Study Objectives Methodology INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background

August 2004 organisation. However, because of the difficulty of calculating non-financial risks, this study will only look at expectations of financial impact and the motion and time study in the event of down time in the BI-RTGS system. This information on down time risk is expected to provide a tangible picture for the Bank Indonesia management in calculating the operational risk in the BI-RTGS system, which can then be put to use in pricing policy. The determination of RTOs will also provide a basis for Bank Indonesia to maintain transparency toward BI-RTGS system participants concerning risks and fulfilment of the BI-RTGS system service level agreement.

1.2. Study Objectives

As explained above, down time risk and determination of RTOs is fundamental to development of a BCP Concept. Accordingly, the objectives of this study are: 1. To provide an overview of the development and operational risks of the BI-RTGS system. 2. To examine risks in the event of down time in the BI- RTGS system and possible impact that may result. 3. To study the Recovery Time Objectives from the angle of expected financial impact and technical aspects concerning the time required for the system recovery process.

1.3. Methodology

August 2004 In broad terms, this study applies the descriptive method. This method is used to help explain and describe the operational characteristics of the BI-RTGS system, ranging from transaction growth and operational risks to financial impact in the event of downtime. The data used is secondary data obtained from the payment system database, the BI-RTGS system operational logbook and literature studies. The scope of the data analysis begins with the system operational data for the 2003 period. Data from 2003 was selected with the expectation that it would explain the cyclical or seasonal nature of transaction data in the BI-RTGS system over a one year period. To ascertain the time required for system recovery, primary data was obtained from observations during trial runs of the Disaster Recovery Plan in 2004. To obtain a more detailed picture of the possible impact of downtime at member banks, information was gathered through in-depth interviews at a sampling of four leading banks: Bank Central Asia, Bank Mandiri, Lippo Bank and ABN Amro Bank. This sampling was determined on the basis of number and diversity of transactions conducted by those banks using the BI-RTGS system. This selection of banks was expected to be representative of the pattern and diversity of transactions conducted in the BI-RTGS system. The RTO analysis from the financial side uses the August 2004 Business Impact Analysis approach, which studies the degree of financial impact from down time risk. Down time risk is calculated using the following formula: Determining Down Time Risk Tom Pisselo, 2002 1 Potential Down Time Cost = average transactionsday x average nominal transaction value or Potential Down Time Cost = number of peak hour transactions x average nominal transaction value To calculate potential down time risk, two different transaction periods will be used: monthly and daily. These periods are analysed separately because the monthly data contains cyclical or seasonal data for December while the daily period was chosen because a one-week period contains one day that is cyclical or seasonal, i.e. Thursday. To determine down time cost, it is also possible to assess the impact of down time on Bank Indonesia’s internal systems. Down Time Risk for Bank Indonesia’s Internal Systems Down Time Cost = Bank Indonesia revenues from RTGS system transactions From a technical angle, the RTO analysis will apply the Motion and Time Study method by calculating the time taken for each recovery process in the existing BI-RTGS system. This analysis is used as an added reality check for the Time August 2004 Recovery Objectives that need to be determined. The time calculation method is based on the results of a trial conducted in conjunction with this RTO study in 2004 using various test scenarios for the BI-RTGS system Disaster Recovery Plan.

1.4. Scope of the Paper