49
Chapter  III  explains  the  research  methodology  used  in  this  research.  This  chapter  deals with  research  method.  This  chapter  will  present  population,  sample,  and  sampling  technique;
data collection; variables and operational definition; and analysis techniques.
A. Research Method
The research method employed in this study is quantitative method. It means a research which  is  the  information  gathered  and  analyzed  by  statistical  analysis.  This  research  will  be
conduct  in  statistical  analysis  to  know  the  factors  which  will  be  the  factors  of  Accounting Information System success model in Sragen. This research type is a hypothesis testing. Sekaran
2003  states  that  studies  engage  in  hypothesis  testing  usually  explain  the  nature  of  certain relationships,  or  establish  the  differences  among  groups  or  the  independence  of  two  or  more
factors in a situation. Regarding the depth, this research belongs to statistical study, which has high  generalization  but  does  not  reveal  too  deeply  Jogiyanto  2005.  Sekaran  2003  suggests
that: The  nature  of  the  study  –  whether  it  is  exploratory,  descriptive,  or  hypothesis  testing,  –
depends  on  the  stage  to  which  knowledge  about  the  research  topic  has  advanced.  The design decisions become more rigorous as we proceed from the exploratory stage, where
we  attempt  to  explore  new  areas  of  organizational  research,  to  the  descriptive  stage, where  we  try  to  describe  certain  characteristics  of  the  phenomena  on  which  interest
centers, to the hypothesis testing stage, where we examine whether or not the conjectured relationships  have  been  substantiated  and  an  answer  to  the  research  question  has  been
obtained.
B. Population, Sample, and Sampling Technique
Population  refers  to  the  entire  group  of  people,  events,  or  things  of  interest  that  the researcher  wishes  to  investigate  Sekaran  2003.  The  population  of  this  research  is  the
Accounting  officer  of  Local  Government  in  Sragen.  A  sample  is  a  subset  of  the  population
49
Sekaran  2003.  Jogiyanto  2005  suggests  that not  all  of  facts  can  be  taken,  therefore,  only
samples from the facts that can be taken to test the hypotheses. Regarding the sample usage, Sekaran 2003 argues that:
The  reason  for  using  a  sample  rather  than  collecting  data  from  the  entire  population  is that  it  would  be  practically  impossible  to  collect  data  from,  or  test,  or  examine  every
element. Even if it were possible, it would be prohibitive in terms of time, cost, and other human  resources.    The  study  of  a  sample  rather  than  the  entire  population  is  also
sometimes likely to produce more reliable results. This is mostly because fatigue is reduced and fewer errors will be happen.
In this research, the researcher will employ purposive sampling means that sample chosen is  based  on  some  criteria. There  are  two  kinds  of  purposive  sampling, judgment-sampling  and
quota-sampling.  This  research  used  judgment-sampling,  meaning  that  the  samples  are  taken with  criteria  of  certain  judgment  Jogiyanto  2005.  The  respondent  of  this  research  are
accounting  officer  of  Local  Government  in  Sragen  who  use  SIMDA.  The  reason  for  using judgment sampling is claimed by Sekaran 2003:
Judgment-sampling involves the choice of subjects who are most advantageously placed or in  the  best  position  to  provide  the  information  required.  Thus,  the  judgment-sampling
design is used when a limited number or category of people have the information that is sought. In such cases, any type of probability sampling across a cross-section of the entire
population is purposeless and not useful. Sekaran 2003 argues that although restricted in general ability, judgment-sampling may
sometimes  be  the  best  sampling  design  choice,  especially  when  there  is  a  limited  population that can supply the information needed.
Regarding  the  sampling  design,  this  research  uses  purposive  sampling  with  judgment-
sampling, meaning that the sample is taken with criteria of certain judgment Jogiyanto 2005. The criteria of sample are:
a. accounting officer of Local Government of Sragen
49
b. acounting officer of Local Government of Sragen who use SIMDA. Sekaran  2003  argues  that  sampling  is  the  process  of  selecting  a  sufficient  number  of
elements  from  the  population.  The  purposive  sampling  is  confined  to  specific  types  of  people who can provide the desired information, either because they are the only ones who have it, or
conform to some criteria set by researcher Sekaran 2003.
C. Data Collection