Biomass and Total Height

The correlation coefficient of non linear regression model derived from the analysis is higher than linear regression model. However, the equation model from the linear regression model is still usable, because the correlation coefficient is strong more than 80. The curve pattern from non linear regression model polynomial and power is highly representing the pattern of biomass that influenced by diameter of each tree in forest cover A, B, C and D. The high of correlation value of forest cover A, B, C and D between the tree biomass and DBH shows that the diameter breast, the parameter reflecting the trees stem influence much on biomass compared with another growth parameter, as the previous research proved that the stem biomass gives the biggest percentage to the total tree biomass. The trees biomass on Acacia mangium tropical forest tress 80 of biomass is on stem, 11 on branch, 5 on leaves and 4 on small branch Wicaksono, 2004. Another result from the biomass in tropical forest trees study of Adinugroho 2002 also resulted the resemble distribution percentage of biomass.

4.3.2 Biomass and Total Height

The independent correlation test and ANOVA test was also conducted for trees biomass and tree total height parameter in each forest cover type. Analysis of variant ANOVA result shows that there is no significant different between the parameter of each observation plot for all forest cover type statistical result in appendix. The power regression pattern of forest cover type A and B visually show that there is significant different between total height influence of the observation plot Figure 4.17 and Figure 4.18. The correlation between the parameter of each 59 pattern plot is strong, depicted in correlation coefficient is more than 80 resulted from power regression model. yA1 = 0.0391x 3.0505 R 2 = 0.8446 yA2 = 0.0309x 3.2342 R 2 = 0.8792 yA3 = 0.0317x 3.2418 R 2 = 0.9253 yA4 = 0.045x 3.0335 R 2 = 0.9046 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 10 20 30 40 50 60 Total height m Tr ee bi o m a s s k g p la n t A1 A2 A3 A4 Power A1 Power A2 Power A3 Power A4 Figure 4.17 Tree biomass and total height of forest cover type A using power regression. yB1 = 0.0175x 3.4075 R 2 = 0.8915 y B2= 0.1525x 2.6609 R 2 = 0.8066 yB3 = 0.0244x 3.3282 R 2 = 0.8843 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 10 20 30 40 50 Total he ight m Tree bi om ass k g pl ant B1 B2 B3 Power B1 Power B2 Power B3 Figure 4.18 Tree biomass and total height of forest cover type B using power regression. 60 The pattern of power regression model of forest cover C Figure 4.19 show that the difference value of total height on tree biomass is different when the total height reach more than 25 m. It is due to the condition of plot observation of forest cover C that has different vegetation density, but the difference is tolerable because the pattern of changing is equally the same. yC1 = 0.0063x 3.7457 R 2 = 0.8894 yC2= 0.1615x 2.4668 R 2 = 0.6312 yC3 = 0.1509x 2.6875 R 2 = 0.8201 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 10 20 30 40 50 60 Total height m Tr e e b iom a s s k g pl a n t C1 C2 C3 Power C1 Power C2 Power C3 Figure 4.19 Tree biomass and total height of forest cover type C using power regression. yD1 = -0.0276x 2 + 76.26x - 302.15 R 2 = 0.7563 yD5 = 0.6605x 2 + 73.085x - 316.09 R 2 = 0.7357 yD4 = 2.5675x 2 - 12.876x + 15.241 R 2 = 0.7135 yD3 = 0.3641x 2 + 59.397x - 261.65 R 2 = 0.8471 yD6 = 1.0147x 2 + 2.8755x - 3.1677 R 2 = 0.9015 -500 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Total height m Tr ee bi om ass kg pl ant D1 D5 D4 D3 D6 Poly. D1 Poly. D5 Poly. D4 Poly. D3 Poly. D6 Figure 4.20 Tree biomass and total height of forest cover type D using polynomial regression. 61 The polynomial regression pattern of forest cover D derived from independent analysis, shows that there is no significant different on influencing total height to tree biomass between the observation plot. The plot observation data for all points of forest cover type A, B, C and D is used to derived the regression model that the trend lines of dispersion plot values are fitted using polynomial, power and linear model. The correlation coefficient of the trees biomass and total height of each cover type is lower than its correlation with the trees diameter, but the correlation is still high range about 70-90 from non linear model Figure 4.21 - Figure 4.25 . The equation model between tree biomass and total height derived from each forest cover type is summarized in Table 4.3. y = 0.0354x 3.1512 R 2 = 0.8875 y = 182.43x - 2055.1 R 2 = 0.4505 y = 7.3733x 2 - 135.75x + 496.5 R 2 = 0.5792 -4000 -2000 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Total height m Tree B iom ass kgplant Plot A Power Plot A Linear Plot A Poly. Plot A Figure 4.21 Tree biomass and total height correlation regression model of forest cover type A. 62 y = 0.0483x 3.0561 R 2 = 0.8593 y = 5.3769e 0.2x R 2 = 0.7997 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 22000 24000 26000 28000 10 20 30 40 50 Total heightm Tr ee Bi om ass k g pl a n t Plot B Power Plot B Expon. Plot B Figure 4.22 Tree biomass and total height correlation regression model of forest cover type B. y = 0.0626x 2.9134 R 2 = 0.767 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 10 20 30 40 50 60 Total Height m T ree B io m ass kg p lan t Plot C Power Plot C Figure 4.23 Tree biomass and total height correlation regression model of forest cover type C. 63 y = 79.011x - 363.25 R 2 = 0.6869 y = 0.9688x 2 + 46.49x - 222.83 R 2 = 0.7014 y = 0.1475x 2.8426 R 2 = 0.7552 -1000 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Total height m Tr ee Bi om as s k g pl ant Plot D Linear Plot D Poly. Plot D Power Plot D Figure 4.24 Tree biomass and total height correlation regression model of forest cover type D. y = 0.0049x 2 - 0.0652x + 0.196 R 2 = 0.4615 y = 0.0002x 2.6932 R 2 = 0.8245 -5 5 10 15 20 25 30 25 50 75 Total Height m T ree B io m a ss kg p lan t Series1 Poly. Series1 Power Series1 Figure 4.25 Tree biomass and DBH correlation regression model of tropical rain forest covering type A, B, C and D. 64 The more strength relation is derived from non linear regression model of forest cover A, B, C and D. The pattern curve of the model is curvilinear. It means that the total trees height will influence significantly on biomass when the trees reach certain total height.

4.3.3 Biomass and LAI