Return and Risk Return and Risk

26 Wyss, Rico von 2004 also explain that liquidity measures are separated into one-dimensional only one variable in one measure and multi-dimensional ones different variables in one measure. The one-dimensional liquidity measure is separated into four groups such as: size of the firm, the volume traded, the time between subsequent trades or the spread. According to Tripathy, naliniprava 2011 trading volume tends to be higher when stock prices are increasing; its changes reflect the available set of relevant information perceived by the market. This research found significant contemporaneous relationship between return volatility and trading volume that indicate the information may flow simultaneously rather than sequentially into the market. The study also found that trading volume is associated with an increase in return volatility and this relationship is asymmetrical. The study revealed that shocks in stock returns impact trading volume in the expected direction over a short horizon. According to Pathirawasam, C. 2011. Higher volume in the market leads to a shorter time needed for trading a predefined amount of shares. So when trading volume is high this is a sign of high liquidity.

2.1.8 Return and Risk

According to McMillan et al. 2011 return is defined as the reward for undertaking the investment, it is the motivating forces in the investment process. There are two components of return which are; yield that is the income component of a security’s return and second is capital gain loss which is the change in price on a security over some period of time. ones different variables in o o ne ne measure. T T he he o o ne-dimensional liquidity measure is separated into four ur groups such as: size of the firm, t t he he volume traded, the time between subs bs equent trades or the he s s pr pr ea e d. d. A According to o T T ri r pa p thy, naliniprava 20 2011 1 tr trad a ing volume t t ends to be hi i g gher whe hen n st st oc oc k pric ic es es a re increasing; its c ha ng g es es reflect ct t t he he availab b le le set of releva a nt nt i i nf nf orma ma ti on p er ceived by th e market. This res ea a rc r h fo f un un d d si si gnif f ic ic ant co o nt n em po ra a ne ous relation sh ip between return vola ti li ty and t ra di d ng v v ol olum u e th hat a in indi di c cate t t he information may f low simultaneo us ly rather than seque n ntiall lly y in in to to the market t . Th e stud y also found tha t tr ad in g vo lu me is as so ci ated with an n increase in in return volatility and this r elatio ns hip is a sy mm et rical. The study r e evealed d tha at shoc ks ks in stoc k re tu u rn rn s s im im pa pa ct ct trading volum um e e in in t t he he exp ec ted di re e ct ctio ion over er a a short horizon. According to Path h ir iraw aw as as am, C. 2011. Higher volume i i n n th th e ma mark rket et leads to a shorter time needed for trading a predefined amoun un t t of of s sha har res. So So w w hen tr d ad i ing vo o lu lume me i is high h t t hi hi s s is is a a s s ig ig n n of hig h h li li qu qu id id i ity.

2.1.8 Return and Risk

According to McMillan e et al. 201 11 return is defined as the reward for undertaking the investment, it is th h e e mo o t tivating forces in the investment process. There are two components of retu u rn which are; yield that is the income d 27 According to Drake, Pamela Peterson and Fabozzi, frank J. 2009 risk is derived from Italian verb riscare which means “to dare”. Investors “dare to” get profits by taking advantage of opportunistic side of risk. According to Damodaran, Aswath 2012 risk in finance is defined in term of actual return on an investment around an expected return, even when those returns represent positive outcomes. According to McMillan et al. 2011 there are some sources of risk, such as: a Interest Rate Risk: changes in the level of interest rate that resulting on the variability in security’s return. b Market Risk: fluctuations in the overall market that makes variability in return. c Inflation Risk: the chance that purchasing power of invested money will decline. d Business Risk: the risk of doing business in a particular industry or environment e Financial Risk: it is associated with the use of debt financing. The variability in the return getting larger if the proportion of asset financed by debt is larger. f Liquidity Risk: this risk higher when the investment can’t be sought or sold quickly. g Currency Risk: this risk face by all investors who invest internationally related with the uncertainty of return after convert the foreign gains to the own currency. profits by taking advantag ag e e of opportu u ni ni st st ic side of risk. According to Damodaran, Aswat t h h 2012 risk in finance is defined i i n n term of actual return on d an investmen ent around an expe e ct t ed ed ret et ur ur n, n, e e ve v n when those e returns represent positive ve outcomes. A Acc ccor o di d ng to McMillan et al. l

2 2

01 01 1 1 there are som m e sources of risk sk, such a a s: s a In In te rest Rate Risk: changes in the l ev el l o o f in i te te re re st st rate that resulting on the varia bi li ty in secu ri ty ’s return. b Market Ris k: fluctua ti ons in t he overall mar ke e t t th hat at m m akes va ri ab il ity in ret urn. c Inflation Ri sk: th e chance that purchasing power of inve vested d mo ne e y y wi wi ll ll d d ec ec li l ne. d Business Risk: the r ris isk k of of doing business in a particular indu dust st r ry or environment e Fi Fina a nc nc ia ial l R Risk: it it i i s s as asso soci ciat at d ed wit h h th th e e us us e f of d d b ebt financ ncin ing g. The va va ri riability in the r r eturn ge ge tt ing larger if f th th e e pr p op p or or ti ti o on of asset financed by debt is larger. f Liquidity Risk: th this risk h higher when the investment can’t be sought or sold quick k ly l . g Currency Risk: this risk face by all investors who invest 28 h Country Risk: it political referred as political risk, this risk related with economy stability. According to Jones, Charles P. 2009, Fabozi, Frank J. and Drake, Pamela Peterson 2009 and McMillan et al. 2011 define that there are two risks that must be consider when investor deal with investment. The first is systematic risk, risk that cannot be diversified no matter the investor does or it called nondiversifiable risk, such as interest rate, inflation, economic cycles, political uncertainty, and natural disaster. Second is unsystematic risk, which is risk that can be eliminated by diversification or it called diversifiable risk. Risk can be measure using variance and standard deviation. Variance is absolute measure of dispersion. Standard deviation is a measure of the dispersion in outcomes around the expected value.

2.1.9 Relation between Investors’ attention with Liquidity

Dokumen yang terkait

Influence Of Liquidity And Leverage On The Profitability Of Coal Mining Companies In Indonesian Stock Exchange

1 59 92

INFLUENCE OF INVESTORS’ ATTENTION ON STOCK RETURN, LIQUIDITY, AND RETURN VOLATILITY COMPARISON BETWEEN MANUFACTURE COMPANIES IN INDONESIA AND INDIA.

0 3 15

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT THE EFFECT OF EARNINGS MANIPULATION WITH USING M-SCORE ON STOCK RETURN (Empirical Evidence in Indonesia Listed Companies on LQ45 at Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2009-2011).

0 3 26

INFLUENCE OF INVESTORS’ ATTENTION ON STOCK RETURN, LIQUIDITY, AND RETURN VOLATILITY COMPARISON BETWEEN INFLUENCE OF INVESTORS’ ATTENTION ON STOCK RETURN, LIQUIDITY, AND RETURN VOLATILITY COMPARISON BETWEEN MANUFACTURE COMPANIES IN INDONESIA AND INDIA.

0 3 19

INTRODUCTION INFLUENCE OF INVESTORS’ ATTENTION ON STOCK RETURN, LIQUIDITY, AND RETURN VOLATILITY COMPARISON BETWEEN MANUFACTURE COMPANIES IN INDONESIA AND INDIA.

0 3 9

CONCLUSION, IMPLICATION, LIMITATION, AND SUGGESTION INFLUENCE OF INVESTORS’ ATTENTION ON STOCK RETURN, LIQUIDITY, AND RETURN VOLATILITY COMPARISON BETWEEN MANUFACTURE COMPANIES IN INDONESIA AND INDIA.

0 8 60

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND PREVIOUS RESEARCH GENDER, ETHNICITY AND RELIGION IN INVESTMENT BEHAVIOUR WHILE TAKING RISK.

0 3 31

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND PREVIOUS RESEARCH IMPACT OF CARHART FOUR FACTOR MODEL TO THE RETURN OF COMPANY IN INDONESIA FIXED INCOME MUTUAL FUND 2005-2011.

0 2 28

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND PREVIOUS RESEARCH THE IMPACT OF FAMILY INVOLVEMENT IN OWNERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT TOWARDS COMPANY’S PERFORMANCE, COMPARISON BETWEEN PT. GUDANG GARAM TBK. AND PT. BENTOEL INTERNATIONAL.

0 2 14

Theoretical Background and Previous Research THE INFLUENCE OF GENDER IN INVESTMENT DECISION.

0 3 16