Difference between the Two Means

is 1.85. Because F hitung 1.53 1.85 then we can conclude that the data of both pretest is homogeny. While the homogeneity of post-test of both groups was computed as follow: F = Ve Vc = 50.75862069 56.36781609 = 0.900489396 The value of F table with dk numerator V1 = n1 - 1 = 30 - 1 = 29, dk denominator v2 = n2-1 = 30 - 1 = 29 and α = 5, squared to V1 =30 and V2 = 30 is 1.85. Because F hitung 0.90 1.85 then we can conclude that the data of both pretest is homogeny.The computation of homogenity can be seen in Appendices.

4.3 Difference between the Two Means

After analyzing the normality and homogeneity of the data, the computation was made. The first way to identify the significant difference between the control and experimental groups were by comparing the different means of both groups. The data being compared were the difference between the two means of the pre-test and post-test, because the data showed the result of the treatment. The difference between the two means was computed using the following formula as stated by Arikunto 2002:264: Ne Xe Xe   Nc Xc Xc   Where: Xe = the mean of the experimental group Xc = the mean of the control group  Xe = the total of the students‟ scores in the experimental group  Xc = the total of the studen ts‟ scores in the control group Ne = the number of the students in the experimental group Nc = the number of the students in the control group The mean of the control group on the pre-test: �� = Σ�� �� = 1952 30 = 60.07 The mean of the control group on the post-test: �� = Σ�� �� = 2300 30 = 76.67 Whereas, the mean of the experimental group on the pre-test: �� = Σ�� �� = 1964 30 = 65.47 The mean of the experimental group on the post-test: �� = Σ�� �� = 2520 30 = 84.00 From the calculation, it can be seen that in the control group, the mean of the pre-test was 65.07 and the post-test 76.67. From those scores, the different mean between the pre-test and the post-test on the control group was 11.60. While, on the experimental group, the mean of pre-test was 65.47 and post-test was 84.00. The different mean between those tests was 18.53. It meant that the different mean on the experimental group was higher than that of the control group. It could be concluded that there was good improvement of the experimental groups achievement after they received the treatment using BBC Nature videos. However, it could not be concluded that the difference between the two means of pre-test and post-test was significant. Therefore, to determine whether the difference between the two means was statistically significant, the t- test formula was applied.

4.4 Analyzing the T-test

Dokumen yang terkait

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF THE X-8 YEAR STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT AT SMAN ARJASA JEMBER IN THE 2012/2013 ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 4 16

The Effectiveness of Collaborative Learning in Improving Students’ Abililty in Reading Descriptive Text (A Pre-Experimental Study of the Seventh Grade Students of SMP Pelita Harapan, South Jakarta).

0 6 103

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON STUDENTS ABILITY IN WRITING NARATIVE TEXT AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMP N 1 TOROH A Descriptive Study On Students Ability In Writing Narative Text At The Second Year Of SMP N 1 Toroh In 2016/2017 Academic Year.

0 2 10

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT AT THE EIGHT GRADE A Descriptive Study On Students’ Ability In Writing Recount Text At The Eight Grade Of SMP N 2 Colomadu In 2013/2014 Academic Year.

0 0 11

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT AT THE EIGHT GRADE A Descriptive Study On Students’ Ability In Writing Recount Text At The Eight Grade Of SMP N 2 Colomadu In 2013/2014 Academic Year.

0 3 10

STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT THE EIGHT GRADE OF SMP N 3 SAWIT IN 2013/2014 ACADEMIC YEAR Students’ Ability In Writing Descriptive Text At The Eight Grade Of SMP N 3 Sawit In 2013/2014 Academic Year.

0 2 13

INTRODUCTION Students’ Ability In Writing Descriptive Text At The Eight Grade Of SMP N 3 Sawit In 2013/2014 Academic Year.

0 2 5

STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT THE EIGHT GRADE OF SMP N 3 SAWIT IN 2013/2014 ACADEMIC YEAR Students’ Ability In Writing Descriptive Text At The Eight Grade Of SMP N 3 Sawit In 2013/2014 Academic Year.

0 1 12

(ABSTRAK) THE USE OF PHOTOGRAPH AS MEDIA TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT (An Experimental Study of the Eighth Year students of SMP N 12 Semarang in the Academic Year of 2008/2009).

0 0 2

THE USE OF PHOTOGRAPH AS MEDIA TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT (An Experimental Study of the Eighth Year students of SMP N 12 Semarang in the Academic Year of 2008/2009).

0 0 67