RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 1 Main and Interaction Effects
1. INTRODUCTION
In order to improve the properties of existing composites, new research had led to the development of fiber metal laminate FML. FML is a sandwich structure consisting of layers of fiber reinforced composite material and metal sheets. Farsani et al. [1] conducted a charpy impact experiment on basalt fiber reinforced epoxy composite BFRE and FML made of BFRE composite with aluminum and steel layers. ASTM D6110 standard was used for flatwise and edgewise specimens to investigate the Charpy impact response. It was found that the damage tolerance of FMLs is superior compared to the plain BFRE composite for both flatwise and edgewise impact loads. Steel layered FML has higher energy absorption levels compared to aluminum layers. Low velocity impact tests were undertaken by Carrillo and Cantwell [2] to highlight the impact energy absorption characteristics of thermoplastic matrix FML based on a self-reinforced polypropylene composite and a 2024-0 aluminum layer. They found that impacted plates exhibit a high level of energy absorption, with damages in the form of thinning in the aluminum plies and fractures in the composite layers. Gin Bo Chai and Periyasamy [3] stated that the response of FML to low velocity impacts is affected by many parameters, e.g: Type of metal, fiber, matrix, stacking sequence, metal volume fraction, impactor geometry, target shape, post-stretch percentage and others in their review. This huge interdependency results in the difficulty to attain the optimum FML. For laminated test pieces, tests may be performed both flatwise and edgewise, and for each of these, there exists the possibility of having the laminations put parallel or normal to the direction of blow [5]. The aim of this study is to investigate the Charpy impact response on a novel oil palm empty fruit brunch fiber reinforced composite with an Al 6061-O metal layer or in other words, oil palm composite fiber metal laminates OPC FML. To obtain a better understanding of the behavioral impact of OPC FML, the monolithic aluminum was tested under charpy flatwise impact loads at room temperature and the results were compared with OPC FML. It means that the effect of different material properties and structures on behavioral impact is studied. All specimens are studied using microscopic observation in order to examine its’ failure mechanisms. 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 FML fabrication The oil palm fiber reinforced polypropylene composite panel OPC with a thickness of 1.0mm was produced using 30wtgranulated empty fruit bunch palm fiber as reinforcement and 67wtpolypropylene PP as matrix with 3wt Maleic anhydride grafted Polypropylene MaPP as its coupling agent. The composition was heated at 185°C for 8 minutes followed by fast cooling to room temperature in a picture frame mold. The FMLs were manufactured by stacking two 0.5 mm thick aluminum sheets 6061-O for the skin and one 1.0 mm thick oil palm fiber reinforced polypropylene composite as the laminate. The laminate was glued together using modified polypropylene film adhesive at the bi-layer surface of the material. The stack was heated to 155°C under a pressure of 1kgcm² in a motorized hydraulic mold test press machine for 5 minutes before being left to cool slowly to room temperature. The dimensions of the OPC FML panel produced were 200 x 200x2 mm. 2.2 Impact test on FML specimen Generally the charpy test piece is supported by a horizontal beam and is broken by a single swing of a pendulum. In this work, impact specimens with dimensions of 55x10x2mm were cut from the OPC FML panels using a water jet cutting machine. Low velocity impact tests were carried out using a pendulum impact tester Instron CEAST 9050 with a hammer capacity of 50J according to ASTM E-23. Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of flatwise charpy impactParts
» Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» INTRODUCTION Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» METHODOLOGY Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» EXPECTED RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
» CONCLUSIONS Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» ACKNOWLEDGMENT Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] P. K. Panda, “Review: environmental friendly
» RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» CONCLUSIONS The effects of pineapple leaf fiber loading on the
» ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] J.P. Dhal, and S.C. Mishra, “Processing and
» SUMMARY Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] R. Schilling, “Sheet bending and determination of
» REFERENCES [1] S. Choi. and J.A. Eastman, “Enhancing Thermal
» Scanning Electron Microscopy SEM
» Fourier Transform Infrared FTIR
» Thermal Conductivity Testing METHODOLOGY
» REFERENCES [1] Weitz, D. A., Huang, J. S., Lin, M. Y., and Sung,
» Stability Test METHODOLOGY 1 Preparation of Nanofluids
» Thermal Properties Test METHODOLOGY 1 Preparation of Nanofluids
» Heat Transfer Performance Test
» REFERENCES [1] L.S. Sundar and K.V. Sharma, “Thermal conductivity
» Selection and Development of Mathematical Model
» RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 1 Main and Interaction Effects
» REFERENCES [1] Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» METHODOLOGY 1 FML fabrication Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
» ACKNOWLEGEMENT Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] S. Alhallaj, R. Kizilel, A. Lateef, R. Sabbah, M.
» REFERENCES [1] M.A Abdullah, N. Tamaldin, M.A. Mohamad,
» REFERENCES [1] J. I. R. Lalvani, K. Kirubhakaran, M.
» REFERENCES [1] M.A. Abdullah, F.R. Ramli and C.S. Lim,
» REFERENCES [1] T.S. Hsu, J.F Liu, P.N. Yu, W.S. Lee, and J.S.
» REFERENCES [1] D. Martinec and Z. Hurak, “Vehicular platooning
» Welding Process METHODOLOGY 1 Sample Preparation
» Tensile Test METHODOLOGY 1 Sample Preparation
» REFERENCES [1] Nielsan, C.V., Friis, K.S., Zhang, W, and N Bay,
» METHODOLOGY RESULT AND DISCUSSION
» REFERENCES [1] C.A. Yunus, M.A. Boles and Y. He,
» Taguchi L 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
» REFERENCES [1] K.E. Kaharudin, A.H. Hamidon, F. Salehuddin,
» REFERENCES [1] D.K. Kim, J.K. Bae and S.J. Kim, “Comparison of
» MATERIALS AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS
» RESULTS AND DISCUSSION SUMMARY
» REFERENCES [1] Warn, G.P. and Ryan, K.L., “A Review of Seismic
» RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The results were divided into 3 sections:
» REFERENCES [1] M. Olsson, Designing and Optimizing Side View
» RESULTS Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» SUMMARY The information of biomimetic design features was
» REFERENCES Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] Anurag Chaudhry and M. Jagadesh Kumar,
» REFERENCES [1] N. A. Hamid, “Component Design and material
» BACKGROUND Chia et al.[4] showed analysing some cases of the
» METHODOLOGY In this work, the building is divided into many
» REFERENCES [1] R. Saidur and H. Masjuki, “Energy and Associated
» Effect of Load and Temperature to Coefficient of Friction
» m REFERENCES [1] K. Mabuchi, K. Tanaka, D. Uchijima, and R.
» Oxidation Test METHODOLOGY 1 Material
» Functional Group Analysis METHODOLOGY 1 Material
» REFERENCES [1] Achten, W.M.J., L.Verchot, Y.J. Franken, E.
» RESULTS DISCUSSION Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] C. Buzea, I. I. Pacheco, and K. Robbie,
» BACKGROUND Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» Mathematical Models BASIC CONTROL SYSTEM
» Control System Block Diagrams
» METHODS Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] S. R. Majumdar, Pneumatic Systems: Principles
» CONTROL PERFORMANCES Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] Y. Ando, “Development of three-dimensional
» REFERENCES [1] J.D. Carlson and B.F. Spencer, “Magnetro-
» EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» Material Removal Rate RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
» Wear Rate Tool wear ratio can be calculated using the
» TARGET PROFILES Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] T. A. Weishar, “Morphing Aircraft Technology -
» INTRODUCTION Many studies related to the electro-hydraulic servo
» MODELING EHS SYSTEM Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» Problem Statement 1.2 Problem Statement
» LITERATURE REVIEW 1. Jigs Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» METHODOLOGY 1. BTG Jig Design
» Cost Analysis Table 1 shows the scrap value per unit from week
» Analysis result of tensile young’s modulus
» REFERENCES [1] M.A.M. Ali, S. Nobukawa, and M. Yamaguchi,
» Stationary Mould Design STATIONARY MOVEABLE MOULD DESIGN
» Moveable Mould Design STATIONARY MOVEABLE MOULD DESIGN
» REFERENCES [1] A. Ahmadzai, A.H. Behravesh, M.T. Sarabi, and
» Process Flow METHODOLOGY 1 Design
» Cycle Time METHODOLOGY 1 Design
» METHODOLOGY The concept design started with the concept generation
» REFERENCES [1] C.Baechler, M.DeVuono, J.M.Pearce, “Distributed
» METHODOLOGY SUMMARY Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] Boryung Technology, “Operating Instructions,”
» REFERENCES [1] S. Herle, S. Man, G. Lazea, and P. Raica,
» REFERENCES [1] L. W. Teck, et al., Flexible approach for Region
» DYNAMIC MODEL STRUCTURE Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» SIMULATION Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] M. A. Majid, W. S. W. Ibrahim, S. Mohamad, and
» Effect of Road Surface Condition and Tire Size
» REFERENCES [1] D. Wenhua, Z. Dawei, Z. Xingyu, “Dynamic
» Material Preparation and Experimental Setup
» REFERENCES [1] F. Asdrubali, “Survey on the acoustical properties
» One Floor Portal Frame Model
» REFERENCES [1] P. Fiala, G. Degrande, and F. Augusztinovicz,
» Experimental set up METHODOLOGY 1 Preparation of Material
» Validation of Results RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
» Mobility of Plates with All Edges Having Same Boundary Conditions
» Mobility of Plates with Identical Opposite Edges
» REFERENCES [1] A. W. Leissa, “Vibration of plates,” NASA SP-160,
» FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» EXPERIMENTAL SETUP Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] L.M. Lyamshev, “A method for solving the
» ACOUSTICS IN MOSQUE Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» SIMULATION MODEL 1 CATT Geometry Model
» REVERBERATION TIME RESULTS Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] A. A. Abdou, “Comparison of the acoustical
» INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] A. Putra, F.A. Munir and C.D. Juis, “On a simple
» Input Power in Infinite Beam Structure
» Averaging Over Frequency Bands
» REFERENCES [1] B.A.T Petersson, and B.M. Gibbs, “Towards a
» Harmonic Balance Method METHODOLOGY
» Multiple Scale Method METHODOLOGY
» REFERENCES [1] C.B. Williams, and S.P. Beeby, “Analysis of a
» CORROSION INSPECTION MONITORING Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» VISUAL CORROSION CLASSIFICATION Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» CORROSION FEATURES Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] Pure Technologies, Case Study: City of Calgary -
» REFERENCES [1] H. Kavi, A.K Toksoy, M. Guden, “Predicting
» Temperature Profile RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 1 Visual Observation
» NO RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 1 Visual Observation
» REFERENCES [1] M.A. Galbiati, A. Cavigiolo, A. Effuggi, D.
» REFERENCES [1] Eco-Business.2010.” Turning waste into income
» Comparison Commercial and Experimental
» Experimental Setup Figure 1 illustrates the setup of the experiment for
» REFERENCES [1] NGV Global, “NGV Global 2011 Statistic Show
» REFERENCES [1] G. Corro, N. Tellez, E. Ayala, and A. Marinez-
» Pedal Sensor through Variable Resistor
» Relay Triggered Circuit HARDWARE DESIGN METHODOLOGY
» MOSFET Drive Circuit Power MOSFET IRL2703 is a fast switching speed
» Power Efficiency and Dissipated Energy Calculation
» REFERENCES [1] B.G. Pollet, I. Staffel, J.L. Shang, “Current status
» RESULTS DAN DISCUSSION Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] S. Roundy and P. K. Wright, “A piezoelectric
» REFERENCES [1] A. Pravin, T. Ashok. Pise and S. Chougule.
» Experimental Set-Up METHODOLOGY 1 Device Configuration
» RESULTS AND DISCUSSION From the Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, all graphs
» REFERENCES [1] S. Kalpakjian S. R. Schimid “Manufacturing
» Powder-Pack Boronizing Procedure The boronizing treatments will be carried out in a
» Hardness values The initial hardness values for boronized and
» Kinetics of Atoms at Surface Using Arrhenius Equation
» REFERENCES [1] O. Ozdemir, M.A. Omar, M. Usta, S. Zeytin, C.
» Machining Condition METHODOLOGY 1 Workpiece
» Effect of Feed Rate and Cutting Speed on Surface Roughness
» Optimum parameter for surface roughness
» ACKNOWLEDMENT Thanks to Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
» REFERENCES [1] Mekid and Ryu. “Rapid Vision-based Dimensional
» Color histogram BACKGROUND 1 Body discomfort
» RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Proceeding Of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2015 (MERD’15).
» REFERENCES [1] Nick Ng, “What Is Dynamic Posture?,” 2013.
» METHODOLOGY The stages in this research are as follows:
» REFERENCES [1] N.P. Mahalik, A.N. Nambiar, “Trends in food
Show more