigated.5Incertainperiods,theywereexportedwidelyin
theEasternMediterraneanandasfarasSpaintothewest.
Finally,thetectonicfragmentationoftheregionhasensuredtheperennial
threatofearthquakes.Someofthemoresevereoftheseearthquakeshave
destroyedmajorstructuresandhaveevendisruptedtheflowoflocalsprings.
ScholarshavespicedupthewrittenhistoryofCorinthwithaliberalgarnish
ofrealandimaginaryseismicevents;thesehaveservedtoexplaindisruptions
inthearchaeologicalrecord.OngoingresearchbyNicholasAmbraseys,a
leadingauthorityinseismicengineering,hasshown,however,thatwenow
needtoreconsidereveryseismiceventthathasbeeninvokedtoexplainthe
3
ChrisL.Hayward,“High-ResolutionProvenanceDeterminationofConstruction-Stone:
APreliminaryStudyofCorinthianOoliticLimestoneQuarriesatExamilia,”Geoarchaeology
11(1996)215–34.
4
Robin F. Rhodes, “The Earliest Greek Architecture in Corinth and the 7th-Century
TempleonTempleHill,”inCorinth,theCentenary,1896–1996(ed.CharlesK.WilliamsII
theCentenary,1896–1996
andNancyBookidis;CorinthXX;Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,2003)85–94.
5
ThisresearchisbeingundertakenbyG.D.R.Sanders,LouiseJoyner,andIanWhitbread.
Sanders/UrbanCorinth:AnIntroduction
3
destructionofvariousphasesofthecity.Hisfindings,whichhavebeengenerallyacceptedbygeologistsandseismologistsalike,arethatearthquakesin
Greecerarelyexceededamagnitudeof6.5andneverexceeded7.0onthe
logarithmicRichterscale.AccordingtoAmbraseysandJ.A.Jackson,the
natureoffaultsinGreeceissuchthattherangeofdamagewroughtbyan
earthquakeofsuchamagnitudeislimitedtoafewtensofkilometersfromthe
epicentre.Thus,anearthquakesuchasthe551/52C.E.earthquakerecordedby
ProcopiusatChaironeiaincentralGreececlearlydidnothavethecatastrophic
effectonCorinththatthreegenerationsofscholarshaveclaimed.6
Corinthpossessedfourharbors.SchoenusandPoseidonawerepresumably
fairlysimpledockingfacilitiesthatservedeitherendoftheDiolkos.7TheDiolkoswasapavedportageroadbuiltacrossthe6-kmwidthoftheisthmus,with
anaveragegradientofabout1.5%.Itwasprobablyconstructedbythetyrant
PerianderinthesixthcenturyB.C.E.,andisscoredbythewheelsoftransport
vehicleswhosewheelbaseaveraged1.5macross.Oneithersideofthepaved
portionwereearthenroads.Historicalsourcesmentionsixattempts—fivesuccessfulandoneunsuccessful—toportagewarshipsovertheisthmusbetween
428 and 30 B.C.E. Niketas Oryphas, revealing his familiarity with ancient
literature,effectedasixthsuccessfulcrossingin881C.E.
MostcommentatorsinsistthattheDiolkoswasusedprincipallyformilitary
purposes,butfromthevulgarhumouroftheThesmophoriazousaeofAristophanes,onegetsaverydifferentimpression.8Mnesilochos,aninterloperamong
womenandhimselfdisguisedasawoman,hideshismasculinitybypushing
hishugestageproppenisbackbetweenhislegs.WhenKleisthenesattemptsto
finditfrombehind,Mnesilochuspushesittothefront.Thisactionisrepeated
severaltimes.Finally,Kleisthenescriesinexasperation,“Youhaveasortof
isthmus,bro’,haulingyourprowtoandfromoreoftenthantheCorinthians
[haulshipsacrosstheDiolkos].”WecansurmisethattheDiolkoswasactively
andregularlyusedformerchantships,orelsetherewouldbenohumorin
Kleisthenes’quip.ThetriremesthatcrossedtheDiolkoswerecomparablein
sizeandcapacitytotheKyreniaship(14mlongx4.2mwide,ladenweight
ca.39tons).Mr.Sarris,theshipbuilderoftheKyreniareplica,assuresme
that,properlysupportedbythekeelsom,ashipofthosedimensionscouldbe
6
N.N.AmbraseysandA.Jackson,“SeismicityandAssociatedStrainofCentralGreece
between1890and1988,”GeophysicsJournalInternational101(1990)663–708.
GeophysicsJournalInternational
7
G. Raepsaet, “Le Diolkos de l’isthme à Corinthe: son trace, son fonctionnement,”
BCH
BCH117(1993)233–56.
8
Aristophanes, Thesmophoriazousae (ed. Benjamin Bickley Rogers; LCL; Cambridge,
Mass.:HarvardUniversityPress,1924)line648.SinceRogersdidnottranslatethepassage,
therenditionismine.
4
UrbanReligioninRomanCorinth
movedconsiderabledistances—evenwithitsfullcargoaboard—withoutthe
slightestdamage.9
Suchtrafficmusthavekeptasocietyofwagonersandtheirteamsofoxen
fullyoccupied.Theportageprovedsovaluablethateffortsweremadeto
replaceitwithacanal.TheemperorNeroactuallybeganworkonthecanal
bypersonallydumpingthefirstshovelfulofearthintoagoldenbucket,using
agoldenshovel.Hediedbeforemuchprogresscouldbemade,butnotbefore
hisimageasthegodHerakleshadbeeninscribedinonewallofthecutting.
UnderVespasian,about800yardsofcanalwereexcavatedtoadepthof90
feet,using6,000JewishslavescapturedinthesackofJerusalem,beforethe
projectwasfinallyabandoned.10HerodesAtticus,theAthenianteacherofphilosophyandwealthypatronofextravagantmonuments,brieflycontemplated
thecompletionofNero’sandVespasian’sworkbutdemurredonthegrounds
thatitwashubristictosucceedwhereemperorshadfailed.Bythetimethe
canalwasfinallycompletedin1893,theLevanttradehadwaned.
Kenchreai on the Saronic Gulf and Lechaion on the Corinthian Gulf
were altogether different kinds of harbors. Kenchreai was excavated by
theAmerican School of Classical Studies in the 1960s.11 It consists of a
settlementonthesouthslopesofapromontorywithapairofharbormoles
encirclingaroundbasinfacingsoutheast.Architecture,pottery,andcoins
derivefrommanycenturiesofoccupationandincludeshrinesofthegods
(oneperhapsdedicatedtoIsis)andasmallearlyChristianbasilicaofthe
sixthcentury.Lechaionmustbeconsideredtheprincipalharbor.Locatedon
thecoastnorthofthecity,theharborconsistsofaseriesoflandlockedbasins
accessiblefromtheseabyanarrowchannel.Theouterworksoftheharbor
includedthreelongmoles,twoforasquarebasinandthethirdtoprotectthe
entrancetotheinnerharbor.Sporadicexcavationsintheareaindicatethat
theassociatedsettlementwasextensive.Themostconcentratedcampaign
ofarchaeologicalwork,thatoftheAmericanSchoolinthe1960s,revealed
anenormousearlyChristianbasilicabetweentheinnerharborandthesea.12
M.L.Katzef,“TheKyreniaShip,”inAHistoryofSeafaring(ed.G.F.Bass;London,
1982)50–52;andidemandS.W.Katzef,“BuildingaReplicaofanAncientGreekMerchantman,”inProceedingsofthe1stInternationalSymposiumonShipConstructioninAntiquity
(ed.H.E.Tzalas;Athens:n.p.,1989)163–75.
10
Onthispoint,seetheessaybyDavidGilmanRomanointhisvolume(pp.xxx–xxx,
esp.xxx).
11
RobertL.Scranton,JospehW.Shaw,andLeilaIbrahim,TopographyandArchitecture,
vol.1ofKenchreai,EasternPortofCorinth(Leiden:Brill,1978).
12
D.I.Pallas,“Korinth,”ReallexikonzurByzantinischenKunst(Stuttgart:Hiersemann,
1966–) 4:745–811.
9
Sanders/UrbanCorinth:AnIntroduction
5
TogetherthesefourharborsattestthesheervolumeofCorinth’scommercial
interestsatvarioustimes.
Trafficmovingnorthandsouthacrosstheisthmuswaschanneledinto
narrowcorridorsalongtheKakiaSkalaoroverMountGeraneion.Atoneend
ofthecorridor,routesfannedouttoAthensandtoThebesandbeyond.Atthe
otherend,theroutesledalongthecoastwesttowardsPatras,easttoEpidauros,
andthroughpassesoneithersideofAcrocorinthintothePeloponnese,to
theArgolidandArcadia.Thehistoricalcommunicationsnetworkofsouthern
Greecehasrecentlybeentreatedpurelyasaproblemingraphtheory.This
isanapplicationmostusefultoeconomicgeographersandperhapsfamiliar
tomostofusastheparticulartalentofthetitlecharacterinthefilmGood
WillHunting.Corinthwasunsurprisinglyfoundtobeatthemathematical
andgeographicalcenteroftheRomanprovinceofAchaia.13
Asinmoderncommerce,whetherbuildingacementfactoryoropening
adowntownbar,locationhasalwaysbeenimportanttocommercialsuccess.
ThismuchmayhaveoccurredtotheapostlePaulwhenhechoseCorinth
forhisministry.InthemiddleofthefirstcenturyC.E.,Corinthwasaperfect
placeforthedisseminationofgoodsandideas—amultilingual,polytheistic,
cosmopolitancommunityvisitedbytravelers,merchants,andseamenfromall
overtheMediterranean.Itisnotdifficulttoimaginewhythemoralcondition
ofcommerce-orientedCorinth,itsinhabitants,andvisitorsstillconcerned
PauldeeplysometwohundredyearsaftertheinfamouscultofAphroditeon
Acrocorinthhadcloseditsdoors.14
Well-watered,overlookedbyanimposingacropolis,flankedbyalarge
fertileplaintothenorthandnorthwest,andlocatedbetweentwoseas,Corinth
commandedtheprincipalnodalpointinthelandandseacommunicationsof
southernGreece.Itsstrategicandcommercialpositionwassupplementedby
valuablenaturalresourcesforexport,includingbuildingmaterials,excellent
claysforceramicsandmortars,wood,andagriculturalproduce.Itwasnotso
muchCorinth’sownrichesthatwerebeingmoved,however.Theimportance
ofCorinthwasasanentrepôtthroughwhichtheproduceofotherregions
wasshipped.
G.D.R.SandersandI.K.Whitbread,CentralPlacesandMajorRoadsinthePeloponnese,BSA85(1990)333–61.
14
OnCorinthianAphrodite,seetheessaysbyJohnR.Lanci(pp.xxx–xxx)andCharlesK.
WilliamsII(pp.XXX–XXX)inthisvolume.
13
6
UrbanReligioninRomanCorinth
HISTORYOFTHECORINTHEXCAVATIONS
TheAmericanSchoolofClassicalStudiesatAthenshasbeenexcavating
atCorinthsince1896.Overthecourseofthetwentiethcentury,scholarly
interestshavechangedconsiderably.Theearliestexcavatorswerelargely
concernedwithancienttopographyandplannedtorevealasmuchofthe
centerofthepre-Romancityastheycould.Whiletheyrevealedlargeportions
ofthecenterofCorinth,theirtaskwasmademoredifficultbyMummius’s
sackin146 B.C.E.andbythefoundationofaRomancolonyin44 B.C.E.,
whenthecityplanwasre-engineeredandsettlerscoveredoreventoreout
thecoreoftheClassicalcity.
Theyearsbetween1925and1940sawcontinuedbutrathermoresystematicclearanceofthetheaterandforumareas.Interestshiftedfromtopographic
totaxonomicandchronologicalconcerns.Atthetime,however,itwasstill
generallythepracticetoexcavatewithlargeteamsofnonspecialistlaborers
underlimitedsupervision.Theydugfromtopsoiltoforumlevel,adepthof
3–4m,inasingleseason,andalthoughtherecoveryofdatawasfarsuperiortotheearliercampaigns,itwasnotwhatonewouldnowdemand.The
excavatorsgeneratedalargenumberofbooksandarticlesonurbanhistory,
buildings,inscriptions,sculpture,ceramics,andminorobjects.ThisliteraturehasshapedpresentpopularconceptionsofCorinthandsetmanyofthe
standardsonwhicharchaeologistsintheEasternMediterraneanstillrely.
Fromthemid-1960stothepresent,thearchaeologicalstudyofCorinth
hasundergoneasustainedperiodofideologicalandmethodologicalevolutionifnotrevolution.Duringthisexcitingintellectualpassage,scholarshave
beguntofocusonthehumanratherthanthemonumentalsideofantiquity,
and post-Classical archaeology has come into its own. Despite the sheer
volume of work undertaken in these thirty-five years, the overall plan of
thesitehaschangedremarkablylittle.Ourunderstandingoftheurbanand
historicallandscape,however,hasbeentransformed.Systematicexcavation
bysmallteamsoftrainedtechnicianssupervisedbyarecordingarchaeologist
haspermittedclosecontrolofthestratigraphicsequences.Newprocedures
for the recording of finds were instituted, context materials and not just
remarkableobjectsweresaved,andpreliminaryreportsofworkappeared
annuallyinthejournalHesperia.Itwouldbefairtosaythatnowequalportionsoftheresearcharedonebydescriptivescientistswithhandlensesand
microscopesandbyresearchersengagedinthepainstakingarchaeological
autopsyofearlierrecords.
Sanders/UrbanCorinth:AnIntroduction
7
Coinshavebeensupplantedbypotteryasthecurrencyofchronology.
Coinsarecommonandsurvivewell,andtheyproviderefreshinglyspecific
informationabouttheirdateofissue—buttherightcoinisrarelyfoundin
therightplace.Untilcomparativelyrecently,ceramicsspecialiststendedto
concentrateonfinewaresbecausetheacceptedbiaswasthatcoarsewares
werenotworthstudyingbecausetheywerenotdiagnostic.Coarsewares,
however,comprisethelargemajorityoffindsfromanycontext.Someperiods
wereneglectedsimplybecausetheywereunfashionable,andLateRoman
potteryassemblagesareacaseinpoint.ThestudyofLateRomanCorinth
wasdrivenbycoinsanddisastersuntilthepublicationofaLateRomanfine
potterysurveybyJohnHayesin1972.15Unfortunately,theheroicefforts
ofDemetriosPallasinthebasilicasandJamesWisemanatthegymnasium
cametooearlytobenefitfromHayes’svolume.16
Potteryisubiquitousinarchaeologicalcontextsandcanbeusedtodate
phasesofactivitywithafairdegreeofprecision.KathleenSlane’svolume
on the Demeter sanctuary and her specialist articles have given us some
ideaofwhatCorinthianpotterylookedlikethroughtheRomanperiod.17It
wasonlywiththeexcavationseastofthetheaterinthe1980sthatsufficient
quantitiesofwell-excavateddeposits,manyretainedintheirentirety,enabled
Slane to undertake a thorough diachronic survey of Roman pottery from
thefoundationofthecolonytothebeginningoftheseventhcentury.18This
studyisbasedonstatisticalanalysesofnumberandweightbytypeandon
stratigraphicrelations.19Thefinalpublication,whichiseagerlyanticipated,
willbethefirstcompleteoverviewofRomanpotterytypologyforaGreek
site. It will show how the proportions of different pottery types changed
overtime;also,analysisofimportswillallowresearcherstoidentifyshifts
ineconomiccontacts.Thistoolwillenablescholarstoreassessoldcontexts
and redraft our history of the city. Its impact should be felt well beyond
CorinthandevenGreece.
J.W.Hayes,LateRomanPottery(London:BritishSchoolatRome,1972).
Pallas,“Korinth”;andJamesWiseman,“ExcavationsintheGymnasiumArea.1969–
1970,”Hesperia41(1972)1–42.
17
Slane,KathleenW.TheSanctuaryofDemeterandKore:TheRomanPotteryandLamps
(CorinthXVIII.2;Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,1990).
18
CharlesK.WilliamsIIandOrestesH.Zervos,“Corinth,1988:EastoftheTheater,”
Hesperia58(1989)1–50;forbibliography,seetheessaybyCharlesK.WilliamsIIinthis
volume(pp.xxx–xxx).
19
KathleenW.Slane,“Corinth’sRomanPottery:QuantificationandMeaning,”inCorinth,
theCentenary,1896–1996
theCentenary,1896–1996(ed.CharlesK.WilliamsIIandNancyBookidis;CorinthXX;
Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,2003)321–36.
15
16
8
UrbanReligioninRomanCorinth
ThewayinwhichwelookatdeadCorinthianshasalsochanged.Charles
Williams’sexcavationssouthoftheMuseumencounteredapackedcemetery
datingtotheFrankishperiod.20Tocopewiththeexcavationandanalysis
ofthiscomplicatedmassofevidence,anthropologistsArtRohnandEthne
Barneswereinvitedtoexcavateandstudytheburials.21Rohnhasnotonly
trainedourspecialistpickmentoarticulateburialsandthenremovethem;he
hasalsobeguntoexaminechangesinburialpracticethroughtime.Barnes
isabletodiscerninbonesrepetitivestresspatternsthatbetrayregularheavy
exerciseofdifferentkinds.Shecanalsorecognizetheeffectsofgenetics,
illness, malnutrition, and violence.Although they started with Medieval
andcontinuedwithpost-Medievalburials,RohnandBarnesnowinclude
Romanandearliermaterialintheirresearch.Corinthnowhassucharange
offascinatingpathologiesthataspecialfacilitywasrecentlyopenedtohouse
acomparativecollectionforstudy.
DespitetheexcavationofmanyhundredsofRomantombs,onlyindividual
tombshaveoccasionallybeenpublished.Inthe1960s,HenryRobinsonwas
invitedtoexcavateinadvanceoftheconstructionofadrainagechannelalong
theedgeofthenorthterraceofCorinth,wherehefoundseveralsignificant
gravesdatingfromthefirstthroughfifthcenturies C.E.MaryWalbankand
KathleenSlaneareinthefinalstagesofproducingabook-lengthpublication
ofthesediscoveries.22
ThetopographyoftheCorinthiahasreceivedratherpatchycoverage,but
acomprehensivepictureisgraduallyemerging.JamesWiseman’simportant
extensivesurveyoftheregionputmanysitesonthemap.23Otherinvestigators
addedtopoitothisbasicwork;twonewdoctoralthesesandathirdnearing
completionhaveexaminedthebordersofCorinthwithEpidaurus,Sikyon,
andArgos.24TherecentlycompletedEasternCorinthiaarchaeologicalsurvey
wasanintensivesurveyofamuchsmallerterritorythatwilladdanewdimensiontoourunderstandingofthehistoricalgeography.MaryWalbankwas
CharlesK.WilliamsII,L.M.Snyder,EthneBarnes,andOrestesH.Zervos,“Frankish
Corinth,1997,”Hesperia67(1998)223–81.
21
EthneBarnes,“TheDeaddoTellTales,”inCorinth,theCentenary,1896–1996(ed.
theCentenary,1896–1996
Charles K. Williams II and Nancy Bookidis; Corinth XX; Princeton, N.J.:ASCS, 2003)
435–43.
22
SeetheessaybyMaryE.HoskinsWalbankinthisvolume(pp.xxx–xxx).
23
JamesWiseman,TheLandoftheAncientCorinthians(SIMA50;Göteborg:P.Åström,
1978).
24
Y.A.Lolos,“TheHadrianicAqueductofCorinth,”Hesperia66(1997)271–314;and
M.D.Dixon,“DisputedTerritories:InterstateArbitrationintheNortheastPeloponnese,ca.
250–150 B.C.”(Ph.D.diss.,OhioStateUniversity,2000).
20
Sanders/UrbanCorinth:AnIntroduction
9
thefirsttodiscussRomanlanddivisioninCorinthia.25DavidRomanoand
PanosDoukellishavesinceindependentlyextrapolateddifferentschemes
ofmensurationonthebasisofcropmarks,fieldboundaries,androads.26In
thepastcoupleofyears,resistivitysurveyhasaddedmuchoftopographical
interesttothepicturepresentedbytheexcavatedremains.27
TheAmericanSchoolhasalsobeenactiveinexcavationoutsideofthecity
butwithinitsterritory.ElizabethGebhardandhercolleagueshavecontinued
the excavations and publication program started by Oscar Broneer at the
majorCorinthiansanctuarydedicatedtoPoseidonandPalaimonatIsthmia.28
TimothyGregoryandhiscolleagueshavecontinuedPaulClement’sworkin
theLateRomanfortressandRomanbaths,alsoatIsthmia.29RobertScranton
excavatedaboveandbelowthewaterlineatKenchreai.30Inadditiontothe
Americanwork,theBritishSchoolexcavatedandpublishedthesanctuary
ofHeraatPerachoraunderHumfryPayneandlaterRichardTomlinson.31
Manyofthesediversethreadsofmorerecentresearchhavealreadyappeared
asbooks,asarticlesinHesperia,andelsewhere.Themostimportantnew
synopsis is the volume originating in the 1996 centenary conference.32 It
containstwenty-sevenpapersbyactivestudentsofCorinth’sarchaeology
25
MaryE.HoskinsWalbank,“TheFoundationandPlanningofEarlyRomanCorinth,”
JRA10(1997)95–130.
26
DavidG.Romano,“CityPlanning,Centuriation,andLandDivisioninRomanCorinth:
ColoniaLausIuliaCorinthiensisandColoniaIuliaFlaviaAugustaCorinthiensis,”inCorinth,
theCentenary,1896–1996
theCentenary,1896–1996(ed.CharlesK.WilliamsIIandNancyBookidis;CorinthXX;
Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,2003)279–301;PanagiotisN.Doukellis,“Leterritoiredelacolonie
romainedeCorinthe,”inStructuresruralesetsociétésantiques:actesducolloquedeCorfou,
14–16mai1992(ed.PanagiotisN.DoukellisandLinaG.Mendoni;Paris:Lesbelleslettres,
1994) 359–90; and Mary E. Hoskins Walbank, “What’s in a Name? Corinth Under the
Flavians,”ZPE139(2002)251–64.
ZPE
27
TheresultsofthisongoingsurveywillbepublishedinHesperiabyG.D.R.Sanders
andM.Boyd.
28
Forbibliography,seetheessaybyElizabethR.Gebhardinthisvolume(pp.xxx–xxx).
29
Timothy E. Gregory, The Hexamilion and the Fortress (Isthmia V; Princeton, N.J.:
PrincetonUniversityPress,1993);andTheCorinthiaintheRomanPeriod:IncludingthePapers
GivenataSymposiumHeldatTheOhioStateUniversityon7–9March1991(ed.Timothy
E.Gregory;JRASup8;AnnArbor,Mich.:JournalofRomanArchaeology,1993).
30
Scranton,Shaw,andIbrahim,TopographyandArchitecture.
31
R. Tomlinson, “Perachora,” in Le Sanctuaire Grec (ed. Albert Schachter and Jean
Bingen;Entretienssurl’Antiquitéclassique37;Geneva:FondationHardt,1992)321–51.
ForamorerecentappraisalofthetempleandcultseeB.Menadier,“TheSixthCenturyBC
TempleandtheSanctuaryandCultofHeraAkraia,Perachora”(Ph.D.diss.,Universityof
Cincinnati,1995).
32
CharlesK.WilliamsIIandNancyBookidis,eds.,Corinth,theCentenary,1896–1996
(CorinthXX;Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,2003)
10
UrbanReligioninRomanCorinth
statingtheircurrentideasandfeaturesacompletebibliographyofCorinth
fromtheNeolithictoLateMedievalperiods.
Inhisearlyyearsasdirector,Williamsconcentratedonthereinterpretation
ofsomeseventyyearsofscholarshipbyrestudyingtheearlierexcavation
recordsandbyundertakingnewexcavationsinandaroundtheforum.Over
thecourseoffifteenyearshewasabletodocumenthowthecitydeveloped
overtime,andabriefoverviewofhissynthesisfollowsbelow.33
DEVELOPMENTOFTHEURBANAREA
TheareaofthesiteopenedtodateconcentrateslargelyontheRomanforum
anditssurrounds.Thiszoneisthetransition,markedbyasteepslope(10–20%
gradeover15m)betweenthetwoterracesonwhichCorinthwasbuilt.Here
thenaturaldrainagepatternandspringlinehascreatedafairlybroadvalley
andarelativelyeasytransitionforwheeledandpedestriantrafficbetween
theterraces.Theuppervalleyisoccupiedbytheforumandthelowervalley
bytheLechaionRoad.
ThereisampleevidenceforprehistoricsettlementdatingfromtheNeolithic to sub-Mycenean periods. Corinth is reckoned to have synoecized,
thatis,emergedasapolity,intheeighthcenturyB.C.E.,sendingouttrading
coloniestoSyracuseandCorfu.ArchaeologicallyatCorinththereislittle
evidencefortheformandextentofthecity.TheearliestGeometricperiod
isrepresentedbydomesticdebrisinthevalleyfloor,graves,andawell.In
thesecondhalfoftheeighthcentury,however,burialwaskeptseparatefrom
theresidentialarea.Atthesametime,thefirststonearchitecturebecomes
evidentandthewatercoursesofthespringsareartificiallychannelled.Evidenceofroadssurvives.Theseroadsdirecttrafficfromthesouthandfrom
thesouthwesttowardsthenorthatthemouthofthevalley.
IntheseventhcenturyB.C.E.,thefirsttemplewasbuiltontherisetothe
northoftheforum. 34Thestreetplandevelopedwiththeadditionofroads
parallel to the Geometric streets; these roads also channeled traffic from
the south and west towards the north.The Sacred Spring was elaborated
andperhapsatthispointfirsthadcultassociatedwithit.Inthemid-seventh
33
Afullbibliographycanbefoundinibid.,whichalsoincludesplansillustratingchanges
intheforumareaovertime.Formoredetail,seeWilliams’spublicationsinHesperia.
34
ForasurveyofCorinth’ssanctuarieswithpertinentbibliographyseeNancyBookidis,
“TheSanctuariesofCorinth,”inCorinth,theCentenary,1896–1996(ed.CharlesK.Williams
theCentenary,1896–1996
IIandNancyBookidis;CorinthXX;Princeton,N.J.:ASCS,2003)247–60.
Sanders/UrbanCorinth:AnIntroduction
11
century,asmallhousewithawellwasconstructedtothesouthofthespring.
IntheLechaionRoadvalley,theCyclopeanfountainwasconstructedand
housesnowfacedtheroadtowardsAcrocorinth.Inthesixthandearlyfifth
centuries,theearlytemplewasdestroyed(ca.580C.E.)tobereplacedabout
fortyyearslaterbytheArchaictemplethatstillstandsonthesitetoday.The
formalapproachwasfromthenortheast,butaccesswassupplementedbya
monumentalrampleadingupfromthestreetthatranpasttheSacredSpring
tothesoutheast.Totheeastofthetemple,atthebaseofthecliffseparatingitfromthevalley,asmallstoawasbuilt.Aclusterofproto-Geometric
gravesreceivedatemenos,andasmallundergroundshrinewasestablished
alongsideanewroadtoAcrocorinth.
Thelaterfifthandearlyfourthcenturiessawarapidorganizedandformalizeddevelopmentthatgivestheimpressionofathoroughlyurbanspace.
ThePeireneFountainreceiveddrawbasins,TempleAwasconstructedtothe
north,andtheSacredSpringwasfurtherdevelopedwithatriglyphandmetope
wallandacuriousapsidaltemple.Aracecoursemoreorlessfollowedthe
southernmostArchaicroad,andthehousesthatflankeditwerereplacedby
largercomplexes.Tothewest,thehouseofamerchantdealinginimported
fish fillets was constructed and subsequently removed, and finally a bath
complexwasestablished.Themainchangesinthefollowingperiodwerea
realignmentoftheracetrackandtheconstructionoftheSouthStoa.
Aquestionthathasconstantlyarisenisthelocationoftheagora.ByanalogywiththeAthenianagora,manywouldpointtotheracetrackasevidence
thattheCorinthianagorawasthepredecessoroftheRomanforum.Inthe
Greekperiod,however,thisareahadarelativelysteepandcontinuousslope
fromtheSacredSpringuptotheSouthStoa,interruptedonlybytheracetrack.
Allroadsfoundtodatechanneltrafficinageneralnorthwarddirection,while
thewatersupplyalsosuppliestheareatowardsthenorth.Althoughitmightbe
arguedthatthelackofinscriptionsintheareaoftheforumistobeexpected
inatyranny,andlateranoligarchy,asopposedtoademocracy,itisnotable
thatwhatinscriptionshavebeenfoundareconcentratedatthenortheastside
ofTempleHill.Abetterhypothesis,therefore,isthattheagorawaslocated
immediatelytothenorthoftheexcavatedzone.Ifitwasnotanagora,then
whatwerethemainfunctionsoftheexcavatedareaofthelaterforuminthe
Classical period?According toWilliams, it was largely dedicated to cult
(especiallynon-Olympiancult),housing,andminorindustry.Theevidence
forcultincludesfragmentsofinscriptions,buildings,temenoi,aracetrack,
andtwenty-sixheroreliefs.Thecultsattestedtendtobeofdeitieswithlocal
ratherthanpan-HellenicsignificanceandincludenotonlyHellotis,celebrated
12
UrbanReligioninRomanCorinth
withatorchraceontheracetrack;hersisterKotyto,honoredperhapsin
theSacredSpring;ArtemisKorinthos;andPeirene;butalsoPoseidonand
Aphrodite,andperhapsDionysos,Hermes,andthenymphs.Cultsofheroes
includeZeuxippusandvariousunknowndeadancestors.
In 146 B.C.E., after defeating theAchaian League led by the Corinthians at Lefkopetros on the Isthmus, the Roman general Mummius sacked
Corinth.Hekilledthemalepopulationandsoldthewomenandchildren
intoslavery.ThereafterCorinthwasnolongerapoliticalentitybutatbest
analmost-desertedghosttownoccupiedbyasmallnon-Corinthianpopulationengagedincultivationoftheagriculturalland.Findsidentifiedfrom
this interim period amount to forty-two knidian amphorae stamps, some
Megarianbowls,andoverninetycoins.Theprestigeandincomefromthe
IsthmiangamesdevolvedtoCorinth’snorthwestneighbor,Sikyon,andthe
richagriculturallandwasauctionedoffasagerpublicuseverytwoyearsin
Rome.Thecitywasrefoundedin44B.C.E.byJuliusCaesarasacolonyfor
16,000colonists.Itsterritorywasmeasuredoutintoportionsforthecolonists
andthecitywasredevelopedonanorthogonalplan.Thereislittlereasonto
believethatmanyofCorinth’sreligioustraditionssurvived.NancyBookidis
hasdealtbrieflywiththreeofthecultsthatwereresurrected:thoseofApollo,
Asklepius,andDemeter.35
IntheearlyRomanperiod,theforumwasahugeopenspacemeasuring
about 200 m east-west and 100 m north-south, and taking its orientation
fromthesurvivingSouthStoa,whichdefineditssouthernedge.TheSouth
Stoawasmodified,someofitssmallerspacesbeingconvertedintolarger
rooms,butitretaineditscolonnade.Dominatingtheskylinetothenorth,
theArchaicTempleofApolloonTempleHillwasflankedbycolonnadesto
thenorthandsouth.Thecolonistshadrotateditsorientationby180degrees
tofaceanapproachfromtheroadoutoftheforumtothewest.Itsinterior
colonnadewasremovedandre-erectedinalinerunningnorthfromthewest
endoftheSouthStoaalongtheroadtoAcrocorinth.Alsotothenorthwasa
longbasilicaflankingtheLechaionRoadononesideandthecliffofTemple
Hillontheother.TheLechaionRoad,enteringtheforumfromthenorth,
ascendedabroadstairwaythroughathree-bayedmonumentalarch.Eastof
theLechaionRoad,PeireneFountainhadbeenrefurbishedandextended.
Theformersimplefaçadeofthedrawbasinswaswalledoffwithaseries
ofarches.Arectangulartwo-storycourtenclosingarectangularpoolwas
addedtothenorth.
35
Seeheressayinthisvolume(pp.xxx–xxx).
Sanders/UrbanCorinth:AnIntroduction
13
OntheeastsideoftheforumstoodtheJulianBasilica.Atforumlevel
thiswasacryptoporticusbasement.Thefirststory,approachedbyastaircaseoffourteenstepsleadinguptoaporch,wasanopenrectangularspace
measuring38x24m,withCorinthiancolumnssupportingaclerestoryand
a marble dado. Inside were sculptures of the imperial family, including
AugustusinPentelicmarble,dressedinatogawithafolddrapedoverhis
head,andportrayedengagedinsacrifice.Hewasflankedbyhisadoptedsons
CaiusandLuciusCaesar,eachportrayedinheroicnuditywithachlamys
overtheshoulder,perhapsastheDioscuroi.Clearlythisbuildinghadsome
highcivicfunction.
TothewestoftheforumstoodTempleE,a6x11–columnperipteral
templeonalowbasewithlongstoasflankingittothenorthandsouth.The
identificationofthetemplehasbeenhotlydebated.Somethinkthatitwas
dedicatedtoJoveorZeusbasedonitssizeandlocation,whileothersregarditasthetempleofOctavia.Infrontofthetemplewasarangeofmore
typicallyRomantemplesandmonuments.Twoprostyletemples,FandG,
were dedicated to Venus and to ClarionApollo respectively. Built in the
Romanstyle,theystoodonhighmarble-cladpodiaofconcreteandrubble
thatwereapproachedfromtheeastbyastair.Tothenorthwasafountain
housededicatedtoPoseidon,decoratedwithastatueofthegodanddolphins,
andacircularmonumentdecoratedintheCorinthianorderanddedicated
byGnaiusCorneliusBabbius.Southofcenterintheforumwastherostra,
consideredbymanytobethebemainfrontofwhichPaulwasbroughtby
theeldersoftheJewishcommunity(Acts18:12).Asecondtoposforthose
followingthetravelsofPaulinGreececanbefoundeastofthetheater,also
remodeledtosuitRomantaste.Aninscriptionfoundtherereads:ERASTUS
PROAEDILIT[AT]ES(ua)P(ecunia)STRAVIT(“Erastus,inreturnforhis
aedileship,laidthepavementathisownexpense”).Sincetheofficeofaedile
canbeprettymuchequatedwiththatofoikonomos,itisthoughtthatthis
couldbetheoikonomosErastuswhosegreetingsPaulforwardsinhisletter
totheRomans(16:23).36
Ahundredyearslater,theplanoftheforumremainedmuchthesame,
receivingadditionssuchastheodeion,anothertempleatthewestendof
theforum,shopstothewestoftherostra,andanewbasilicasouthofthe
SouthStoa.
FormoreonErastus,seetheessaysbyHelmutKoester(pp.xxx–xxx),StevenJ.Friesen(pp.xxx–xxx),andJamesA.Walters(pp.xxx–xxx)inthisvolume,aswellasSteven
J. Friesen, “Poverty in Pauline Studies: Beyond the So-called New Consensus,” JSNT 26
(2004)323–61.
36
14
UrbanReligioninRomanCorinth
Finally,intheLateRomanperiodCorinthseemstohavebeenradically
transformed.EarthquakesinthelatefourthcenturyC.E.andasocialcallby
AlaricandhisGothsseemtohavereducedthecity.Thegreatsanctuariesof
theHellenicdeitiesDemeterandAsklepios,alreadyunderlegislativepressure
toclose,apparentlydidnotsurvive.Effortsweremadetorefurbishthearea
oftheforum,however—mostnotablybyreappointingPeireneFountain37
andthewestshops,andbyconvertingthecentralshopsintothebroadest
stairwayintheRomanworld.Intheearlyfifthcentury,acitywallwaslaid
out,encompassingtheheartofthecity.Remote-sensingsurveysuggeststhat
thiswallenclosedonlyabout25%oftheareahithertoenvisioned,andassertionsabouttherelationshipsofcemeteriesandchurchestothecitycenter
willclearlyhavetoberevised.Thesixthcenturysawtheconstructionof
thefirstbuildingstobededicatedtoChristianworship.38Ahugechurch,the
lengthoftw