41
D. Instruments and Data Gathering Technique
The  instruments  of  this  study  were  the  researcher  and  tokens  of  the  verbs
refuse
and
reject
.  The  researcher  was  the  instrument  of  this  study  because  the researcher  who  was  going  to  conduct  the  study.  Ary,
et  al
.  2010  stated  that  a human could be an instrument for a study. They added
that “in qualitative studies, the  human  investigator  is  the  primary  instrument  for  gathering  and  analyzing  of
data”  p.424.  In  addition,  Lichtman  2013  said  that  the  researcher  became  the primary instrument because he or she who collected and gatherred the information
and  the  data.  In  this  study,  the  data  gathering  was  conducted  by  the  researcher. Later, she would analyze the data for this study.
The second instrument for conducting this study was the tokens of the verbs
refuse
and
reject
from  COCA.  The  researcher  would  see  the  occurrences  of  the verbs
refuse
and
reject
in  different  registers,  which  could  indicate  the  meaning and the context they were used. The verbs
refuse
and
reject
could have different collocations  which  distinguished  the  contexts  from  each  other.  The  researcher
would  take  note  and  highlight  the  information  from  the  token  related  to  the collocations. For instance, the tokens below showed the collocations of the target
word which would be analyzed. 1  ,  when  a  state  recognizes  marriages,  the  federal  government  will
discriminate  and  -  and refuse benefits  to  some  of  the  married  people  that the state recognizes and not others. COCA: ABC This Week
2  understand the motivation to take up arms or call for military intervention, we  specifically reject this  position  as  we  find  it  unacceptable  politically,
nationally, and ethically. Militarizing COCA: Middle East Q
42
E. Data Analysis Technique
In  qualitative  research,  the  first  stage  in  analyzing  data  was  organizing  to ease the data retrieved Ary,
et al.
, 2010. The data had to be put into a form ready for analyzing.  In organizing, the data was classified. The researcher put  the data
into the table of classification. In this study, the researcher classified the data into two. The first data consisted of the tokens of the verb
refuse
and the second one consisted  of  the  tokens  of  the  verb
reject
.  After  doing  it,  the  data  on  the  tables were  interpreted.  Ary,
et  al
.  2010  defined  interpretation  as  producing  the meaning and providing explanation.  Ary,
et al
. 2010 added that “the quality of
the  interpretation  depends  on  the  background,  perspective,  knowledge,  and theoretical orientation of the researcher and the intellectual skill he or she brings
to  the task ” p.490. The researcher verified what he or she knew was supported
by the data. In this  study,  the tokens of the verbs
refuse
and
reject
will be interpreted. Here, it would be known more about the meanings of each verb in the tokens. The
researcher    would  investigate  every  token  to  comprehend  the  meaning  in  which the verbs occurred, since there were some definitions of each verb. After that, the
researcher picked 100 tokens for each verb to give the examples and analyze them deeper.  Based  on  Ary,
et  al
.  2010,  “there  is  no  general  rule  to  include  in  a qualitative
study” p.429. Those 100 tokens each verb were enough to know the use  of  the  synonymous  verbs  in  the  daily  life  context.  Sampling,  which  was
selecting participants,  was important in a qulitative study Ary,
et al
., 2010. The participants in this study also referred to the tokens of the verbs
refuse
and
reject
.
43 The  researcher  selected
purposive  samples
,  which  was  sufficient  to  provide minimum insight and understanding of what the researcher was studying Ary,
et al
., 2010. Ary,
et al
.2010 said that purposive samples had to be relevant to the topic  of  the  study.  To  do  the  sampling,  the  researcher  used  her  experience  and
knowledge, specially which was related to this study. Thus, the tokens used had to represent  all meanings  of the verbs
refuse
and
reject
. Moreover, the collocations of  the  verbs  would  present  the  meanings  and  contexts  they  took  place.  The
analysis would be conducted based on the definitions on the dictionaries and the related references mentioned in Chapter II.
F. Research Procedure
There were six steps to conduct this study. Ary,
et al
. 2010 gave the steps to conduct qualitative study. The first step was specifying the phenomenon to be
investigated.  In  this  study,  the  researcher  wanted  to  investigate  the  synonymous verbs,
refuse
and
reject
by corpus study. The researcher was going to find out the frequencies  of  the  verbs
refuse
and
reject
and  the  collocations  of  the  verbs.  The collocations would show the meanings of those verbs which might have similar or
different contexts in use. By the guidance from Ary,
et al
. 2010, the second step was selecting the source from which the observations were to be made. The researcher chose COCA
as  the  source  of  the  data  in  this  study.  The  researcher  used  a  laptop  to  browse COCA site to take the tokens of the verbs
refuse
and
reject
. Next, the researcher would copy the tables of the tokens because the tokens could not be downloaded.