Experimental Class Table 3.1 Controlled Class Table 3.4

II. Research Findings A. Data Description

According to the research methodology of this study, the writer collected the data by using pretest and postest. The test is given to 48 students which consist of 24 students of experimental class and 24 students of controlled class. To know the results of the test, the writer makes the table of students’ score as follows:

1. Experimental Class Table 3.1

The test score of the experimental class students Pre Test Post Test Gained Students Score Score Score 1 45 70 25 2 55 75 20 3 50 70 20 4 55 75 20 5 40 55 15 6 60 80 20 7 45 70 25 8 55 80 25 9 55 75 20 10 45 65 20 11 50 70 20 12 55 75 20 13 60 75 15 14 40 60 20 15 55 80 25 16 60 80 20 17 45 65 20 18 55 75 20 19 60 85 25 20 50 70 20 21 65 85 20 22 65 75 10 23 55 70 15 24 65 90 25 From the description above, the writer get the students’ pretest score of experimental class with minimum score is 40 and maximum score 65, mean is 53,43, median is 53 and mode is 53,03. As described it below: Table 3.2 The table of frequency distribution of pre-test No Interva l f x fx x2 fx2 Limit 1 40-43 2 41,5 83 1722,2 5 3444,5 39,5-43,5 2 44-47 4 45,5 182 2070,2 5 8281 43,5-47,5 3 48-51 3 49,5 148,5 2450,2 5 7350,7 5 47,5-51,5 4 52-55 8 53,5 428 2862,2 5 22898 51,5-55,5 5 56-59 57,5 3306,2 5 55,5-59,5 6 60-63 4 61,5 246 3782,2 5 15129 59,5-63,5 7 64-66 3 65 195 4225 12675 63,5-66,5 24 1282, 5 20418, 5 After they are taught by using jigsaw technique, the writer get the students’ postest score of experimental class with minimum score is 55 and maximum score 90, mean is 74, median is 74.21, and mode is 74. As described it follows: Table 3.3 The table of frequency distribution of post-test No Interval f x fx x2 fx2 Limit 1 55-60 2 57,5 115 3306,2 5 6612,5 54,5- 60,5 2 61-66 2 63,5 127 4032,2 5 8064,5 60,5- 66,5 3 67-72 6 69,5 417 4830,2 5 28981,5 66,5- 72,5 4 73-78 7 75,5 528,5 5700,2 5 39901,75 72,5- 78,5 5 79-84 4 81,5 326 6642,2 5 26569 78,5- 84,5 6 85-90 3 87,5 262,5 7656,2 5 22968,75 84,5- 90,5 24 1776 32167, 5 133098

2. Controlled Class Table 3.4

The test score of the controlled class students Pre Test Post Test Gained Students Score Score Score 1 45 55 10 2 40 55 15 3 50 60 10 4 45 55 10 5 55 60 5 6 35 50 15 7 45 60 15 8 55 60 5 9 50 60 10 10 30 50 20 11 50 65 15 12 50 70 20 13 40 55 15 14 55 65 10 15 50 65 15 16 45 55 10 17 60 75 15 18 45 60 15 19 55 65 10 20 45 60 15 21 65 70 5 22 50 55 5 23 60 70 10 24 50 60 10 From the description above, the writer get the students’ pretest score of controlled class with minimum score is 30 and maximum score 65, mean is 49, median is 49.2, mode is 49. As described it below: Table 3.5 The table of frequency distribution of pre-test controlled class No Interval f x fx x2 fx2 Limit 1 30-35 2 32,5 65 1056,25 2112,5 29,5-35,5 2 36-41 2 38,5 77 1482,25 2964,5 35,5-41,5 3 42-47 6 44,5 267 1980,25 11881,5 41,5-47,5 4 48-53 7 50,5 353,5 2550,25 17851,75 47,5-53,5 5 54-59 4 56,5 226 3192,25 12769 53,5-59,5 6 60-65 3 62,5 187,5 3906,25 11718,75 59,5-65,5 24 1176 14167,5 59298 After they are taught by using conventional method, the writer get the students’ postest score of controlled class with minimum score is 50 and maximum score 75, mean is 60.66, median is 59.5, and mode is 58.8. As described it follows: Table 3.6 The table of frequency distribution of post-test controlled class No Interval f x fx x2 fx2 Limit 1 50-53 2 51,5 103 2652,25 5304,5 49,5-53,5 2 54-57 6 55,5 333 3080,25 18481,5 53,5-57,5 3 58-61 8 59,5 476 3540,25 28322 57,5-61,5 4 62-65 4 63,5 254 4032,25 16129 61,5-65,5 5 66-69 0 67,5 4556,25 65,5-69,5 6 70-73 3 71,5 214,5 5112,25 15336,75 69,5-73,5 7 74-77 1 75,5 75,5 5700,25 5700,25 73,5-77,5 24 1456 28673,75 89274

B. Data Analysis

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effectiveness of group work in teaching reading: a quasi experimental study at the second grade of Mts Neger Parung

0 25 102

Comparing The Effectiveness Of Using Jigsaw Technique And Students Team Achievement Divisions Technique In Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Research At Second Grade Students Of Mts Salafiyah Depok)

2 44 148

The effectiveness of jigsaw technique in learning reading of exposition text: a quasi-experimental study at the second year students of SMAN 34 Jakarta.

0 7 99

The effectiveness of using mind mapping technique on students’ reading of narrative text: a quasi-experimental study at the second grade of MAN 19 Jakarta

0 4 181

The Effectiveness of Using Jigsaw Technique to Develop Students’ Reading Comprehension on Narrative Text; A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 63 Jakarta Selatan

0 6 139

The Effectiveness Of Using Reading, Encoding, Annotating And Pondering (Reap) Technique Towards Students’ Reading Skill Of Descriptive Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At The Seventh Grade Of Mts Salafiyah)

5 18 138

The effectiveness of using jigsaw technique in teaching narrative text (an experimental study of the second grade students of MTs Pembangunan Nurul Islam – Tangerang Selatan)

0 8 0

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SQ3R TECHNIQUE FOR TEACHING READING (An Experimental Study at the Second Grade of SMP N 1Purwojati in Academic Year 2012/2013) - repository perpustakaan

0 0 16

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JIGSAW TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING READING RECOUNT TEXT (AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AT THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 1 KALIMANAH IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014) - repository perpustakaan

0 0 11

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JIGSAW TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING READING RECOUNT TEXT (AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AT THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 1 KALIMANAH IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014) - repository perpustakaan

0 0 15