58
holding area to the areaof the division. Furthermore, Tangerang regency government will provide a revolving fund to the city of the division in
dependently. South Tangerang City was formed after the House of Representatives and the government agreed in a plenary session of the
Parliament. South Tangerang agreed with the approval ofthe establishment of 11 new autonomous regions other. The formation of the new kora
welcomed residents who live in the southern part of Tangerang. South Tangerang residents fight for the establishment of a new city since 2000.
Various ways they run their government to grant the wishes of separating themselves from Tangerang Regency. Based on Law Number 51 Year
2008, South Tangerang City consists of 7seven districts:
Table 4.1 DistrictintheprovinceofSouthTangerang
No District
Wide Area 1
Ciputat 1.838 Ha
2 CiputatTimur
1.543 Ha 3
Pamulang 2.682 Ha
4 PondokAren
2.988 Ha 5
Serpong 2.404 Ha
6 Serpong Utara
1.784 Ha 7
Setu 1.480 Ha
Source: Data are processed
59
B. Characteristics of Respondents
1. Return Questionnaire Number of questionnaires distributed to tax payers in South Tangerang
50 fifty questionnaire. Here is a sample and return the questionnaire are presented in the following table:
Table4.2 Samples
and Return’s Rate
Information Total
Percentase Questionnaire Distributed
Questionaire are not Returned Questionaire cannot be Processed
Questionaire can be Processed 50
50 100
100 Source: Data are processed
Total of 50 questionnaires were responded toquestionnaires that100 of the total questionnaires distributed.
2. Description Statistics Demographics of Respondents Here are Descriptive Statistics that describe the data in this research
are presented in the table on the next page:
60
Table 4.3 Descriptive Statistics
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum
Maximum Mean
Std. Deviation KWP
50 27
43 35.42
4.131 PP
50 33
73 50.68
8.287 KP
50 32
56 46.28
6.302 KPP
50 21
56 42.32
8.608 Valid N listwise
50
Source: Data are processed Based on the data described above table that the number of
respondents N is 50, out of the 50 respondents had a minimum value of variable taxpayers consciousness of 27 and a maximum of 43and an
average value of 35.42 with a standard deviation of 4.131. Service variable has a minimum value of 33 and a maximum of 73 and an average value of
50.68 with a standard deviation of 8.287. Variable adherence possess minimum value of 30 and a maximum of 51 and an average value of 42.34
with a standard deviation of 5.699. While the tax revenue performance variable has a minimum value of 21 and a maximum of 56 and an average
value of 42.32 with a standard deviation of 8.608. Next is the characteristics of respondents by education and gender are
presented in the table on the next page:
61
Table 4.4 Description of Respondents Demographic Statistics
By Education and Sex
From the results of statistical test son the 4.4 table provides information regarding the demographics of the respondents based on
statistical descriptions education and gender, which also described the frequency of the number and percentage of respondents. From the table, it
can be seen that the respondentis male dominated with 27 people 54 than female respondents with 24 people 46. Latest education of the
majority of the respondentsare numbered S1 that 19 people 38. While recent education minority of the respondents were first responders S2 male
sex.
Information Male
Female Total
Education Total
Total Total
SMU equal 2
4 3
6 5
10 D3
7 14
6 12
13 26
S1 10
20 9
18 19
38 S2
7 14
5 10
12 24
S3 1
2 1
2 Total
27 54
23 46
50 100
62
C. Discovery and Discussion 1. Data Quality Test
a. Validity test
Validity test is a test used to measure valid or not valid statements in the questionnaires. A statement is considered valid if the statement
is able to demonstrate the extent to which the gauges can be measured. Testing the validity used the Pearson Correlation by calculating
the correlation between the score of each question and a total score. Criteria used to see data is valid or invalid as follows:
1. The item stated to be valid, if the probability value of Sig 0.05. 2. The item stated to be invalid, if the probability value of Sig
0.05.
The following table shows the results of testing the validity of the four variables used in this research, taxpayers consciousness, tax
services, taxpayers compliance and tax revenue performance.
From the testing that has been done, the results will be presented in
detail in the table below for each of the variables in this study.
63
Table 4.5 Taxpayers Consciousness
Question Number
Pearson Correlation Sig2-Tailed
Remark 1X
1
.1 0.556
0.000 Valid
2X
1
.2 0.371
0.008 Valid
3X
1
.3 0.478
0.000 Valid
4X
1
.4 0.738
0.000 Valid
5X
1
.5 0.650
0.000 Valid
6X
1.
6 0.873
0.001 Valid
7X
1
.7 0.622
0.000 Valid
8X
1
.8 0.809
0.000 Valid
9X
1
.9 0.774
0.000 Valid
Source: Data are processed Table 4.5 shows the variable taxpayers consciousness have valid
criteria for all items of question with a significance value less than 0.05.
Tabel 4.6 Tax Services
Question Number
Pearson Correlation Sig2-Tailed
Remark 1X
1
.1 0.476
0.000 Valid
2X
1
.2 0.713
0.000 Valid
3X
1
.3 0.578
0.000 Valid
4X
1
.4 0.739
0.000 Valid
5X
1
.5 0.783
0.000 Valid
6X
1.
6 0.661
0.000 Valid
7X
1
.7 0.770
0.000 Valid
8X
1
.8 0.694
0.000 Valid
