The Pre-Test Score and Post-Test Score of Experimental Class The Pre-Test Score and Post-Test Score of Controlled Class

39

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION

This chapter presents the result of the research. The discussion of this chapter elaborates data description, data analysis, test of the hypothesis, and data discussion.

A. Research Finding

After collecting the data of both experimental class and controlled class, the writer analyzed all the data using statistical analysis as described below.

1. Data Description

After conducting the research, the writer obtained two kinds of data, namely experimental class and controlled class, which were gained from pre-test and post- test that were administered to both experimental class and controlled class. The result of the pre-test and post-test of both classes will be presented below:

a. The Pre-Test Score and Post-Test Score of Experimental Class

The pretest score was collected before the writer giving any treatment of Picture Word Inductive Model to the students of experimental class. Post-test was given after all the treatments had been applied to the students of experimental class. Below is the table pre-test and post-test score of experimental class: Table 4.1 Pre-Test and Post-Test of Experimental Class No. Students Number Pre-test Score Post-test Score Gained Score 1 Student 1 33 53 20 2 Student 2 50 66 16 3 Student 3 66 86 20 4 Student 4 53 73 20 No. Students Number Pre-test Score Post-test Score Gained Score 5 Student 5 46 76 30 6 Student 6 56 73 17 7 Student 7 60 83 23 8 Student 8 63 86 23 9 Student 9 70 76 6 10 Students 10 43 56 13 11 Student 11 40 70 30 12 Student 12 43 70 27 13 Student 13 66 90 24 14 Student 14 76 80 4 15 Student 15 40 73 33 16 Student 16 83 86 3 17 Student 17 46 66 20 18 Student 18 53 80 37 19 Student 19 56 60 4 20 Student 20 80 83 3 21 Student 21 46 56 7 22 Student 22 70 73 3 23 Student 23 73 76 3 Based on the table above, it can be clarified that the mean score of the pre-test of experimental class was 57.53. Moreover, the student‟s lowest score was 30, while the highest score is 86. After being treated by Picture Word Inductive Model, the mean score of the post-test was 73.73. The post-test score which has the lowest score 50, while the highest score was 96. The finding pointed out there was significant difference.

b. The Pre-Test Score and Post-Test Score of Controlled Class

The controlled class was administered at 8.7 of SMPN 3 Tangerang Selatan which consisted of 40 students but only 30 of students‟ paper of it which were qualified to be evaluated. Below is the table of the pre-test and post-test of the controlled class. No. Students Number Pre-test Score Post-test Score Gained Score 24 Student 24 63 66 3 25 Student 25 46 70 24 26 Student 26 86 93 7 27 Student 27 43 70 27 28 Student 28 60 76 16 29 Student 29 30 50 20 30 Student 30 86 96 20 Total ∑= 1726 ∑= 2212 ∑= 493 Average M= 57.53 M= 73.73 Table 4.2 Pre-Test Score and Post-Test Score of Controlled Class No. Students̓ Number Pre-test Score Post-test Score Gained score 1. Student1 66 73 7 2. Student 2 40 66 26 3. Student 3 50 53 3 4. Student 4 83 90 7 5. Student 5 60 66 6 6. Student 6 46 50 4 7. Student 7 40 53 13 8. Student 8 70 73 3 9. Student 9 66 70 4 10. Student 10 43 50 10 11. Student 11 80 83 3 12. Student 12 46 63 17 13. Student 13 66 76 10 14. Student 14 53 60 13 15. Student 15 73 76 3 16. Student 16 53 60 14 17. Student 17 70 76 13 18. Student 18 83 96 13 No. Students̓ Number Pre-test Score Post-test Score Gained score 19. Student 19 80 96 16 20. Student 20 43 70 27 21. Student 21 46 56 7 22 Student 22 70 73 3 23. Student 23 60 66 6 24. Student 24 36 53 17 25. Student 25 46 66 20 26. Student 26 43 73 30 27. Student 27 66 76 10 28. Student 28 76 80 4 29. Student 29 56 70 14 30. Student 30 63 66 3 Total ∑= 1773 ∑= 2079 ∑= 326 Average M= 59.10 M= 69.30 As mentioned in the table above, the mean score of the pre-test of controlled class was 59.10. While the lowest score was 36 and the highest score was 83. Otherwise, the mean score of the post-test of controlled class was 69.30. It has the lowest score 50 and the highest score was 96. After the writer got all the scores from experimental and controlled class, she made the chart to draw the increasing of scores before and after treatments were conducted. The result of all scores can be seen in the table below. Figure 4.1 The Comparison Chart of Students’ Score

2. Data Analysis a. Normality Test

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effect of Using Comic Strips on the Eighth Grade Students’ Recount Writing Achievement at SMPN 1 Jember in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

0 6 4

Grammatical Error Analysis of the Eighth Grade Students in Writing Descriptive Text at SMP Negeri 1 Jember in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

1 7 3

The Effectiveness of Pictures in Text in Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eight Grade Students of MTsN 13 Jakarta).

0 18 178

An Analysis of Students' Error in Writing Recount Text (A Case Study in the Second Grade Students of SMP Trimulia Jakarta))

16 39 151

The Effectiveness of Numbered Heads Together Technique (NHT) Toward Students’ Reading Ability on Descriptive Text A Quasi Experimental Study at the Second Grade of SMPN 2 Tangerang Selatan in Academic Year 2013/2014

1 9 128

The Effectiveness of Using Picture in Teaching Reading of Procedure Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Third Grade of SMK YAPIMDA Jakarta)

1 8 114

The Effectiveness Of Using English Comics Strips In Teaching Writing Of Narrative Text; A Quasi-Experimental Research at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Islam Al-Ikhlas in the Academic Year 2013/2014.

1 7 117

The Relationship between Students' Creative Thinking Ability and Their Writing Recount Text Skill (A Corelational Study at the Eleventh Grade students of MA Khasanah Kebajikan Tangerang Selatan Academic Year 2015/2016)

0 10 0

The Effectiveness of Using Clustering Technique in Teaching Writing Recount Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Second Grade ofMts Negeri 3 Jakarta)

1 11 109

The Effect of Peer-Assessment Method towards Students' Writing of Recount Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Negeri 11 Tangerang Selatan year 2015/2016)

0 3 72