General comparison of differences between standards Standard 1 – Comparison of ‘sourcing and on farm preparation’

Comparison of world livestock export standards Page 26 of 58

5.2 General comparison of differences between standards

Each country relative to Australia Basis of comparison AUS NZL OIE IRL USA GBR CAN EU BRA ARG CHL URY MEX Outcome focus √ Specific 3 √ Specific 3 √ Specific 3 √ General 2 X √ General 2 X X X X X X X Risk management √ Specific 3 √ General 2 X X X X X X X X X X X Assignment of responsibilities √ Specific 3 √ Specific 3 √ Specific 3 √ General 2 √ General 2 √ General 2 √ General 2 √ General 2 Not evident Not evident Not evident √ General 1 Not evident Detailed standards √ Specific 3 √ Specific 3 √ General 3 √ Specific 2 √ General 2 √ Specific 2 √ Specific 2 √ Specific 2 Not evident X X X X Training and key competencies √ Specific 3 √ Specific 3 √ Specific 3 √ Specific 2 √ General 2 √ Specific 2 √ Specific 2 √ General 2 Not evident Not evident Not evident √ General 1 Not evident Remedial actions √ Specific 3 √ Specific 3 √ Specific 3 X X X X X X X X X X Supporting legislation √ Specific 3 √ Specific 3 X √ Specific 3 √ General 2 √ Specific 3 √ General 2 √ Specific 2 √ General √ General √ General √ General √ General Comparison of world livestock export standards Page 27 of 58 General comparison of differences between standards continued Each country relative to Australia Basis of comparison AUS NZL OIE IRL USA GBR CAN EU BRA ARG CHL URY MEX Contingency planning √ Specific 3 √ Specific 2 √ Specific 3 X X X X X X X X X X RD program Evident Not evident Not evident Not evident Not evident Not evident Not evident Not evident X X X X X Licensing accreditation √ Specific 3 √ Specific 3 X √ Specific 3 X √ General 2 √ General 2 Not evident Not evident Not evident Not evident √ General 1 Not evident Transparent reporting system √ Specific 3 √ Specific 3 X √ General 2 Not evident Not evident √ General 2 Not evident Not evident X X X X Audit program √ Specific 2 Not evident Not evident Not evident Not evident Not evident Not evident Not evident X X X X X

5.3 Standard 1 – Comparison of ‘sourcing and on farm preparation’

Each country relative to Australia Basis of comparison AUS NZL OIE IRL USA GBR CAN EU BRA ARG CHL URY MEX Identification and trace-back √ Specific 3 √ Specific 3 Not evident √ Specific 3 X √ Specific 3 √ Specific 2 √ General 2 Not evident √ Specific 2 √ Specific 3 Develop ing √ General 1 Comparison of world livestock export standards Page 28 of 58 Each country relative to Australia Basis of comparison AUS NZL OIE IRL USA GBR CAN EU BRA ARG CHL URY MEX Selection criteria fitness to travel – health and disease √ Specific 3 √ Specific 3 √ General 3 √ Specific 2 √ Specific 2 √ Specific 3 √ General 2 √ General 2 X X X √ General 2 X Selection criteria fitness to travel – body condition √ Specific 3 √ Specific 2 √ General 2 X X √ Specific 3 X √ General 2 X X X √ General 1 X Selection criteria fitness to travel – age, wool length, horn length pregnancy, breed type etc √ Specific 3 √ General 2 √ General 3 √ Specific 2 X √ Specific 3 X √ General 1 X X X Not evident X On farm preparation √ General 2 √ Specific 2 √ General 3 X X Not evident X X Not evident Not evident Not evident Not evident Not evident

5.4 Standard 2 – Comparison of ‘land transport’