4.6.1. Grading the Items of the Questionnaire
The questionnaire consisted of five questions; each of them had these options namely: a, b, and c. each option had a score that showed the quality of each item.
The score ranges were from 1 to 3 as shown in the table below: Table 11. Grading the items of questionnaire
Options Score
Meaning A
1 Low
B 2
Medium C
3 High
Arikunto, 1998: 215 in Ratnasari, 2005 The explanation of the point above was
a. If the students choose a, the score is 1, it means that it is low, b. If the students choose b, the score is 2, it means that it is medium,
c. If the students choose c, the score is 3, it means that it is high.
4.6.2 Determining the Grade Score
The writer analyzed the result of the questionnaire after the students answered the questionnaire. The result of the data analysis of each question could be classified
into a range of mean below: Table 12. Determining the score grade
Range of
Mean Students’
Interest The
Advantage Students’
motivation The
relevancy Sustainability
0.00- Low
Do not Low
Not Not
1.00
1.01- 2.00
2.01- 3.00
Medium
High help
the students
Help the
students help
the students
very much Medium
High relevant
Relevant
Very relevant
necessary
Necessary
Very necessary
4.6.3 Tabulating the Data of Questionnaire
The purpose of tabulating the questionnaire was to make the result of grading clearly. The table consists of these columns: name and score per item, which was
presented in appendix
4.6.4 Finding the Mean
The formula used for computing the mean is as follows: M =
x N
Then the result of the mean of each aspect was as follows: Table 13. The result of the mean
Issue Mean
Students’ interest The advantage of using puppets in teaching
transactional and interpersonal conversation Students’ motivation
2.16 2.8
2.52
The relevancy of using puppets in teaching transactional and interpersonal conversation
Sustainability 2.6
2.44
4.6.5 Matching the Mean to a Criterion