Ecological Economics 33 2000 193 – 203
SURVEY
The evolution of aquaculture in African rural and economic development
Randall E. Brummett
a,1
, Meryl J. Williams
b,
a
International Center for Li6ing Aquatic Resources Management Egypt, PO Box
2416
, Cairo, Egypt
b
International Center for Li6ing Aquatic Resources Management Headquarters, PO Box
2631
,
0718
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Received 22 January 1999; received in revised form 5 August 1999; accepted 27 October 1999
Abstract
In Africa, aquaculture has developed only recently and so far has made only a small contribution to economic development and food security. We review developments and identify constraints to the expansion of aquaculture in
economic and rural development at the continental, national and farm levels. Past development initiatives failed to achieve sustainable increases in production. In contrast, a growing number of smallholder farmers in many countries
have been adopting and adapting pond aquaculture to their existing farming systems and slowly increasing their production efficiency. An evolutionary approach that builds on a fusion of local and outside participation in
technology development and transfer appears more likely to produce fish production systems that are more productive and more environmentally and socially sustainable in the long term. © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All
rights reserved.
Keywords
:
Aquaculture; Africa; Rural development; Food security; Integration; Evolution of aquaculture www.elsevier.comlocateecolecon
1. Introduction
Although tilapia may have been cultured in Egypt as long as 2500 years ago, there is little
tradition of fish culture in most African countries Bardach et al., 1972. Though this novelty ap-
plies in varying degrees to many fish farming regions, when coupled with the severe political
and socioeconomic constraints facing African agriculture in general, the result is an aquaculture
sector that makes only a small contribution to food security and economic development. This is
despite Africa’s natural endowments of high-po- tential aquatic genetic resources and adequate
water in many parts Kapetsky, 1994, 1995. This situation may now be changing, brought about by
Corresponding author. Tel.fax: + 63-2-812-3798. E-mail address
:
m.j.williamscgiar.org M.J. Williams
1
ICLARM Contribution Number 1381. 0921-800900 - see front matter © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 2 1 - 8 0 0 9 9 9 0 0 1 4 2 - 1
R .E
. Brummett
, M
.J .
Williams Ecological
Economics
33 2000
193 –
203
Table 1 Milestones in African aquaculture
a
Research Development
Clarias Fish culture starts in Kenya 1924
1920s 1930s
Fish culture starts in Zaire 1937 1940s
Intensification in Zaire 1946+, Starts in Zambia 1942, Cameroon 1948, Congo-Brazzaville
1949, Zimbabwe 1950 Rapid development, increase in number of ponds,
Tilapia culture 1950s
spreads to many countries. 1960s
Spread and development of fish culture peaks, re- Tilapia culture and biology
gression begins. ‘Other’ species biology.
Regression continues. Second wave of develop- 1970s
Tilapia culture systems, pond culture systems ment begins.
Oysters, ‘other’ species biology, surveys, eco- ‘Second wave’ continues — Cote d’Ivoire, Kenya.
1980s Tilapia culture systems
Small and large-scale private sector farming starts nomicscommercial aspects, subsistence inte-
in Cote d’Ivoire, Egypt, Kenya, Nigeria and grated aquaculture–agriculture.
Zambia; shellfish farming initiated in Tunisia, South Africa, Morocco, Senegal, Zimbabwe,
Malawi, Mauritius and Reunion. Serious crisis of confidence in the subsistence scale aquaculture
where 90 of development assistance concen- trated.
Broader range of biological, socioeconomic, inter- Commercial development and diversification con-
1990s disciplinary and inter-sector research
tinues in many countries; production gradually mounts. Re-examination of directions for small
scale aquaculture and contributions to food secu- rity of the poor. Many countries and regional
bodies e.g. the Southern African Development Community start development plans for aquacul-
ture. Private sectorgovernment and non-govern- ment organization roles re-examined.
Sustainability, natural resource management in- cluding biodiversity and climate considerations
begin to impinge on the sector.
a
Adapted from Powles 1987 and extended to the present period, with special reference to Huisman 1990, New 1991, Satia 1991, Lazard, et al. 1991, Harrison et al. 1994.
a combination of increasing demand for food and other goods from the finite natural resource base
and efforts by farmers, researchers, national gov- ernments and development assistance agencies.
We examine the evolution of African aquaculture at continental, national and farm levels, and pro-
pose ways in which its rate of development may be speeded up yet avoid the environmental pitfalls
of
some rapid
aquaculture development
elsewhere.
2. Aquaculture development