Progam of Financial Inclusion

38 Financial Identity Number FIN. To motivate public access toward inancial services, a study is required upon the provisions that can support public easy access to inancial services, which covered in the Fourth Pillar, namely policiessupporting regulations. In this pillar, the Government and BI will make eforts to provide supports in a policy in the form of regulations issuance that can facilitate the communities in obtaining inancial services. BI in year 2012 has issued multilicense provision. Meanwhile, the policies that will support the facilitation of inancial services among others are policies of branchless banking and credit start-up. Fifth Pillar observes the importance of facilitating intermediation and distribution which emphasizes on the eforts to increase awareness of inancial institutions toward the community groups’ potential to get inancial services. BI, in its efort to enhance the facilitation of intermediation, in cooperation with Indonesian banking has developed “TabunganKu” product which is a form of savings with a low administration cost. Eforts to increase the outreach of formal inancial institution services to the community groups in rural areas are conducted through branchless banking in which one of them contains the possibility of a mobile money application in Indonesia, whereas cellular phones can be used as a means of saving money in the form of an account at a particular bank. It is expected that remote areas can still get services of banking facility through the concept of branchless banking without having to establish Bank oice infrastructures. On the credit distribution side, expansion of credit extension outreach shall be conducted through the concept of credit start-up and land certiication. Consumer protection is one of the advantages to be gained by public if they are associated with formal inancial institutions compared to if they get connected with informal inancial service providers, given that formal inancial service providers have regulator which implements governance and supervision including regulation on protection for their consumers. This thing is relected in the Sixth Pillar of consumer protection. For instance, for bank customers, BI has required banks to 39 communicate with any prospective customer the beneits, risks and costs contained in a inancial product, and also to follow-up their customers’ complaints with clear process and deadline of settlement as well as to facilitate the communities whose problems cannot be resolved by banks through the work unit that handles banking mediation in BI. Cross Pillar The achievement of efectiveness in the implementation of the above six pillars, cannot be separated from a number of factors which together can be seen as cross-pillar activitie. Those activities are among others a Improvement of supporting infrastructures physic and communication and information technology, b Availability of database supply and demand sides that supports the process of policy decision on inancial inclusion, c Encourage the establishment of credit bureau institutions that supports inancial inclusion policy. By the enhancement of public access toward this inancial service provision, the low income communities can also enjoy services such as depositssavings. From the deposit pattern of the low income people, inancial institutions will know their customers better, so that it can open inancing opportunities for prospective customers. Aside from that, the easy access to payment system services will also afect to the smoothness of economic transactions, even toward the communities in remote areas. Buying and selling process can be done more smoothly, and the communities can use advanced technology such as cellphone to pay the purchase of raw materials from farmers in remote areas. Farmers would not have to sell their agricultural produce with low prices due to limited cash brought by the collector traders, as payment can be made using e-money now. This kind of things will support the increase of economic activities that can improve living standard of the communities. That is also the case with insurance services; the availability of micro insurances will help the communities anytime they must deal with problems that can be covered by their insurances. Those things are expected to strengthen the society condition so 40 Pillar 1 - Minimum Capital Requirements Pillar 1 determines minimum capital requirements capital adequacy which are associated with credit risk, market risk and operational risk. In this case, banks must maintain capital adequacy to cover risks faced. According to Basel II documents, bank capital ratio, or the ratio between that they still continuously perform and participate in the activities of economy.

C. Basel II

Capital is one of the main focuses of all bank supervisor authorities in conducting prudential principle. Therefore, one of the regulations that need to be developed to strengthen banking system and becomes the bufer against potensial loss is a regulation on capital adequacy. Considering the important role of bank capita, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision BCBS has issued a concept of capital framework that becomes the international standard. The initial concept of bank capital framework was issued in year 1988 which was then reined in year 2006 by the issuance of International Convergence on Capital Measurement and Capital Standard A Revised Framework document or better known as Basel II. Basel II is intended to enhance the resilience and soundness of inancial system by focusing on the risk- based capital calculation, supervisory review process and market discipline. In general, Basel II framework consists of three pillars, i.e. Pillar 1: capital adequacy minimum capital requirements; Pillar 2: supervisory review process; and Pillar 3: market discipline. 41 regulatory capital and weighted average assets according to risk ATMR should not be less than 8. Pillar 1 of Basel II introduces several alternatives approaches in calculating capital charges of credit risk, market risk and operational risk. Those approaches started from a simple approach to complex approach and can be adjusted according to the level of complexity of the products and activities of the bank. For the initial stage, banks should use the simple approach to calculate capital charges of credit risk, market risk and operational risk. Bank may use a more complex approach provided that the bank is ready and able to conduct capital charges calculation with a more complex approach and also has been granted approval from the supervisory authority. Pillar 2 - Supervisory Review Process Pillar 2 requires a review process conducted by supervisors to ensure that bank capital is adequate to fully cover the bank risks. In accordance with the four 4 principles of Pillar 2, banks must own a process to assess capital adequacy comprehensively which related to the risk proile and strategy to maintain their capital adequacy or known as Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process – ICAAP Principle 1. On the other hand, supervisors will review adequacy of evaluation process conducted by banks or referred to as Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process – SREP principle 2. Meanwhile, according to principle 3, supervisors expect banks to operate above the minimum regulatory capital ratio and in accordance with principle 4 supervisors may conduct intervention to prevent declining capital below the minimum level required and then request banks to take immediate actions in the event the capital cannot be maintained. In performing SREP as referred to in Principle 2 stated above, supervisors may calculate bank capital adequacy toward: 1. Risks that still cannot be fully measured in Pillar 1 due to the use of standard approaches by bank, for instance concentration risk; 2. Risks that have not been calculated in Pillar 1, among others, liquidity risk, interest rate risk in banking book, 42 reputational risk and strategic risk. Some of the said risks cannot be measured quantitatively so as to be more like qualitative interpretations including risks from bank external factors that might arise due to the policy, and economic or business conditions. Pillar 3 - Market Discipline To complete the other two pillars, Pillar 3 of Basel II determines a disclosure requirement that makes it possible for market participants to assess primary information concerning risk exposures, process of measuring risks and capital adequacy of banks. In principle, pillar 3 aims to encourage the creation of a sound banking business environment, among others by increasing transparency to public so that the public can participate in supervising bank business activities. Several main prerequisites in order that the objectives can be achieved are, among others: 1. Availability of adequate information for public regarding bank condition; and 2. Public ability in assessing bank condition through analyses on the available information. Implementation of Basel II in Indonesia Framework of Basel II Pillar 1, Pillar 2, and Pillar 3 in Indonesia has been implemented in full since December 2012. Some regulations related to the implementation of the Basel II among others are: Pillar 1 1. Circular Letter SE No. 136DPNP concerning Guidelines on Calculation of Risk-Based Weighted Assets ATMR for Credit Risk using standard approach. The regulation has come into force as of January 2012, requiring banks to compute credit risk exposure using the standard approach. 2. Calculation of Market Risk is stipulated in SE No. 1421 DPNP concerning Revision on SE No.933DPNP of BI dated 18 December 2007 concerning Guidelines on Standard Method Utilization in the Calculation of Capital Adequacy Requirements for Commercial 43 Banks by Taking into Account Market Risks. Besides, for banks that will use an internal model, regulation on the said matter is stipulated in SE No. 931DPNP concerning Guidelines on Internal Model Utilization in the Calculation of Capital Adequacy Requirements for Commercial Banks by Taking into Account Market Risks. 3. Meanwhile, calculation of operational risk is stipulated in SE No. 113DPNP concerning Calculation of ATMR for Operational Risk Using Basic Indicator Approach. Pillar 2 In relation to pillar 2 Supervisory Review Process, Bank Indonesia has issued a provision that requires banks to provide minimum capital according to their risk proiles. The said provision is stipulated in Bank Indonesia Regulation PBI No. 1418PBI2012 on Minimum Capital Adequacy Requirement KPMM for Commercial Banks based on Risk Proiles and Fulillment of Capital Equivalency Maintained Assets CEMA, entered into force as of December 2012. Through the said provisions, banks are required to provide minimum capital based on risk proiles with the following ranges: 1. Bank with a risk proile 3 of rating-1, a minimum capital of 8 2. Bank with a risk proile of rating-2, a minimum capital of 9 up to 10 3. Bank with a risk proile of rating-3, a minimum capital of 10 up to 11 4. Bank with a risk proil of rating-4 or 5, a minimum capital of 11 up to 14 Pillar 3 In order to increase market discipline, BI has issued PBI No. 1414PBI2012 concerning Transparency and Publication of Bank Reports and SE No. 1435DPNP concerning Annual Reports of Commercial Banks and Speciic Annual Reports Submitted to BI. In the abovementioned 3 What it means by risk proile is a Bank risk proile as stipulated in the regulation of Bank Indonesia concerning Assessment of Commercial Bank Soundness Rating. 44 regulations, more comprehensive disclosures are regulated, i.e. concerning risk exposures owned by banks, risk mitigations conducted, and capital adequacy of banks, in line with the requirement in Pillar 3 of Basel II. With the issuance and application of the said regulations, implementation of Basel II comprehensively can be achieved, so that Indonesian banking industry that is more sound, more capable to survive crisis condition, and more competitive in global inancial industry, can be created. This will further encourage the improvement of a sound Indonesian inancial system.

D. Basel III

In order to respond to 2008-2009 global inancial crises, the Leaders Summit in year 2008 held in Washington D.C. has agreed on 50 steps of the world economic rescue or known as Washington Action Plans WAP. To follow-up the said rescuing measures, G-20 has given a mandate to Basel Committee on Banking Supervision BCBS to formulate a package of global inancial reformation 4 which aims to enhance the resilience both at micro level and at macro level. The resilience enhancement at micro level shall be carried out by improving quality and quantity of bank capital as well as the resilience and adequacy of bank liquidity. Meanwhile, the resilience enhancement at macro level is conducted by applying conservation bufer, leverage ratio that can help mitigating risks that disrupt inancial system, countercyclical capital bufer to reduce procyclicality and also requires banks or inancial institutions that are systemic in nature to provide bufer. In accordance with BCBS documents, Basel III framework will start being applied in January 2013 gradually until it reaches its full implementation in January 2019. 4 BCBS has issued two 2 documents as parts of global inancial reformation package, i.e. A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking System, and International Framework for Liquidity Risk Measurement 45 In general, the coverage of Basel III is as follows: