1.67 0.60 BALANCING CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT: A SOCIOECONOMIC STUDY OF FARMERS INTERACTION WITH KERINCI SEBLAT NATIONAL PARK (KSNP).

Table 2. Proportion of income by sectors in last year August 2001 to July 2002 KSNP Village by site Rpyear ICDP Village Non CDP Village ICDP Village Non CDP Village ICDP Village Non ICDP Village Mean Rp MeanRp Mean Rp. MeanRp MeanRp Mean Rp. 1 Wetland rice 843750.00

9.79 670928.57

16.13 2389972.97

19.38 837714.29

27.97 1910303.03

46.04 4553825

53.06 2

Perennial crops 2662687.50

27.72 970202.38

9.98 2212135.14

22.27 807142.86

27.30 790370.59

18.73 602095.24

7.81 3

Dry land farming 3369919.64

24.85 2341464.29

22.58 5551351.35

40.47 1843428.57

31.65 386741.18

5.56 1914263.49

10.85 4

Forest product 0.00

0.00 147619.05

2.25 27027.03

0.52 238000.00

7.67 135294.12

2.04 223428.57

1.57 5

Livestock 861750.00

10.29 669404.76

5.07 677702.70

4.32 21428.57

0.56 513088.24

5.80 1459523.81

9.46 6

Carpentry 73571.43

1.23 31238.10

0.93 0.00

0.00 8571.43

0.29 222647.06

6.30 787341.27

5.86 7

Trade 678928.57

3.51 661904.76

3.27 289189.19

1.77 0.00

0.00 586235.29

8.06 393928.57

3.84 8

Civil servantmilitary 289285.71

1.70 1337142.86

8.22 1488108.11

7.30 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 114285.71

1.33 9

Employee of private sector 4750.00

0.15 585714.29

2.70 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 171428.57

1.16 10

Fishery 0.00

0.00 7619.05

0.03 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 17777.78

0.20 11

Craft 51785.71

2.74 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 107.14

0.00 5882.35

0.10 0.00

0.00 12

Home industry 35714.29

0.50 70952.38

0.87 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 13

Transportation 161250.00

3.04 300000.00

2.53 2166216.22

1.89 104285.71

4.55 0.00

0.00 63492.06

0.47 14

Wage labor 407142.86

3.48 119285.71

1.79 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.61 35294.12

1.43 67460.32

1.43 15

Remittance 771971.25

8.46 791619.05

20.55 89189.19

2.07 0.00

7.38 216929.41

2.98 250015.87

2.98 16

Others ….. 79035.71

2.54 104571.43

3.14 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.77 7272.73

0.00 0.00

0.00 Total

10,291,542.67 100.00 8,809,666.68 100.00 14,890,891.90 100.00 3,860,678.57 100.00 4,810,058.12 100.00 10,618,866.26 100.00 Table 3: Proportion of income by sectors continued No Source of income. Pesisir Selatan Rejang Lebong Musi Rawas All Site ICDP Village Non CDP Village ICDP Village Non CDP Village ICDP Village Non CDP Village ICDP Vil- Non ICDP Vil- Mean Rp MeanRp Mean Rp MeanRp Mean Rp MeanRp 1 Wetland rice 1148152.17 31.73 1529166.67 17.22 807105.26 18.65 789285.57 28.62 766702.70 12.33 301219.51 9.00

21.90 28.91

2 Perennial crops 735702.13 10.22 1704000.00 15.25 1087566.67 42.22 1476151.02 25.78 3033729.73 40.20 2032429.73 43.45

26.51 20.46

3 Dry land farming 70319.15 1.32 0.00 0.00 183589.74 9.32 213823.08 10.34 565351.35 9.50 449024.39 9.82

15.42 13.50

4 Forest product 240755.32 3.79 750000.00 4.64 2564.10 0.23 23112.24 1.73 495945.95 4.61 0.00 0.00

1.89 1.95

5 Livestock 2441808.51 4.32 1687500.00 3.79 3846.15 0.15 6020.41 0.28 1814864.86 8.77 133902.44 1.39

9.02 4.83

6 Carpentry 273478.26 21.08 250000.00 14.94 0.00 0.00 113877.55 1.86 351351.35 3.33 14634.15 1.63

1.98 2.71

7 Trade 1221276.60 1.92 780000.00 2.38 217948.72 2.99 366734.69 7.52 1589189.19 7.49 1044878.05 12.29

5.13 6.12

8 Civil servantmilitary 746276.60 7.51

0.00 8.47

338461.54 2.43 0.00 0.00 673297.30 4.67 235121.95 2.44

2.91 2.39

9 Employee of private 306382.98 1.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.33 0.84

10 Fishery 2170.21 1.60 0.00 0.00 81025.64 3.58 8163.27 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.62 0.26

11 Craft

0.00 0.31

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4054.05 0.05 0.00 0.00

0.63 0.00

12 Home industry 63829.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.24 0.17

13 Transportation 1060869.57 0.70 750000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 805405.41 5.44 600000.00 7.42

2.17 2.67

14 Wage labor 130425.53 2.14

0.00 7.14

0.00 0.00 29591.84 1.44 129729.73 0.71 21951.22 3.25

1.16 1.67

15 Remittance 271319.15 1.02 7118333.33 0.00 553974.36 20.92 553918.37 21.52 29189.19 0.43 302556.10 9.31

7.22 12.93

16 Others ….. 1939361.70 3.65

0.00 30.80

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 196216.22 2.47 0.00 0.00

3.18 0.60

Total 10,652,127.67 100.02 14,569,000.00 100.00 3,276,082.18 100.00 3,580,678.04 100.00 10,455,027.03 100.00 5,135,717.54 100.00 100.00 100.00 No Source of income. Kerinci Merangin Solok The category of respondent response toward the existence of the park then tested with Chi-Square to determine whether the difference of knowledge between ICDP and NON ICDP village statisti- cally significant. The statistical analysis shows that for Kerinci and Merangin the number of sample who KSNP known to them is not statisti- cally different. Asymptotic Significance for these two sites are 0.063 and 0.117 respectively 7 . Meaning both sample know about the KSNP. But for other sites, number of sample in ICDP village and those in Non ICDP village who know about the KSNP is statistically significant. Asymptotic significance is less then 0.000xx, Meaning, the number of sample who know about the presence of the park is greater in ICDP Village as compare to Non ICDP villages. For all sites, the differ- ence on villagers’ knowledge about the park be- tween villagers in ICDP facilitated village ICDP Village with those of Non ICDP Village is a sta- tistically significant. However, exception is found for Kerinci and Merangin. Using other indicator such as Pearson Chi- Square value, it is greater than then X 2 table. It means that knowledge of KSNP villagers to- wards existence of the park at ICDP village is better then those of Non ICDP Village. The con- clusion is that ICDP facilitation has increased vil- lagers knowledge about the presence of the park. In Kerinci, both ICDP and Non ICDP facilitated villages, the villagers know about the existence of the park. Possible reason could be that Sungai Penuh as capital of the district is where KSNP headquarter is found is relatively closed to these sites. As such, the interaction between the park management with the villagers might have been more intensive then rest of districts prior to ICDP implementation. Villagers could explain very well the purposes of the park as to protect the natural resource, to protect flora and fauna as well as to limit access the forest.

2.2 Length of time villagers know about the park.

Dokumen yang terkait

Keanekaragaman jenis tumbuhan obat di hutan taman nasional gunung gede pangrango

1 4 4

Conflict management of bulls (Bos javanicus d’Alton 1832) conservation with community in Meru Betiri National Park and Alas Purwo National Park East Java

2 28 252

The concept of community empowerment in Kerinci Seblat National Park (KSNP), Musi Rawas Regency, South Sumatera Indonesia

6 142 348

Conflict management of bulls (Bos javanicus d’Alton 1832) conservation with community in Meru Betiri National Park and Alas Purwo National Park East Java

0 29 481

The concept of community empowerment in Kerinci Seblat National Park (KSNP), Musi Rawas Regency, South Sumatera - Indonesia

2 83 678

KEMISKINAN DI DALAM DAN SEKITAR KAWASAN TAMAN NASIONAL KERINCI SEBLAT DI KABUPATEN PESISIR SELATAN (PERILAKU DAN STRATEGI BERTAHAN HIDUP) PROVERTY WIHTIN AND AROUND KERINCI SEBLAT NATIONAL PARK IN SOUTH PESISIR REGENCY (BEHAVIOUR AND SURVIVAL STRATEGIS).

0 0 1

SUBMONTANE FOREST AT BANTIMURUNG BULUSARAUNG NATIONAL PARK: HOTSPOT OF BIRD DIVERSITY AND ITS MANAGEMENT CONSERVATION

0 1 14

KAJIAN AWAL POTENSI TUMBUHAN OBAT, ANTI KANKER, ANTI HIV DARI TAMAN NASIONAL KERINCI-SEBLAT The preliminary study of medicinal plant from Kerinci Seblat National Park as anti cancer and anti HIV

0 0 8

Economic evaluation on green tech in handling critical land areas around buffer zone of Kerinci Seblat National Park - Repository Unja

0 4 17

Agroforestry Natural and Benefits Stimuli for Improvement of Kerinci Community at Kerinci Seblat National Park (KSNP)

0 0 12