Analysis of Readability Privacy policy - Wikipedia

 21  P3P Area Popular, Percentage Unclear Random, Percentage Unclear Type of Data Collected 25 average 30 average Data Use 29 average 35 average Data Recipients and Sharing 45 45 Access Provisions 4 4 Data Retention 72 70 Table 4: Uncertainty in Human Readable Policies. Type of Data Collected and Data Use are Averaged Over Multiple Sub-categories. This high level of uncertainty is, itself, an interesting result. Websites with human readable privacy policies do not offer the level of detail and specificity to enable analysis of many of their practices.

3.4 Analysis of Readability

Anecdotal evidence suggests one of the reasons people are reluctant to read privacy policies is the polices are difficult to understand. Readability analysis supports the view that polices are inaccessible to most of the population. There are a variety of standard metrics for comparing how easy it is to comprehend a text. In general, readability metrics are ratios based on word length, sentence length, and paragraph length. All other things being equal, we expect that the longer a sentence is, the more complex it is and the harder it is to read. Higher scores indicate more difficult text. The Kincaid formula 39 is = [11.8 syllables number of words] + [0.39 number of words number of sentences] – 15.59 The average readability scores for the privacy policies we looked at indicate most people would find them difficult to read. For the sake of contrast, we include typical readability scores for two other forms of communication: press releases from the White House, and New York Times articles. 40  22  Metric Popular Random White House Press Release New York Times Article Kincaid Score 12.4 12.5 4.1 6.2 Standard Deviation 1.8 2.3 Minimum Kincaid 7.3 6.8 Maximum Kincaid 17.9 18.1 Table 5: Readability Scores for Popular and Random Sites Certainly there is room for improvement. Unfortunately, corporations have incentive to retain the status quo. Because the FTC uses privacy policies to bring action for fraudulent and deceptive practices, legal departments may be wary of using plain English. Corporations may have fewer liability concerns by using standard, boiler-plate legal language.

3.4.1 Differences in Readability

The Popular and Random are very similar to each other: most policies require a college education to understand. There is slightly more variability in the Random policies, as seen in both a wider range from minimum to maximum and a slightly higher standard deviation.  23  4 Focus on Financial Industry This year we present an in-depth look at the privacy policy trends in the financial industry. This section of the report includes excerpts from a study published in the Fall 2006 issue of IS: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society. 41

4.1 Analysis of Privacy Protections