t
o
t
t
: The alternative hypothesis H
a
is accepted and the null hypothesis H is
rejected. It means that the use of Picture Word Inductive Model is effective on students‟ ability in writing recount text to the eighth grade students of
SMP Negeri 3 Tangerang Selatan. t
o
t
t
: The alternative hypothesis H
a
is rejected and the null hypothesis H is
accepted. It means that the use of Picture Word Inductive Model is not effective on students‟ ability in writing recount text to the eighth grade
students of SMP Negeri 3 Tangerang Selatan. By comparing the value of t
o
= 2.39 and t
t
= 1.67 or 2.391.67, the writer made the conclusion of the hypothesis that t
o
is bigger than t
t
. So, the alternative hypothesis H
a
is accepted and the null hypothesis H
o
is rejected. It means there is significance difference between the result of using Picture Word Inductive Model
PWIM and without using it.
B. Data Interpretation
Based on data description, the students‟ writing ability at the eighth grade
students of SMP Negeri 3 Tangerang Selatan is improved, especially by using Picture Word Inductive Model. In the description of the data which was taken from 30
students of experimental class has the mean of pre-test 57.53 before using Picture Word Inductive Model. After giving 4 times treatments for experimental class using
Picture Word Inductive Model, the writer got the mean of post-test 73.73. So, the writer got the mean of gained score 16.43. The smallest score in the pre-test was 30
and the highest score was 86. The data showed in post-test that the smallest score was 50 and the highest score was 96. In conclusion, the lowest and the highest scores
in the post-test were higher than those in the pre-test. Besides that, the description of the mean of the controlled class which was
taken from 30 students was 59.10 in pre-test score without usingPicture Word Inductive Model. After giving 4 times treatments for controlled class without using
Picture Word Inductive Model, the writer got the mean of post-test 69.30. So, the
writer got the mean of gained score10.86. The smallest score in the pre-test was 36 and the highest score was 83. The data showed in post-test that the smallest score
was 50 and the highest score was 96. In conclusion, the lowest and the highest scores in the post-test also higher than in the pre-test.
In analyzing the data, the writer analyzed the hypothesis of pre-test and post- tests both of class. This step is the main step to know whether Picture Word Inductive
Model is significant toward the students ‟ ability in writing recount text or not. The
writer analyzed by conducting T-test formula, the significant used 5 0.05, and the criteria tis value of t
test
t
o
t
table
. From the result above showed that t
test
t
o
t
table
t
t
or 2.391.67. Therefore, the alternative hypothesis H
a
is accepted; there is a significant difference between students
‟ ability in writing recount text using Picture Inductive model and without using Picture Word Inductive Model. It can be seen
that the average gained score of experimental class is higher than the average gained score of controlled class. Therefore, it means Picture Word Inductive Model is
effective on students‟ ability in writing recount text to the eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 3 Tangerang Selatan.
C. Data Discussion
