Result of Normality Test Result of Homogeneity Test

D. Result of Data Analysis

1. Fulfillment of the Assumptions

a. Result of Normality Test

The normality test is used to measure whether the data in both control class and experimental class are normally distributed or not. In this case, the writer used Lilliefors formula to test the normality of the data. The hypotheses for normality test formulated as follows: H a = the data have normal distribution H o = the data do not have normal distribution The test criteria: H a is accepted if L observed ≤ L critical , it means that the data are in normal distribution. H o is accepted if L observed ≥ L critical , it means that the data are not in normal distribution. Table 13 Normality Test of the Experimental Class and Control Class Class Pre-test Post-test Conclusion L observed L critical L observed L critical Control 0.148311 0.195 0.091526 0.195 Normal Experimental 0.144154 0.190 0.112391 0.190 Normal Based on the table above, it can be seen that in experimental class and control class showed that L observed  L critical . The writer concluded that the data in both classes were normally distributed For more information see appendices14, 15, 16 and 17.

b. Result of Homogeneity Test

Homogeneity test is used to determine whether the data obtained from the sample homogenous or not. The hypotheses are: H o : the variance of the data is homogenous H a : the variance of the data is not homogenous The criteria of the test are as follows: H o is accepted if F observed ≤ F critical it means that the variance of the data is homogenous. H a is rejected if F observed ≥ F critical it means that the variance of the data is heterogeneous. To measure the homogeneity test of control class, the writer used the formula as follows: � observed = the biggest variants The smallest variants The result of homogeneity test is: 1 Pre-test of Experimental class and Control class Variance S 2 of pre-test control class: 21.7193 Variance S 2 of pre-test experimental class: 20.6044 F observed = 21.7193 20.6044 =1.0541 Table 12 Homogeneity Test Result in Pre-test Control Class and Experimental Class Class Variance F observed F critical Conclusion Control 21.7193 1.0541 2.08 Homogenous Experimental 20.6044 2 Post-test of Experimental and Control class Variance S 2 of the post-test control class: 17.7222 Variance S 2 of post-test experimental class: 11.5568 F observed = 17.7222 11.5568 = 1.53349 Table 13 Homogeneity Test Result in Post-test Control Class and Experimental Class Class Variance F observed F critical Conclusion Control 17.7222 1.53349 2.08 Homogenous Experimental 11.5568 Based on the table above, it can be seen at the result of the test in pre-test and post-test are 1.0541 and 1.53349 while the F critical at the significant level of 0.05 is 2.08. It proved that Ho is accepted because F observed ≤ F critical . It means that the variance of the data was homogeneous See appendices 18 and 19.

c. The Result of Hypothetical Test

Dokumen yang terkait

STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT OF THE TENTH GRADE YEAR STUDENTS’ OF SMKN 6 SURAKARTA Students' Ability in Writing Descriptive Text of the Tenth Grade Year Students' of SMKN 6 Surakarta in 2015/2016 Academic Year.

0 5 18

STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT OF THE TENTH GRADE YEAR STUDENTS’ OF SMKN 6 SURAKARTA Students' Ability in Writing Descriptive Text of the Tenth Grade Year Students' of SMKN 6 Surakarta in 2015/2016 Academic Year.

0 3 12

THE INFLUENCE OF USING DICTOGLOSS TECHNIQUE TOWARDS STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY IN ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION TEXT AT THE FIRST SEMESTER OF THE ELEVENTH GRADE OF SMA KARYA MATARAM SOUTH LAMPUNG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2016 2017

3 14 166

THE INFLUENCE OF USING CONCEPT MAPPING TOWARDS STUDENTS’ DESCRIPTIVE PARAGRAPH WRITING ABILITY AT THE FIRST SEMESTER OF THE TENTH GRADE OF SMAN 2 LIWA IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2016 2017

0 2 178

THE INFLUENCE OF USINGTHINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) TECHNIQUE TOWARDS STUDENTS’ NARRATIVE TEXT WRITING ABILITY IN THE TENTH GRADE OF SMA PERSADA BANDAR LAMPUNG AT THE SECOND SEMESTER IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2016 2017

0 0 91

THE ABILITY OF WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA N 2 KUDUS IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 20132014 TAUGHT BY USING ESTAFET WRITING

0 0 19

THE INFLUENCE OF USING GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) TOWARDS STUDENTS’ PROCEDURE TEXT WRITING ABILITY AT THE FIRST SEMESTER OF THE TENTH GRADE OF SMAN 1 BULOK TANGGAMUS IN 2016/2017 ACADEMIC YEAR - Raden Intan Repository

0 0 81

THE INFLUENCE OF USING HIGHLIGHTED JOURNAL STRATEGY TOWARDS STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY IN DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT THE FIRST SEMESTER OF THE TENTH GRADE OF SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 2 BANDAR LAMPUNG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2018/2019 - Raden Intan Repository

0 2 98

THE INFLUENCE OF USING DICTOGLOSS TECHNIQUE TOWARDS STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY IN ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION TEXT AT THE FIRST SEMESTER OF THE ELEVENTH GRADE OF SMA KARYA MATARAM SOUTH LAMPUNG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2016/2017 - Raden Intan Repository

0 0 166

THE INFLUENCE OF USING FREE WRITING TECHNIQUE TOWARDS STUDENTS’ ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION TEXT WRITING ABILITY AT THE FIRST SEMESTER OF THE ELEVENTH GRADE OF MA AL- HIKMAH BANDAR LAMPUNG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 20172018

0 3 147