Previous Study THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

improving the quality of the situation 1 . Indeed, the purpose of the researcher is help the students to improve their ability in writing descriptive text. Then, the learning objective is reached. Second, Classroom Action Research is a method which should be done continously in the class to know the improvement of the implementation in every cycle. It is in line with Arikunto’s statement in Iskandar that “Classroom Action Research is an analysis of learning activities through an action which is performed and happened in the class simultaneously 2 . In other word, Classroom Action Research is defined as an activity which is done by the teacher collaborated with other people; the aim is to increase learning process quality in class 3 . Besides, the other some possible reasons in using Classroom Action Research as a method in this research are: 1. To know more about the learners problem in teaching and learning process. 2. To learn more about how far the teacher make an improvement in hisher teaching. 3. To decide an appropriate strategy and media for a certain material 4 . In brief, Classroom Action Research is a research which is done rationally, systematic, and reflective empiric which is done by the teacher or lecturer collaborated with the researcher to emend and to improve learning situation. 1 Arifin, Bagaimana Menyiasati PTK Anda Agar Sukses?, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Metode dan Paradigma Baru, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2011, p. 97. 2 Iskandar, op. cit., p.21. 3 Ibid. 4 Siti Aisyah Ginting and Ridho Sari C. Sitanggang, loc.cit., p. 7. The method used in this study basically influenced by Kurt Lewin’s design 5 . This design presents four elements to do, include: planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. Here is the figure of CAR process: CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 Figure 3.1 Kurt Lewin’s Action Research Design 5 Rido Kurnianto, et.al., Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Jakarta: APIS, 2009, p. 20. PLANNING ACTING OBSERVING REFLECTING PLANNING ACTING REFLECTING OBSERVING The implementation of Clasroom Action Research CAR based on the Kurt Lewin’s design, in each cycle as follows: CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 Figure 3.2 The Phases of Classroom Action Research Modified by the writer Planning After doing several things to get scaffolding of the class, such as interviewing the teacher, observing the class, and giving the pre-test, here the writer and the teacher prepare the lesson plan, observational guidelines, and the post-test. This phase may take a week within two cycle. Acting The writer applies the lesson plan that has been made; that is teaching descriptive text using mind map strategy. It is includes three meetings for each cycle. Observing While the process of teaching- learning is taking place, the collaborator observes the writ er’s performance, the class situation, and students’ responses. At the end of cycle 1, the students are given a post test 1 with the purpose to know whether or not the students’ make any progress toward improvement. It is conduct with the same time with action phase. Reflecting After getting the result of post-test 1, the writer and the teacher discuss about the implementation of the action. Next, they make some modification to revise the founded obstacles that may occur in the first cycle. Planning The writer and the teacher are together making a new lesson plan which some emendation in pattern drill strategy, and also prepare the observational guidelines and post-test. Acting The teacher implements the new lesson plan; where students need to be emphasized on using mind mapping strategy in writing descriptive text. Reflecting The writer and the teacher discuss about the result in implementing the emendation action. If the target of CAR has already achieved, the cycle will be stopped. But if it is not, the cycle will continue to the next one. Observing The teacher observes the writer ’s performance, the class situation, and the student’s response. At the end of cycle two, the students were given the post-test 2. Then, the writer calculates the score and sees if there is some improvement from the previous test.

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving students' writing ability through clustering technique (A classroom action research in the second year of SMP al-hasra Bojongsari- Depok)

4 11 109

Improving Students' Descriptive Writing through Role, Audience, Format, and Topic (RAFT) Strategy (A Classroom Action Research in the Seventh Grade of SMP Paramarta Jombang)

1 16 104

Applying Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Technique to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension in Discussion Text. (A Classroom Action Research in the Third Grade of SMA Fatahillah Jakarta)

5 42 142

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

The effectiveness of directed reading activity towards students’ reading skill of descriptive text: an experimental study at the seventh grade student of MTs Al-Ihsan Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan.

0 2 122

The Use of Diary Writing to Improve Eight Grade Students' Writing Skill at SMPN 3 Malang

0 16 8

THE USE OF MIND MAPPING STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING PROCEDURE TEXT (A Classroom Action Research at the Grade Eleven of MA Darul Qurro Kawunganten Academic Year 20142015)

0 0 13

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT OF SCHOOL ENVIRONTMENT THROUGH MIND MAPPING ( A Classroom Action Research at 8H Students of SMP Negeri 1 Sumpiuh in Academic Year 20132014)

0 0 12

THE USE OF PICTURE-GUESSING GAME TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT (CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE GRADE VII D OF SMP ALAM AL-AQWIYA CILONGOK IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2014/2015) - repository perpustakaan

0 0 13

THE USE OF MIND-MAPPING TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS (Classroom Action Research at Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 3 Ciawigebang Kuningan in the Academic Year of 2015/2016) - UNWIDHA Repository

0 0 33