Dividend Payout Policy this file 555 2271 1 PB
Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis JAB|Vol. 13 No. 2 August 2014| administrasibisnis.studentjournal.ub.ac.id
3
e. the absence of information asymmetries –
what management knows about the future is not significantly different from what
investors know.
Barclay, et al., 1995 The assumption of Dividend Irrelevance
Theory is based on an efficient capital market. In an efficient market, the shift of ownership is
created by the change in dividend policy that is conducted in fair conditions Brealy et al., 2007,
which means that dividend policy does not affect
the overall value of stockholders’ equity or in other words, there is no party who is advantaged or
disadvantaged. Under
Dividend Irrelevance
Theory, financial leverage and dividend decisions are likely to be unimportant since they have no
impact on firm value Ross et al., 2008. The manager’s decisions either to raise or to lower the
current dividend do not affect the current value of the company.
2.
The Free Cash Flow Hypothesis Free cash flow refers to the cash that is not
retained and reinvested in the fixed assets or working capital so that it is available for the
investors Brealy et al., 2007. It is the cash flow available for shareholders after funding profitable
investments for the sustainability of a business. Therefore, free cash flow is the cash flow in excess
of the cash required to fund profitable capital projects.
The mature firms that are able to generate enough income to cover their investment financing
needs through their operations should spend their free cash flows in the form of dividend Jensen,
1986 as cited by Ardestani et al., 2013. According to the free cash flow hypothesis, an increase in
dividends should benefit the stockholders by reducing the ability of managers to pursue wasteful
activities, since dividend payment reduces the free cash flow. Furthermore, the free cash flow also
implies that debt reduces free cash flow because the firm must make interest and principal
payments.
3. Agency Cost Theory
According to the free cash flow model, finance available after financing all positive net present
value projects can result in conflicts of interest between managers and shareholders Jensen, as
cited in Abor and Bokpin, 2010. The conflict of interest between managers and stockholders is the
result of each party’s tendency to give priority for their personal interest. Bondholders would like the
stockholders to leave as much cash as possible in the firm so that this cash would be available to pay
the bondholders during times of financial distress. Stockholders would like to keep the extra cash for
themselves. Meanwhile, managers may pay dividends simply to keep the cash away from the
bondholders. Managers may also pursue their personal interest at the expense of stockholders
especially when the corporation has plenty of free cash flow.
The agency cost refers to the management’s intention to invest in negative Net Present Value
projects; however dividend payout can eliminate this problem by controlling the cash available to
managers Jensen, 1986 as cited by Ardestani et al., 2013. According to the free cash flow model,
firms with higher level of cash flow should have either higher dividend payout or higher leverage in
order to minimize the agency cost. Therefore, dividend can serve as a way to reduce agency
costs. By paying dividends equal to the amount of surplus cash flow, a firm can
reduce management’s ability to squander the firm’s resources.