Distribusi Morfologi Vertikal Skeletal Wajah Pasien Suku Batak di Klinik RSGMP FKG USU Berdasarkan Analisis Steiner

36

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Riedel RA. Esthetics and its relation to orthodontics therapy. Angle Orthod
1970; 20: 168-9.
2. Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4thed. Missouri: Mosby, 2007: 3-21,
208-9.
3. Singh G. Textbook of Orthodontics. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee, 2007: 3-6,
30-6, 94-116.
4. Susilowati. Hubungan antara derajat konveksitas profil jaringan keras dan
jaringan lunak wajah pada suku Bugis dan Makassar. Dentofasial 2009; 8
(2): 125-30.
5. Gago ABM, dkk. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish
population. European Journal of Orthodontics 2012; 335-9.
6. Bhalajhi SI. Orthodontics: the art and science. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Arya
Publishing House, 2003: 1-6.
7. Heryumani JCP. Proporsi sagital wajah laki-laki dan perempuan dewasa
etnik Jawa. M.I. Kedokteran Gigi 2007; 22 (1): 22-7.
8. Fardani S, dkk. Hubungan antara rotasi mandibula dengan perubahan tinggi
muka anterior dan posterior. J Ked Gi 2012; 3 (1): 50-6.

9. Coubourne MT, Dibiase AT. Handbook of Orthodontics. Missouri: Mosby,
2010: 150-79.
10. Jacobson A. Radiographic Cephalometry: From Basics to Videoimaging.
London: Quintessence Publishing Co, 1995: 77-85, 131-2.
11. Grippaudo et al. Relationship between vertical facial patterns and dental arch
form in class II malocclusion. J Progress in Orthodontics 2013; 14: 43.
12. Tsunori M, Mashita M, Kasai K. Relationship between facial types and tooth
and bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning. Angle
Orthod 1998; 68 (6): 557-62.
13. Jefferson Y. Facial beauty-establishing a universal standard. IJO. 2004; 15
(1) : 9-22.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

37

14. Suminy D, Zen Y. Hubungan antara maloklusi dengan hambatan saluran
pernafasan. M.I. Kedokteran Gigi 2007; 22(1): 32-40.
15. Grewal H, dkk. Cephalometric comparison of horizontal and vertical skeletal
parameters in North and South Indian population groups. Journal of Pierre

Fauchard Academy 2013; 27 : 14-7.
16. Thomas M, dkk. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms for the lambada population
in telangana region of andra pradesh. Indian Journal of Dental Research
2012:1-6.
17. Hashim HA, Albarakati SF. Cephalometric soft tissue profile analysis
between two different ethnic groups: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent
Pract 2003; 4(2):60-73.
18. Agrawal D. Cephalometric analysis for diagnosis and treatment of
orthodontic patients. Orthodontic Cyberjournal 2012.
19. Gulati A, Jain S. Comparison of dentoskeletalcephalometric values of Malwa
population.Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy 2013; 27 : 95-101.
20. Athanasiou AE. Orthodontic Cephalometry. New York: Mosby-Wolfe, 1995:
9-11.
21. Hassan AH. Cephalometric norms for the Saudi children living in the western
region of Saudi Arabia: a research report. Journal Head and Face Medicine
2005.
22. Kusuma ARP. Bernafas lewat mulut sebagai faktor ekstrinsik etiologi
maloklusi. Majalah Ilmiah Sultan Agung 2010; 48 (123): 1-19.
23. Enlow D, Hans MG. Essentials of facial growth. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders
Company, 1996: 20, 27, 58-67, 79-89.

24. Schudy FF. Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to
function and treatment. Angle Ortho 1964; 34 (2): 75-93.
25. Jefferson Y. Skeletal types:key to unraveling the mystery of facial beauty and
its biologic significance. IJO 1996; 7 (2) : 7-23.
26. Girardot RA. Comparison of condylar position in hyperdivergent and
hypodivergent facial skeletal types. Angle Ortho 2001; 71 (4): 240-6.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

38

27. Fachrudin U. Golden proportion tinggi wajah anterior bawah suku batak dari
berbagai pola pertumbuhan wajah skeletal klas I di RSGMP FKG USU 2012.
Tesis. Medan: USU, 2012: 15-6.
28. Daulay AS. Adat Budaya Batak Dalihan Natolu Analisa dari Sudut Prinsip
serta Urgensinya dalam Merajut

Integrasi

dari

Identitas Bangsa.

http://leoriset.blogspot.co.id/2008/06/adat-budaya-batak-dalihan-na-tolu.html
(22 September 2015)
29. Abassy MA, dkk. Comparative cephalometric study of class I malocclusion in
Egyptian and Japanese adult females. Orthodontic Waves 2012; 71: 59-65.
30. Aldress AM. Lateral cephalometric norms for Saudi adults: A meta analysis.
The Saudi Dental Journal 2011; 23:3-7.
31. Baruah N, Bora M. Cephalometric evaluation based on steiner’s analysis on
young adults of assam. 2012; 17-22.
32. Bjork, A. Prediction of Mandibular Growth. Am. J. Orthodontics 1969; 55(6):
585-599.
33. Awwad AA. Cephalometrci norms of the of the population of the state of
Kuwait. Disertasi. 2006.
34. Silaudkas A. Assesment of skeletal and dental pattern of class II division 1
malocclusion with relevance to clinical practice. Baltic Dental and
Maxillofacial Journal 2006; 8:3-8.
35. Karslen AT. Craniofacial growth differences between low and high MP-SN
angle males: a longitudinal study. Angle Ortho 1997; 67(2): 103-110.

36. Roy, AS et.al. Jaw Morphology and Vertical Facial Types: A Cephalometric
Appraisal. JOFR 2012;2(3): 131-138.

Universitas Sumatera Utara