4.4 Analysis of Cycle Two
The cycle two was conducted in four meetings. The first meeting was on March 19, 2011, the second meeting was on March 21, 2011, the third meeting was
on March 23, 2011, and the last meeting was on March 26, 2011. The procedure of teaching and learning process was the same as the first
cycle. The first, the second, and the third meeting of cycle two were used for doing the treatment. I did the treatment with some revision. I prepared some new topics and
revised the technique in discussing the topic. In short, I then had them enjoy in practicing the structure. A post-test was administered for them all in the last meeting
of cycle two. The post- test was done to know about students‟ speaking skill
improvement. The analysis of the post-test was presented in the following part of sub discussion.
4.5 Analysis of Test
4.5.1 Pre-Test
The Pre-Test was held on the first meeting of cycle one, on March 9, 2011, after the teacher explained the material. This section was conducted by the two
assistants. The aim of the test was to measure the students‟ speaking ability before the treatment. There were thirty-two students in the test. They were asked these
questions: 1 Do you have facebook? 2 Is it important? 3 Whywhy not? And 4 what is your recommendation about facebook?
There was no significant problem in conducting the pre-test. The class could be managed well. The result of the pre-test was as follows:
No. Student‟s
Code The result of students‟ achievement in speaking
Pronunciation Vocabulary Structure
Fluency 1.
A-01 1
3 2
1 2.
A-02 2
3 3
2 3.
A-03 1
3 1
1 4.
A-04 1
2 2
2 5.
A-05 1
2 2
1 6.
A-06 1
2 1
1 7.
A-07 1
2 2
1 8.
A-08 1
2 2
2 9.
A-09 2
3 2
2 10.
A-10 1
2 1
2 11.
A-11 1
3 3
1 12.
A-12 1
2 1
1 13.
A-13 2
3 2
1 14.
A-14 1
2 2
1 15.
A-15 2
3 2
2 16.
A-16 1
1 1
1 17.
A-17 2
2 2
1 18.
A-18 1
3 2
2 19.
A-19 1
2 1
1 20.
A-20 1
2 1
2 21.
A-21 2
3 3
2 22.
A-22 1
2 1
1
23. A-23
1 2
3 1
24. A-24
1 2
2 1
25. A-25
1 2
2 1
26. A-26
1 3
2 1
27. A-27
1 2
1 1
28. A-28
1 3
3 1
29. A-29
1 1
1 1
30. A-30
2 2
2 1
31. A-31
1 2
2 1
32. A-32
1 2
2 1
TOTAL 39
73 59
41 MEAN
1.21 2.28
1.84 1.28
Table 4.1 Result of Pretest Based
on the result above, it was showed that the sum of students‟ score in pronunciation was 39, vocabulary 73, structure 59, and the fluency 41. The result of
pretest was investigated then for the mean. To get the mean, I used this formula:
N x
x Which: x = the mean
x = the sum of any test score = the total number of respondents
The average of the students‟ result was 1.21 for pronunciation, 2.28 for vocabulary, 1.84 for structure, and 1.28 for fluency. Actually they had been having a
well achievement of their speaking ability. But they were still getting confused with
the pronouncing of the difficult words and they were not accustomed to speak in English. It influenced their fluency in their speaking.
4.5.2 Post-Test
The post-test was administered on the last meeting of cycle two, on March 26, 2011. All students of XII IPS 4 joined the test. This section was also conducted
by the two assistants. The questions of the post-test were the same as the ones given in the pre-test. The result of the post-test was shown in the following table.
No. Student‟s
Code The result of students‟ achievement in speaking
Pronunciation Vocabulary Structure
Fluency 1.
A-01 2
4 3
2 2.
A-02 3
4 4
4 3.
A-03 2
4 2
2 4.
A-04 3
3 3
3 5.
A-05 3
4 4
3 6.
A-06 2
3 3
2 7.
A-07 3
3 3
3 8.
A-08 3
4 3
3 9.
A-09 3
4 4
4 10.
A-10 2
3 3
3 11.
A-11 3
4 4
3 12.
A-12 2
3 2
2 13.
A-13 3
4 3
3 14.
A-14 3
3 4
4 15.
A-15 4
4 4
3
16. A-16
2 3
2 2
17. A-17
2 3
2 3
18. A-18
3 4
3 3
19. A-19
3 3
2 4
20. A-20
3 4
3 3
21. A-21
4 4
4 3
22. A-22
3 3
3 2
23. A-23
3 3
3 3
24. A-24
3 4
3 3
25. A-25
2 3
3 3
26. A-26
3 4
3 4
27. A-27
3 3
2 2
28. A-28
3 3
4 4
29. A-29
3 3
2 3
30. A-30
3 3
4 3
31. A-31
2 3
3 2
32. A-32
3 3
3 3
TOTAL 89
110 98
94 MEAN
2.78 3.43
3.06 2.93
Table 4.2 Result of the Post-test Based on the result above, it was showed that the sum of students‟ score in
pronunciation was 89, vocabulary 110, structure 98, and the fluency 94. The result of pretest was investigated then for the mean. To get the mean, I used the same formula
with the formula used in the pre-test:
N x
x
Which: x = the mean x = the sum of any test score
= the total number of respondents The average of the students‟ result was 2.78 for pronunciation, 3.43 for
vocabulary, 3.06 for structure, and 2.93 for fluency. It can be concluded that the students‟ achievement in speaking had a significant improvement and the students
had been able to be categorized into a well achievement.
4.5.3 Test-Result