Innovations in extending social insurance coverage to independent workers
9
few  years,  CCSS,  the  entity  responsible  for  the  social  contribution  collection  has implemented a series of programmes essentially directed at hiring administrative staff and
inspectors,  in  order  to  reinforce  the  follow  up  of  cases  of  evasion  by  employers  and independent workers.
Costa Ricas social insurance institution includes a corps of specialized inspectors for overseeing the registration of independent workers, who work in several economic sectors
and according to different schedules, to enable both daytime and night-time supervision. In addition to good human resources, the programme also has allocated resources to
acquire the physical, material, and technologic resources needed to successfully implement this  strategy.  The  incorporation  of  a  greater  number  of  social  security  inspectors  has
allowed for the extension of contributory coverage to all parts of the country, including to independent workers in rural areas.
3.4.  Mechanisms aimed at including micro and small companies
In  order  to  extend  contributory  coverage,  social  insurance  systems  may  integrate specific  mechanisms  to  cover  different  company  categories,  such  as  micro  and  small
companies. This type of measure has primarily facilitated the formalization of companies, but  has  also  simultaneously  contributed  to  reduce  exclusion  from  the  social  security
system. In this section, we introduce three successful examples of such schemes. The first is  the  simplified  scheme
6
currently  in  force in  Uruguay,  called  Monotributo. The  second example  is  located  in  Brazil  and  is  called  Simples  Nacional  National  Simple  or  Super
Simples Super Simple. The third is the French Auto-entrepreneur scheme. The case of Monotributo in Uruguay
The Monotributo scheme consists of an optional unified tax package, which includes the payment both of social security contributions and of taxes. This scheme covers micro
and  small  companies  performing  their  activities  mostly  in  the  informal  economy.  In addition  to  Uruguay,  Monotributo  was  also  implemented  in  other  countries,  including
Argentina.
From  the  year  2000,  the  Board  of  Directors  of  the  Social  Security  Institute  of Uruguay,  which  is  responsible  for  managing  social  insurance,  has  acknowledged  that  an
important  sub-set  of  own-account  workers  was  governed  by  inadequate  rules  which  had contributed  to  its  potential  marginalization  from  the  social  protection  system.  Several
studies have shown that more than 80 per cent of this type of worker was excluded from social security coverage. It was in this context that the Monotributo scheme was promoted.
Its aim was not only tax formalization, but also to ensure social protection to independent workers who up until then were excluded from the system.
Initially,  this  schemes  results  were  unsatisfactory,  which  led  to  a  series  of  internal changes in 2006, allowing, among other things, for the easing of restrictions on access to
6
Simplified systems may be used to increase the inclusion of important groups, but at the expense of reducing the coverage of general schemes. This diversion effect has generated much controversy
in social insurance system management.
10
Summary of innovative mechanisms to extend social insurance coverage to independent workers
this special scheme
7
. One of the most significant reforms that this scheme has undergone was the inclusion of one-person businesses, in addition to de facto companies, with some
restrictions. The  reform  extended  the type  and  maximum  number  of  activities companies may  be  involved  in
8
,  and  incorporated  into  the  system  those  companies  selling  their products by credit card. Before the reform, only small companies selling products to end
consumers  were  included.  Currently,  registration  for  the  scheme  is  allowed  not  only  to companies selling to end consumers, but also to those marketing their products to private
companies and the State, although there are some exceptions. Also, there was an increase in  the  maximum  turnover  allowed  for  a  company  to  entitle  it  to  enter  this  scheme.  This
measure enabled annual increases over 100 per cent both for small commercial companies and service providers.
The scale of the results generated by this scheme is evidenced by the increase in the average  annual  growth  of  one-person  businesses  registered.  Between  2002  and  2006  this
amounted  to  1.3  per  cent,  whereas  between  2007  and  2009,  when  the  reforms  came  into force,  the  increase  amounted  to  6.5  per  cent.  In  absolute  terms,  the  reform  generated  an
estimated increase of 12,722 one-person businesses registered between the dates above.
The case of auto-entrepreneurs in France In  2008,  the  French  Government  launched  a  new  status  for  business  owners.  Auto-
entrepreneurs are independent workers with an annual turnover under € 81,500, for trading activities, or under € 32,600 for service provision.
Auto-entrepreneurs are subject to specific regulations on taxation and social security contributions.  Registration  in  social  security  schemes  is  compulsory  for  auto-
entrepreneurs. Unlike the rates applicable to other independent workers, contributions are established as a package, in terms of an income percentage which varies from 12 per cent
and  21.3  per  cent,  depending  on  the  sector  within  which  the  business  is  located.  Auto- entrepreneurs also may choose to pay a universal package, determined as a percentage of
income, which incorporates both social contributions and income taxes, thus greatly easing the accounting in the business creation stage.
―Auto-entrepreneur‖ is a flexible independent worker status which aims to encourage and  facilitate  business  creation  and  development.  An  auto-entrepreneur  may  for  instance
also  undertake  some  wage  labour.  It  can  be  seen  as  a  tool  to  formalize  work  which  was previously  undeclared  for  several  reasons  procedure  complexity,  incompatibility  with
other declared income sources, etc., especially in service providing cleaning, gardening, etc.. This initiative was very successful from its inception, in terms of business creation.
In 2011, there were more than 700,000 active business owners.
The case of Super Simples in Brazil In Brazil, Simples Nacional has become an important mechanism to protect workers
in  micro  and  small  companies.  This  special  scheme  was  established  in  1996  under  the terms  of  the
Lei  do  Simples
―Law  of  Simple‖,  and  has  been  the  object  of  important changes since its enactment.
7
These  changes  were  introduced  through  the  Ley  de  Reforma  Tributaria  de  2006,  2006  Tax Reform Law  in  force since July 2007. The reform  was promoted by the BPS Board of Directors,
and subsequently undertaken by the Executive and the Parliament.
8
There  was  an  inclusion  of  companies  selling  goods,  and  providing  services,  as  well  as  of  small artisan producers.