Data Analysis Technique METHODOLOGY
39 noisy and not focused in learning process. They did not want to pay attention to
the teacher’s saying. When the researcher interviewed some students after two months the writer taught them, they said both previous and recent teacher always
taught the same technique, which was memorizing. The students said that there was no variety of technique in the class. It made students have no motivation to
learn English in class. The answer from the students could be concluded that the way of teaching from the teacher was one of the causes. The interview was not
only done with the students, but also another teacher in Bumblebee English Course Yogyakarta. She said that there were some students who were still shy and
unconfident in performing their task in the learning process. Therefore, this case was from the students themselves.
The main point of the problem faced by young learners of Bumblebee English Course Yogyakarta was their lack of motivation. It influenced the
atmosphere of teaching learning activity. The learning process became not conducive.
Games technique was chosen because it is considered as fun and enjoyable. Besides, games give variation in language learning and increase
learners’ motivation by using the target language Lewis and Bedson, 1999: 5. Therefore, the researcher as the teacher prepared the material for every meeting
based on the technique applied. After formulating the action that would be utilized to solve the problems in
the teaching and learning process faced by young learners of Bumblebee English Course Yogyakarta, the researcher implemented it. The implementation of action
40 was done in a part of cycle. Each cycle had four steps. There were plan, action,
observation, and reflection. Plan was designed before implementing the action. It was used for having a goal planned by the researcher. Then, the researcher had
action to apply the plan that had been designed before. When implementing the action, the researcher also observed the progress of the students in the classroom.
The result of any action would be reflected by the researcher to figure out whether the students were enhanced in their motivation or not. After having action, the
students would give their opinion in personal journal. These responses in form of opinion would also be a consideration of how the researcher reflected the process
of teaching learning. The implementation was conducted from February until March 2010
February 22
nd
, 25
th
, and March 1
st
, 4
th
. Every week, there were two meetings, on Monday and Thursday. Every meeting was conducted in at least 60 minutes.