Effect of Various Polar Solvents to The Improvement of Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Bacterial Quinones from Activated Sludge

Jurnal Teknologi Proses
Media Publikasi Karya Ilmiah Teknik Kimia

6(1) Januari 2007: 26 – 30 ISSN 1412-7814
Effect of Various Polar Solvents to The Improvement of Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Bacterial Quinones from Activated Sludge

Irvan Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Sumatera Utara, Medan 20155

Abstract Extraction and identification of bacterial quinones is becoming increasingly important. The main purpose of this research is to investigate the possibility of extracting quinones from activated sludge using supercritical fluid
extraction and also to investigate the effect of various polar solvents in order to improve the yield. A ± 0.1 g
freeze-dried activated sludge sample was extracted at 35oC, 20 Mpa using supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2). This technique was able to extract quinones, yet with very low yield. In order to enhance the yield, performance of scCO2 was improved by adding any modifiers to the fluid. Various polar solvents such as methanol, acetone, ethanol, and chloroform were investigated. By adding the modifiers, four ubiquinones and 12 menaquinones species were identified in 0.1 g dried activated sludge based on retention time and spectrum analysis. Among the tested various polar solvents, methanol showed to be the best modifier, based on the highest total quinone content extracted and the lowest dissimilarity index.
Keywords: supercritical fluid extraction, polar solven,t activated sludge, bacterial quinines.

Introduction
Microbial community structure is one of the important factors controlling the pollutantdegrading capacity of ecosystem. The capacity of an ecosystem to degrade organic compounds and its response to the changes in environmental conditions depend not only on the total population of microorganisms present, but also on the microbial community structure of that system (Hu et al., 1999). Microbial population dynamics can be analyzed using quinone profile.
Nowadays, the technique of using quinone profiles has gained increased recognition as a simple and useful tool to analyze microbial population dynamics in mixed cultures (Hu et al., 2001; Hedrick and White, 1986). In the conventional method, analysis of quinones is

performed by organic solvent extraction (direct extraction) with chloroform–methanol mixture (Collins and Jones, 1981). Samples containing quinones are separated into a complex mixture of lipid and impurities. The impurities are removed by column chromatography, while microbial quinones are separated by thin layer chromatography (TLC). The compositions of purified fractions of ubiquinones and menaquinones are then analyzed by HPLC. Because satisfactory results could not be obtained using TLC, a solid-phase extraction method using Sep-Pak Plus Silica was employed for the purification and separation of quinones (Hu et al., 1999). However, the conventional method has still some disadvantages: timeconsuming, tedious and the use of large quantities of various organic solvents, which have detrimental effects on the environment.

Irvan / Jurnal Teknologi Proses 6(1) Januari 2007: 26 – 30


27

Thus, the development of a new method by employing environmentally benign solvent like scCO2 is crucial and offers solutions to the above-mentioned disadvantages.
Quinones are lipid-soluble substances found in almost all species of organisms (Hiraishi, 1988). Bacterial quinones are located in cytoplasma covered by the rigid cel wall of bacteria. In order to extract quinones from the matrix, the cell wall must be ruptured previously. The bacterial cell may be subjected to extreme conditions which cause disruption. There are two treatments which strongly believed to be the cause of the cell wall disruption, freeze dryer in sample treatment and supercritical fluid CO2 in main process. Researchers have investigated that freezing process has an effect on cell wal disruption due to the formation of expanding ice crystals. Souzu, H. (1980) has studied about the damage of Escherichia coli cell membrane caused by freezing treatment. Another process which considered to have a main effect in disrupting the cell wall is supercritical CO2. At high pressure that generally used, supercritical CO2 can penetrate and rupture the cell wall of bacterial cell. This disruption effect allowed us to sterilize and to extract intracellular products in certain process. Angela Dillow et al. (1999) from University of Minnesota have applied supercritical CO2 to sterilization process while Polak et al. (1989) were able to extract lipids from algae (Skeletonema costatum) and succeeded to recover about 50% of the total lipids from the organism.
Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) for analytical purposes has attracted considerable attention from researchers, especially in sample preparation techniques. SFE has shown the ability to compete with conventional organic solvent extraction method (Van der Velde et al., 1992) and usually takes a shorter time than conventional extraction because mass-transfer rates are higher in supercritical fluids than in liquid solvents. For environmental and analytical purposes, scCO2 is a very suitable extraction fluid, because of its low critical temperature and pressure (Tc = 31.1°C, Pc = 7.4 MPa). Moreover, CO2 is relatively non-toxic, inert, inexpensive and readily available. These favorable properties of CO2 have caught our

interest to investigate the feasibility of analyzing quinones in activated sludge by applying scCO2 extraction. This investigation focused mainly on the effect of various solvents as modifier on total quinone contents and quinone profile.
Materials and methods
Activated sludge samples
Activated sludge used in this study was obtained from the aeration tank of domestic wastewater plant at Toyohashi University of Technology, Japan. Prior to quinone extraction experiments, activated sludge samples were dried in a vacuum-freeze dryer for 24 hours and then sieved to collect particles smaller than 500 μm for extraction. A 0.1 g freeze-dried sample was used in each experiment. Supercritical fluid extraction
All experiments were performed using a SFE system (Jasco, Japan). The system is mainly equipped with two high-pressure pumps (SCF201, Jasco, Japan), a back pressure regulator (880-81, Jasco, Japan), a 1 ml extraction vessel (Jasco, Japan) and an oven (GC A 353, GL Sciences Inc.) which controls the temperature of the extraction vessel. CO2 with methanol as modifier was used as supercritical fluid. The operation condition of this experiment as follows: extraction vessel temperature 35oC, pressure 20 MPa, CO2 flow-rate 2.7 ml/min, methanol flow-rate 0.3 ml/min. This operation was conducted for 15 minutes, during this operation extracted microbial quinones were trapped and collected on the Sep-Pak Plus Silica cartridges (Waters Co., Tokyo) joined in series. The collected quinones were eluted from the cartridges with pure acetone. Finally, prior to HPLC analysis, menaquinones and ubiquinones contained in the acetone were purified and separated using two other Sep-Pak Plus Silica cartridges.
Organic solvent extraction
Conventional analysis of quinones using organic solvent extraction method was also carried out to investigate for the reliability of the SFE method. The procedure reported by Hu et al.(1999) was used to extract ubiquinones and menaquinones from activated sludge. A similar

28 Irvan / Jurnal Teknologi Proses 6(1) Januari 2007: 26 – 30

0.1 g dried activated sludge sample in SFE method was also used in conventional analysis. Quinones were initially extracted from the sludge using chloroform-methanol mixture (2:1, v/v) and subsequently extracted into hexane. The hexane extract, containing the ubiquinones and menaquinones, was separated and purified using two Sep-Pak Plus Silica cartridges joined in series before analyzed by HPLC.
Chromatographic analysis
The extracted microbial quinones were analyzed using HPLC (Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with ODS column (Zorbax-ODS, 4.6 mm I.D. x 250 mm, Agilent Technologies, USA) and two detectors, namely UV-Vis detector (Model SPD-10A, Shimadzu) and photodiode array detector (SPD-M10A, Shimadzu). The temperature of the column oven was maintained at 35oC. A mixture of methanol and isopropyl ether (9:2, v/v) was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The types of quinones were identified according to the retention time and the UV spectrum of each peak observed in UV detector. Ubiquinone 10 (UQ-10) were used as the quantitative standards. The wavelengths used to quantify quinones were 275 nm and 270 nm for ubiquinones and menaquinones, respectively.


275 nm

Several minor quinones, such as MK-10, MK10(H2) and MK-10(H6), could not be extracted. This was likely due to the limited ability of pure CO2 to dissolve polar compounds. It was necessary to add polar solvents to overcome the solubility limitation of pure CO2 and to enhance the extraction yield of quinone from the activated sludge. Eventhough only low yield and small number of quinone species were able to be extracted, however this experimental results confirmed that there is a posibility to extract bacterial quinones from activated sludge by using supercritical carbondioxide extraction.

80
UQ-8
60

40

UQ-7

UQ-9

UQ-10

20

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Retention Time (min)


270 nm

Results and Discussion
Non-modified supercritical fluid extraction of bacterial quinones
The extraction of quinones from activated sludge was initially carried out by using pure supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) without any modifier. This technique was able to extract quinones, yet with very low yield and small number of quinone types. The chromatograms of extracted quinones by using nonmodified supercritical CO2 extraction were shown in Figure 1.
Without adding the modifiers, four ubiquinones (UQ-7, UQ-8, UQ-9 and UQ-10) and nine menaquinones species (MK-6, MK-7, MK-8, MK-8(H2), MK-8(H4), MK-9, MK9(H2), MK-9(H4), and MK-10(H4)) were identified in 0.1 g dried activated sludge.

80

60

MK-6

MK-8(H2)

MK-7

MK-8(H4)

40 MK-9


MK-8

MK-9(H2)

MK-10(H4)

20 MK-9(H4)

0 10 20 30 40
Retention Time (min)
FIGURE 1: HPLC chromatograms of ubiquinones (above) and menaquinones (below) obtained by scCO2 extraction without modifier at pressure 25 MPa and temperature 35oC

Irvan / Jurnal Teknologi Proses 6(1) Januari 2007: 26 – 30

29

Modified supercritical fluid extraction of bacterial quinones

choloroform as modifier are 0.27, 0.09, 0.10, 0.17 and 0.22, respectively.


275 nm

Various polar solvents such as methanol, acetone, ethanol and chloroform were investigated in this study. These experiment also used condition operation which similar to the previous experiment. As a result, all of the minor quinones mentioned above were extractable by adding the modifiers to the scCO2. Four species of ubiquinones and twelve species of menaquinones were observed in the activated sludge, with the dominant quinones being UQ-8, MK-9(H2), followed by MK10(H4), MK-6 and Q-10. The chromatograms of extracted quinones by using methanol modified supercritical CO2 extraction were shown in Figure 2. By using methanol-modified scCO2, the total quinone content increased by 750%, while quinone content obtained using other modifiers increased by 250–500%.

80 60 40 20
2

UQ-8

UQ-7

UQ-9

UUQQ--1100

4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Retention Time (min)

270 nm


The role of modifier in scCO2 has been investigated elsewhere (Jeong and Chesney, 1999). Addition of polar modifier enhances the ability of scCO2 to extract quinones due to increased solubility and desorption of quinones from the activated sludge. Figure 3. shows that the use of different organic solvents as modifiers can yield very different total quinone content. The highest total quinone content was obtained by using methanol as modifier compared to acetone, ethanol and choloroform. This is most likely due to the fact that methanol has the highest polarity index among the tested solvents. According to Burdick and Jackson’s polarity index (Lee and Markides, 1990), the solvent’s polar property in descending order is as follows: methanol, acetone, ethanol and chloroform. Table 1 are listed the most widely used modifier and their polarity index.
Diversity index
The value of diversity index equal to 11.99 for the method employing methanol-modified scCO2 extraction was almost similar to that obtained by conventional method of 11.95, meaning that the two methods have similar microbial diversity value. Comparing with the conventional method, the values of dissimilarity of quinone profiles by SFE method using pure CO2, and adding methanol, ethanol, acetone and

MK-6

80

MK-7

MK-9(H2)

MK-9
60

MK-8(H4)

MK-10(H4)

40


MK-8(H2)

MK-10(H2)

MK-8

MK-9(H4)

20

MK-10

MK-10(H6)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Retention Time (min)
FIGURE 2: HPLC chromatograms of ubiquinones (left) and menaquinones (right) obtained by sc-CO2 extraction with methanol as modifier at pressure 25 MPa and temperature 35oC
The lowest value of dissimilarity, 0.09, was obtained between conventional method and methanol-modified scCO2 extraction. This value means that the two quinone profiles could be considered similar to each other. Hu et al. (2001) suggested that two quinone profiles could be considered different when the dissimilarity index is higher than or equal to 0.1.

30 Irvan / Jurnal Teknologi Proses 6(1) Januari 2007: 26 – 30


Quinone content ( μ mol / g-dry-cell)

0.6

0.5 MK-10(H4)
0.4 MK-9(H2)
0.3

0.2
0.1
0 Pure CO2

MK-6 Q-10
Q-8

M ethanol

Ethanol


Ace tone

Chloroform

M K - 10(H6) M K - 10(H4) M K - 9(H4) M K - 8(H4) M K - 10(H2) M K - 9(H2) M K - 8(H2) MK-10 MK-9 MK-8 MK-7 MK-6 UQ-10 UQ-9 UQ-8 UQ-7

FIGURE 3: Comparison of total quinone content obtained by scCO2 extraction with or without various modifiers at the concentration of 10% (v/v)

Conclusions

The feasibility of applying supercritical CO2 extraction for bacterial quinone extraction from activated sludge was studied. The experimental showed that the addition of modifier is required to increase the extracted total quinone content. The experimental result also showed that among the various modifiers tested in this study, methanol appeared to be the best modifier based on the highest yield and the value of diversity index

TABLE 1: Frequently used modifiers in SFE and

their polarity indexes.

Modifier

Polarity Index


Methanol

5.1

Acetone

5.1

Ethanol

4.3

Chloroform

4.1

1-Propanol

4.0


2-Propanol

3.9

1-Hexanol

3.5

Water

10.2

References
Hu, H. Y., Fujie, K., Urano, K. 1999. Development of a novel solid phase extraction method for analysis of bacteria quinones in activated sludge with higher reliability. J. of Biosci. Bioeng. 87: 378-382.
Hu, H.Y., Lim, B.R., Goto, N., Fujie, K. 2001. Analytical precision and repeatability of respiratory quinones for quantitative study of microbial community structure in environmental samples. J. Microbiol. Met. 47: 17–24.
Hedrick, D.B. and White, D.C. 1986. Microbial respiratory quinones in the environment I. A sensitive liquid chromatographic method. J. Microbiol. Meth. 5: 243-254.
Collins, D. M. and Jones, D. (1981) Distribution of isoprenoid quinone structural types in bacteria and their taxonomic implications. Microbiol. Reviews, 45 (2), 316-354
Hiraishi, A. 1988. Respiratory quinone profiles as tools for identifying different bacterial populations in activated sludge. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 34: 39-56.
Souzu, H. 1980. Studies on the damage to Escherichia Coli cell membrane caused by different rates of freeze-thawing. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 603, 13 – 26.
Dillow, A.K., Dehghani, F., Hrkachc, J.S., Foster, N.R., and Langer, R. 1999. Bacterial inactivation by using near and supercritical carbon dioxide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 10344-10348, Medical Sciences.
Polak, J.T., Balaban, M., Peplow, A., and Philips, A.J. 1989. Supercritical Fluid Science and Technology, chapter 28, pages 449-467. Number 406 in ACS Symposium Series. American Chemical Society, Washington D.C.
Van der Velde, E.G., de Haan, W., Liem, A.K. 1992. Supercritical fluid extraction of polychlorinated biphenyls and pesticides from soil. Comparison with other extraction methods. J. Chromatogr. A, 626, 135–143.
Jeong, M.L., Chesney, D.J. 1999. Investigation of modifier effects in supercritical CO2 extraction from various solid matrices. J. Supercrit. Fluid, 16, 33–42.
Lee, M. L. and Markides., K. E. 1990. Analytical Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Extraction, Chromatography Conferences, Inc., Provo, Utah.