3.4. Data Gathering Technique
The data were gathered from the two instruments used in the research as elaborated in the previous part. The research was conducted to the third grade of
technique of light vehicle in SMKN 1 Purworejo on 20 Mei 2012 to 30 September 2012. The needed data classified into the stages based on the combination of
RD and ADDIE model. The stages, needed data, participants and instruments were clearly shown on table 3.1.
Table. 3.1 The Data Needed by the Researcher Stages
Needed Data Participants
Instruments
1. Analysis Research
and information
collecting
The students’ perceived needs.
The students’ real
needs.
Students’ difficulties in learning English.
Identifying the gap between the
students’ needs
and the
fulfillment ofthat needs in English teaching and
learning daily activity. The
method and
technique used
by teacher in conducting
English teaching and learning activity
Students’ motivation
and participation
in learning English in the
class. The use of technology
inteaching and learning activity.
The students’ devices
in access
online Moodle
The third grade of Technique of
LightVehicle in SMKN
1 Purworejo
English teacher Questionnaire
Interview
2.Development Preliminary
Field Testing The fulfillment of good
E-learning software
requirements. Feedback from the
participants to ensure thevalidity of the online
Moodle. Opinion
from the
participants to ensure the validity of the
online Moodle. Suggestion from the
participants to ensure the validity of the
product English teacher
The expert from
SEAMOLEC Questionnaire
3.Implementation Main Field
Testing Feedback from the
participants deal with the final version of the
online Moodle. The third grade
of technique of light vehicle in
SMKN 1
Purworejo Questionnaire
3.5. Data Analysis Technique
In order to make conclusions, the data obtained from interview and questionnaires distributed were presented and analyzed. To analyze the interview
results, the recorded interviews were put into a transcript. In analyzing the questionnaires, the researcher followed several steps.
First, the data collected from questionnaires were recapitulated in the form of table. Then, the researcher counted the percentage of each response. The result
was obtained by dividing the number of the students who chose certain answer with the total number of the students, then multiplied by 100. The data collected
would be calculated using percentage as follow:
Note: n = the total number of the students who chose certain answer
N = the total number of the students A table presented the data in the form of computation of the collected
answers from the questionnaires which had been distributed to the research participants. Then, the researcher made the interpretation of the result in the form
of written paragraphs.
Table 3.2: The Template of the Needs Analysis Questionnaire
No Questions and statements
Answer Number
Percentage
The data from materials evaluation were obtained through questionnaires that are in the form of scores. The classification was adapted from Likert
Scaleproposed by Best 1970. There are five agreements are applied as follows: Strongly disagree = 1
Disagree = 2
Not sure = 3
Agree = 4
Strongly agree = 5
The score of the questionnaire was calculated using descriptive statistics to the source of variance. The source of variance here was number of cases and
mean. The central tendency of the respondents’ opinion on the designed set of materials could be recorded in the table as follows:
Table 3.3 Template of Descriptive Statistics of Experts’ Opinions on Online
Moodle
No Respondents’
opinions on Frequency of points of agreement
Central tendency 1
2 3
4 5
N Mn
Notes: N
= Number of cases the number of respondents Mn = Mean indicators of central tendency of the set of sources
The formula to get Mean is: Best 1970 classifies the range of the point of agreement from 1
– 5. He also provides the interpretation of point of agreement, which is presented on a
following table:
Table 3.4. The Interpretation of the Degree of Agreement Range
Meaning
1.00 -1.99 Replace the rejected part of the design
2.00 – 2.99
Add more part or modify part of the design based on the lack on the statement.
3.00 – 3.99
Conduct more exploration on the existing part of the design based on the statement
4.00 – 5.00
No revision
In order to judge whether the designed materials were acceptable or not, the researcher gave description to categorize the result. The maximum points were
five. The materials designed were considered as good and acceptable if the total points were more than seventy-five percent from the total maximum points. It
means that the range of the score is 3.75 - 5.0. The materials designed were
considered good but needed crucial revisions if the total of central tendency was fifty percent up to seventy five percent or 2.5 - 3.74. The materials designed were
considered poor designed if the total number of central tendency was below fifty percent or 0
– 2.4.
CHAPTER IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter is essentially the realization of what has been planned in Chapter III. This chapter is divided into two major parts. The first part presents
the process of designing online Moodle as e-learning media in teaching English for the industrial internship students. The second part presents the designed online
Moodle.
4.1. The Process of Designing Online Moodle
The researcher adapted the steps of Research and Development cycles and also employed ADDIE model in the process of designing the learning model. To
answer the research question of how is online Moodle as e-learning media in teaching English for the industrial students designed, the steps of how to create
final version of the learning model were elaborated in this section. By elaborating each step clearly, it would describe the answer of the research question. There
were five steps, namely analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation.
4.1.1. Analysis
The researcher conducted need analysis started on June to September 2013. In conducting the need analysis, the researcher employed questionnaire and
interview as the instruments in order to obtain reliable data by distributing need analysis questionnaires to students of grade three Technique of Light Vehicle
SMKN 1 Purworejo, interviewing an English teacher of SMK Negeri 1
Kategori