Respondents’ Characteristics Results 1 General Description of UMKM Used as Sample
21
It is evidenced that the Psychological Empowerment X2 positively but insignificantly contributes to Creativity Y1, as shown by the fact that the lane coefficient
value is 0.110215 and the T-statistical value is equal to 1.281721, which is lower than the T-critical value, which is 1.96, meaning insignificance. Thus, hypothesis 2 in which it was
stated that the psychological empowerment significantly contributed to creativity cannot be evidenced.
The Asta Brata leadership X3 turns out to contribute positively and significantly
to Creativity Y1, as shown by the lane coefficient, that is, 0.347938, and the T-statistical value, that is, 3.302404, which is higher than the t-critical value, which is 1.96. Thus, it
can be inferred that the better the implementation of the asta brata leadership the better the
employee creativity will be, meaning that the asta brata leadership significantly
contributes to creativity can be evidenced. Creativity Y1 turns out to positively and significantly contribute to Innovation
Y2. The result of the data analysis shows that the lane coefficient is 0.261187 and that the T-statistics value is equal to 2.418521, which is lower than the T-critical value, which is
1.96. Such a result of examination indicates that the better the creativity, the better the innovation will be. Thus, hypothesis 4 in which it was stated that creativity significantly
affected creativity can be evidenced. The Structural Empowerment X1 turns out to positively but insignificantly affect
Innovation Y2, as can be identified from the lane coefficient, which is 0.024062, and the T-Statistical value, which is equal to 0.256907, which is lower than the T-critical value,
which is 1.96. Thus, hypothesis 5 in which it was stated that the structural empowerment significantly affected innovation cannot be evidenced.
The Psychological Empowerment X2 positively and significantly contributes to Innovation Y2, as shown by the lane coefficient value, which is 0.334554 and the T-
statistical value, that is, 3.492114, which is higher than the T-critical value, that is, 1.96. Thus, hypothesis 6 in which it was stated that the psychological empowerment
significantly affected innovation can be evidenced. The
Asta Brata leadership X3 positively and significantly contributes to Innovation Y2. Based on the result of data analysis obtained from the lane coefficient
value, which is 0.374291, and the T-statistical value, which is 3.458552 and higher than the T-critical value, which is 1.96, hypothesis 7, in which it was stated that the
Asta Brata leadership significantly affected innovation can be evidenced.