© IJSE – ISSN: 2086 Complete feed diet was offered daily from 07.00 u
for 98 days. Weighing and recording of comp offered were carried out routinely. The complete
was offered at the experiment day and the complete feed offered the day before at 06.00–07
weighted and recorded routinely. Ten days before experiment, the remaining feed was collected
around 5 for dry matter analysis. Drinking water ad libitum. Dry matter intake was calcula
multiplication of total CF offered with of dry complete feed and then deducted with the multip
discharged complete feed with discharged of dry complete feed. OM intake was obtained from mul
of dry matter of the complete feed intake g w organic matter intake. Crude protein intake was
from multiplication of dry matter of the complete f g with crude protein of the complete feed. TDN i
obtained from multiplication of dry matter of the feed intake g with TDN. Body live weight was
every two weeks prior the completion of the resea conducted prior the feeding. Daily weight gain wa
from the different between final weights with init which divided with total days of research grams
Tulloh, 1978; Parakkasi, 1999.
III. RESULT
AND DISCUSSION
Feed Intake
The feed intake of sheep after treated with com is shown in Table 2. The highest average intake of
organic matter and TDN was T
3
followed by T
1
, The highest average intake of crude protein wa
followed by T
4
, T
2
and T
1
. The variance analysis sh the feed intake among four treatments was sig
different p0.05. The result of Duncan test show was more significantly different upon different cru
levels 10, 12, 14 and 16 at relative similar en TDN compared to T
2
and T
4
but not significantl to T
1
. The average intake of organic matter show was significantly different to T
4
but not sig different to T
1
and T
2
. The average intake of cru showed that T
3
was significantly different to T
2
not significantly different to T
1
. Table 2. The average nutrient intake of the shee
Variable Treatment
T
1
T
2
T
3
...........................................gekorhari.................. DMI
817.7+49.9
ab
746.3+16.9
b
865.8+35.2
a
OMI 736.7+44.9
a
659.0+14.9
a
750.6+30.5
a
CPI 86.9+5.3
b
91.6+2.1
b
118.7+4.82
a
TDN intake 520.5+31.8
ab
461.4+10.4
b
556.0+22.6
a
Superscript with different letter at the same row shows significant different p DMI=Dry Matter Intake; OMI=Organic Matter Intake; CPI=Crude Protein Intake
The research found that the formulation of comple not impact the flavor and appetite of the sheep.
organic matter intake and dry matter intake which fo different crude protein level indicated different cru
intake. Even the TDN of the complete feed was similar but the dry matter intake and organic matter
different which caused the differences in TDN in
2086-5023, 15
th
April 2016, All rights reserved 0 up to 20.00
mplete feed ete feed that
e remaining 07.00 were
fore the final d and taken
ter was given ulated from
ry matter of tiplication of
dry matter of ultiplication
with of as obtained
te feed intake DN intake was
the complete as measured
search which was obtained
initial weight msheepday
omplete feed of dry matter,
, T
2
and T
4
. was T
3
and s showed that
significantly owed that T
3
crude protein energy level
ntly different owed that T
3
significantly crude protein
and T
4
but eep
T
4
................... 606.9+123.0
c
529.9+107.4
b
96.5+19.6
b
365.7 +82.8
c
p0.05; Remarks:
plete feed did ep. Different
h followed by crude protein
as relatively ter intake was
intake. The increasing of feed intake would increase t
on the crude protein level treatment, dry m estimated by cubic equation as fol
5,638.01X+450.92X
2
–11.86X
3
R
2
=72.65 equation, it can be calculated that the
intake occurred at 14 of crude protein lev
Figure 1. Dry Matter Intake under Diffe The dry matter intake resulted in this
than the dry matter intake resulted from which used dried tofu waste 1.8 of th
kg of thin tail sheep i.e. 422.63 gsheep observed male local sheep 12 kg fed w
concentrate containing fermented-dried 465.83 gsheepday of dry matter intak
resulted 274.82 gday of dry matter in body live weight 13.2–18.5 kg.
This result corresponds to Rachmaw that Priangan sheep 19.40 kg fed w
concentrate containing fermented-rubbe dry matter intake 809.57–818.20 gshee
2008 found that male sheep 16.87 kg 100 added with mal nutrition block an
4 of ultra-mineral resulted dry m gsheepday. Sugiyono 2010 found tha
tail sheep fed with cut king grass and waste resulted in dry matter intake of
Furthermore, Akhadiarto 2009 found local sheep fed with paddy straw and
ration supplemented with fresh cow’s r in dry matter intake of 856.6 gsheepday
However, the result of this research dry matter intake resulted from Purbow
found that the dry matter intake of 12.76 fed with complete feed crude protein c
and offered for 6 of the total body gsheepday. In addition, Purbowati et a
that the dry matter intake of 13+1.46 kg with complete feed in the form of pell
from agricultural and agro-industria gsheepday.
Feed intake capability describes the p The highest dry matter intake resulted fr
obtained from complete feed which form crude protein content 865.83 gsheepda
69 e the weight gain. Based
y matter intake could be follow: y=23,968.143–
.65. According to the e maximum dry matter
level Figure 1.
fferent Protein Content this research was higher
rom Bulu et al. 2004 f the total weight 19.99
epday. Nirwana 2005 d with corn forage and
ied cacao pulp resulted take. Arifin et al. 2010
r intake on sheep with awan 2008 who found
with King grass and ber seed cake resulted
heepday. Daulay et al. kg fed with field grass
and supplemented with matter intake 821.64
that 20 kg of male thin nd 450 g of dried tofu
of 853.29 gsheepday. nd that 20 kg of male
nd dried cassava waste s rumen liquid resulted
day. rch was still lower than
owati et al. 2008 who .76 kg male local sheep
in content was 17.35 dy weight was 942.72
t al. 2009 also found
kg male local sheep fed ellet which formulated
trial waste was 924 e palatability of the feed.
from this research was ormulated with 14 of
day. This finding was
© IJSE – ISSN: 2086 not much different to Kearl 1982 and NRC 2
stated that 30 kg of male local sheep need dry ma as much as 830 and 840 gsheepday, res
Palatability is influenced by physical properties i.e color, texture, and shape such as mash, pellet, cru
also influenced by chemical properties i.e. wate protein and other substances. The sight and smell
sheep have important role but color doesn’t infl senses. Palatability can be quantitativelymeasu
number offeed intakeg kg in unitsof time Parakk NRC, 2000; Soeharsono et al., 2011. The fu
reasonof complete feed’sdry matter intakewas high it hada smooth textureanda highlevel ofpalatabil
results arealsoin linewithAnggorodi1994, andT 1998 who stated that feed intake is inf
thepalatabilityandnutritionalvalue of the rations.
The value of organic matter intake could be estim on the crude protein level contained in the complete
this cubic equation: y=20,513.134–4,796.88X + 3 10.03X
3
R
2
=73.55. Thus, it can be equated maximum organic matter intake occurred at 14.10
protein level Figure 2.
Figure 2. Organic Matter Intake under Different Content
The difference of organic matter intake on T
3
a closely related to higher dry matter intake contai
On the contrary, there were no differences among T
2
. Principally, the proportion of organic matter co dry matter content is the highest which indicate
organic matter intake is in line with the dry matter is expected that higher organic matter intake wil
higher energy and can be utilized to carry out process.
The crude protein intake could be estimated crude protein level contained in CF using this
cubic equation: y=2,908.673–698.429X + 56.556X R
2
= 64.30. According to the equation, it could be that the maximum crude protein intake occurred whe
of crude protein was 14.50 Figure 3. The cru intake resulted by Purbowati et al. 2009 using com
containing crude protein level 13.60–16.99 range 130.08–153.18 gday. On the contrary, Purbow
2007 used complete feed containing crude prote 14.48–17.42 resulted in dry matter intake o
2086-5023, 15
th
April 2016, All rights reserved 2007 who
matter intake respectively.
i.e. firmness, crumble. It is
ater content, ell senses of
influence the sured bythe
akkasi, 1999; fundamental
igherbecause bility. These
dTilmanetal. influencedby
timated based ete feed using
382.222X
2
– ted that the
0 of crude
Protein and T
4
was tained in T
3
. ng T
3
, T
1
and contained in
ates that the tter intake. It
will result in ut metabolic
ed based on is following
6X
2
–1.493X
3
be calculated hen the level
crude protein omplete feed
ged between owati et al.
otein content of 112.33–
165,80 gday. If compared to crude breeding sheep which was 93.80–142.9
the result of Purbowati et al. 2009 has the sheep.
The difference of crude protein differences on the dry matter intake
intake. The increasing of crude protein of dry matter intake, organic matter i
intake and TDN to a certain limit and th protein content 16. Different protein
complete feed should provide differe protein content in complete feed, but fac
not better than T
3
. This could be due content and TDN of T
3
was much better
Figure 3. Crude Protein Intake at Diffe The TDN intake could be estima
protein level contained in CF using equation:
y =18,463.082–4,360.880X
R
2
=76.55. According to the equation, that the maximum crude protein intake oc
of crude protein was 14.17 Figure 4. T treatments was not significantly different
the TDN content that was relatively si intake which not significantly different.
and Bell in Parakkasi 1999, the need determined by environment, age, body
composition and desired body weight Djayanegara 1993 stated that the environ
affects the needs of energy is temperature, wind speed. TDN intake was not significa
due to feed factors, feed composition environment. The average TDN intake res
al.
2009 was 469.37 g. Thus result was al.
2006 which found that the average TD g but lower than the result found by Purbo
724.02 g. The average TDN intake foun 2009 has met the standard determined b
410-680 g.
Complete feed in mash form was sheep. The flavor was sweet as the a
Different effect occurred due to the dif content at each treatment. This researc
lower crude fiber content and higher result of proximate analysis, it was fo
70 de protein needed by
2.90 g Ranjhan, 1981, as fulfilled the needs of
ein intake is due to ke and organic matter
in causes the increasing r intake, crude protein
then decreases at crude in content contained in
ferences following the fact showed that T
4
was due to the crude fiber
ter than T
4
.
fferent Protein Content mated based on crude
g this following cubic 0X+347.995X
2
–9.133X
3
n, it could be calculated occurred when the level
. The TDN intake among nt which could be due to
similar and dry matter t. According to Rodotis
eeds of feed energy is ody weight, race, feed
ht gain. Haryanto and ironmental condition that
re, relative humidity and icantly different could be
ion, cattle and similar resulted by Purbowati et
as higher than Rianto et TDN intake was 341.33
rbowati et al. 2005 i.e. und by Purbowati et al.
d by Ranjhan 1981 i.e. s proved palatable for
addition of molasses. different of crude fiber
arch found that T
3
had er TDN. Based on the
found that crude fiber
© IJSE – ISSN: 2086 content in complete feed was T
1
=22.58; T T
3
=22.53; and T
4
=25.19.
Figure 4. TDN Intake at Different Protein Con A processing of palm oil waste as feedstuff is in
the previous research. Silage and ammoniated-pa treatment as raw material for sheep could inc
content of dry matter, organic matter, NH
3
, pH and the feed digestibility and intake. It also gave posit
to energy and nitrogen balance. Solid palm oil was complete feed is potential for cattle’s nutrition so
contains 12.63 of crude protein and 154 kal.10 energy which could significantly increase the d
weight gain and safe for cattle Hanafi, 2004; Utom Palm kernel cake had higher nutrient content co
others byproducts which could be used for concent et al.,
2005. It consists of 90 of dry matter, 16.1 protein, 15.2 of crude fiber, 4 of ash, 63
matter without N, 0.29 of calcium, 0.71 of pho 6.2 of metabolized energy. Palm oil sludge coul
the daily body weight gain of cow and sheep as mu gcowday and 0.03 gsheepday Widjaja and Utom
Previous research related with the uses of com formulated from ammoniated and fermented-
showed that the complete feed is safe for sheep a toxic, not cause haematological and lever malign
indicated
by the
blood profile
he hematocritandglucose level and alanine aminot
ALT level and aspartate aminotransferase AS normal range Mayulu et al., 2012.
Daily Weight Gain
The highest daily weight gain occurred at T
3
trea followed by T
1
, T
2
and T
4
Table 3
.
The analysis o showed that daily weight gain resulted from four
was significantly different p0.05. The result o demonstrated that T
3
was significantly different to but not significantly different to T
1
. The analysis sh complete feed which formulated from palm oil
and mill’s byproduct with appropriate crude pro increase the daily weight gain of the sheep.
2086-5023, 15
th
April 2016, All rights reserved T
2
=24.09;
ontent s in line with
palm leaves increase the
nd increased sitive impact
aste in block source as it
.100gram of daily body
Utomo, 2004. compared to
entrate Sabu .1 of crude
of extract hosphor, and
ould increase much as 0.77
Utomo, 2005. mplete feed
-feed stuff p as it is not
lignancies as hemoglobin,
otransferase AST is in
treatment and s of variance
ur treatment lt of Duncan
to T
2
and T
4
showed that il plantation
rotein could Table 3. Average Daily Body Weigh
Variable Treatme
T
1
T
2
Daily body weight gain
gsheepday 161.0+6.4
ab
143.2+16.6
b
Different superscript at the same row shows significant di
The daily body weight gain resulte was 112.98–174.18 gsheepday Figure
higher than daily weight gain of male l fed with palm pressed fiber which am
and supplemented with cassava leav weight gain resulted from this researc
Zain, 2007. Rachmawan 2008 used rubber seed cake for Priangan sheep wi
19.40 kg body weight. This treatment r gain of the sheep by 64.89 gsheepday.
2004 found that fresh solid with 1 weight, unfermented complete feed b
complete feed block resulted daily we and 83 gsheepday.
Corn and concentrate with 20 of f powder resulted daily body weight gain
Nirwana, 2005. Sugiyono 2010 sho forage mixed with dried tofu waste resul
of 20 kg thin tail sheep by 96.25 gs results demonstrate that this research gi
weight gain among others.
The daily weight gain resulted from the result of Purbowati 2008 who foun
with 17.35 of crude protein content weight gain by 164.98 gsheepday o
Moreover, Purbowati et al. 2009 res weight gain by 150-165 gday on shee
complete feed in form of pellet. Akh resulted daily body weight gain by 173
kg of male local sheep fed with pad cassava waste pulp.
Figure 5. Graph of Daily Body Weight Ga Content
Body weight gain is the result of nu became one of influential factors as re
contained in the feed and the digestibilit
71 ght Gain of the Sheep
ment T
3
T
4
174.2+4.0
a
113.0+4.8
c
nt different p0,05.
lted from this research ure 5. This value was
e local sheep 10–14 kg ammoniated using urea
aves. The daily body arch is 54 gsheepday
sed 22 of fermented with 9 months age and
t resulted daily weight ay. Utomo and Widjaja
1 of the total body block and fermented
weight gain by 45, 64, f fermented cacao peel
in by 83.33 gsheepday howed that King grass
sulted daily weight gain gsheepday. All these
give higher daily body m this research confirm
und that complete feed nt resulted daily body
on male local sheep. resulted the daily body
heep fattening fed with Akhadiarto 2009 also
73.5 gsheepday on 20 paddy straw and dried
Gain at Different Protein nutrient consumed and
related to the nutrients ility of the feed Taylor,
72 © IJSE – ISSN: 2086-5023, 15
th
April 2016, All rights reserved 1994; Parakkasi, 1999; Phillips, 2001; Harfiah, 2005; Salem
and Smith, 2008. The increasing of daily body weight gain is presumably due to the increasing of dry matter and crude
protein intake, the digestibility and metabolic of protein. These factors could increase the protein amount which can
be utilized to form body tissue. High magnitude of daily body weight gain on sheep indicates that complete feed has
good quality and palatability. High ration intake and digestibility causes high protein intake and N retention which
leads to the increasing of daily body weight gain
.
However, a situation occurred where higher protein 16 in T
4
resulted lower daily body weight gain than T
3
. This could be due to dry matter intake on T
4
was lower which resulted lower crude protein intake and lower TDN. In term
of crude protein intake and TDN ratio, T
3
was lower 0.21 than T
4
0.27. This indicates that complete feed resulted from T
4
treatment experienced excess protein ration that can’t be utilized for daily body weight gain.
IV. CONLUSIONS
