Comparison of world livestock export standards
Page 26 of 58
5.2 General comparison of differences between standards
Each country relative to Australia Basis of comparison
AUS NZL
OIE IRL
USA GBR
CAN EU
BRA ARG
CHL URY
MEX Outcome focus
√ Specific
3 √
Specific 3
√ Specific
3 √
General 2
X √
General 2
X X
X X
X X
X
Risk management √
Specific 3
√ General
2 X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
Assignment of responsibilities
√ Specific
3 √
Specific 3
√ Specific
3 √
General 2
√ General
2 √
General 2
√ General
2 √
General 2
Not evident
Not evident
Not evident
√ General
1 Not
evident Detailed standards
√ Specific
3 √
Specific 3
√ General
3 √
Specific 2
√ General
2 √
Specific 2
√ Specific
2 √
Specific 2
Not evident
X X
X X
Training and key competencies
√ Specific
3 √
Specific 3
√ Specific
3 √
Specific 2
√ General
2 √
Specific 2
√ Specific
2 √
General 2
Not evident
Not evident
Not evident
√ General
1 Not
evident Remedial actions
√ Specific
3 √
Specific 3
√ Specific
3 X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
Supporting legislation
√ Specific
3 √
Specific 3
X √
Specific 3
√ General
2 √
Specific 3
√ General
2 √
Specific 2
√ General
√ General
√ General
√ General
√ General
Comparison of world livestock export standards
Page 27 of 58
General comparison of differences between standards continued
Each country relative to Australia Basis of comparison
AUS NZL
OIE IRL
USA GBR
CAN EU
BRA ARG
CHL URY
MEX Contingency
planning √
Specific 3
√ Specific
2 √
Specific 3
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
RD program Evident
Not evident
Not evident
Not evident
Not evident
Not evident
Not evident
Not evident
X X
X X
X
Licensing accreditation
√ Specific
3 √
Specific 3
X √
Specific 3
X √
General 2
√ General
2 Not
evident Not
evident Not
evident Not
evident √
General 1
Not evident
Transparent reporting system
√ Specific
3 √
Specific 3
X √
General 2
Not evident
Not evident
√ General
2 Not
evident Not
evident X
X X
X
Audit program √
Specific 2
Not evident
Not evident
Not evident
Not evident
Not evident
Not evident
Not evident
X X
X X
X
5.3 Standard 1 – Comparison of ‘sourcing and on farm preparation’
Each country relative to Australia Basis of comparison
AUS NZL
OIE IRL
USA GBR
CAN EU
BRA ARG
CHL URY
MEX Identification and
trace-back √
Specific 3
√ Specific
3 Not
evident √
Specific 3
X √
Specific 3
√ Specific
2 √
General 2
Not evident
√ Specific
2 √
Specific 3
Develop ing
√ General
1
Comparison of world livestock export standards
Page 28 of 58
Each country relative to Australia Basis of comparison
AUS NZL
OIE IRL
USA GBR
CAN EU
BRA ARG
CHL URY
MEX Selection criteria
fitness to travel – health and disease
√ Specific
3 √
Specific 3
√ General
3 √
Specific 2
√ Specific
2 √
Specific 3
√ General
2 √
General 2
X X
X √
General 2
X
Selection criteria fitness to travel –
body condition √
Specific 3
√ Specific
2 √
General 2
X X
√ Specific
3 X
√ General
2 X
X X
√ General
1 X
Selection criteria fitness to travel –
age, wool length, horn length
pregnancy, breed type etc
√ Specific
3 √
General 2
√ General
3 √
Specific 2
X √
Specific 3
X √
General 1
X X
X Not
evident X
On farm preparation √
General 2
√ Specific
2 √
General 3
X X
Not evident
X X
Not evident
Not evident
Not evident
Not evident
Not evident
5.4 Standard 2 – Comparison of ‘land transport’