SPACE AS THE ORGANIZING CONCEPT IN URBAN DESIGN

SPACE AS THE ORGANIZING CONCEPT IN URBAN DESIGN

Late in the nineteenth century the Viennese archi- tect Camillo Sitte reacted against the poor imita- tions, throughout Europe, of Haussmann’s schemes

for Paris in the mid-century. 26 Many nineteenth- century groupings are dull mainly because they were designed about a few ideal viewing points without the subtleties of spatial composition of the greater works. Axial planning degenerated into the unimaginative use of the straight edge and the

TOWNS AND BUILDINGS

stereotyped employment of compact solid building

architecture is relegated to a subsidiary supporting

blocks as the primary element of urban design.

role. The façades of buildings, which stand alone in

Furthermore these building blocks of city planning

space, meet an an external angle and are seen by

were often set out on a major axis, as for example

the observer as a mass. Reversing the process, build-

in South Kensington, London, described by Gibberd

ings arranged around a space have façades which

as being ‘. . . like meat on a skewer’ 27 (Figure 3.34).

meet at an internal angle and there is an effect of

Within such developments the main architectural

volume.

relationship is the correspondence of adjacent

Relating building forms seen in mass at urban

entrances. Sitte reversed current urban design

densities requires some form of rectangular or

dogma by emphasizing the square and the street as

regular layout and preferably this should occur on a

the elements of city development. In other words,

flat site. When buildings form the walls of squares

according to his theory it is the spaces in the city

and streets this is not nearly so important. The

which should receive the attention of the designers.

multitude of vanishing points are not so apparent.

This theory of urban design places emphasis on the outdoor rooms and corridors of the city; they are the volumes to be designed and the buildings are merely two-dimensional enclosures – the walls of the spaces.

Following Sitte’s pattern of city development buildings are designed in such a way that the scene

Figure 3.35 Geraci, Reggio

becomes more important as urban design while

Calabria Figure 3.36 Geraci, Reggio

Calabria Figure 3.37 Geraci, Reggio

3.36 Calabria

URBAN DESIGN: STREET AND SQUARE

Figure 3.38 St Mark’s Square, Venice

1 = Piazza San Marco 2 = Piazzetta San Marco 3 = San Marco 4 = Doges Palace 5 = Campanile 6 = Library

Figure 3.39 Entrance to the Piazzetta San Marco, Venice

An irregular spatial layout is not obvious to the spectator apart from very obtuse angles in an awkward triangular space. Even when irregularities are apparent the scene is often thought quite picturesque with adjacent planes eliding to form a single element containing the space (Figures 3.35–3.37).

Sitte’s suggested method of organizing building groups is best illustrated by the Piazza and Piazzetta San Marco in Venice (Figures 3.38–3.42). His own words describe most eloquently his views:

So much beauty is united on this unique little patch of earth, that no painter has ever dreamt up

TOWNS AND BUILDINGS

Figure 3.40 Piazza San Marco, Venice Figure 3.41 San Marco from the Piazzetta, Venice Figure 3.42 Piazzetta San Marco, Venice

anything surpassing it in his architectural backgrounds; in no theatre has there ever heen seen anything more sense-beguiling than was able to arise here in reality. This is truly the sovereign seat of a

great power, a power of intellect, of art, and of

the abundance of their sculptural decoration, the

industry, which assembled the riches of the world

rich polychromy of S. Marco, the powerful

on her ships, and from here exercised dominion

Campanile. However, it is the felicitous arranging of

over the seas, relishing her acquired treasures at

them that contributes so decidedly to the whole

this, the loveliest spot in the whole wide world. Not

effect. There is no doubt that if these works of art

even Titian or Paolo Veronese could invent anything

were disposed separately according to the modern

more magnificent for the imaginative city views in

method, straight in line and geometrically centred,

the backgrounds of his large paintings of weddings

their effect would be immeasurably decreased.

and other occasions. If we were to examine the

Imagine S. Marco isolated, with the Campanile set

means by which this unexcelled grandeur was

on the axis of its main portal in the middle of a

achieved they would, indeed, prove to be

huge modern square – the Procuratie, library, etc,

extraordinary: the effect of the sea, the

standing about separately in the modern “block

accumulation of superlative monumental structures,

system” instead of forming a tight enclosure – and

URBAN DESIGN: STREET AND SQUARE

to top it all, a boulevard of almost 200 feet in

suggest that suburban expansion will cease to exist

width running past this so-called plaza. One cannot bear the thought. 28

in the twenty-first century. Though in Europe particularly there may be a return to urban form more in keeping with our cultural heritage. It is

CONCLUSION

assumed that over large areas of European cities urban designs will he required for projects where

There are two main ways in which buildings can be

land will be intensively used with little space being

arranged in space. The buildings themselves can be

available for massive landscaping schemes. Certainly,

the positive object designed as a three-dimensional

there will be parts of cities such as industrial estates

mass, the ‘figure’ in the composition, while the

where buildings will sit on their own site

space in which they stand is the ‘ground’. The alter-

surrounded by car-parking space. But for the major

native method advocated by Sitte and his followers

parts of the city the ideas of Sitte will take on added

is a reversal of this process. Space itself becomes

importance. These ideas will be considered in detail

the ‘figure’, the positive element, the volume to be

in the following chapters. They will examine spatial

designed and buildings are relegated to a supporting

composition using squares, streets and the methods

role, the ‘ground’. As the background of the urban

used for their combination.

scene the buildings are the stage setting for the activities of daily life taking place within the spatial

NOTES

volumes they define. There are a number of techniques by which buildings of three-dimensional mass can be unified;

1 Boesiger, Willy. Le Corbusier, Thames and Hudson, London,

with the use of landscaping, through the unified

1972, pp.116–119

architectural treatment of simple volumes and by the use of the right angle, axis or vista. Axial or 2 Le Corbusier. The Chapel at Ronchamp (trns. Jacqueline

Cullen), Architectural Press, London, 1957

vista planning takes on an added dimension and greater subtlety when used in conjunction with a

3 Baker, G.H. Le Corbusier, An Analysis of Form, Van

spatial composition following the prescriptions of

Nostrand Reinhold, Wokingham, Berkshire, 1984,

Sitte. In any system of categorization there will pp.186–211 always be the possibility of overlap, the use of two

4 Murray, Peter. The Architecture of the Renaissance, Thames

or more basic concepts together with the deliberate

and Hudson, London, 3rd edn, 1986, pp.123–127, and

and successful application of principles to achieve

Burckhardrt, Jacob, The Architecture of the Italian

particular effects. It does appear, however, that in Renaissance (ed. Peter Murray), Penguin, Harmondsworth, any given composition one method, one concept

1985, pp.61–63

should be the dominant idea if unity is to be

5 Summerson, John. The Classical Language of Architecture,

achieved.

Thames and Hudson, London, 1980, p.49

For the remainder of the text it will be assumed

6 Serlio, Sebastiano. The Five Books of Architecture (an

that urban areas in the future will be constrained by

unabridged reprint of the English edition of 1611), Dover

the imperative of resource conservation both in

Publications Inc, New York, 1982, Book 3, Chapter 4, Fol.

terms of land allocation and the husbanding of

energy. Such an imperative would place a premium

7 Downs, Kerry. Hawksmoor, Thames and Hudson, London

on the development of a tightly grained urban fabric

1969, pp.92–94, and Kersting, A.F. and Ashdown, John. The

as opposed to prairie planning associated with the

Buildings of Oxford , Batsford, London, 1980, pp.22, 64 and

North American suburban ideal. This is not to

TOWNS AND BUILDINGS

8 Gibberd, Frederick. Town Design, Architectural Press,

19 Vitruvius. The Ten Books of Architecture (trns. by Morris

London, 2nd edn, 1955 pp.216–217

Hicky Morgan), Dover Publications, New York, 1960,

9 Tunnard, Christopher. The City of Man, The Architectural

pp.24–32

Press, London, 1953

20 Morris, A.E.J. History of Urban Form, George Godwin,

10 Unwin, Raymond. Town Planning in Practice, London,

London, 1972 pp.117–118

21 Popham, A.E. The Drawings of Leonardo da Vinci,

11 Norberg-Schulz, Christian. Existence, Space and

Jonathan Cape, London, 1964, pp.161. 312–314

Architecture , Studio Vista, London, 1971, pp.l7l–177 and

22 Irving, R.G. Indian Summer, Lutyens, Baker and Imperial

Gibherd, F. Op cit, pp.125–127

Delhi , Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1981,

12 Gibberd, F. Op cit, p.75

pp.259–26O

13 Ibid, p.252

23 Giedion, S. Space, Time and Architecture, Harvard

University Press, Cambridge. Mass., 3rd edn, 1956, p.76

14 Scully, Vincent. The Earth, The Temple and The Gods: Greek Sacred Architecture , Yale University Press, New

24 Ibid, p.648

Haven and London, 1962, p.65

25 Gibberd, F. Op cit, p.77

15 Abercrombie, Patrick. Greater London Plan, HMSO, London,

26 Sitte, Camillo. Der Stadte-Bau, Carl Graeser & Co. Wien,

16 Scoffham, E.R. The Shape of British Housing, Godwin,

27 Gibberd, F. Op cit, p.75

London and New York, 1984, p.56

28 Quoted from the translation of Sitte in Collins, G.R. and

17 University of Liverpool, Recorder, Report of the

Collins, C.C. Camillo Sitte, The Birth of Modern City

Development Gommittee to the Council of the University

Planning , Rizzoli, New York, 1986, pp.196–197

for the Years 1959–1964 , The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, January 1965

18 Guadet, J. Elements et Theorie de L’Architecture, Vols I to IV, 16th edn, Librairie de la Construction Moderne, Paris, 1929 and 1930

This Page Intentionally Left Blank