59 put down cost. One of them, however, said that it is not resources efficient as the
material price is expensive. Another one said that it depends on the project funding as very big budget is required for this. Other respondents, however, had
no idea regarding this matter.
4.4.10 Property Development in a City that Currently Offers or Has Offered
Incentives for Green Building
Respondents were asked to explain whether their company has developed property in a city that currently offers or has offered incentives for green building
at the time of construction. Almost all of the respondents failed to mention the city offering such incentive. The complete respondents’ responses representing
each of the companies are shown in the table below.
Table 4.19 Property Development in a City that Currently Offers or Has Offered
Incentives for Green Building
Company Response
Wijaya Karya All of the respondents said that they had no idea on this matter.
Pembangunan Perumahan
One of the respondents said in the affirmative, but the others did not give answers,
Hutama Karya All of the respondents said that their company has not developed
property in such cities. Waskita Karya
One of the respondents said that the company has not had a chance to develop property in such cities, while the others did not give
answer.
Adi Karya All of the respondents said in the negative. Because there was no
budget and no incentive offered to build green, the company usually only made a small garden around the project site.
Almost all of the respondents did not even have idea whether their company has developed property in a city that currently offers or has offered
incentives for green building at the time of construction. These results can show
60 that the green incentives are very negligible not the main motivation for the
company in deciding where they are going to pursue construction tender.
4.4.11 The Cities Offering Incentives for Green Development
Respondents were asked about the cities which have offered or are offering their company incentives for green development. The cities mentioned by
the respondents were Jakarta, Semarang, Kudus and Jepara. The complete respondents’ responses representing each of the companies are shown in the table
below.
Table 4.20 Cities Offering Incentives for Green Development
Company Response
Wijaya Karya Most of the respondents said that they did not have idea on this
matter, and only one of them mentioned Jakarta as the city offering incentives for green development.
Pembangunan Perumahan
One of the respondents said Semarang, but the others did not give answers,
Hutama Karya All of the respondents did not answer this question.
Waskita Karya One of the respondents mentioned Semarang. Jepara and Kudus
the Muria region, but the others did not give answer. Adi Karya
All of the respondents did not answer the question, though one of them said that the company had some incentive.
Most of the respondents could not name the cities which have offered or are offering their company incentives for green development. Only some managed
to name some cities i.e. Jakarta, Semarang, Jepara and Kudus the Muria region as the cities with some incentive. The results show that green construction concept
is still new that only very few cities even considering giving incentives to speed up its development.
61
4.4.12 The Form of Incentives to Build Green Construction
