Random walk Theory and Efficient Market Hypothesis Random walk Th

18 of Market and Return of Market. Risk of Market shows the Risk of each market that will take by the investor. Risk of market can either be measured by using the standard deviation or variance between returns from that same security or market index http:www.investopedia.com. d Market Capitalization, According to investorwords, it is represents the aggregate value of a company or stock. It is obtained by multiplying the number of shares outstanding by their current price per share. Market capitalization is use to see the size of the market. The higher the amount of capitalization market it is means the higher the size of the market http:www.investorwords.com

2.1.4 Random walk Theory and Efficient Market Hypothesis

According to Bodie et al. 2008 random walk theory is the notion that stock price changes are random and unpredictable. If stock price movement were predictable, that would be damning evidence of stock market inefficiency. According to Rose, Peter S. and Marquis, Milton H. 2008 the efficient markets hypothesis suggest all information that has bearing on the market value the prices of that assets. Bodie et al. 2008 define that efficient market hypothesis is the hypothesis that prices of securities fully reflect available information about securities. It’s clearly define by McMillan et al. 2011 that efficient market is a market in which asset prices fully reflect all past and present information; market in which asset prices reflect the new information quickly and rationally. The important point of efficient market is price should be expected react only to the measured by using th th e e standard d d ev evia ia tion or variance between returns from that sa a m me security or market index http: ww www.investopedia.com. d Mark k e et Capitalization, A A cc cc or or di di ng ng to o investorwords, s it is represents t the aggregate e va va lu lu e e of a company or stock k. . It It i i s s obtained by y multiplying the e nu nu mb mb er of sh sh a ar es outstandi ng by the ir c c ur ur rent pr pr ic ic e e pe per share. Market ca ca pi pi ta liza za t tion i s us e to see the s iz e of the marke t. T he he highe h r r th th e e am a ou n nt of capi pi t ta lization mar ke t it is means the hi gh er the s iz e e of t the he marke et h htt p: www.investor wo rds.co m

2.1.4 Random walk Th

eo ry a nd Efficie nt Mar ket Hypothesis Acco rd in g to o B B od od ie ie et et al. 2008 rand nd om om w w al al k k th eory i s th e e n notion t t ha ha t t stock price changes are random and nd u u np np r redictable. If stock price movement t we we r re pr pred edic ic ta ta ble, that would be damning evidence of stock market inefficien en c cy. Ac A co d rd i ing to to R R o ose, Peter r S S. an an d d Ma Ma rquis, M M il il to to n n H H. 20 20 08 08 the e ef effi ficient mark ket et s s hy y po p th th es es is is suggest all inf nformation on that has bear in in g g on the e m m a arket value the prices of that assets. Bodie et t al. 2008 define that efficient market hypothesis is the hypothesis that prices of se ecurities fu fully reflect available information about securities. It’s clearly define by Mc cMilla lan et al. 2011 that efficient market is a market in which asset prices fully refle le ct all past and present information; market 19 elements information release such as unexpected or surprise information and investors process the unexpected information and revise expectation. Rose, Peter S. and Marquis, Milton H. 2008 explains that if efficient market hypothesis is correct, investors will react to temporary underpricing or temporary overpricing of assets and make changes in their portfolios because any temporary deviation of actual returns from expected returns should be eliminated. McMillan et al. 2011 also stated that there are some factors that contributing to market efficiency such as market participants where the number of investors individual and institutional related to the market efficiency. Other factor is information availability such as trading activity and traded companies and financial disclosure . There are two costs that incurred by traders in identifying and exploiting possible market inefficiencies affect the interpretation of market efficiency. First is transaction cost, according to Investopedia http:www.investopedia.com it is an expenses that incurred when buying or selling securities. Transaction costs include brokers commissions and spreads the difference between the price the dealer paid for a security and the price the buyer pays. Second is information acquisition cost, the cost of a business to acquire a new customer. The company recognizes costs, including marketing and incentives, to introduce new customers to the companys products and services. The customer acquisition cost is calculated by dividing total acquisition costs by total new customers over a set period of time. According to Bodie et al. 2008 in market equilibrium, efficient informational gathering should be beneficial, because when information cost Rose, Peter S. and M M ar arquis, Milton n H H . 2008 explains that if efficient market hypothesis is is correct, investors will react to te te mp m orary underpricing or temporary ov overpricing of assets s an n d d ma ma ke ke c c ha ha ng ng es in their port rtfo fo lios because any tempor r a ary deviation o of a a ct t u ual returns from expecte e d d r re tu turns should be e eliminated. Mc Mc Mi Mi ll l an a et a a l l. 2 011 also stated t ha t t th th ere ar ar e so so me m facto tors that contri ri bu buti ting ng to m ma rket efficiency such a s market participa nt t s s where e th th e e nu n mb b e er of in n ve ve st t ors i i nd ividual and institutiona l related t o th e market e e fficie ie nc nc y y. Oth e er fa fact ct o or is s in fo rmation availa bi li ty suc h as tradi ng activity and tr ad d ed e c com ompa pa nies an d fin nanc ial disc lo sure . . There are tw o co st s th at incur re d by traders i n n identifyin ing g and ex x ploiting possible ma rket i ne fficienc ie s affe ct the interpretatio n n of m m a arke et effici cien en cy. Fi rs t is is t t ra ra ns n action cos s t t, a a cc cc or or di d ng t o In Inv vestoped ed ia ia h ttp:www.investopedia.com it i i s s an n e xpenses that incurred when buyin ing g o or se sell l in ing g securities. Transaction costs include brokers commissions and d s s p prea ea ds ds t the di di ff ffer e ence b b t etween t t he he p p i rice the d d ea ea le le r r pa paid id f for a sec ecur ur it ity y an d d th the price th th e b buyer pays . Se S cond d i i s s in information acqu quisition c cost, the cost o f f a a bu b siness ss t t o o acquire a new customer. The company y recognize es costs, including marketing and incentives, to introduce new cus to t mers to o the companys products and services. The customer acquisition cost is cal alcula a t ted by dividing total acquisition costs by total new customers over a set period of o time 20 investors’ money to uncover and analyze, investors will expect the investment analysis result can increased the expected return and investor will have an incentive to spend time and resources to analyze and uncover new information only if that activity can generate higher investment return. According to Fama 1970 in McMillan et al. 2011 there are three forms of efficiency that shows in Table below: Table 1 Three Forms of Market Efficiency Market Prices Reflect : Forms of Market Efficiency Past Market Data Public Information Private Information Weak form of market efficiency √ Semi strong form of market efficiency √ √ Strong form of market efficiency √ √ √ Source: McMillan et al. 2011 According to Fama 1970 in McMillan et al. 2011 the securities prices in the weak form fully reflect the past market data, which refers to historical prices and trading volume information. The investors cannot predict the future prices changes by extrapolating prices or pattern of prices from the past because it’s already reflected in current prices. Prices in Semistrong form efficient market reflect all the past and publicly available information. In Rose, Peter S. and Marquis, Milton H. 2008 all buyers and sellers are rational and use the all publicly available information to help them value financial assets. Strong form shows that securities prices is fully reflect all the public and private information such as information that possessed by insiders who work with incentive to spend time and re re s sources to ana naly ly ze and uncover new information only if that activity y ca can generate higher investment retur r n. n Accord d in ing to Fama 1970 in n Mc M Mi Mi ll ll an an et et al. 2011 there e a a re three forms of efficien ency that shows s in in T T ab a le below: Table 1 Three Forms of Market Effici en n cy cy Mark et Prices Reflec t : Fo orm rms of M M arket Efficiency Pa st Marke t Data Public Information Pr P ivat t e e In n fo form r at i io We Weak f f o or m of m arket efficien cy √ Semi str ong form of ma rk et efficie en cy √ √ St S rong g form of market efficien cy √ √ √ So o ur ur ce e : McMi ll an et a l. 2 011 According to Fama 197 7 0 i i n n Mc Mc Mi Mi ll llan et al. 2011 the securities pr pr ic ic e es in in t t he h weak form fully reflect the past market data, which refers to h h is isto tori ri c cal pr pr ic ic es es a and nd t t ra ra di di ng ng v vol olum um e e in info fo rm rmat at ion. n. T The he i inv nv es es to to rs rs c c an an no no t t pr pr ed ed ic ict t th th e e fu fu ture pric ices e c c ha ha ng ng es es b by y ex ex tr trapolating g pr p ices or pa pa tt ern of p ri ri ce ce s fr fr om om t t he he pas s t t because it’s already reflected in current pr r i ices. Prices in Semistrong form m efficient m market reflect all the past and publicly available information. In Rose, Pete ter S. a a n nd Marquis, Milton H. 2008 all buyers and sellers are rational and use the all l p publicly available information to help them 21 the company and have access to its privileged information as stated in Rose, Peter S. and Marquis, Milton H. 2008.

2.1.5 Asymmetric Information

Dokumen yang terkait

Influence Of Liquidity And Leverage On The Profitability Of Coal Mining Companies In Indonesian Stock Exchange

1 59 92

INFLUENCE OF INVESTORS’ ATTENTION ON STOCK RETURN, LIQUIDITY, AND RETURN VOLATILITY COMPARISON BETWEEN MANUFACTURE COMPANIES IN INDONESIA AND INDIA.

0 3 15

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT THE EFFECT OF EARNINGS MANIPULATION WITH USING M-SCORE ON STOCK RETURN (Empirical Evidence in Indonesia Listed Companies on LQ45 at Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2009-2011).

0 3 26

INFLUENCE OF INVESTORS’ ATTENTION ON STOCK RETURN, LIQUIDITY, AND RETURN VOLATILITY COMPARISON BETWEEN INFLUENCE OF INVESTORS’ ATTENTION ON STOCK RETURN, LIQUIDITY, AND RETURN VOLATILITY COMPARISON BETWEEN MANUFACTURE COMPANIES IN INDONESIA AND INDIA.

0 3 19

INTRODUCTION INFLUENCE OF INVESTORS’ ATTENTION ON STOCK RETURN, LIQUIDITY, AND RETURN VOLATILITY COMPARISON BETWEEN MANUFACTURE COMPANIES IN INDONESIA AND INDIA.

0 3 9

CONCLUSION, IMPLICATION, LIMITATION, AND SUGGESTION INFLUENCE OF INVESTORS’ ATTENTION ON STOCK RETURN, LIQUIDITY, AND RETURN VOLATILITY COMPARISON BETWEEN MANUFACTURE COMPANIES IN INDONESIA AND INDIA.

0 8 60

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND PREVIOUS RESEARCH GENDER, ETHNICITY AND RELIGION IN INVESTMENT BEHAVIOUR WHILE TAKING RISK.

0 3 31

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND PREVIOUS RESEARCH IMPACT OF CARHART FOUR FACTOR MODEL TO THE RETURN OF COMPANY IN INDONESIA FIXED INCOME MUTUAL FUND 2005-2011.

0 2 28

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND PREVIOUS RESEARCH THE IMPACT OF FAMILY INVOLVEMENT IN OWNERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT TOWARDS COMPANY’S PERFORMANCE, COMPARISON BETWEEN PT. GUDANG GARAM TBK. AND PT. BENTOEL INTERNATIONAL.

0 2 14

Theoretical Background and Previous Research THE INFLUENCE OF GENDER IN INVESTMENT DECISION.

0 3 16