Kuesioner Penelitian Hubungan Faktor Resiko dengan Terjadinya Nyeri Punggung Bawah ( Low Back Pain) Pada Tenaga Kerja Bongkar Muat (TKBM) Di Pelabuhan Belawan Medan Tahun 2015
Lampiran 1
Kuesioner Penelitian
Hubungan Faktor Resiko dengan Terjadinya Nyeri Punggung Bawah
( Low Back Pain) Pada Tenaga Kerja Bongkar Muat (TKBM) Di Pelabuhan
Belawan Medan Tahun 2015
Nomor Responden :
I. Faktor Personal
1. Umur :
2. BB (berat badan) :
3. TB (tinggi badan) :
4. IMT (Indeks Masa Tubuh) :
5. Masa kerja :
6. Apakah anda seorang perokok?
a. Ya b.Tidak
7. Berapa kali anda melakukan kegiatan olahraga dalam seminggu ?
1. Sering ( ≥ 3 kali sering )
2. Kadang ( 1- 2 kali seminggu )
3. Jarang ( 1- 3 kali sebulan )
8. Berapa lama anda bekerja dalam satu hari ?
Lampiran 1
II. Faktor pekerjaan
1. Pengukuran beban kerja Nama Beban kerja
Ringan Sedang Berat (75 (100 ( 125
- – 100 / – 125 / – 150 / menit ) menit) menit )
2. Pengukuran Sikap Kerja Dengan Metode REBA (Rapid Entry Body Assesment) Tabel A.
1. Pergerakan Leher Skor :
Lampiran 1
2. Pergerakan Punggung Skor :
3. Pergerakan Kaki Skor :
Lampiran 1
Tabel. B
1. Pergerakan Lengan Atas Skor :
2. Pergerakan Lengan Bawah Skor :
Lampiran 1
3. Pergerakan Pergelangan Skor :
TABEL SKOR REBA
1. Skor Tabel A
Lampiran 1
2. Skor Tabel B
Lampiran 1
3. Skor Tabel C
Sikap Kerja TKBM Pelabuhan Belawan
80 ◦ 12 ◦
20
40 ◦ ◦ ◦
Keterangan sikap kerja :
1. Pergerakan leher 12
2. Pergerakan punggung 80
3. Pergerakan kaki 40
4. Pergerakan lengan atas 20
60 ◦ 40 ◦
Keterangan sikap kerja :
1. Pergerakan punggung 60
2. Pergerakan kaki 40
3. Pergelangan lengan atas 20
80 ◦ 15 ◦
60 ◦
15
60 ◦ ◦
Keterangan sikap kerja :
1. Pergerakan leher 15
2. Pergerakan punggung 80
3. Pergerakan kaki 60
4. Pergerakan lengan bawah 60
5. Pergerakan pergelangan 15
MASTER DATA
HUBUNGAN FAKTOR RESIKO DENGAN TERJADINYA NYERI PUNGGUNG BAWAH ( LOW BACK PAIN ) PADA
TENAGA KERJA BONGKAR MUAT ( TKBM ) DI PELABUHAN BELAWAN TAHUN 2015
14
30
2 54 166
20
2
2
1
1
2
1
81
98
1
2
1
13
50
2 63 160
25
2
10
2
2
2
1 92 119
2
2
15
1
1
1
1 67 175
1
1
1 91 118
2
1
11
1
24
1 80 180
25
2
5
2
2
1 85 119
2
2
1
12
1
24
1 58 160
23
2
6
2
1
1
2 91 116
24
22
2
2
2
18
1
49
2 57 167
20
2
14
2
1
2
2 86 117
2
19
1 94 116
1
22
1 51 166
19
2
3
1
1
1
1
82
98
1
2
2
2
16
6
2
1
1
2 84 119
2
1
16
1
52
2 58 162
22
2
2
2
2
2
1 84 117
2
2
17
1
52
2 60 163
23
2
21
2
1
5
No .
1 60 183
2 68 170
24
2
2
1
1
2
2 83 108
1
2
4
1
24
18
1
1
2
1
1
1
1 98 124
2
1
5
1
23
1 68 173
23
27
3
5
1 93 119
Case control Umur Umurk BB TB
IMT
IMTK Masa Masak Rokok Olahraga Lama denyutseb denyutses beban sikap
1
1
34
2 70 167
25
2
6
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
36
2 68 176
22
2
5
2
1
2
1 92 109
2
2
2
2
2 60 165
1 58 162
22
2
5
2
1
1
1 83 107
1
1
9
1
50
22
1
2
15
2
1
2
2 81 116
1
2
10
1
23
1 60 180
19
24
8
1
1
1
1 88 115
2
1
6
1
24
1 68 165
25
2
5
2
1
2 82 118
2
1
1
7
1
40
2 60 160
23
2
6
2
1
2
1 96 119
2
1
20
1
2 68 170
53
2
38
1
1
98
82
1
2
1
1
2
2
22
1 65 170
21
2
24
30
1
24
1
2
1 82 132
1
1
2
6
2
1 63 160
2
24
2
39
2
2
1 84 131
2
1
37
2
2
9
2
35
2
2
1 83 118
2
1
2
2
2 50 165
22
2 64 170
36
2
34
1
2
1 95 116
29
18
1 88 132
2
1
1
2
6
2
21
1 60 170
24
36
1
2
2
93
85
1
2
1
2
8
40
23
1
2
2
45
1
1
1 84 110
1
1
1
2
1 53 165
23
1 60 160
19
2
44
1
2
1 91 118
23
19
1
1 51 160
2
2 92 131
1
1
2
6
2
20
24
2
2
46
1
1
1 82 116
1
1
3
1
2
1 58 162
41
1
1
2
2
23
1 61 164
23
2
1
1 82 100
2
1 85 132
1
1
2
5
2
22
1
1
6
1 82 131
2
19
1 52 167
24
2
43
1
2
1
1
1
2
5
2
20
1 61 173
23
2
42
1
2
1
23
2 95 136
1
1
2
5
2
19
1 51 165
1
1
24
1
2
1 92 114
1
1
2
5
2
25
19
2
12
2
25
2 68 165
40
1
26
1
1 83 131
1
2
1
2
10
2
22
2 59 165
33
2
1 60 180
1
80
22
2 78 190
28
1
21
2
1
98
1
3
2
1
1
2
2
20
2 55 165
27
2
1
24
6
1
23
1
2
1 84 132
1
1
2
2
1
23
1 60 160
24
1
22
2
1
2 85 115
2
2
2
5
31
1
2
7
2
22
2 59 164
35
1
2
1 94 132
1
1 82 116
2
1
1
3
2
19
2
2
26
1 89 130
2
24
1 65 163
24
2
33
1
2
1
2
1
2
6
2
24
1 67 166
24
1
32
2 53 165
1
1 94 107
2
37
1
28
1
2
2 90 131
1
1
6
22
2
22
1 60 165
24
1
27
2
2
2 62 166
2
30
21
2
2
1 99 105
2
1
2
15
2
2 57 165
9
39
1
29
2
2
1 92 109
2
1
2
1
47
2
1
1
2
80
97
1
1
59
2
21
1 50 170
19
3
2
1
1
1
1
80
81
1
1
60
2
23
1 58 163
19
1
1
3
19
1
2
1
1
80
90
1
1
57
2
24
1 52 169
2
18
2
1
2
1
1
75
84
1
1
58
2
22
1 56 170
2
1
2
1 82 118
1
1
63
2
23
1 60 172
20
2
3
1
1
1
1
85
1
64
2
26
2 49 162
19
2
2
1
1
2
1 85 119
2
99
1
1
1
1
1
81
98
1
1
61
2
24
1 58 160
23
2
1
1
1
1
1 83 108
1
1
62
2
22
1 59 170
20
2
1
1
1
3
19
2
1
1 83 119
2
1
50
2
23
1 56 165
21
2
5
2
1
1
1
80
92
1
1
51
2
50
2 50 163
19
2
15
2
1
1
2
1 78 110
18
37
2 65 170
22
2
8
2
1
2
1 80 131 2 2
48
2
23
1 52 170
1
5
5
2
1
1
1 93 119
2
1
49
2
24
1 60 163
23
2
2
1
1 53 168
1 54 170
3
1
1
2
1
84
90
1
2
55
2
24
22
23
2
3
1
1
1
1
62
91
1
1
56
2
22
2
2 65 160
2
53
52
2
26
2 50 161
19
2
3
1
1
2
2 83 110
1
2
2
29
23
1 60 160
20
2
2
1
2
1
1 81 100
1
1
54
2
2
Umur TKBM * Low Back Pain Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Umurk * Low Back Pain
64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0% Umurk * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation
Low Back Pain Case Control Total Umurk
1 Count
14
24
38
% within Umurk 36.8% 63.2% 100.0%
% within Low Back Pain 43.8% 75.0% 59.4%
% of Total 21.9% 37.5% 59.4%
2 Count
18
8
26
% within Umurk 69.2% 30.8% 100.0%
% within Low Back Pain 56.2% 25.0% 40.6%
% of Total 28.1% 12.5% 40.6%
Total Count
32
32
64
% within Umurk 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
% within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Umurk (1 / 2) .259 .090 .750 For cohort Low Back Pain = .532 .326 .868 Case
For cohort Low Back Pain = 2.053 1.098 3.837 Control N of Valid Cases
64 IMT TKBM * Low Back Pain
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent
IMTK * Low Back Pain 64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0%
IMTK * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation Low Back Pain Case Control Total
IMTK < 18.4 Count
1
3
4 % within IMTK 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Low Back Pain 3.1% 9.4% 6.2% % of Total 1.6% 4.7% 6.2%
18.5 - 25.0 Count
31
29
60 % within IMTK 51.7% 48.3% 100.0% % within Low Back Pain 96.9% 90.6% 93.8% % of Total 48.4% 45.3% 93.8%
Total Count
32
32
64 % within IMTK 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Risk Estimate Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper Odds Ratio for IMTK (< 18.4 / 18.5 - 25.0) .312 .031 3.170 For cohort Low Back Pain = Case
.484 .087 2.689 For cohort Low Back Pain = Control 1.552 .832 2.894 N of Valid Cases
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Masak * Low Back Pain
64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value Df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Point Probability Pearson Chi-Square 1.067 a 1 .302 .613 .306 Continuity Correction b .2671 .606
Likelihood Ratio 1.1131 .291 .613 .306 Fisher's Exact Test .613 .306 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.050 c 1 .306 .613 .306 .250 N of Valid Cases
64 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table c. The standardized statistic is -1.025.
64 Masa Kerja TKBM *Low Back Pain
Masak * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation Low Back Pain Case Control Total
Masak <4 Count
7
17
24
% within Masak 29.2% 70.8% 100.0%
% within Low Back Pain 21.9% 53.1% 37.5%
% of Total 10.9% 26.6% 37.5%
>4 Count
25
15
40
% within Masak 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%
% within Low Back Pain 78.1% 46.9% 62.5%
% of Total 39.1% 23.4% 62.5%
Total Count
32
32
64
% within Masak 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
% within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value Df sided) sided) sided) Point Probability a Pearson Chi-Square 6.667 b 1 .010 .019 .010 Continuity Correction 5.400
1 .020
Likelihood Ratio 6.823 1 .009 .019 .010 Fisher's Exact Test c .019 .010 Linear-by-Linear Association 6.5621 .010 .019 .010 .008 N of Valid Cases 64 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table c. The standardized statistic is -2.562.
Risk Estimate Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper Odds Ratio for Masak (<4 / >4) .247 .083 .734 For cohort Low Back Pain = Case
.467 .239 .910 For cohort Low Back Pain = Control 1.889 1.174 3.038 N of Valid Cases
64 Kebiasaan Merokok TKBM * Low Back Pain
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Rokok * Low Back Pain
64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0% Rokok * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation
Low Back Pain Total Case Control Rokok Ya Count
28
29
57
% within Rokok 49.1% 50.9% 100.0%
% within Low Back Pain 87.5% 90.6% 89.1%
% of Total 43.8% 45.3% 89.1%
Tidak Count
4
3
7
% within Rokok 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%
% within Low Back Pain 12.5% 9.4% 10.9% Total Count
32
32
64
% within Rokok 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
% within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Risk Estimate Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper Odds Ratio for Rokok (Ya / Tidak) .724 .148 3.531 For cohort Low Back Pain = Case
.860 .430 1.720 For cohort Low Back Pain = Control
1.187 .486 2.898
N of Valid Cases64 Chi-Square Tests Value Df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Point Probability
Pearson Chi-Square .160 a 1 .689 1.000 .500 Continuity Correction b .000
1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .161 1 .688 1.000 .500 Fisher's Exact Test1.000 .500 Linear-by-Linear Association .158 c 1 .691 1.000 .500 .287 N of Valid Cases 64 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table c. The standardized statistic is -.397.
Kebiasaan Olahraga TKBM * Low Back Pain Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Olahraga * Low Back Pain
64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0% Olahraga * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation
Low Back Pain Case Control Total Olahraga Sering Count
14
24
38 % within Olahraga 36.8% 63.2% 100.0% % within Low Back Pain 43.8% 75.0% 59.4% % of Total 21.9% 37.5% 59.4%
Jarang Count
18
8
26 % within Olahraga 69.2% 30.8% 100.0% % within Low Back Pain 56.2% 25.0% 40.6% % of Total 28.1% 12.5% 40.6%
Total Count
32
32
64 % within Olahraga 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value Df sided) sided) sided) Point Probability a Pearson Chi-Square 6.478 b 1 .011 .021 .011 Continuity Correction 5.247
1 .022
Likelihood Ratio 6.610 1 .010 .021 .011 Fisher's Exact Test c .021 .011 Linear-by-Linear Association 6.3771 .012 .021 .011 .008 N of Valid Cases 64 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table c. The standardized statistic is -2.525.
Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Olahraga .259 .090 .750 (Sering / Jarang) For cohort Low Back Pain =
.532 .326 .868 Case For cohort Low Back Pain = 2.053 1.098 3.837 Control N of Valid Cases
64
Lama Kerja TKBM * Low Back Pain Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Lama * Low Back Pain 64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0%
Lama * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation
Low Back Pain Case Control TotalLama < 8 jam Count
3
2
5 % within Lama 60.0% 40.0% 100.0% % within Low Back Pain 9.4% 6.2% 7.8% % of Total 4.7% 3.1% 7.8%
> 8 jam Count
29
30
59 % within Lama 49.2% 50.8% 100.0% % within Low Back Pain 90.6% 93.8% 92.2% % of Total 45.3% 46.9% 92.2%
Total Count
32
32
64 % within Lama 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Risk Estimate Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper Odds Ratio for Lama (< 8 jam / > 8 jam) 1.552 .241 9.974 For cohort Low Back Pain = Case
1.221 .570 2.614 For cohort Low Back Pain = Control .787 .261 2.369 N of Valid Cases
Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent bebankerja * Low Back Pain 64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value dfAsymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Point Probability Pearson Chi-Square .217 a 1 .641 1.000 .500 Continuity Correction b .0001 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .2181 .640 1.000 .500 Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .500 Linear-by-Linear Association .214 c 1 .644 1.000 .500 .323 N of Valid Cases
64 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table c. The standardized statistic is .462.
64 Beban Kerja TKBM *Low Back Pain
bebankerja * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation Low Back Pain Case Control Total bebankerja Ringan Count
9
18
27 % within bebankerja 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Low Back Pain 28.1% 56.2% 42.2% % of Total 14.1% 28.1% 42.2%
Sedang Count
23
14
37 % within bebankerja 62.2% 37.8% 100.0% % within Low Back Pain 71.9% 43.8% 57.8% % of Total 35.9% 21.9% 57.8%
Total Count
32
32
64 % within bebankerja 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value Df sided) sided) sided) Point Probability a Pearson Chi-Square 5.189 b 1 .023 .042 .021 Continuity Correction 4.100
1 .043
Likelihood Ratio 5.269 1 .022 .042 .021 Fisher's Exact Test c .042 .021 Linear-by-Linear Association 5.1081 .024 .042 .021 .016 N of Valid Cases 64 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table c. The standardized statistic is -2.260.
Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for bebankerja .304 .108 .861 (Ringan / sedang) For cohort Low Back Pain =
.536 .297 .967 Case For cohort Low Back Pain = 1.762 1.078 2.881 Control N of Valid Cases
64 Sikap Kerja TKBM * Low Back Pain
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Sikap * Low Back Pain
64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0% Sikap * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation
Low Back Pain Case Control Total Sikap sedang Count
15
24
39 % within Sikap 38.5% 61.5% 100.0% % within Low Back Pain 46.9% 75.0% 60.9% % of Total 23.4% 37.5% 60.9% tinggi Count
17
8
25 % within Sikap 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%
% of Total 26.6% 12.5% 39.1% Total Count
32
32
64 % within Sikap 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Sikap .294 .102 .848 (sedang / tinggi) For cohort Low Back Pain =
.566 .350 .914 Case For cohort Low Back Pain = 1.923 1.031 3.585 Control N of Valid Cases
64 Dokumentasi Penelitian