Solutions to the Contest Problems of IMO 1964
4.6 Solutions to the Contest Problems of IMO 1964
1. Let n = 3k + r, where 0 ≤ r < 2. Then 2 n =2 3k +r =8 k ·2 r ≡2 r (mod 7). Thus the remainder of 2 n modulo 7 is 1 , 2, 4 if n ≡ 0,1,2 (mod 3). Hence 2 n − 1 is divisible by 7 if and only if 3 | n, while 2 n + 1 is never divisible by 7.
2. By substituting a = x + y, b = y + z, and c = z + x (x, y, z > 0) the given inequality becomes
6xyz
2 y + xy 2 +y 2 z + yz 2 +z 2 x + zx ≤x 2 , which follows immediately by the AM–GM inequality applied to x 2 y , xy 2 ,x 2 z ,
xz 2 ,y 2 z , yz 2 .
3. Let r be the radius of the incircle of △ABC, r a ,r b ,r c the radii of the smaller circles corresponding to A , B,C, and h a ,h b ,h c the altitudes from A , B,C respec- tively. The coefficient of similarity between the smaller triangle at A and the triangle ABC is 1 − 2r/h a , from which we easily obtain r a = (h a − 2r)r/h a = (s − a)r/s. Similarly, r b = (s − b)r/s and r c = (s − c)r/s. Now a straightforward computation gives that the sum of areas of the four circles is given by
(b + c − a)(c + a − b)(a + b − c)(a 2 +b 2 +c 2 ) π Σ =
(a + b + c) 3
4. Let us call the topics T 1 ,T 2 ,T 3 . Consider an arbitrary student A. By the pigeon- hole principle there is a topic, say T 3 , he discussed with at least 6 other students. If two of these 6 students discussed T 3 , then we are done. Suppose now that the 6 students discussed only T 1 and T 2 and choose one of them, say B. By the pigeonhole principle he discussed one of the topics, say T 2 , with three of these students. If two of these three students also discussed T 2 , then we are done. Otherwise, all the three students discussed only T 1 , which completes the task.
5. Let us first compute the number of intersection points of the perpendiculars passing through two distinct points B and C. The perpendiculars from B to the lines through C other than BC meet all perpendiculars from C, which counts to
3 · 6 = 18 intersection points. Each perpendicular from B to the 3 lines not con- taining C can intersect at most 5 of the perpendiculars passing through C, which counts to another 3 · 5 = 15 intersection points. Thus there are 18 + 15 = 33 intersection points corresponding to B ,C. It follows that the required total number is at most 10 · 33 = 330. But some of these points, namely the orthocenters of the triangles with vertices at the given points, are counted thrice. There are 10 such points. Hence the maximal number of intersection points is 330 − 2 · 10 = 310.
Remark. The jury considered only the combinatorial part of the problem and didn’t require an example in which 310 points appear. However, it is “easily”
verified that, for instance, the set of points A (1, 1), B(e, π ), C(e 2 , π 2 ), D(e 3 , π 3 ),
E (e 4 , π 4 ) works.
356 4 Solutions
6. We shall prove that the statement is valid in the general case, for an arbitrary point D 1 inside △ABC. Since D 1 belongs to the plane ABC, there are real num- bers a , b, c such that (a + b + c) DD −−→
1 =a DA +b DB +c DC . Since AA 1 k DD 1 ,
DA 1 −−→ =k 1 ∈ R. Now it is easy to get 1 = −→
it holds that −−→ AA −−→ DD for some k
−→ −(b DB +c DC )/a, −−→ DB 1 = −(a DA +c DC )/b, and DC 1 = −(a DA + b−→ DB )/c. This
By using
6V h−−−→ D A D −−−→ B −−−→
h−→ −→ −→
1 1 , 1 1 , D 1 C 1 DABC = DA , DB , DC we get
V D 1 A 1 B 1 C 1 = 6abc (a + b + c) 3
= 3V DABC .
4.7 Contest Problems 1965 357
Parts
» Problem Books in Mathematics
» The Eighth IMO Sofia, Bulgaria, July 3–13, 1966
» The Ninth IMO Cetinje, Yugoslavia, July 2–13, 1967
» The Tenth IMO Moscow–Leningrad, Soviet Union, July 5–18, 1968
» The Eleventh IMO Bucharest, Romania, July 5–20, 1969
» The Twelfth IMO Budapest–Keszthely, Hungary, July 8–22, 1970
» The Thirteenth IMO Bratislava–Zilina, Czechoslovakia, July 10–21, 1971
» The Fourteenth IMO Warsaw–Toru ´n, Poland, July 5–17, 1972
» The Fifteenth IMO Moscow, Soviet Union, July 5–16, 1973
» The Sixteenth IMO Erfurt–Berlin, DR Germany, July 4–17, 1974
» The Seventeenth IMO Burgas–Sofia, Bulgaria, 1975
» The Eighteenth IMO Vienna–Lienz, Austria, 1976
» The Nineteenth IMO Belgrade–Arandjelovac, Yugoslavia, July 1–13, 1977
» The Twentieth IMO Bucharest, Romania, 1978
» The Twenty-First IMO London, United Kingdom, 1979
» The Twenty-Second IMO Washington DC, United States of America, July 8–20, 1981
» The Twenty-Third IMO Budapest, Hungary, July 5–14, 1982
» The Twenty-Fourth IMO Paris, France, July 1–12, 1983
» The Twenty-Fifth IMO Prague, Czechoslovakia, June 29–July 10, 1984
» The Twenty-Sixth IMO Joutsa, Finland, June 29–July 11, 1985
» The Twenty-Seventh IMO Warsaw, Poland, July 4–15, 1986
» The Twenty-Eighth IMO Havana, Cuba, July 5–16, 1987
» The Twenty-Ninth IMO Canberra, Australia, July 9–21, 1988
» The Thirtieth IMO Braunschweig–Niedersachen, FR Germany, July 13–24, 1989
» The Thirty-First IMO Beijing, China, July 8–19, 1990
» The Thirty-Second IMO Sigtuna, Sweden, July 12–23, 1991
» The Thirty-Third IMO Moscow, Russia, July 10–21, 1992
» The Thirty-Fourth IMO Istanbul, Turkey, July 13–24, 1993
» The Thirty-Fifth IMO Hong Kong, July 9–22, 1994
» The Thirty-Sixth IMO Toronto, Canada, July 13–25, 1995
» The Third-Seventh IMO Mumbai, India, July 5–17, 1996
» The Thirty-Eighth IMO Mar del Plata, Argentina, July 18–31, 1997
» The Thirty-Ninth IMO Taipei, Taiwan, July 10–21, 1998
» The Fortieth IMO Bucharest, Romania, July 10–22, 1999
» The Forty-First IMO Taejon, South Korea, July 13–25, 2000
» The Forty-Second IMO Washington DC, United States of America, July 1–14, 2001
» The Forty-Third IMO Glasgow, United Kingdom, July 19–30, 2002
» The Forty-Fourth IMO Tokyo, Japan, July 7–19, 2003
» The Forty-Fifth IMO Athens, Greece, July 7–19, 2004
» The Forty-Sixth IMO Mérida, Mexico, July 8–19, 2005
» The Forty-Seventh IMO Ljubljana, Slovenia, July 6–18, 2006
» The Forty-Eighth IMO Hanoi, Vietnam, July 19–31, 2007
» The Forty-Ninth IMO Madrid, Spain, July 10–22, 2008
» Solutions to the Contest Problems of IMO 1959
» Solutions to the Contest Problems of IMO 1960
» Solutions to the Contest Problems of IMO 1964
» Solutions to the Contest Problems of IMO 1965
» Solutions to the Contest Problems of IMO 1966
» Solutions to the Longlisted Problems of IMO 1967
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1968
» Solutions to the Contest Problems of IMO 1969
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1970
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1971
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1972
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1974
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1975
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1976
» Solutions to the Longlisted Problems of IMO 1977
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1978
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1979
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1981
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1982
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1983
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1984
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1985
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1986
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1987
» The algebraic equation x 3 − 3x 2 + 1 = 0 admits three real roots β , γ , a, with √
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1989
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1990
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1991
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1992
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1993
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1994
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1995
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1996
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1997
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 1998
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 2000
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 2001
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 2002
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 2003
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 2004
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 2005
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 2006
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 2007
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 2008
» Solutions to the Shortlisted Problems of IMO 2009
Show more