commit to user
38
Nisa A. Azam
2. Cycle 1
a. Planning the action
In this stage, the lesson plan was made for the whole meetings in cycle 1. It  was  planned  to  have  five  meetings  which  was  conducted  once  a  week.  The
materials  were  taken  from  the  internet  and  some  of  them  were  posted  on  the teacher blog. It was about recount text as aimed in the curriculum.
Considering the students’ condition that they were really fond of being a second  grade student,  the  topic  of the lesson was all the  same  for  five meetings;
that  was  “school  activities”.  The  main  media  used  was  student  blog  and  the worksheet was mostly in the form of blog page.
b. Implementing the action
1 The first meeting
The  lesson  started  at  8.20  a.m.  It  was  the  second  lesson  on  that  day  in RSBI  8G.  At  the  beginning  of  the  English  class,  the  students  were  all  ready  to
learn. It seemed that they were too enthusiastic and “when I came in, they were all vigorously turning on their  laptop and got connected to the  internet. It was quite
noisy  in  that  morning,”  Research  Diary,  06102010.  Unfortunately,  the  server was not in a good condition as one student said, “Miss, pindah di luar kelas aja ya
Miss.  Di  sini  nggak  bisa,  tapi  di  luar  bisa,”  Research  Diary,  06102010.  So, they  had  to  move  the  class  outside  the  room.  While  waiting  for  the  connection,
they were divided into 5 groups consisting of 4 persons. After  all  of  the  students got  a  group,  the  class  then moved  again  to  the
hall. In the hall, each group had a task to create one blog account. At that time, the connection was still unreached, so the students were getting noisy. Some of them
even  got  bored  because of  the  very  low  connection.  This  activity  “take  a  longer time until the connection was accessible in recess,” Research Diary, 06102010.
Until the  end of the  first session, none of the  groups had made the blog  account successfully.
During the recess, there were groups which stayed in the hall and kept on trying to create the account. In was note in Research Diary 06102010:
“Ada 2 kelompok yang masih bersedia menghadapi laptopnya dan berusaha membuat akun blog. Kelompok pertama birotrilili berhasil membuat akun
commit to user
39
Nisa A. Azam
serta  melakukan  initial  post  …  Sementara  kelompok  kedua  bloge8ge, waktu yang dibutuhkan sedikit lebih lama … .”
When the connection was getting better, that two groups could create the blog and posted  an  initial  text  on  it.  For  the  rest  of  the  group,  “they  still  had  no  blog
account,  but  they  had  wrote  the  draft  of  the  initial  post,”  Research  Diary, 06102010. Finally, the class was finished at 9.55 a.m. after the class reflection.
2 The second meeting
The English class started at 8.20 a.m.. The topic in this meeting was still about the blog account and its feature. Considering the previous meeting, all of the
tasks  for  this  meeting  were  stated  in  the  beginning  of  the  lesson.  The  students were  asked  to  continue  the  previous  posting  and  to  revise  it.  Then,  they  had  to
revise another paragraph having misspelled words on it. The purpose of this task was to make the students familiar with a blog feature, spelling checker.
In this meeting, the representatives of each group wrote the name of their blog  and  its  addresses  on  the  board,  so  that  the  they  could  visit  their  friends’
blogs.  The  name  of  the  blog  were  Theigolden,  Sunshine  Theigolden,  Birotrilili, blogge8g, and thedeiia-thedeia Research Diary, 20102010.
The students worked in group with, at  least, one laptop per group. They had  a  small  group  discussion  during  the  lesson.  However,  the  seat  arrangement
was  not arranged properly  since  not  all  of the students worked in the classroom. Then,  “having  given the  instruction,  more  than  half  of  the class  went  outside  to
find a place which had a faster internet connection” Research Diary, 13102010. They  were  allowed  to  go  outside  the  class  to  find  the  better  connection.  The
corridor was the more preferable place than the classroom. When  it  was  coming  to  the  end  of  the  lesson,  the  students  stopped
working  online  and  the  lesson  was  reflected.  Then,  the  students  were  asked  to bring pictures photographs for the next meeting and they might discuss it in their
groups for the rest of the time.
commit to user
40
Nisa A. Azam
3 The third meeting
The third meeting was conducted at 8.20 – 9.55 a.m. It was done in two sessions: “the first session was purposed to write the draft and the second session
was  time  for  posting”  Research  Diary,  20102010.  In  this  meeting,  all  of  the task were stated in the beginning of the lesson. The students were asked to write 5
sentences based on the pictures which they had brought.  But then, they only had to write 3 sentences describing one picture each person.
Started  to  do  the  task,  the  students  worked  in  their  group.  Two  groups were  working  effectively  since  they  had  only  five  pictures.  While  the  other  two
groups,  worked  less  effective  because  they  had  some  stocks  of  photographs  in their  laptop. They got confusion in deciding which photos were better to publish
on the blog as “I did not tell them to bring the sequenced photos”. It was supposed to  let  them  work  individually  and  made  them  not  “not  riveted  on  a  rule  in
writing,” Research Diary, 20102010. There were two sessions in this meeting, the offline and online working.
In the offline working, the students wrote their sentences about the photos on their papers  or  directly  type  it  on  their  laptops.  During  this  process,  they  might  have
discussion with other friends and consult their work to the teacher. Unfortunately, they also tried an alternative way to consult the translator:
Seorang  siswa  berkata  kepada  temannya  yang  sulit untuk  menerjemahkan kalimatnya  ke  dalam  bahasa  inggris,  “Iki  lho, nganggo  Google  Translate.
Tulisen neng kono,“ Research Diary, 20102010.
Finishing the offline  work,  they started to  log on the  group blogs. Each group had to post their works including the photos that they described. The result
of  the  post  was  vary  since  not  all  group  posted  the  works  in  one  post.  They preferred to post it individually or one post for two persons.
4 The fourth meeting
The fourth meeting was scheduled at the same time as previous meetings, 8.20 – 9.55 a.m. The lesson begun with the review of the previous lesson.  Then,
the  students got  a  model of short  recount text taken  from  a blog post which was
commit to user
41
Nisa A. Azam
projected  through  the  LCD.  The  students  should  pay  attention  on  the  use  of conjunction and word order my friends and I.
Once the students got enough model and explanation, they were given an exercise    to  rearrange  jumbled  paragraphs  based  on  its  content  and  the  use  of
conjunctions.  The  next  exercise  was  about  correcting  the  punctuation  and capitalization of a paragraph. All of the exercises were done together orally.
After  that,  the  students  got  an  assignment  to  write  a  short  story  on  the worksheet.  They  had  to  write  3  paragraphs  about  the  school  activity.  The
instruction was written clearly on the worksheet. After all students got the paper, they  started  to  work  individually.  During  the  writing,  some  of  them  asked  for
some helps from their friends and consulted the work to the teacher. At the end of the session, all of the students had finished the story and collected the worksheet
to the teacher.
5 The fifth meeting
It  was  the  last  meeting  in  cycle  1.  The  lesson  started  at  9.00  a.m.  and finished at 10.15 a.m. On that day, there was a ceremony before the first lesson, so
that  the  schedule  was  changed.  The  situation  did  not  really  support  to  have  a lesson,  but “when  I  was  coming  to  the  end  of  the  ladder-steps, one  student  who
was outside her class greeted me cheerfully” Research Diary, 10112010. The meeting begun with a review of previous lesson which was related to
the students’ last stories. After that, it was continued by new topics: past tense and preposition time and place. It was rather different from the previous meeting that
“the  students  noted  what  I  had  explained  explained  about  the  grammar  rules,” Research  Diary,  10112010.  Additionally,  the  material  was  not  only  about  the
use  of  past  tense  and  preposition,  but  also  the  common  mistakes  found  in students’ writing.
…selain  materi  past  tense  dan  preposition,  saya  juga  menyampaikan kesalahan yang cukup sering ditemui pada pekrjaan kemarin. Diantaranya,
penggunaan  tobe  dan  penulisan  ‘then’,  serta  penempatan  kata  ‘there’.  Di tengah-tengah  saya  menyampaikan  materi,  ada  siswa  yang  berkata  lirih,
‘Tumben aku pinter,’ sambil tersenyum Research Diary, 10112010.
commit to user
42
Nisa A. Azam
The materials were accessible on teacher blog, so the students might access when they  came  online.  Finishing  the  note  taking,  the  students  had  a  task  to  revise
another blog post. They had to revise the use of tenses, punctuation, preposition, and  spelling  on  the  post  Research  Diary,  10112010.  The  students  should
discuss  the  text  in  group  and  report  their  finding.  At  the  end  of  the  lesson,  all groups had found and revised all of the mistakes on the post.
c. Observing the action