Resolution WHA66.22 Follow-up of the

67 Annex 2 BOX 2: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO CEWG RECOMMENDATIONS CONDUCTED AT THE REGIONAL LEVEL ACTIVITY IMPORTANT RECOMMENDATIONOUTCOME 1. Conduct of Regional Consultation for Development of a Regional Framework on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property in New Delhi on 5-6 April, 2011 13 SEAR Member States identified national and regional priorities for the 8 elements and 25 sub-elements of the GSPA, and presented a set of recommendations for WHO and Member States of the region that requires further engagement at national, regional and global levels 2.1 Conduct of Regional Technical Consultation in Bangkok, Thailand on 15- 17 August 2012 14 2.2 Regional technical discussion of the CEWG Report conducted during the 65 th SEA Regional Committee Meeting in Yogyakarta, Indonesia on 7 Sept. 2012 2.3 Regional Resolution SEARC65R3 Consultative Expert Working Group on Research and Development: Financing and Coordination adopted during 65 th SEA Regional Committee Meeting 12 “To engage actively in the negotiations in an open- ended meeting of Member States in November 2012, inter alia, by supporting the development of the Global Health RD Observatory, effective global RD coordination, adequate and sustainable funding for RD on diseases of Type II and III and specific RD needs of diseases of Type I in developing coun tries” 0.14 3.1 Conduct of country studies in Thailand, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Indonesia to document existing norms and standards followed in the classification of health RD activities; to identify current and future priorities for RD for health products and to identify project which need to be implemented in order to develop and deliver priority health products 3.2 Conduct of Regional Consultation for Developing a Strategic Workplan as a follow-up of the Report of the Consultative Expert Working group CEWG on Research and Development: Financing and Coordination held in Bangkok, Thailand on 25-26 July 2013 15 The participants of the Regional Consultation presented 6 recommendations for the development of norms and standards for the classification of health RD towards setting-up of RD observatories. These include, among others, the following: 15 a. Setting-up of a national RD observatory to collect, analyse, coordinate, prioritize and monitor RD resource flows from the public and private sectors; b. Member States may develop modalities and identify institutional entities to develop, establish, maintain and manage health RD observatories; c. Member States may pilot-test the proposed classification grid for norms and standards for RD in terms of diseases, product development and policy. In the same meeting, 7 potential priority areas for RD demonstration projects were identified and ranked. 68 BOX 2: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO CEWG RECOMMENDATIONS CONDUCTED AT THE REGIONAL LEVEL ACTIVITY IMPORTANT RECOMMENDATIONOUTCOME

4. Meeting of Experts on Demonstration Projects held in New Delhi, India on 24-

25 October 2013 16 Identified 4 research and development demonstration projects for submission to and consideration at the Technical Consultative Meeting to be held in Geneva on 3-5 December 2013. These were: 16 1. Combatting tuberculosis in the region development of diagnostics and drugs 2. Project on medicines and devices for diabetes mellitus 3. Multiplexed point-of-care test for acute febrile illness 4. Dengue vaccine development

5. Regional Meeting for the Assessment of Progress in Implementing Global

Strategy and Plan of Action on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property for Southeast Asia held in Bangkok, Thailand on 16-18 December, 2014 Member States agreed to provide a self-assessment as established by WHA62.16 and develop a priority mapping for the GSPA next steps, using the matrix agreed upon during the Consultation. WHO is asked to summarize and consolidate the results of the GSPA self-assessment and forward it from SEARO to WHA. Specific actions by Member States and WHO in relation to each of the 8 GSPA elements were also identified. 69 Annex 2 Contd BOX 3. PRIORITY-SETTING ACTIVITIES OF SEAR MEMBER STATES ON HEALTH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Country Bangladesh  Identification of research priorities in Bangladesh falls under the purview of the Bangladesh Medical Research Council BMRC, a national organization under the Ministry of Health Family Welfare MOHFW.  In 2011, WHO SEARO requested the Bangladesh to examine the “National RD priorities for Bangladesh and identify priority demonstration projects based on the local pharmaceutical manufacturing industry’s needs for improved technology and their capabilities for technology absorption, as per road map suggested by the Consultative Expert Working Group CEWG on Research and Development  The following priority innovative projects were identified: a. Phytochemical profiling, standardization and quality control of traditional and herbal drugs to ensure their safety and efficacy; b. Discovery of the new chemical entities from medicinal plants, microbes and marine sources. c. Process Development and Validation to Synthesize Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients APIs: Laboratory Scale to Industrial Scale through Pilot Scale production of bulk drugs. d. Production of high value biopharmaceuticalscatalysts by recombinant DNA technology and fermentation technology. Bhutan  Initiated a process for research priority setting in November 2014 where a workshop was held and a report is yet to be published India  Priority setting in India is done based on the following: o Global Forum for Health Research GFHR, ACHR framework o WHO SEARO- Regional Priorities o The WHO-India Country Cooperation Strategy CCS 2012-2017 o National Institute of Health- Global Priority Indonesia  The National Research Agenda 2010-2014 covered the development of vaccines, drugs of raw materials, traditional medicines, health and medical devices, etc.  The National Research Agenda 2015-2019 on health sector is going to be finalised based on burden of disease  MoH Decree no.872013 provides road map on drugs raw materials development Myanmar  National Health Policy of Myanmar has a policy guidance to encourage conduct of medical research activities not only on prevailing health problems but also giving due attention to health system research.  Promotion of Health Research should be done with the objective of conducting health researches that will contribute to health sector development