Ethnicity and Religion Gender Age Correlation Between Socioeconomic Variables
26 VCR
.764
.215 Gas Stove
.223
.688
Antenna
.743
-.023 Second House
.188
.639
Cement Floor .677
.411 Latrine
-.079 -.611
Sand Floor
-.617
-.225 Wood Stove
-.102
-.572
Generator .521
.395 Vehicle
-.202 .494
Cement Walls
.467
.350 Carton Walls
-.328
-.442
No Sewage
-.371
-.162 bold denotes high factor loading
As indicated by table 6.3, the items that have the highest positive loading on the first component are TVs, VCRs, satellite antennas, cement floors, generators, and
cement walls. Items with high negative loading on the first factor include sand floors, and the lack of sewage facilities. Thus, factor one subsequently called “wealth factor
one” is comprised of accessories and floor structure.
Items with high positive loading on the second factor include septic systems, gas stoves, possession of a second house, and a vehicle. Items with high negative
loading on the second factor include latrines, wood stoves, and carton walls. The second factor subsequently called “wealth factor two” is comprised of household
structure, amenities, and luxury items.
The items on wealth factor one suggests that households with high loading on this factor are more settled in Mahahual. Items such as TVs, generators, VCRs, and
satellite antennas could be stolen if a watchful eye were not kept on the items. Wealth factor two indicates a different type of wealth than wealth factor one. Due to the high
positive loading of both a second house and vehicle, the second wealth factor represents a high degree of mobility. One would expect that a members of households
with a high wealth factor two loading come to the coast to engage in productive activities and have families in another location. However, since structural and
accessory items are present on both factors, distinctions between these two items are not clear cut. Thus, these wealth factors should be viewed in tandem rather than as
independent wealth indicators.
A score on the component scale is calculated for each household based on the presence or absence of items in their household. Pollnac 1997 states “the factor or
component scores are the sum of the component coefficient times the sample standardized value.” Thus, each item has a contribution to the factor score based on
its loading in table 6.3. Items with high positive loading have a stronger contribution than those with low or negative values. Factor one scores in the community range
from –1.049 to 3.053. Factor two scores range from -1.848 to 1.638. Scores are standardized, and have a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one.