A. Data Collecting In this research uses descriptive analysis technique. Then, there are the
steps of Data Collecting as follows: a. The titled as a source data is read thoroughly.
b. The data which contains conversational implicature are given a mark. c. Identifying every conversation from the characters in the movie which
contains conversational implicature. d. The research uses conversational implicature by H.P Grice to analyze
this study. e. Last steps, concludes the result.
B. Data Analysis In the phase of data analysis, data in this research which implicatures are
resulted by the characters in the Jurassic World movie. This research will be analyzed by using a pragmatics theory. The theory that uses in this research is
conversational implicature by H.P Grice. The theory will be analyzed through three steps: first, the data will be classified into what are the maxims that non-
observance by the characters, and after that, the research will explain how the non-observance maxims occurs in the movie, then what is the meaning of
each implicature in the movie. 3. The Instrument of The Research
Instrument of this research is a conversational implicature from Jurassic World Movie which is used to looking for the data. The selected data in this
movie are the data which have violation on maxim because these things are need to analyze one by one.
4. Analysis Unit As the unit of analysis, the research uses movie titled of Jurassic World from
the director Collin Trevorrow, production by Universal Studios and it released in 2015.
CHAPTER II THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK
A. Previous Research
For consideration in this study, there are a few listed of some previous studies by several researchers that discussed about the same subject. First is, the thesis
was conducted by Asrorul Nur Muvida in 2015 with the titled” The Conversational Implicature that used by the three main characters in Hotel
Transylvania movie ”. This study is focus on analyze how are the main character
utterances in the conversation by using a theory of H.P Grice. Besides that, this research related to implicature that can be considered. The writer of this research
analyzed one of the four cooperative principles in pragmatics which is a maxim of manner that used by three main characters in that movie and also explain
about the context of each utterance that have been spoke. The writer of the research used so many data to count which data that can conclude to the
generalized or particularized conversational implicature. Based on the conclusion of this research, the writer found 234 utterances are included as
Generalized conversational implicature and found about 44 utterances are included as Particularized conversational implicature.
The second study was conducted by Wakhana Putri in 2011 with the titled “ An analysis of implicature as found in a transcript of interview between Barack
Obama and Hisyam Melhem from Al- Arabiya TV ”. This research focuses on the
implicature as found in the transcript of interview between Obama and Hisyam
8
Melhem. In this research, applies Grice’s theory about the cooperative principle and Hymes’ theory about context. In analyzing the writer uses pragmatic by
which the data are analyzed by determining the unit of certain language used by the speaker as a certain purpose out of the text. In the other word, the writer
analyzes the data by using the context of the language used by the speaker. Moreover, in this case, the pragmatic tool is focused on the speaker, Barack
Obama. Thus, to get the validity and reliability of the result, the writer tries to view the object from the context in order to get the conclusion.
However, this research is different with two previous researches above. This study will describe further about conversational implicature that occurs in the
dialogue between the characters in the movie. This research is going to analyze what are the maxims of Cooperative Principle that non- observed by the
characters in the movie. In addition this research also will analyze about how the non-observance maxim occurs in the movie, then what is the meaning of each
implicature that occurs in the movie.
B. Pragmatics
The subject of pragmatics is very familiar in linguistics today. Many linguists argue that we cannot really understand the nature of language itself
unless we understand pragmatics: how language is used in communication. There are many definitions about the notion of pragmatics defined by linguists.
Further, Kreidler 18 states that pragmatics is another branch of linguistics that is concerned with meaning. While, Peccei 5 states that pragmatics
concentrates on the aspect of meaning that could not be predicted by linguistic knowledge alone and take into account our knowledge about the physical and
social world. The focus of pragmatics analysis is on the meaning of words or sentence.
Furthermore, Yule 4 in “Pragmatics” said that pragmatics is the study of the relationships between linguistic forms and the users of those forms.
Furthermore, pragmatics is the study of those relations between language and context that are grammaticalized or encoded in the structure of language
Levinson 9. The advantage of studying language via pragmatics is that one can talk about people’s intended meanings, their assumptions, their purposes or
goals and the kinds of actions that they are performing when they speak. Yule 129-133 stated that the coverage of pragmatics includes
presupposition, implicature, entailment, speech act, and deixis. From the definition above, the writer concludes that pragmatics is the study about
meaning conveyed by the speaker or writer and interpreted by listener or reader. From the speaker view, pragmatics is an analysis about meaning of the speaker
utterance rather than the meaning of a word or phrase that is used them. From the contextual point of view, pragmatics is the interpretation about the meaning
of a person in a particular context and the influence of context to his or her statement.
In addition, This implies that Pragmatics is the study of speaker meaning since it deals more with what the speaker means by uttering than what the words
