Pre-Test Post-Test Analysis of Test

4.4 Analysis of Cycle Two

The cycle two was conducted in four meetings. The first meeting was on March 19, 2011, the second meeting was on March 21, 2011, the third meeting was on March 23, 2011, and the last meeting was on March 26, 2011. The procedure of teaching and learning process was the same as the first cycle. The first, the second, and the third meeting of cycle two were used for doing the treatment. I did the treatment with some revision. I prepared some new topics and revised the technique in discussing the topic. In short, I then had them enjoy in practicing the structure. A post-test was administered for them all in the last meeting of cycle two. The post- test was done to know about students‟ speaking skill improvement. The analysis of the post-test was presented in the following part of sub discussion.

4.5 Analysis of Test

4.5.1 Pre-Test

The Pre-Test was held on the first meeting of cycle one, on March 9, 2011, after the teacher explained the material. This section was conducted by the two assistants. The aim of the test was to measure the students‟ speaking ability before the treatment. There were thirty-two students in the test. They were asked these questions: 1 Do you have facebook? 2 Is it important? 3 Whywhy not? And 4 what is your recommendation about facebook? There was no significant problem in conducting the pre-test. The class could be managed well. The result of the pre-test was as follows: No. Student‟s Code The result of students‟ achievement in speaking Pronunciation Vocabulary Structure Fluency 1. A-01 1 3 2 1 2. A-02 2 3 3 2 3. A-03 1 3 1 1 4. A-04 1 2 2 2 5. A-05 1 2 2 1 6. A-06 1 2 1 1 7. A-07 1 2 2 1 8. A-08 1 2 2 2 9. A-09 2 3 2 2 10. A-10 1 2 1 2 11. A-11 1 3 3 1 12. A-12 1 2 1 1 13. A-13 2 3 2 1 14. A-14 1 2 2 1 15. A-15 2 3 2 2 16. A-16 1 1 1 1 17. A-17 2 2 2 1 18. A-18 1 3 2 2 19. A-19 1 2 1 1 20. A-20 1 2 1 2 21. A-21 2 3 3 2 22. A-22 1 2 1 1 23. A-23 1 2 3 1 24. A-24 1 2 2 1 25. A-25 1 2 2 1 26. A-26 1 3 2 1 27. A-27 1 2 1 1 28. A-28 1 3 3 1 29. A-29 1 1 1 1 30. A-30 2 2 2 1 31. A-31 1 2 2 1 32. A-32 1 2 2 1 TOTAL 39 73 59 41 MEAN 1.21 2.28 1.84 1.28 Table 4.1 Result of Pretest Based on the result above, it was showed that the sum of students‟ score in pronunciation was 39, vocabulary 73, structure 59, and the fluency 41. The result of pretest was investigated then for the mean. To get the mean, I used this formula: N x x Which: x = the mean x = the sum of any test score = the total number of respondents The average of the students‟ result was 1.21 for pronunciation, 2.28 for vocabulary, 1.84 for structure, and 1.28 for fluency. Actually they had been having a well achievement of their speaking ability. But they were still getting confused with the pronouncing of the difficult words and they were not accustomed to speak in English. It influenced their fluency in their speaking.

4.5.2 Post-Test

The post-test was administered on the last meeting of cycle two, on March 26, 2011. All students of XII IPS 4 joined the test. This section was also conducted by the two assistants. The questions of the post-test were the same as the ones given in the pre-test. The result of the post-test was shown in the following table. No. Student‟s Code The result of students‟ achievement in speaking Pronunciation Vocabulary Structure Fluency 1. A-01 2 4 3 2 2. A-02 3 4 4 4 3. A-03 2 4 2 2 4. A-04 3 3 3 3 5. A-05 3 4 4 3 6. A-06 2 3 3 2 7. A-07 3 3 3 3 8. A-08 3 4 3 3 9. A-09 3 4 4 4 10. A-10 2 3 3 3 11. A-11 3 4 4 3 12. A-12 2 3 2 2 13. A-13 3 4 3 3 14. A-14 3 3 4 4 15. A-15 4 4 4 3 16. A-16 2 3 2 2 17. A-17 2 3 2 3 18. A-18 3 4 3 3 19. A-19 3 3 2 4 20. A-20 3 4 3 3 21. A-21 4 4 4 3 22. A-22 3 3 3 2 23. A-23 3 3 3 3 24. A-24 3 4 3 3 25. A-25 2 3 3 3 26. A-26 3 4 3 4 27. A-27 3 3 2 2 28. A-28 3 3 4 4 29. A-29 3 3 2 3 30. A-30 3 3 4 3 31. A-31 2 3 3 2 32. A-32 3 3 3 3 TOTAL 89 110 98 94 MEAN 2.78 3.43 3.06 2.93 Table 4.2 Result of the Post-test Based on the result above, it was showed that the sum of students‟ score in pronunciation was 89, vocabulary 110, structure 98, and the fluency 94. The result of pretest was investigated then for the mean. To get the mean, I used the same formula with the formula used in the pre-test: N x x Which: x = the mean x = the sum of any test score = the total number of respondents The average of the students‟ result was 2.78 for pronunciation, 3.43 for vocabulary, 3.06 for structure, and 2.93 for fluency. It can be concluded that the students‟ achievement in speaking had a significant improvement and the students had been able to be categorized into a well achievement.

4.5.3 Test-Result

Dokumen yang terkait

Small Group Discussion in Teaching Speaking at Eleventh Grade of Senior High School 3 Malang

0 35 20

The Ability of the First Grade Students at Senior High School 2 Batu in Finding the Generic Structure of Narrative Text

0 34 17

Grammatical Error Analysis of the Eighth Grade Students in Writing Descriptive Text at SMP Negeri 1 Jember in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

1 7 3

Teaching Reading Skill through Paraphrasing and Summarizing at the Second Grade of Senior High School Pembangunan 1 Bogor

1 5 73

Teaching listening through storytelling: A Case Study in the First Year Class Junior High School of Paramarta, Jombang

0 4 67

The Effectiveness Of Group Discussion In Teaching Speaking : An Experimental Study at the Second Grade of SMA IIBS,RI Cikarang

0 19 54

THE USE OF MEME COMIC AS MEDIA TO TEACH SPOOF TEXT An Experimental Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Kutowinangun, Kebumen in the Academic Year of 20152016

1 40 127

Analyzing Teacher’s Feedback Used in Teaching Speaking : A Case Study at the First Year of SMA IT AR RAIHAN Bandar Lampung

0 29 107

THESIS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ENGLISH TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESS TO STUDENTS WITH VISUAL IMPAIRMENT (A Case Study on the Ninth Grade of Junior High School at SMP YKAB Surakarta in the Academic Year of 20122013)

0 0 117

Grade of Junior High School 1 Limpung Batang In the Academic Year of 20102011) THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for Gaining The Degree of Bachelor in English Language Education

0 2 74