The Result of Correlation between Students’ Reading and Writing

CHAPTER IV RESULT OF STUDY

4.1 The Result of Correlation between Students’ Reading and Writing

After getting the students’ scores of reading comprehension on recount text and the score of writing of the same text, the writer statistically analyzed the data to find out the correlation between those two variables. In this research, she measured the correlation between the students’ achievement on reading recount text and their writing of the same text of the eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 24 Semarang, in the academic year of 20082009. To correlate those two variables, she applied the Pearson Product Moment Formula by using the following steps: Step 1 : Find out scores of reading and writing and enter in column X and Y Step 2 : square the score and enter in column X 2 and Y 2 Step 3 : multiply the score of reading and writing and enter in column XY Step 4 : sum up each column Step 5 : apply the Pearson Product Moment Formula to find out the correlation between students’ reading and writing. After she finished the correlation analysis calculation, she found out that the correlation coefficient of the two variables was 0.519. Then to know whether this correlation was significant or not, it is necessary to find out its significance. The rejection or acceptance of the Null hypothesis Ho is based on the level of significance. In Psychological or educational research, the 5 alpha of 49 significance is occasionally used as standard of acceptance of the Null hypothesis and it is also used as a standard for rejection 5 level of significance to judge the correlation between the two variables above. The level of significance gained in this investigation was 0.519; whereas the figure on the table of critical value of ‘r’ Product Moment with 95 confidence level and the number of subject 38 is 0.320. It means the correlation coefficient between the students’ achievement on reading recount text and their writing of the same text was significant because R xy R table or in other words, the null hypothesis Ho which explained that there was no significant correlation was rejected, while the working hypothesis Hi which explained that there was a significance correlation was accepted. The following chapter presents conclusion and suggestions as the result of the study.

4.2 Students’ Reading Comprehension Test