CONCLUSION T1 112011025 Full text

43 their statement that they were not bothered if all members were given the same marks, which was indicated by 68.3 of the responses. This result could be understood by inferring that there were a few students having a sort of mixed feelings in filling in the questionnaires. Regardless of the discussed findings which already met the aim of the study, there were also some limitations in the present study. The first limitation concerns the correlation of female and male students, or even the length of experiencing group work, to their perceptions toward group work. Perhaps, there will be new findings revealed if further studies correlate the influences of students‟ gender or the length of experiencing group work to the way they perceive certain items in the questionnaires. The second limitation concerns the grade of the students, and also the setting of the study. Different results may have been acquired if the participants of the study had been other graders in the school, or the twelfth graders in others secondary schools. Thereby, further research is essential to figure out whether students‟ perceptions differ if the context is changed. The implication of the study is that the secondary teachers need to consider their students‟ perceptions into account when teachers want to assign some team-work tasks. Most importantly, teachers should be willing to teach their students how to manage an effective working team. Therefore, students can really know and even get the real benefits of group work if they do it correctly. 44

F. ACKNOWLEDGMENT

First of all, I want to express my greatest gratitude to Jesus Christ, for blessing me with good health and wisdom from the start until the completion of my thesis. Without His blessings, I will not certainly be able to do my study this well. I also would like to take this opportunity to express my sincere appreciations to those who always support me in various ways to finish this thesis: a. My family, who at all times pray for me, give me encouragement, and even remind me to take enough rest during my thesis completion. b. My supervisor, Elisabet Titik Murtisari, M.TransStud., PhD , who is very kind- hearted and patient in giving me useful advice and guidance in finishing this study despite of her very busy schedule. c. My examiner, Dra. Martha Nandari S. Handoko, MA, for examining as well as giving useful advice and corrections to improve my thesis writing. d. My lovely companions, Iin, Melcy, Awul, Xtin, Chin, Wen, Phelin, and Fani who always cheer me up as well as support each other to be able to celebrate the graduation day together. e. My superb besties, Feli, Sherly, Novi, Ike, and Evi who pray for me all the time for the great achievements in my life. Without their cares and supports, the thesis writing of mine will not be able to get to this final point. 45

G. REFERENCES

Alghamdi, R., Gillies, R. 2013. The impact of cooperative learning in comparison to traditional learning small groups on EFL learners outcomes when learning English as a foreign language. Asian Social Science, 9 13, 19-27. Analoui, B., Sambrook, S., Doloriert, C. 2011. Engaging students in group work to maximise knowledge sharing Bangor Business School Working Paper No. 11006. Retrieved February 4, 2015 from Bangor Business School Working Paper website: http:www.bangor.ac.ukbusinessresearchdocumentsBBSWP11006.pdf Astin, A. W., Astin, H. S. 2000. Leadership reconsidered: Engaging higher education in social change . Battle Creek, MI: W.K. Kellogg Foundation. Barkhuizen, G. P. 1998. Discovering learners‟ perceptions of ESL classroom teachinglearning activities in a South African context. TESOL Quarterly, 32 , 85- 107. Block, D. 1994. A day in the life of a class: Teacherlearner perceptions of task purpose in conflict. System, 22 , 473-486. Bolton, M. K. 1999. The role of coaching in student teams: A „just-in-time‟ approach to learning. Journal of Management Education, 23 , 233-250. Boud, D., Cohen, R., Sampson, J. 1999. Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24 4, 413 –426. Boud, D. 2001. Introduction: Making the move to peer learning. In D. Boud, R. Cohen, J. Sampson Eds., Peer learning in higher education – learning from and with each other pp. 1-17. London: Kogan. Bourner, J., Hughes, M., Bourner, T. 2001. First year undergraduate experiences of group project work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26 , 19-39. Burdett, J. 2003. Making groups work: University students perceptions. International Education Journal, 4 3, 177-191. 46 Coers, N., Lorensen, M. 2009. Case study: Student perceptions of groups and teams in leadership education. Journal of Leadership Education, 8 1, 93-110. Cohen, S. G., Bailey, D. E. 1997. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23 , 239-290. Colbeck, C.L., Campbell, S.E., Bjorklund, S.A. 2000. Grouping in the dark: What college students learn from group projects. The Journal of Higher Education, 71 1, 60-83. Cronbach, L. J. 1950. Further evidence on response sets and test design. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10 1, 3-31. Daly, J.P., Worrel, D.L. 1993. Structuring group projects as miniature organizations. Management Education, 17 2, 236-242. Davis, B. D., Miller, T. R. 1996. Job preparation for the 21st century: A group project learning model to teach basic workplace skills. Journal of Education for Business, 72 2, 69-73. Davis, B. G. 1993. Tools for teaching . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Ettington, D. R., Camp, R. R. 2002. Facilitating transfer of skills between group projects and work teams. Journal of Management Education, 26 4, 356 –379. Falchikov, N. 2001. Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education . New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer. Gillies, R. M. 2011. Promoting thinking, problem-solving and reasoning during small group discussions. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17 1, 73-89. Greenbank, P. 2007, September. An examination of the factors influencing student participation in collaborative approaches to examination preparation. Paper presented at the Education in a Changing Environment International Conference, University of Salford, Greater Manchester. Retrieved February 4, 2015 from http:www.ece.salford.ac.ukproceedingspapers32_07.pdf