people having different skills. In addition, there was only 1 respondent choosing “agree” when responding to statement no. 11 The respondents worked by
themselves in Play Performance Course because their friends could not understand them. Then, the rest of the respondents chose “strongly disagree”
52.5 and “disagree” 45. It was also supported by the data gained from the statement number 3. Almost all of the respondents 97.5 stated that they could
work in a group better through Play Performance course.
4.1.2 The Perceptions of the English Language Education Study Program
ELESP Students on Play Performance Course
In order to find out the perceptions of the English Language Education Study Program ELESP students on Play Performance course, the researcher
distributed questionnaires to the ELESP students. There were six closed questions hopefully representing their perceptions on Play Performance course, which were
number 12 up to 17. The data indicated that students of the English Language Education Study Program were interested in joining Play Performance course.
Almost all of the respondents 97.5 chose “strongly agree” 30 and “agree” 67.5. They considered Play Performance course as an interesting course in
English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University of Yogyakarta. There were 50 of the respondents choosing “strongly disagree”
when responding to statement no. 12 For the respondents, Play Performance is just ‘wasting time” and 47.5 of them chose “disagree” on the same statement. It
was also supported by data indicating that almost all of the respondents thought that they had had valued experience through Play Performance course. The data
indicated that 97.5 of the respondents chose “strongly disagree” 30 and
“disagree” 67.5 when responding to statement no. 13 When the respondents joined Play Performance Course, the respondents thought that the respondent had
already wasted their time without having valued experience. The following was the description of the students’ responses to each
statement related to the ELESP students’ perception on Play Performance course.
No
Statements SA
A D
SD
12.
For the respondents, Play Performance is just “wasting time”.
0 0 2.5
1 47.5
19 50
18
13.
When the respondents joined PPC, they thought they had already wasted their
time without having valued experience. 2.5
1 0 0
67.5 27
30 12
14.
Before the respondents joined PPC, they had already been interested in joining
PPC. 30
12 67.5
27 2.5
1
15.
The respondents enjoyed joining PPC. 32.5
13 65
26 2.5
1
16.
The respondents agreed that PPC had given them positive effects in their life.
37.5 15
62.5 25
0 0
17.
PPC was useful for the respondents as an English
Language Education
Study Program ELESP student.
37.5 15
55 22
7.5 3
Table 4.2 The Table of the Perceptions of the ELESP Students on Play Performance Course
Table 4.2 shows the students’ responses to each statement on the questionnaire related to the ELESP students’ perceptions on Play Performance
course. Responding to the statement no. 15, whether the ELESP students enjoyed joining Play Performance course or not, almost all of the respondents 97.5
chose “strongly agree” 32.5 and “agree” 65. It means that almost all of them enjoyed joining Play Performance course. In addition, all of the respondents
100 chose “strongly agree” and “agree” when responding to statement no. 16. In other words, all of the respondents agreed that Play Performance course had
given them positive effects in their life. Moreover, almost all of the respondents 92.5 believed that Play Performance course was useful for them as an English
Language Education Study Program student.
4.1.3 The Possible Contributions of Play Performance Course for English
