Br na, P. Confronting misconceptions in the domain of simple Ebenezer, J. V., and G. L. Erickson. Chemistry students’ Feltovich, P. J., R. J. Spir o, and R. L. Coulson. The nature of Glynn, S. M. Explaining science concepts: a teaching-with- Halloun, I. A

the term ‘‘compliance’’ for the term ‘‘elasticity’’ may not help to dispel the confusion. Visual r epr esentations. The visual representations of important phenomena that are used in textbooks and other media such as computer simulations and animations 21 can also be a source of significant student misconceptions. For example, the illustra- tions meant to describe the process of diffusion of solutes in solution always show the various solute molecules as large ‘‘objects’’ that occupy appreciable space and that can clearly interfere with by colliding each other’s movement. Several of the faulty mental models that lead to the misconceptions observed in this study seem to arise from a similar mechanism 2. Analogies. Finally, it is important to recognize that the use of analogies, particularly common in science education at all levels 4, can actually result in the creation of student misconceptions 16. In some cases the simplified pictorial representations of scien- tific phenomena referred to above are analogies and thus potential sources of all of the forms of misconcep- tions cataloged by Spiro et al. 16. What can we, as teachers of physiology, lear n fr om these r esults? First, we need to recognize that in spite of our best efforts, it is likely that something we do or say in the classroom, or include in our written materials, will contribute to students de- veloping a misconception about some important physi- ological phenomenon. We must, therefore, strive for precision and clarity in our words, use pictorial representations that communicate only what we seek to communicate, and use only carefully thought out analogies as we seek to build our students’ understand- ing with increasingly complex models. Having done that, we must be prepared to detect the misconceptions being used by our students and then assist them in remediating these faulty models. We have proposed the creation of an active learning environment in our classrooms as an approach to accomplishing both of these goals 10. Providing students with opportunities to test their mental mod- els by making predictions andor solving problems can provide opportunities for the instructor to detect misconceptions, while at the same time allowing the students to prove to themselves that their models lead to incorrect predictions, the first step in remediating a misconception 19. This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant DUE-965782. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Foundation. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. Michael, Dept. of Physiology, Rush Medical College, 1750 W. Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60612 E-mail: jmichaelrush.edu. Received 26 January 1999; accepted in final form 26 August 1999. Refer ences

1. Br na, P. Confronting misconceptions in the domain of simple

electrical circuits. Instructiona l Sci. 17: 29–55, 1988.

2. Ebenezer, J. V., and G. L. Erickson. Chemistry students’

conceptions of solubility: a phenomenography. Sci. Educ. 80: 181–201, 1996.

3. Feltovich, P. J., R. J. Spir o, and R. L. Coulson. The nature of

conceptual understanding in biomedicine: the deep structure of complex ideas and the development of misconceptions. In: Cognitive Science in Medicine, edited by D. A. Evans and V. L. Patel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989, p. 113–172.

4. Glynn, S. M. Explaining science concepts: a teaching-with-

analogies model. In: The Psychology of Lea rning Science, edited by S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, and B. K. Britton. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1991, p. 219–240.

5. Halloun, I. A., and D. Hestenes. The initial knowledge state

of college physics students. Am . J. Phys. 53: 1043–1055, 1985.

6. Halloun, I. A., and D. Hestenes. Common sense concepts

about motion. Am . J. Phys. 53: 1056–1065, 1985.

7. Jacobs, G. Word usage misconceptions among first-year univer-

sity physics students. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 11: 395–399, 1989.

8. McCloskey, M. Naive theories of motion. In:

Menta l Models, edited by D. Gentner and A. L. Stevens. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983, p. 299–324.

9. Michael, J. A. Students’ misconceptions about perceived

physiological responses. Am . J. Physiol. 274 Adv. Physiol. Educ. 19: S90–S98, 1998.

10. Modell, H. I. How can we help students learn respiratory

physiology? Am . J. Physiol. 273 Adv. Physiol. Educ. 18: S68–S74, 1997.

11. Modell, H. I., and J. A. Michael Editors. Promoting active