SPEECH FUNCTION IN RADITYA DIKA'S UTTERANCES IN STAND UP COMEDY SHOW.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Great thanks and praise to the Almighty Jesus Christ who has blessed and given the ability to the researcher to complete her thesis as the partial fulfillment of the requirements for degree of Sarjana Sastra at the English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, State University of Medan.

This thesis would not have been possible without the guidance and the help of several individuals who always contributed and extended their valuable assistances in the preparation and completion of this thesis. The researcher’s special appreciation goes to:

 Prof. Dr. Syawal Gultom, M.Pd., the Rector of State University of Medan.  Dr. Isda Pramuniati, M.Hum., the Dean Faculty of Language and Arts,

State University of Medan.

 Prof. Dr. Hj. Sumarsih, M.Pd., the Head of English and Literature Departmentand as her Thesis Examiners, Dra. Meisuri, M.A., the Secretary of English Department, Nora Ronita, S.Pd., S.S., M.Hum., the Head of English Education Program and Syamsul Bahri, S.S, M.Hum., the Head of English Non-Educational Program, Faculty of Languages and Arts, State University of Medan.

 Drs. Muhammad Natsir, M.Hum, as her Thesis Supervisor.

 Prof. Dr. Lince Sihombing, M.Pd and Drs. Lidiman Sahat Martua Sinaga, M.Hum as her Thesis Examiners.

 Maam Eis Sri Wahyuni, M.Pd., as the Administration Staff of English Department for helping the writer in preparing all the fulfillment in conducting this thesis.

 Darwin Butar Butar and Arlince Pardede for the patience, affection, prayer, financial support and taught the researcher many worth things in facing the life. Thanks also given to her three little sisters: Kiki Butar Butar, Chacha Butar Butar and Evita Butar Butar. And also given to her beloved cousin: Olivia Lumban Gaol.

 All her beloved friends in English Literature A and B 2011, especially for her close friends in campus Eren Gultom, Bripda Henny Anggria, Lusi Manalu, Swari Fadhillah, Swarman Siahaan, Ucha Sinaga, Viatari Dipa Pencawan and others that cannot be mentioned all. Thanks for their support, kindness, great love and care to the researcher, also warm hearted encouragement friendship in finishing this thesis.

 Her best friends Debby Naibaho, Febriani Manurung, Kesia Hutasoit, Chyntia Hasibuan, Zefanya Siahaan, Vida Nasution and Mia Siahaan for their support, sharing, caring, laughing and stupid things that we made together since we’re in Senior High School.

 The people who direct or indirectly contributed in this study, your kindness means a lot to her.

Medan, December 2015 The Writer,

Ines Seri Pinta Uli Butar Butar NIM. 2113220020

ABSTRACT

Damanik, Miranda Sari. Registration number 8136112056. Speech Function in Raditya Utterances in Stand Up Comedy Show. A Thesis. English Applied Linguistic Program, Post Graduate School. State University of Medan.2015.

Interpersonal function of language is the use of language to interact, establish, negotiate, and maintain relationship. The choice of speech functions and the mood realization are part of the interpersonal functions which can influence the interpersonal relationship between the speakers in a conversation. The objectives of this study are (1) to describe the system network of speech functions dominantly used in Raditya Dika’s utterances in Stand Up Comedy Show,(2) to investigate speech function realized in moods in Raditya Dika’s utterances in stand up comedy show,and (3) to elaborate the reason the system network of speech function dominantly used.The research applies qualitative descriptive design. The sources of data is Raditya Dika in Stand Up Comedy Show program on Metro TV. The data of the study are utterances of Raditya Dika in Stand Up Comedy Show. There are three episodes with different topics that will be chosen. They are stand up comedy show which was displayed on Aug 7, 2011 Episode 2 part 1 of 2, Stand Up Comedy Raditya Dika 13 Juli 2011 – Part 1 and Stand Up Comedy Show Metro TV (Desember 2011). The research findings show that the system network of speech functions in Raditya Dika’s utterances are statement which was information was the most system network of statement and then followed by furry, disappointment, reason, blame , clarification, Support ,probability and hope. And then followed by call, greeting. The next system network of speech functions dominantly used was question which was Wh-question and then followed by yes/no Wh-question. And the last was command. The dominant speech function of command was positive command and then followed by negative command. Statement, question, command, and where statement which realized in tagged declarative mood occurs most dominantly and then question realized by interrogative mood and command realized by imperative mood. Every sentence has realized in the speech function and also speech function in semantics has realized in mood system in lexicogrammar. The conclusion is a raditya dika utterances as the object of the study which realized in the speech function and mood. It could be dominant using of speech function. So that is the reason why speech function is dominant using in Raditya Dika’s utterances.

ABSTRAK

Damanik, Miranda Sari. Nomor Induk Siswa 8136112056. Speech Function in Raditya Utterances in Stand Up Comedy Show. Sebuah Thesis. Linguistik Terapan Bahasa Inggris, Program Pasca Sarjana. Universitas Negeri Medan .2015.

Fungsi interpersonal bahasa merupakan fungsi bahasa utuk berinteraksi, membangun, menegosiasi, dan memelihara hubungan sosial antar penutur. Pemilihan fungsi ujaran dan realisasi mood adalah bagian dari fungsi interpersonal yang yang dapat mempengaruhi hubungan interpersonal antara pembicara dalam percakapan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah (1) untuk menggambarkan fungsi sistem jaringan pada ujaran raditya dika dalam acara Stand Up Comedy Show, (2) untuk menganalisis bagaimana fungsi ujaran raditya dika direalisasikan ke dalam mood pada Stand Up Comedy Show, dan (3) untuk menguraikan alasan pemilihan fungsi ujaran yamg pada ujaran raditya dika di Sand Up Comedy Show.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif. Sumber data adalah Raditya Dika pada Stand Up Comedy Show Program di Metro TV. Data dari penelitian ini adalah ujaran-ujaran oleh Raditya Dika di acara Stand Up Comedy Show. Ada tiga episode dengan topik yang berbeda yang akan dipilih. Mereka adalah Stand Up Comedy Show yang ditayangkan pada 7 agustus 2011 episode 2 bagian 1, Stand Up Comedy Raditya Dika 13 Juli 2011 bagian 1 dan Stand Up Comedy Show Metro TV pada desember 2011. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa fungsi ujaran yang terdapat dalam ujaran raditya Dika adalah statement dimana informasi adalah sistem network yang paling dominan digunakan dan diikuti oleh furry, disappointment, reason, blame , clarification, Support ,probability dan hope. Dan diikuti oleh call, greeting. Jaringan sistem berikutnya yang dominan digunakan adalah question yaitu Wh-question dan Yes/no question.dan yang terakhir adalah command, yang paling dominan adalah posotis command dan diikuti oleh negatif command. Statement, question, command, dan dimana statement direalisasikan oleh declarative mood, question direalisasikan oleh interrogative mood dan command direalisasikan oleh imperative mood. Setiap kalimat direalisasikan di speech function dan juga speech function dalam semantic telah direalisasikan dalam sistem mood dalam lexicogrammar. Kesimpulannya adalah ujaran Raditya Dika sebagai obej penelitian yang direalisasikan dalam speech function dan mood. Itu menjadi yang dominan digunakan dalam speech function. Maka itulah alasan kenapa speech function dominan digunakan dalam ujaran Raditya Dika.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS ………... i

ABSTRACT ... iii

LIST OF TABLES ... iv

CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Backgroud of the Study ... 1

1.2 The Problems of the Study ... 8

1.3 The Objectives of the Study ... 8

1.4 The Scope of the Study ... 9

1.5 The Significances of the Study ... 9

CHAPTER II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 2.1 Interpersonal Functions ... 11

2.1.1 Speech Function ... 13

2.1.2 Realization of Speech ... 18

2.1.3 Mood ... 22

2.2 Utterances ... 30

2.3 Stand Up Comedy Show ... 31

2.3.1 Raditya Dika ... 32

2.4 Relevant Studies ... 34

2.5 Conceptual Framework...40

CHAPTER III. RESEARCH METHOD 3.1 The Research Design ... 43

3.2 Data and Source of Data ... 43

3.3 The Instruments of Data Collection ... 44

3.4 The Technique of Data Collection ... 44

3.5 Technique of Data Analysis ... 44

3.6 The Trustworthiness of the Study ... 46

CHAPTER IV. DATA ANALYSIS, FINDINGS, AND DISCUSSION 4.1 DATA ANALYSIS...46

4.1.1.System network of Speech Functions used by Raditya Dika in Stand Up ComedyShow...46

4.1.2 The Realization of Speech Functions in Moods used by Raditya Dika...56

4.1.3 Reason for the Dominant Used of Speech Function...60

4.2 Findings...62

4.3 Discussion...66

CHAPTER V.CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 5.1Conclusion...70

5.2 Suggestions ...71

References ... 72

List of Tables

Table 2.1: Giving or demanding, goods-&-services or information ... 13

Table 3.1. Summary of Technique for Establishing Trustworthiness ... 44

Table 4. 1.1.1 Initiating of Statement in The Discourses...50

Table 4.1.1.2.1 Initiating of Command in the discourses... ...52

Table 4.1.1.3.1 Initiating of Question... 53

Table 4.1.2.1. System Network of Speech Functions used in Raditya Dika utterances in Stand Up Commedy Show...54

Table 4.1.3.1 Realization of Speech Functions in Moods used ... 57 Pages

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of The Study

Language is a device for comunication. A language basically functions to convey utterances meaning of a person to another on, as stated by Halliday (1994 ) that is to contrue human’s experience, to enact in social relationship and to organize our ideas relevantly to the context. We use language to talk about our experience of the world, including the worlds in our own minds, to describe events and states and the entities involved in them. We also use language to interact with other people, to establish and maintain relations with them, to influence their behavior, to express our own viewpoint on things in the world, and to elicit or change theirs. it can convey his feeling, opinion towards something logically and sistematically either in written or spoken language. So the information can be received by readers efectively. The readers and listeners are involved in the context of situation where the language is used in order to the message can be understood.

Stand up comedy is one of the situations where language is utilized. According to Ramon Papana , stand comedy is an art comedy show, where the comic perform in front of he audiences and speak directly to them. Furthermore she adds that a comic ( the person who does stand up comedy ) tell a short funny story ( we called it bit generally ), which is generally called by monologue actionor routine comedy (https://apostleadrianus.wordpress.com/2013/01/07/221-research-stand-up-comedy-apa-sih-itu/) . It means that stand up commedy is a

monologue comedy that tell a funny story in front of the audience directly to persuade the audience and then make them laugh. Stand up comedy is a single comedy which uses a smart words related to soscial interaction and the action on the stage (wahyudi :2014)( https://apostleadrianus.wordpress.com/2013/01/07/221-research-stand-up-comedy-apa-sih-itu/) ). In doing stand up comedy a comic is given a topic and he will develop the topic clause by clause so that a funny story is created and then entertain the audience. The utterances of the comic in front of the audience must be smart, simple and up date. A good comic can bring the audience to the story and then finally entertain the audience. And the writer wants to analize the utterances the comic from the inter personal function side. The writer wants to analyze what type of speech function is dominantly used in Comic’s utterances in stand up comedy show, how are the types of speech function realized in Comic’s utterances in Stand up Comedy Show and why are the different types of speech function used the way they are.

Since 2011 there have been many comics appearing and one of the most popular comics is Raditya Dika. So the writer will analyze Raditya Dika’s utterances. Raditya Dika is chosen because he is a fenomenal comic. Raditya Dika is a writer, Comic,blogger, Director and an actor. Exactly on July 13th 2011, Raditya Dika is followed Indonesia Stand up Comedy with his point of view about Indonesan television.one thing that makes me want to write about him is not because he is funny but because of his built critique .Although I laugh when I see his comedy action. He gives the opinion that is in the mind of indonesian society especially the students of Indonesia. I really love when dika says directly about

the fact which is happened. He critiques the performance of some bands, advertisement, and then Indonesian film. Youtube gave him an appreciation for his program Malam Minggu Miko which is stared and directed by him. This program get million viewers in youtube and he is the only person in Indonesia that get apreciation in youtube. Furthermore, all of his tweets in tweeter become tending topic and he always get standing applause when he does stand up comedy. This is in line with what Ningsih (2011) found in her research about interpersonal function in Mario Teguh Golden ways that statement is the type of speech function which is dominantly used in Mario Teguh’s Golden Ways and the types of speech function realized by mood is dominantly expressed in “congruent declarative” linguistically. It means that when Mario Teguh is doing monologe to his audience he uses statements sentence mostly in his utterances.

Here is one example of utterance of the well-known motivator in Mario Teguh Golden Ways which are mostly giving statement when motivating or doing a monologue.

Dia akan segera melihat

Dia Akan Segera melihat

Subject Finite Predicator

MOOD RESIDUE

Mood : Subject ^ Finite = Declarative Speech Function : Statement

Markedness : Unmarked Tuhan tidak akan mengubah nasib suatu kaum

Tuhan Tidak akan Mengubah nasib suatu kaum Subject Finite Predicator

MOOD RESIDUE

Mood : Subject ^ Finite = Declarative Speech Function : Statement

Markedness : Unmarked Kita membutuhkan yang benar

Kita Membutukan Yang benar

Subject Prediczto Complement

MOOD RESIDUE

Mood : Subject ^ Finite = Declarative Speech Function : Statement

Markedness : Unmarked

Yet, Raditya Dika in doing a monologue in Stand Up Comedy Show built interpersonal function in various ways to maintain the story and even very often uses question in his utterances to entertain the audience. Here is the example of the dialogue transcript :

Discourse I = Stand Up Comedy on Aug 7, 2011 Episode 2 part 1 of 2 Sayang kamu kenapa sayang ?

Kenapa Sayang kamu?

Wh/complemet Finite Subject Complement

MOOD RESIDUE

Mood : Finite ^ Subject = Interrogative Speech Function : Question

Discourse II = Stand Up Comedy Raditya Dika 13 Juli 2011 – Part 1 Kenapa ginjalku berdarah?

Kenapa Ginjalku berdarah?

Wh/complemet Finite Subject Complement

MOOD RESIDUE

Mood : Finite ^ Subject = Interrogative Speech Function : Question

Markedness : Unmarked

Discourse III = Stand Up Comedy Show Metro TV (Desember 2011) Itu kenapa laki-laki pada senyum banget situ ya?

Itu kenapa laki-laki pada senyum

banget situ ya?

Wh/complemet Finite Subject Complement

MOOD RESIDUE

Mood : Finite ^ Subject = Interrogative Speech Function : Question

Markedness : Unmarked

In entertaining the audience Raditya Dika does not always use statement sentence in his utterances when doing a stand up comedy but he often uses question sentence. Nevertheless According to Syamsudin dkk( 1997/1998:163) monologue expression is a form of language or discourse either oral or written which is not included in the area of conversation, question and answer, drama text

or film, another same text and interview

(http://warsiman.lecture.ub.ac.id/2014/05/analisis-wacana-monolog-sebuah-upaya-memahami-teori-merangkai-suatu-gagasan). From that statement is concluded that in there is no question statement used in doing a monologue. But Raditya Dika uses question sentences in doing monologue in stand up comedy

show. The writer argues that raditya’s use of question in his utterances where he is supposed to entertain the audience and to persuade the audience so that the audience feel inside to his story. The writer also believes that there are other kinds of interpersonal function used by Raditya Dika to maintain the monologue .Based on the previous research by Ningsih ( 2011) and based on that phenomenon the writer would like to find what system networks of speech function is dominantly used by Raditya Dika’s utterances in stand up comedy and how are the system networks of speech function realized in it by by employing Halliday’s theory of metafunctions in Systemic Functional Grammar.

Systemic-Functional Grammar (SFG) grew out of the work of J.F. Firth and was mainly developed by M.A.K. Halliday. It is a theory of language centered on the notion of function. It attempts to account for the way language works in a social and cultural setting. It sees language as a meaning potential that its users draw upon to “construe physical and biological reality (including consciousness)”, “enact social relations” and “bring into being a semiotic reality alongside the physical, biological and social” (Halliday and Martin 1993: 27-28).

For Halliday, language is always a resource for making meaning, and that language is used to serve a variety of different needs (Halliday and Webster, 2002). Firstly, language serves for the expression of “content”: that is, of the language structure and language function speaker’s experience of the real world, including the inner world of his own consciousness. We may call this the ideational function, though it may be understood as easily in behavioral as in conceptual terms (Firth 1968: 91). In serving this function, language also gives

structure to experience, and helps to determine our way of looking at things, so that it requires some intellectual effort to see them in any other way than that which our language suggests to us.

Secondly, language serves to establish and maintain social relations: for the expression of social roles, which include the communication roles created by language itself – for example the roles of questioner or respondent, which we take on by asking or answering a question; and also for getting things done, by means of the interaction between one person and another. Through this function, which we may refer to as interpersonal, social groups are delimited, and the individual is identified and reinforced, since by enabling him to interact with others language also serves in the expression and development of his own personality.

Finally, language has to provide for making links with itself and with features of the situation in which it is used. We may call this the textual function, since this is what enables the speaker or writer to construct “texts”, or connected passages of discourse that is situationally relevant; and enables the listener or reader to distinguish a text from a random set of sentences. One aspect of the textual function is the establishment of cohesive relations from one sentence to another in a discourse (Hasan, 1996). Thus, from the explanation above we can conclude that language cannot be separated from the context of culture, the context of situation, and the verbal context.

As explained before this study will be focused on the function of language used in sentences and clauses uttered by Raditya Dika, which especially centered on the interpersonal function. The reason for choosing this topic to be discussed is

because the writer is wanted to know how a clause is relates to another in a clause complex and to know how change information although stand up comedy is a monologe context. The analysis will be seen through the interpersonal functions, one of the components of metafunction found in functional grammar. In addition the study focus on the interpersonal function in which language is used to enable us to participate in communicative function with other people, to take role and to express and understand feelings, attitudes and judgement. Analyzing Raditya Dika’s utterances in Stand Up Comedy show is meant to find out the types of speech function dominantly used, the speech function realized in moods and why are the different types of speech function used the way they are.

1.2 The Problem of The Study

Based on the background stated above the problem of the study are formulated as the following.

1. What are system networks of the speech function used in Raditya Dika’s utterances in stand up comedy show ?

2. How are speech function realized in moods in Raditya Dika’s utterances in stand up comedy show?

3. Why is the dominant system network of speech function realized in the way it is ?

1.3 The Objectives of The Study The objectives of the study are

1. to describe the system network of speech functions used in Raditya Dika’s utterances in Stand Up Comedy Show,

2. to investigate speech function realized in moods in Raditya Dika’s utterances in stand up comedy show,and

3. to elaborate the reason dominant the system network of speech function realized in the way it is.

1.4 The Scope of The Study

There are many aspects that can be discussed in connection with the study of interpersonal functions. They can be studied in a wider scope in order to gain a much better understanding. Even so, whatever it is a study should have a scope. This study will be focused on the system network of speech functions and the realization in the mood which occurred on the utterances. The study will be focused in Raditya Dika’s utterances in Stand Up Commedy Show on Aug 7, 2011 Episode 2 part 1 of 2, Stand Up Comedy Raditya Dika 13 Juli 2011 – Part 1 and Stand Up Comedy Show Metro TV (Desember 2011).

1.5 The Significance of The Study

The findings of the study are expected to offer theoritical and and practical significance.

Theoritically, the findings will add up more horizons in thories of systemic functional linguistic ( SFL ) and in addition the findings are useful for the next researcher to investigate the other fenomena related to SFL.

Practically, the findings are expected to be relevant for the readers especially whose jobs are related to constructing meaning interpersonally to dig information from the interlocutors.

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

5.1 Conclusion

Language conveys interpersonal function where it is used to enable us to participate in communicative acts with other people, to take on roles and to express and understand feelings, attitudes, and judgements. This interpersonal function pours out through communication or in the program of Stand Up Comedy Show. After presenting the research findings inprevious chapter, conclusions were drawn as follows.

(1) The system network of speech function which was dominantly used in

Raditya Dika’s utterances was in the form of “ statement “ which was 63.12 % which was information was the most list statement in raditya dika utterances which was (58,7 %) and then followed by furry (10,58%), disappointment was 7,16%, reason (6,82 % ), blame (3,75 %), clarification ( 3,34 %), Support ( 2,04 %),probability (1,02 %) and hope ( 0,68 % ). And then followed by call (1,02 %) and greeting ( 6,20 %). The next system network of speech functions dominantly used was question. There were ( 28,73 % )127 clauses used by speaker. The dominant speech function of question in the discourses was Wh-question which was 22.62 % and then followed by yes/no question which had 6.10 %. And the last There ( 5.65 %) 25 clauses used by the speaker. the dominant speech function of command was positive command which was 5.42 % and then followed by negative command which had 0.22 %. Based on that finding,

this research has found that Raditya Dika want to give detail information to the audiences. Besides that it happened because the role of Raditya Dika was as the speaker of the program. As a speaker Raditya Dika used statement to express his ideas in a direct way to give information or deliver messages to the audiences.

(2) There are three realizations of speech functions in moods, they are

declarative, interrogative and imperative.The system network of speech function realized by mood was dominantly expressed in “ declarative “which was 64.97 %. And then followed by interrogative mood 29.46 %. And the last realization of speech functions was imperative. There were 5.80 % of imperative mood.

(3) The speech functions in initiating are realized as follows : statement

realized by declarative mood, question realized by interrogative mood and command realized by imperative mood. The researcher conclude that speech function refers to the verb in the sentence. It catagorizes in the semantic term. Semantic term has realized in the lexicogrammar. Every sentence has realized in the speech functionand also speech function in emantics has realized in mood system in lexicogrammar. The conclusion is a raditya dika utterances as the object of the study which realizes in the speech function and mood. It coul be dominant using of speech function. So that is the reason why speech function is dominant using in Raditya Dika’s utterances.

5.2 Suggestions

After concluding the findings, suggestions were staged as the following.

(1) It is suggested to other researchers to carry out other study in other

specialized interpersonal functions such as Kick Andy, Sarah Sechan, or Jokowi’s speech in order to rich investigation which related with interpersonal function. And also it can give surprising progress in the linguistic field.

(2) It is suggested to the next researcher to do a deeper research about

interpersonal function in different discourses in order to know the different significant from the discourses and it can be more intensively described.

(3) This study will be relevant used by the learners to improve their ability to

understand and produce discourses which are effective in conveying informations in order to make the learners become mastery in analyzing interpersonal function in any discourses.

REFERENCES

Arifin, A., & Samanhudi, U. 2010. Interpersonal Meaning Construction in the Oprah Winfrey Talk Show. International Journal of Leksika.Vol 4. No 1. Aristotle, and George Alexander Kennedy. 1991.On Rhetoric : A Theory of Civic Discourse. New York: Oxford University.

Bogdan, C. R. & Biklen, S. K. 1982. Qualitative Research for education. United Stated of America: Allyn and Bacon.

Butt, et. al. 1995. Using Functional Grammar: An Explorer’s Guided. Sydney: Macquarie University.

Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousnds Oaks; Sage .

Eggins, S. & Slade, D. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassel. Eggins, S. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London:

Covent Garden.

Firth, J. R. 1968. Linguistic Analysis as a Study of Meaning. In selected papers of J. R. Firth. Edited by F. R. Palmer. London: Longmans Linguistics Library.

Gerot, Linda & Wignell, Peter. 1995. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Gerarld Stabler.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction of Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.

Halliday, M. A. K., & J. R. Martin. 1993. Writing Science: Literary and Discursive Power. London: Palmer Press.

Halliday, M. A. K & C. Matthiessen. 2000. Construing Experience Through Meaning: A language based approach to cognition. London: Continuum. Halliday, M. A. K., & C. M.I.M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to

Halliday, M. A. K. & Webster, J. 2002. On Grammar. Collected Work of MAK Halliday. Edited by Jonathan Webster. London: Continuum.

Hapsari, Intan P. Analysing the Grammar of Casual Conversation: Enacting Role Relations. Journal of Language and Literature. 5 (2), 1 – 11.

Hasan, R. 1996. Ways of Saying: ways of meaning. Selected Papers of Ruqaiya Hasan (Open Lingusitics Series). London: Cassel.

Https://apostleadrianus.wordpress.com/2013/01/07/221-research-stand-up-comedy-apa-sih-itu/ Accesed on February 3th 2015

H ttps://rahmanhistory.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/mario-teguh-golden-ways-laki-laki-idaman/ Accesed on May 10th 2015

Http://warsiman.lecture.ub.ac.id/2014/05/analisis-wacana-monolog-sebuah-upaya-memahami-teori-merangkai-suatu-gagasan/ Accessed on June 12th 2015

Huang, Kun-zhen. 2014. Snip-Snap: An Analysis of Interpersonal Meanings in a Political TV Interview. International Journal of English Linguistics; Vol. 4, No. 5; 2014 Indari, A.(2011). Realization of Speech Function in Mood in Susilo Bambang

Yudhoyono Speeches. Medan. Universitas Negeri Medan.

Kondowe,Wellman .2014. interpersonal metafunction in Bingu wa Mutharika’s second – term political discourse : a systemic functional grammatical approach.Vol.6.No.3.

Lincoln, S. Yvonna & Guba, G. Egon. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C., & Painter, C. 1997. Working with Functional Grammar. Sydney: Sydney University Press.

Martin, et. al. 1997. Working with Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Source of New

Method. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Morley. G.D. 2000. Syntax in Functional Grammar. New York: Continuum Wellington House.

Ningsih, Yuliana.2011.Interpersonal Function in TV Program of Mario Teguh Golden Ways.Medan. Universitas Negeri Medan.

Nur, Shakila. 2015. Analysis of Interpersonal Metafunction in Public Speeches : A Case Study of Nelson Mandela’s

Presidential Inauguration Speech.The International Journal of Social Science Vol 30.No.1.

Perdana, Elisa. 2013. Interpersonal Methapor in Mata Najwa’s Talk Show. Vol 1. No 1

Rismayani, R. (2012 ).Speech Function in males’ and Female’s language in Television Advertisement. Medan. Universitas Negeri Medan.

Saj, Hala El. 2012. Interpersonal function: Personal Pronouns in Oprah Winfrey Hosting Queen Rania of Jordan. International journal of science and humanity vol. 2, No. 6,

Saragih, A. 2005. Introduction to Functional Grammar. (Unpublished lecturer handout). Medan: Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Medan.

Saragih, A. 2001. Bahasa dalam Konteks Sosial. Medan: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Medan.

Saragih, A. 2003. Bahasa dalam Context Social: Pendekatan Linguistik

Fungsional Sistematik terhadap Bahasa dan Wacana. Medan: FBS-Universitas Negeri Medan.

Sulistyowati,Titis.2011.The Speech Function In The Conversation Between The Fourth Smester English Departement Students of Muria Kudus University and Some Foreigners.Vol.1.No.1

Thompson, G. 2004. Introducing Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London:

Edward Arnold.

Ye , Ruijuan.2010. Interpersonal Metafunction Analysis of Barack

Obama's Victory Speech.Guangdong Pharmaceutical University.

Yuliati. 2013. Interpersonal Meaning Negotiation in the Teacher – Student Verbal Interaction. The International Journal of Social Sciences. Vol 11.No 1

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

5.1 Conclusion

Language conveys interpersonal function where it is used to enable us to participate in communicative acts with other people, to take on roles and to express and understand feelings, attitudes, and judgements. This interpersonal function pours out through communication or in the program of Stand Up Comedy Show. After presenting the research findings inprevious chapter, conclusions were drawn as follows.

(1) The system network of speech function which was dominantly used in Raditya Dika’s utterances was in the form of “ statement “ which was 63.12 % which was information was the most list statement in raditya dika utterances which was (58,7 %) and then followed by furry (10,58%), disappointment was 7,16%, reason (6,82 % ), blame (3,75 %), clarification ( 3,34 %), Support ( 2,04 %),probability (1,02 %) and hope ( 0,68 % ). And then followed by call (1,02 %) and greeting ( 6,20 %). The next system network of speech functions dominantly used was question. There were ( 28,73 % )127 clauses used by speaker. The dominant speech function of question in the discourses was Wh-question which was 22.62 % and then followed by yes/no question which had 6.10 %. And the last There ( 5.65 %) 25 clauses used by the speaker. the dominant speech function of command was positive command which was 5.42 % and then followed by negative command which had 0.22 %. Based on that finding,

this research has found that Raditya Dika want to give detail information to the audiences. Besides that it happened because the role of Raditya Dika was as the speaker of the program. As a speaker Raditya Dika used statement to express his ideas in a direct way to give information or deliver messages to the audiences.

(2) There are three realizations of speech functions in moods, they are declarative, interrogative and imperative.The system network of speech function realized by mood was dominantly expressed in “ declarative “which was 64.97 %. And then followed by interrogative mood 29.46 %. And the last realization of speech functions was imperative. There were 5.80 % of imperative mood.

(3) The speech functions in initiating are realized as follows : statement realized by declarative mood, question realized by interrogative mood and command realized by imperative mood. The researcher conclude that speech function refers to the verb in the sentence. It catagorizes in the semantic term. Semantic term has realized in the lexicogrammar. Every sentence has realized in the speech functionand also speech function in emantics has realized in mood system in lexicogrammar. The conclusion is a raditya dika utterances as the object of the study which realizes in the speech function and mood. It coul be dominant using of speech function. So that is the reason why speech function is dominant using in Raditya Dika’s utterances.

5.2 Suggestions

After concluding the findings, suggestions were staged as the following. (1) It is suggested to other researchers to carry out other study in other

specialized interpersonal functions such as Kick Andy, Sarah Sechan, or Jokowi’s speech in order to rich investigation which related with interpersonal function. And also it can give surprising progress in the linguistic field.

(2) It is suggested to the next researcher to do a deeper research about interpersonal function in different discourses in order to know the different significant from the discourses and it can be more intensively described. (3) This study will be relevant used by the learners to improve their ability to

understand and produce discourses which are effective in conveying informations in order to make the learners become mastery in analyzing interpersonal function in any discourses.

REFERENCES

Arifin, A., & Samanhudi, U. 2010. Interpersonal Meaning Construction in the Oprah Winfrey Talk Show. International Journal of Leksika.Vol 4. No 1. Aristotle, and George Alexander Kennedy. 1991.On Rhetoric : A Theory of Civic

Discourse. New York: Oxford University.

Bogdan, C. R. & Biklen, S. K. 1982. Qualitative Research for education. United Stated of America: Allyn and Bacon.

Butt, et. al. 1995. Using Functional Grammar: An Explorer’s Guided. Sydney: Macquarie University.

Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousnds Oaks; Sage .

Eggins, S. & Slade, D. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassel. Eggins, S. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London:

Covent Garden.

Firth, J. R. 1968. Linguistic Analysis as a Study of Meaning. In selected papers of J. R. Firth. Edited by F. R. Palmer. London: Longmans Linguistics Library.

Gerot, Linda & Wignell, Peter. 1995. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Gerarld Stabler.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction of Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.

Halliday, M. A. K., & J. R. Martin. 1993. Writing Science: Literary and Discursive Power. London: Palmer Press.

Halliday, M. A. K & C. Matthiessen. 2000. Construing Experience Through Meaning: A language based approach to cognition. London: Continuum. Halliday, M. A. K., & C. M.I.M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to

Halliday, M. A. K. & Webster, J. 2002. On Grammar. Collected Work of MAK Halliday. Edited by Jonathan Webster. London: Continuum.

Hapsari, Intan P. Analysing the Grammar of Casual Conversation: Enacting Role Relations. Journal of Language and Literature. 5 (2), 1 – 11.

Hasan, R. 1996. Ways of Saying: ways of meaning. Selected Papers of Ruqaiya Hasan (Open Lingusitics Series). London: Cassel.

Https://apostleadrianus.wordpress.com/2013/01/07/221-research-stand-up-comedy-apa-sih-itu/ Accesed on February 3th 2015

Https://rahmanhistory.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/mario-teguh-golden-ways-laki-laki-idaman/ Accesed on May 10th 2015

Http://warsiman.lecture.ub.ac.id/2014/05/analisis-wacana-monolog-sebuah-upaya-memahami-teori-merangkai-suatu-gagasan/ Accessed on June 12th 2015 Huang, Kun-zhen. 2014. Snip-Snap: An Analysis of Interpersonal Meanings in a Political

TV Interview. International Journal of English Linguistics; Vol. 4, No. 5; 2014 Indari, A.(2011). Realization of Speech Function in Mood in Susilo Bambang

Yudhoyono Speeches. Medan. Universitas Negeri Medan.

Kondowe,Wellman .2014. interpersonal metafunction in Bingu wa Mutharika’s second – term political discourse : a systemic functional grammatical approach.Vol.6.No.3.

Lincoln, S. Yvonna & Guba, G. Egon. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C., & Painter, C. 1997. Working with Functional Grammar. Sydney: Sydney University Press.

Martin, et. al. 1997. Working with Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Source of New

Method. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Morley. G.D. 2000. Syntax in Functional Grammar. New York: Continuum Wellington House.

Ningsih, Yuliana.2011.Interpersonal Function in TV Program of Mario Teguh Golden Ways.Medan. Universitas Negeri Medan.

Nur, Shakila. 2015. Analysis of Interpersonal Metafunction in Public Speeches : A Case Study of Nelson Mandela’s

Presidential Inauguration Speech.The International Journal of Social Science Vol 30.No.1.

Perdana, Elisa. 2013. Interpersonal Methapor in Mata Najwa’s Talk Show. Vol 1. No 1

Rismayani, R. (2012 ).Speech Function in males’ and Female’s language in Television Advertisement. Medan. Universitas Negeri Medan.

Saj, Hala El. 2012. Interpersonal function: Personal Pronouns in Oprah Winfrey

Hosting Queen Rania of Jordan. International journal of science and

humanity vol. 2, No. 6,

Saragih, A. 2005. Introduction to Functional Grammar. (Unpublished lecturer handout). Medan: Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Medan.

Saragih, A. 2001. Bahasa dalam Konteks Sosial. Medan: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Medan.

Saragih, A. 2003. Bahasa dalam Context Social: Pendekatan Linguistik Fungsional Sistematik terhadap Bahasa dan Wacana. Medan: FBS-Universitas Negeri Medan.

Sulistyowati,Titis.2011.The Speech Function In The Conversation Between The Fourth Smester English Departement Students of Muria Kudus University and Some Foreigners.Vol.1.No.1

Thompson, G. 2004. Introducing Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

Ye , Ruijuan.2010. Interpersonal Metafunction Analysis of Barack Obama's Victory Speech.Guangdong Pharmaceutical University.

Yuliati. 2013. Interpersonal Meaning Negotiation in the Teacher – Student Verbal Interaction. The International Journal of Social Sciences. Vol 11.No 1