Derivatives settled on a gross basis Contingent liabilities and commitments Behavioural profiling

The balances in the above table will not agree with the balances in the consolidated balance sheet as the table incorporates all cash flows, on an undiscounted basis, related to both principal as well as future interest payments. Customer assets and liabilities including non-maturing savingscurrent deposits are represented on a contractual basis or in a period when it can legally be withdrawn. On a behavioral basis for liquidity risk analysis, the assets and liabilities cash flows may differ from contractual basis.

46.1 Derivatives settled on a gross basis

The table below shows the Group’s derivative financial instruments in the period where they mature based on the remaining period to contractual maturity date as at the balance sheet date. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows on a gross settlement basis. Less than 1 week to 1 to 3 3 to 12 More than In millions 7 days 1 month months months 1 year Total 2011 Foreign exchange derivatives – outflow 62,640 61,447 112,085 147,500 65,387 449,059 – inflow 62,494 61,360 112,600 147,560 64,508 448,522 2010 Foreign exchange derivatives – outflow 37,345 47,079 64,501 98,369 50,635 297,929 – inflow 37,356 47,244 64,632 98,767 50,249 298,248

46.2 Contingent liabilities and commitments

The table below shows the Group’s contingent liabilities and commitments in the period where they expire based on the remaining period to contractual maturity date as at the balance sheet date: Less than Over In millions 1 year 1 to 3 years 3 to 5 years 5 years Total 2011 Guarantees, endorsements and other contingent items 20,789 – – – 20,789 Undrawn loan commitments a and other facilities 109,321 3,255 3,333 502 116,411 Operating lease commitments 149 300 241 191 881 Capital commitments 30 3 – – 33 Total 130,289 3,558 3,574 693 138,114 2010 Guarantees, endorsements and other contingent items 16,031 – – – 16,031 Undrawn loan commitments a and other facilities 90,044 2,410 1,949 553 94,956 Operating lease commitments 132 312 185 292 921 Capital commitments 40 1 – – 41 Total 106,247 2,723 2,134 845 111,949 a Undrawn loan commitments are recognised at activation stage and include commitments which are unconditionally cancellable by the Group The Group expects that not all of the contingent liabilities and undrawn loan commitments will be drawn before expiry. 141 DBS Annual Report 2011 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS for the year ended 31 December 2011

46.3 Behavioural profiling

For the purpose of liquidity risk management, the Group actively monitors and manages its liquidity profile within a 1-year period. A conservative view is adopted in the behavioural profiling of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet commitments that have exhibited cash flow patterns that differ significantly from the actual contractual maturity profile. The table below shows the Group’s behavioural net and cumulative maturity mismatch between assets and liabilities over a 1-year period under a normal scenario without incorporating growth projections: Less than 1 week to 1 1 to 3 3 to 6 6 months to In millions a 7 days month months months 1 year 2011 Net liquidity mismatch 15,272 1,120 9,694 4,586 2,670 Cumulative mismatch 15,272 14,152 23,846 28,432 31,102 2010 Net liquidity mismatch 15,969 6,844 16,810 2,297 3,328 Cumulative mismatch 15,969 22,813 39,623 37,326 40,654 a Positive indicates a position of liquidity surplus. Negative indicates a liquidity shortfall that has to be funded As the behavioural assumptions used to determine the maturity mismatch between assets and liabilities are updated from time to time, the information presented above is not directly comparable across past balance sheet dates. Notwithstanding this, the change from the previous year reflects the strong loan growth relative to deposits increase over 2011. 47 CAPITAL MANAGEMENT The Group’s capital management policies are to diversify its sources of capital, to allocate capital efficiently, guided by the need to maintain a prudent relationship between available capital and the risks of its underlying businesses and to meet the expectations of key constituencies, including investors, regulators and rating agencies. The Group has complied with all capital adequacy ratios prescribed by the regulators. The capital management process, which is under the oversight of the Capital and Balance Sheet Committee, includes periodic reviews of both the demand for and supply of capital across the Group. Overseas subsidiaries and non-banking subsidiaries of the Group may be required to comply with country-specific and industry-specific capital requirements depending on the applicable jurisdiction and industry they operate in. Available capital is allocated across competing demands, guided by the policies outlined above, and to ensure regulatory compliance. Quarterly updates are provided to the Board of Directors. The Group has adopted the capital adequacy requirements of Basel II as set out in the revised Monetary Authority of Singapore Notice to Banks No. 637 Notice on Risk Based Capital Adequacy Requirements for Banks incorporated in Singapore with effect from 1 January 2008. 142 The following table sets forth details of capital resources and capital adequacy ratios for the Group. MAS Notice to Banks No. 637 “Notice on Risk Based Capital Adequacy Requirements for Banks incorporated in Singapore” sets out the current requirements relating to the minimum capital adequacy ratios for a bank incorporated in Singapore and the methodology a bank incorporated in Singapore shall use for calculating these ratios. In millions 2011 2010 Tier 1 Capital Share capital 9,350 8,780 Disclosed reserves and others 23,308 23,927 Less: Tier 1 Deductions 5,123 5,064 Eligible Tier 1 Capital 27,535 27,643 Tier 2 Capital Loan allowances admitted as Tier 2 1,151 696 Subordinated debts 5,305 5,281 Revaluation surplus from equity securities 29 149 Less: Tier 2 Deductions 192 142 Total eligible capital 33,828 33,627 Risk-weighted assets 213,722 182,694 Capital Adequacy Ratio Tier 1 ratio 12.9 15.1 Total Tier 1 and 2 ratio

15.8 18.4