Data Analysis Technique METHODOLOGY
36
100 x
n
where
x
: The number of students based on the degree of agreement
n
: The number of all students
To ascertain the validity of the data acquired from both questionnaire and interview, the researcher conducted data triangulation. According to Patton 2002:
247, data triangulation was “the use of variety of data sources in a study”. He added that data triangulation was intended to produce the consistency of findings.
Denzin 1978 as cited in Moleong 1989: 195 claimed that there were four kinds of triangulation techniques, namely the use of source, method, investigating
officer, and theory. In this research, the data triangulation used source since “the researcher cross-checked the data acquired from the questionnaire with the results
of the interview” Patton, 2002: 195. Basically, the data triangulation was also intended to answer the first research question, which is to explore the students’
perceptions on the implementation of weekly tests. Secondly, dealing with the role of students’ perceptions on their
achievements in weekly tests was discussed separately. The researcher analyzed the data using Pearson Product Moment Coefficient of Correlation r. The
formula is presented as follows: PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
37
2 2
2 2
n Y
Y r
n X X
n Y Y
where r
= coefficient correlation
= sum of scores in X-distribution
Y
= sum of scores in Y-distribution
Y
= sum of the products of paired X- and Y- scores
2
X
= sum of the squared scores in X-distribution
2
Y
= sum of the squared scores in Y-distribution n
= number of paired X- and Y- scores subjects
The result of the computation was meant to reveal whether there was any correlation between students’ perceptions and their vocabulary mastery. Besides,
that result would also answer the second research question, which is to what extent the students’ perceptions contribute to their vocabulary mastery.