Bell  Hooks  states  that  women  need  to  have  the  experience  of  working through  hostility  to  arrive  at  understanding  and  solidarity.
93
She  believes  that women have been constructed under the sexist environment which restrains their
chance and ability to resist the social construction of womanhood. She also claims that  avoiding  confrontation  makes  women  away  from  revolutionary  change  and
transformation  both  individually  and  collectively.
94
From  Hooks  view,  it  can  be noted that hostility and the evocation of differences lead to positive improvement.
According to Hooks, solidarity is a form of support for the weakness structure of womens identity.
95
She reveals woman as the victim of social construction who is helpless  and  powerless,  and  also  needs  support  from  someone  who  understands
and experiences the same burden, which is the sister. Overall, women must avoid the fear of differences and develop the sense
of  solidarity.  Different  experiences  actually  reflect  that  people  have  different needs,  and  by  understanding  others  needs  the  subject  may  place  herself  in  the
appropriate  position,  whether  to  follow  the  others  virtue  or  to  resist  its  badness. Robin  Morgan  also  argues  that  woman  should  develop  self-  defense,  physical
strength, and the ability to work collectively, to teach and share an idea for each other.
96
Thus,  sisterhood  allows  the  women  to  build  bond  relation  within  the differences, to provide nurturance as well as autonomy for the woman.
The  explanation  above  represents  the  power  of  sisterhood  to  help  the daughter  keep  her  subjectivity  from  the  social  construction  of  womanhood.  By
93
Hooks, p. 66
94
Hooks, p. 66
95
Hooks, p. 64
96
Robin Morgan. Sisterhood is Powerful. ed.. NY: Vintage Books, 1970, p. 492
having the relationship with female friends, the daughter can have the freedom to uncover  her  feeling  and  burden  through  nurturance  and  attention  given  by  the
other women. The inter-subjective dialogue between them  whether it is  in form of  kind  dialogue  or  critique  also  maintains  the  daughters  awareness  toward  her
self-ability and deficiency. The evocation of differences between women does not make  sisterhood  as  the  trigger  for  womans  struggle  but  help  them  work
cooperatively and resist the social construction of womanhood through solidarity. To  sum  up,  using  Lacan‟s  concept  of  symbolic  identification  and
horizontal ties, and other supporting concept for female empowerment from some theorists; Campbell, Hooks, Cori and Morgan, this study will represent sisterhood
as an effective way for the daughter to fulfill her needs for mothers love as well as  to  get  her  autonomy.  Sisterhood  becomes  the  means  to  challenge  and  subvert
the  primary  and  secondary  identification  to  mother  and  symbolic  father.  It  helps the daughter resist the social construction of womanhood through inter-subjective
dialogue  that  allows  the  exchange  of  idea  and  information,  constructs  equality between the subjects, and significantly constructs woman as the speaking subject.
51
CHAPTER III PROBLEMATIZING
PORTIA’S SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF WOMANHOOD
This chapter problematizes the social construction of womanhood which is constructed  from  Portias  identification  to  the  mother  and  symbolic  father.  This
third  chapter  is going to answer the first research question on how Portia‟s self-
identification  to  the  mother  and  symbolic  father  society  have  limited  her  self- freedom,  constructed  feminine  gender  identity  for  her,  and  triggered  resistance
and retreat from relationship with other people. The discussion firstly focuses on how patriarchal motherhood constructs Portias lacking subject toward social life.
This  part  explains  how  patriarchal  motherhood  affects  the  mothering  process, forms mother-daughters unity and symbiotic relationship. The second discussion
focuses  on  the  social  construction  of  womanhood  and  the  forbidden  pleasure which  later  evokes  Portias  retreat  from  the  relationship  with  symbolic  father  or
society. This second part explains the lacking subjectivity of symbolic father that restrains Portias pleasure toward maternal forms which later stimulates her desire
to return to maternal attachment.
3.1  Portia’s  dependency  toward  mother’s  figure  during  the  process  of patriarchal mothering
The  discussion  in  this  first  sub-chapter  presents  an  argument  that  the construction  of  Portia‟s  earliest  identity  is  influenced  by  the  imposition  of  the
mother‟s  desire.  There  are  three  main  ideas  discussed  in  this  chapter;  Irenes PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
patriarchal  mothering ,  the  effect  of  Irene‟s  oppressive  experience  for  the
mothering process, and the imposition of Irene‟s desire to Portia‟s life. The first main idea explains how Irene‟s desire is strongly constructed and
affected  by  patriarchal  culture.  Living  in  patriarchal  society,  Irene‟s  role  as  a mother is constituted as a primary nurturer for Portia. Bowen represents a model
of patriarchal culture in Portia‟s family where nurturance becomes Irene‟s primary task.  The  second  main  idea  discusses  Irene‟s  oppressive  experience  from  her
relatives that affects the nurturing for her daughter. To avoid the repetition of the oppression  for  Portia,  Irene  keeps  Portia  away  from  socialization  process  with
others. When mothering activity becomes Irene‟s main responsibility, she appears as the only subject
mirrored by Portia and becomes the object of Portia‟s desire. All things are managed and controlled by Irene, and it limits Portia‟s chance to
recognize  others  and  social  life.  The  third  main  idea  discusses  how  Portia‟s dependency  to  mother‟s  desire  then  constructs  her  identity  as  a  lacking  subject
who does not have much knowledge and experience of social relation and order. It
is  significantly  seen  from  Portia‟s  character  as  the  16  years  old  girl  who  still shows her immaturity and childish manner.
3.1.1 Irene’s Patriarchal Mothering
Irene‟s  responsibility  in  childrearing  practice  has  begun  even  before  her husband‟s death. She always takes care of Portia‟s needs. In Portias family, father
is  the  head  of  the  family  and  he  is  not  supposed  to  be  involved  in  childs nurturance. Responsibility in childrearing practice constructs Irenes desire to give
the best life for Portia.  It can be seen from her need for a private house. Irenes PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
need for a private house represents her desire to live peacefully with Portia. Being different from Irene, her husband Mr. Quayne has neglected his familys needs,
as Portia says: It was mother wanted a house, but father never would. The, 52.
Mr.  Quayne  is  so  impulsive  to  his  family  life.  He  brings  Irene  and  Portia  to  the south  of  France,  which  seems  to  him  the  right  place  to  live  in,  and  rents  back
rooms  in  dark  flats  in  villas  with  no  view.  The,  14.  He  does  not  care  about Portia‟s  physical  and  emotional  development.  This  situation  can  be  seen  from
Anna‟s description on how Mr. Quayne brings his family live in such a gloomy place:
… Well, they stayed round about there, and almost never came home. Thomas was sent by his mother to visit them three or four times, but I
think  they  all  found  it  terribly  lowering.  Mr.  Quayne  and  Irene  and Portia always had the back rooms in hotels, or dark flats in villas with
no  view.  Mr.  Quayne  never  got  used  to  the  chill  at  sunset:  Thomas
saw he would die of this, and he did. … The, 14
The  back  rooms  and  dark  surrounding  represent  the  bad  space  and environment  provided  by  Mr.  Quayne.  It  is  such  kind  of  isolated  place  which
limits Portia chance to get good environment and to socialize with other people, as it is inferred in Anna‟s statement about Mr. Quayne‟s avowal letter below:
…  We  had  no  idea,  till  we  got  that  letter  of  his,  that  he‟d  been breaking  his  heart,  all  those  years  abroad,  about  what  Portia  was
missing —or, what he thought she was missing. He had felt, he said in
the letter, that, because of being his daughter and from becoming his daughter in the way that she had, Portia had grown up exiled not only
from her own country but from normal, cheerful family life. … The, 11
Thus, for his inattention to family needs, Irene takes the position as the one who saves  her  family  life,  especially  for  Portia.  She  becomes  responsible  for  her
daughters  self-development.    She  gives  love,  attention,  and  protection  to  Portia which then constructs the notion of mother-daughters bond relationship.
Mother- daughter‟s  bond  relationship  constructs  intimacy  between  Irene
and Portia. Their intimacy makes Irene become the primary responder for Portia‟s physical  and  emotional  needs.  Irene‟s  existence  and  her  intense  response  to
Portia‟s needs build secure attachment between them. It is explained by Cori that as  a  secure  individual,  a  person  will  perceive  herself  as  a  strong,  competent,
valuable, lovable, and special one.
97
Irene helps Portia to build her self-confidence so that Portia possesses self-freedom to express her feeling and manner in her own
way. Besides  the  fact  that  Portia  and  Irene  have  built  strong  intimacy,  bond
relation with Irene also makes Portia inherit her mother‟s characters and manners. Ellie Ragland-Sullivan proposes that mother becomes the center of identity for her
daughter by serving as the mirror form which will be mimetically identified by the daughter.
98
Strong  power  relation  between  the  subject  and  its  image  in  mirror stage  constructs  unity.
99
Imaginary  unity  then  builds  Portia‟s  assumption  of Irene‟s image as hers. It makes Portia imitate Irene‟s manner and desire. In other
words, mirror stage constructs similarity between Portia and Irene. Anna, Portia‟s sister in law, notices Portia‟s similarity to Irene. In her opinion, Portia is just like
Irene.  Although  Irene  looks  like  an  ordinary  person,  she  is  actually  a  brave woman.
97
Cori, p. 41
98
Ragland- Sullivan, p. 8
99
Yanis Stavrakakis. Lacan and the political. NY: Routledge. 1999, p. 18
It  is  explained  by  Anna  that  Irene  is  a  kind  of  brave  woman.  With  her bravery, she gets the job easily in a flower shop. The, 12. It is the same as Portia
who  is  brave  enough  to  secretly  observe  an d  criticize  people‟s  life  in  Windsor
Terrace. Portia‟s bravery is seen from her secret diary. Anna finds Portia‟s diary which reveals Portia‟s story of her daily activities, relation with people, and her
opinion  about  other  people‟s  characteristics.  The  content  of  the  diary  evokes Anna‟s awareness of Portia‟s boldness or bravery. Portia‟s secret writing frightens
Anna, as she says “… I cannot stand being watched. She watches us.” The, 24. For Anna, the diary reflects Portia‟s hidden character. She is not innocent as she
looks. By  her  deceitful  character,  Portia  resembles  her  mother.    Anna  describes
how  Irene,  the  one  who  looks  innocent,  successfully  commits  adultery  with  Mr. Quayne as below:
… His wife was much too nice to have pretty ways, but I daresay Irene had plenty
—if that is how you like them. I‟ve no doubt she made the most fussy capitulations; she would make him feel she had never fallen
before —and I should think it‟s likely she never had. She would not be
everyone‟s  money.  You  may  be  sure  that  she  let  Mr.  Quayne  know that her little life was from now on entirely in his hands. … The, 12
Irenes  innocence,  according  to  Anna,  seems  to  deceive  Mr.  Quayne.  With  her kindness, Irene makes Mr. Quayne trust her so that she can be finally dependent
on him. As the same with Portia, her innocence makes Thomas and Anna trust her tranquil character. For Thomas, Portia is  an obedient girl, as it is  noted from  his
conversation about Portias sleeping habit below: “Did I hear you say we‟d got to go to a movie?”
“Yes, you did.” “Why—now, Anna, why? We haven‟t stayed still for weeks.”
Anna, touching her pearls with an undecided hand, said: “We can‟t all just sit around.”
“I don‟t see why not.” “We  can‟t  all  three  sit  around.  It  gets  me  down.  You  don‟t  seem  to
know what it‟s like.”
“But she goes to bed at ten.” The, 24 Thomas considers Portia as the obedient girl because she always shows her good
manner  to  Thomas.  Anna  who  finds  the  diary  is  suspicious  to  Portia‟s  real characters, as she says:
“Well, it never is ten, as you know. I cannot stand being watched. She watches us.”
“I cannot see why she should.” “I partly see. Anyhow, she makes us not alone.” The, 24
For Anna, Portia is quite tricky because she can make people pity her. Similar to Irene, Portia is successful to create a problem in  Quaynes family because of her
sly and innocent characters. In addition, Irenes similarity to Portia is also reflected from St. Quentins
statement: How very unlike Thomas The, 10  St. Quentin is a familys friend of  Thomas  and  Anna.  He  usually  visits  and  spends  his  time  with  Thomas  and
Anna  in  Windsor  Terrace.  In  one  conversation  with  Anna,  she  tells  him  about Portias secret diary. The content of diary changes St. Quentins perspective about
Portias character, as it is reflected from his conversation with Anna below: “She said more about your being always polite. She does not seem to
think you are a snake in the grass, though she sees a good deal of grass for a snake to be in. There does not seem to be a single thing that she
misses,  and  there‟s  certainly  not  a  thing  that  she  does  not  mis- construct. … The, 9