Maya L Hutapea, 2014 ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING OBSTACLES ON THE SUBJECT OF PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia |
repository.upi.edu |
perpustakaan.upi.edu
4.4.1.3 The Third Obstacle in Problem Three 68
4.4.1.4 The Fourth Obstacle in Problem Three 69
4.4.1.5 The Fifth Obstacle in Problem Three 69
4.5 The Students’ Outcome Space of The Problems
71 4.5.1 The Outcome Space of Ontogenic Obstacles
71 4.5.2 The Outcome Space of Epistemological Obstacles
73 4.5.3 The Outcome Space of Didactical Obstacles
75
4.6 The Extraction of Research Findings and Mathematics Textbooks 76
4.6.1 The Analysis of Instructional Material Design of Pythagorean Theorem in BPM1
77 4.6.2 The Analysis of Instructional Material Design of
Pythagorean Theorem in BPM2 78
4.6.3 The Analysis of Instructional Material Design of Pythagorean Theorem in BPM3
80 4.6.4 The Analysis of Instructional Material Design of
Pythagorean Theorem in BPM4 81
4.6.5 The Analysis of Instructional Material Design of Pythagorean Theorem in BPM5
82 4.6.6 The Extraction of Research Findings and The Analysis
of Mathematics Textbooks 83
4.7 Theoretical Arguments of The Instructional Material Design 84
4.7.1 Theoretical Arguments of The Instructional Material Design For The First Meeting
84 4.7.1.1 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation One
84 4.7.1.2 The Didactical Arguments For Situation One
85 4.7.1.3 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Two
85 4.7.1.4 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Two
86 4.7.1.5 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Three
86 4.7.1.6 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Three
86 4.7.1.7 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Four
86 4.7.1.8 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Four
87
Maya L Hutapea, 2014 ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING OBSTACLES ON THE SUBJECT OF PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia |
repository.upi.edu |
perpustakaan.upi.edu
4.7.2 Theoretical Arguments of The Instructional Material Design For The Second Meeting
88 4.7.2.1 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Five
88 4.7.2.2 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Five
88 4.7.2.3 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation six
89 4.7.2.4 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Six
89 4.7.2.5 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation
Seven and Eight 89
4.7.2.6 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Seven and Eight
90 4.7.2.7 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Nine
90 4.7.2.8 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Nine
91 4.7.3 Theoretical Arguments of The Instructional Material Design
For The Third Meeting 91
4.7.3.1 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Ten 92
4.7.3.2 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Ten 92
4.7.3.3 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation eleven 92
4.7.3.4 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Eleven 92
4.7.3.5 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Twelve 93
4.7.3.6 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Twelve 93
4.7.3.7 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Thirteen 94
4.7.3.8 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Thirteen 94
4.7.4 Theoretical Arguments of The Instructional Material Design For The Fourth Meeting
94 4.7.4.1 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Fourteen
94 4.7.4.2 The Didactical Arguments For Situation fourteen
95 4.7.4.3 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Fifteen
95 4.7.4.4 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Fifteen
95 4.7.4.5 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Sixteen
96 4.7.4.6 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Sixteen
96 4.7.4.7 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Seventeen
97
Maya L Hutapea, 2014 ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING OBSTACLES ON THE SUBJECT OF PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia |
repository.upi.edu |
perpustakaan.upi.edu
4.7.4.8 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Seventeen 97
4.7.4.9 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Eighteen 98
4.7.4.10 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Eighteen 98
4.7.5 Theoretical Arguments of The Instructional Material Design For The Fifth Meeting
98 4.7.5.1 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Nineteen
98 4.7.5.2 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Nineteen
98 4.7.5.3 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Twenty
99 4.7.5.4 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Twenty
99 4.7.5.5 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Twenty One
99 4.7.5.6 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Twenty One
100 4.7.5.7 The Conceptual Arguments For Situation Twenty Two 100
4.7.5.8 The Didactical Arguments For Situation Twenty Two 100
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Conclusion