commit to user 77
a
Between columns q=
n iance
Error c
X c
X var
2 1
b
Between rows q=
n iance
Error r
X r
X var
2 1
c
Between columns HC
q= n
iance Error
r c
X r
c X
var
2 2
1 1
d
Between columns LC q=
n iance
Error r
c X
r c
X var
2 2
2 1
or
n iance
Error r
c X
r c
X var
2 1
2 2
F. Statistical Hypotheses
In this research, the researcher proposed three hypotheses. These hypotheses were based on the formulation of the problems. They were:
1. The difference between Process Approach
and Product Approach to teach writing for the eighth students at SMP TERPADU
Ponorogo. :
= :
2. The difference between the students who have high creativity
and than those who have low creativity
. :
= :
3. Interaction between teaching approaches Process Approach and Product
Approach A and creativity B in teaching writing for the eighth grade students at SMP Terpadu Ponorogo.
: = 0
:
commit to user 78
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDINGS
In this chapter, the analyzed data gained from the research are presented and discussed. The research findings are presented based on the following sub-
chapters: 1 Data description; 2 Normality and Homogeneity Test; 3 Testing Hypothesis; 4 Discussion of the Findings. The detailed description of each sub-
chapter is described as follows:
A. Data Description
The data used for the research were in the form of scores which were obtained from the result of the student’s creativity test and writing test.
Furthermore, the data were divided into 8 as follows: 1 the data of the students who were taught using process approach A
₁; 2 the data of the students who were taught using product approach A
₂; 3 the data of the students having high creativity B
₁; 4 the data of the students having low creativity B
₂; 5 the data of the students having high creativity who were taught using the process approach A
₁B₁; 6 the data of the students having low creativity who were taught using the process approach A
₁B₂; 7 the data of the students having high creativity who were taught using the product
approach A ₂B₁; 8 the data of the students having low creativity who were
taught using the product approach A ₂B₂. The score of the student’s writing
test in more detail can be described as follows: 1. The data of the students who were taught using process approach A
₁ 78
