Economics Moving Target

/ /

Economics &
Moving Targets
I a J Azis ija @ o ell.edu

Basic Premises

• E o o i  g o th a e li ked to k o ledge 
p odu tio , ad a ed skills, a d  isi g de a d fo  
highe  edu atio   t o‐ a   ausalit
• U i e sities go  e o d  a o   o fi es of 
a ade ia, to  e  e t al to de elop e t  a ati e
• “pe di g su ge,  isi g i t a & e t a  o ilit
• Qualit  gap‐‐i t a a d e t a— e ai s; a d highe  
edu atio   eeds to adjust to the speed a d  atu e 
of  ha ges a oss the glo e
– U fa o a le: k o ledge e te p ise as pu li  good is 
o p o ised due to  o
e ializatio .
– Fa o a le: potential a ess a d dist i utio


/ /

Centuries of Rise & Fall
• P e  ‐ th e tu : Chi a’s i e tio  of 
gu po de ,  o pass, p i ti g p ess

‐ th e tu : i dust ial  e olutio  &  g eat 
di e ge e
th e tu : A e i a   e tu

st e tu : As e di g Asia….. hose  e tu ?

Lesso s:   self‐dest u t:  is o du t of those  ithi  
the  ou t ;   e i o e t/ li ate;   geog aph ; 
  ultu e;    eligio ;   poli ies;   i stitutio s

Last 20 Centuries Or So:
Global Growth Share


/ /

Convergences Problems
. Dis uptio  i   atu al o de s: populatio  & 
e o o i  g o th outpa es the  apa it  of 
atu al s ste s affe ti g the  a s hu a  
ei gs o ga ize the sel es,  ausi g 
dist i utio  of flo a a d fau a to  ha ge
. Te h olog  o e ea h & to se e o l  a s all 
sha e of populatio  to li e  e o d the  ea s 
 isis & g o i g i e ualit
. C u li g of so e  esta lished  e o o i  
theo ies/ odels

Objectives/
Targets

Policies

Theories/

Models

Data/
Measurements

Side Impacts/
Irrelevant Var

/ /

Interrelationships for Research in Economic Development
Development
Objectives/Targets

Policies

Development
- Import
substitution
Policies

- Industrialization
and
- SOC & urban
Strategies
infrastructure

Objectives
and
GDP growth
Definition
of
Development

Development
Theories/Models

Data/Measurements

Theories
- Big push and

- Stages
of growth, take
Hypotheses
off
- Minimum
requirement
Development
criteriaModels,
- Aggregate
investment
Techniques,

Data Systems
National income
and
accounting
Measurement
of
Performance


Empirical Applications

Post-WW2
I a  Azis

Policies

Objectives/Targets

- Integrated rural development
- Comprehensive employment
strategy
- Redistribution w/ growth
- Asset distribution
- Radical collectivist

- GDP growth
- Employment
- Income distribution
- Poverty (“basic needs”)

- External equilibrium

Data/Measurements

Theories/Models
- Rural development
- Informal sector
- Rural-urban migration
- Appropriate technology
- Growth-employment trade off
- Dependency theory
- SOC
- Multiple objectives
- Early forms of CGE (non-SAM)
- Sectoral planning

- National income accounting
- IO Table
- Employment census
- Integrated rural survey

- Informal sector survey
- Demographic survey

I a  Azis

1970s

/ /

Objectives/Targets

Policies

• Stabilisation
• External (balance-ofpayments)
equilibrium
• Internal (budgetary and
monetary) equilibrium
• Structural adjustment
• Efficiency


•Stabilisation and structural
adjustment
•Outward orientation
•Reliance on markets
•Privatisation
•Minimisation of role of
government

Theories/Models

Data/Measurements

•Endogenous growth
•Link between trade & growth
•Interrelationships between
human capital & tech transfer
•New institutional economics
and role of institutions
•Interlocking factor markets

•Markets (e.g. outward
orientation vs. Intervention)
•Policy Analysis and
Measurement
•Impact of fiscal & trade policy
•CGE models str adjustment

•Social Accounting Matrix
(SAMs) and whole set of data
shown in 1970s Chart
•Comprehensive
disaggregated
large-scale income
expenditure
household surveys
I a  Azis

1980s

Objectives/Targets


Policies

•Extending East Asian miracle
•Continued deregulation
•Improve socio-economic
conditions
•Appropriate financial
regulation

•Good governance/institution
building
•Resurgance of poverty
reduction
•Financial crisis avoidance
•Limiting globalization &
liberalization
Theories/Models

Data/Measurements

•Role of institutions
•Path-dependence & policy
endogeneity
•Monopolistic competition &
role of market & intervention
•Economics of corruption
•Role of social capital
•Sources of growth & TFP
•Growth regression
•CGE modeling on impact of
crisis, policy response &
structural policies

I a  Azis

1990s

•Improved Social Accounting
Matrix (SAMs)
•Comprehensive
disaggregated large-scale
income expenditure household
surveys
•Multi-year surveys including
subjective poverty measures
•Demographic & health
surveys

/ /

Objectives/Targets
• “a e o je ti es as i  
s Cha t 
ith st o ge  e phasis o  
uestio i g the Washi gto  
Co se sus
• MDG: Hu a  de elop e t  e.g. 
edu atio  a d health, 
e io e t
• “DG
• QE & Fi a ial sta ilizatio
• I e ualit   %‐ %

Policies
• Ca o  li it & t adi g
• Ma aged glo alizatio  a d 
egio al i teg atio
• P o‐poo  g o th
• Ma op ude tial
• Fi a ial i lusio

Theories/Models
Multiple e uili ia
“e o d‐ est fi a ial de egulatio
E doge eit u se & i stitutio  
Co t ol a d  a do ized 
e pe i e ts & age t‐ ased
• Mi o‐ a o si ulatio   odels
• Beha io al studies &  eu o‐
e o o i s

Data/Measurements






• Feed a k & spillo e s i   a o‐
elfa e li kages  e.g., g o th‐
i e ualit ‐po e t   e us
• “ha i g e o o i s  suppl ‐fi st, 
de sit ‐ o
u it ‐t ust d i e  

• Pa el data
• Ma o & Fi s’  ala e sheet
• Mo e detailed  apital flo s data 
&  easu es
• Fi a ial “AM  ith  o e  i o‐
le el household/i di idual data 
a d i teg ated FOF
• Beha io ‐fo used & pe eptio  
su e s
I a  Azis

2000s

Policies

Objectives/Targets



?

Theories/Models

Data/Measurements

?

?
21st Century

Global‐Regional‐
National‐Sub‐National

/ /

A. Sources of Flaws (examples)

• Growing interactions & complexity:
un related links
• Amplification, agents’ behavior:
pro‐cyclicality
• )nstitution

Evolving

B. Concepts/Theories/Models

• Methodology
• Evolution of theories/models

Humility

Fi a ial Se to
Bala e Sheet

Real Se to  & T ade/
P odu ti ity & E i o e t

?

Fis al
I o e I e uality/
Po e ty

Capital Flo s
Mo eta y

/ /

P e‐GFC

Post‐GFC

* Connectedness: the density of the lines represents all the connections;
thicker lines represent more significant connections among entities
* Post GFC: banks red lines and sovereigns black lines are more
noticeable and have greater reach across the globe R. Merton et.al,

Connectedness for One Country Alone

I a  Azis

/ /

Bala ce 
Sheet



“ou e: Azis & “hi  
Elevated Risks, “p i ge

, Managing 

Volatility Spillo e  a d Pe siste
Leh

Ma age e t
Accou ti g

a   ollapse

E pa d  i a iate FO BEKK  odel:

e

EU so e eig  de t 

isis

/ /

/ /

Things to Consider

• Limit of unfettered market, mechanical behavior &
probabilistic.
• Myth of perfect self‐regulating equilibrium &
agents’ behavior K. Arrow: wrong assumption that
agents protect themselves
• Cognitive and emotional factors: psychology &
biology brain evidence  far from deductive R.
Solow: “If you don't know what you're doing, for
heaven's sake do it gently”
• Breadth of socio‐political & historical perspective
• Economics’ inability to tame science , e.g., creative
destruction & to make predictions of real major
events, e.g., crisis, new markets, sharing economy
 Kuhn & Popper’s unpredictability of scientific
discovery and innovation?

Humility!

“Science”
Approach

Alternative
Approach

Subjective
Perception & Judgment
about the case/situation
I a  J Azis

Decision making

Science

Measurement:
Theory & Models
Objective

/ /

On University
• Too  u h dis ussio s o   a ki g & a editatio . Yet, the  
a e  ot a  elia le  a dsti k of p og ess i  edu atio  a d p o e 
to ga i g. Top u i e sities esta lished & se ed so ial  eeds 
efo e  a hi g out to  est of the  ou t  a d the  o ld. 
• The  e  idea of the u i e sit  is a  i defi a le agg egatio  
of ideas a d i fo atio , of hu a it  a d  easo , of 
i agi atio  a d a al sis: a  eposito  of k o ledge, a ho e 
fo  i stitutio alized i uisiti e ess; a  a etake  of the 
a etake s of the futu e
• I   a   ou t ies, i ludi g de eloped  ou t ies, toda ’s 
highe  edu atio  is ad ift a d u e tai  a out its  a ,  ith 
i o ies a d  o t adi tio s:  “lo / et og essed affo da ilit , 
a essi ilit  a d  ualit ;  Questio a le  o t i utio  to 
s ie tifi  p og ess a d so iet ;  U happ   o stitue ies

Unhappy Constituents?
• Pa e ts & stude ts: st esses & te sio s of gai i g ad issio  
a ade ia st i ed to agg a ate, allo  p epa ato  i stitutio s‐
o sulta ts to g o   ith p i e; high  osts & tuitio
• Stude ts: get u e gaged o  o e u de ed tea he s, as the 
latte  tu  i to  o t a to s   ho de ote the ti e to thei  
o   esea h. Not k o i g tea he  e ough to ask
• Tea he : u de paid, la k of  e efits  health  a e ,  a  
ultiple jo s, a d  o dis etio a  i o e fo   esea h a d 
o fe e es  Ha  u i e sit ’s t o  ost  alua le assets!
• U i e sity: a e pushed to i ease size of appli a t pools, less 
i depe de e. Wealthie  s hools ha e the lu u  to 
e pe i e t  e o d  apa it  a d e ulated   othe s
• So iety: ot  ead  g aduates i   a ket pla es  is at h  a d 
fo  fu the  s ie tifi  ad a e e t 

/ /

On Teaching (e.g., Economics)

• Lea  a dis ipli e  o e tl  the fi st ti e tha  ha e to u lea  it 
a d  o e t it su se ue tl . It is e t e el  diffi ult to u lea  
so ethi g o e o e is so ialized i to a epti g the  ai  te ets 
of the dis ipli e  ithout lea i g the  ualifi atio s.
• Topi s like fi a ial i sta ilit , p ospe t theo , satisfi i g, 
elati e i o e, o  as
et i  i fo atio  a e  ot so 
o pli ated a d  a   e e plai ed easil  at the 
 le el. 
Negle ti g the  disto ts e o o i  theo  that stude ts thi k 
f ee  a kets  a   o k pe fe tl   ell  ithout go e
e tal 
o e sight a d  egulatio , pe fe tl   o petiti e  odel  ith 
pe fe t i fo atio   ithout u e tai t
• P o le : E o  
 is  o ei ed as to p epa e stude ts fo  
i te ediate theo   ou ses. Yet,  ajo it  do ’t take othe  
e o o i s  ou ses so  e e  e posed to  o e  ua ed  e sio  
of the dis ipli e a d a e the efo e i do t i ated fo  the  est of 
thei  li es  fo i g toda ’s i telle tual  li ate

On Research

• U i e sities to fu d  esea h i te all  is  a e. Added/sha ed 
ost paid f o  o  sou es & othe s  tuitio  fills the gap?
• Co
oditizatio   diffe e t f o   o
e ializatio  of highe  
edu atio ,  o lo ge   o atio . A hie e e t is  ased o  
isi ilit  a d e te al statu e, a d a ade ia’s see i g 
elu ta e, i eptitude a d  ultu e of  o te t e t satisfied  
ith o   o ditio  u i dful of othe s . Yet, the ke  is d i e 
to e el fo  itself a d to o e o e othe s’
• Use of u i uitous,  e ulous,  u h a used te   e elle e  
edu es pote tial fo  o igi alit  a d self‐a a e ess
• Highe  edu atio   eeds to  ala e:   esea h a d tea hi g, 
s ie tifi  p og ess a d  a ket  eeds; 
ua tit ‐ ualit ‐
e uit   o ‐li e‐li e  ou ses . Most of all, keep links to society

/ /

Humility…..
Courage…..
….Empathy