Respondents’ Characteristics Results 1 General Description of UMKM Used as Sample
                                                                                21
It  is  evidenced  that  the  Psychological  Empowerment  X2  positively  but insignificantly contributes to Creativity Y1, as shown by the fact that the lane coefficient
value is 0.110215 and the T-statistical value is equal to 1.281721, which is lower than the T-critical value, which is 1.96, meaning insignificance. Thus, hypothesis 2 in which it was
stated that the psychological empowerment significantly contributed to creativity cannot be evidenced.
The Asta Brata  leadership X3 turns out to contribute positively and significantly
to Creativity Y1, as shown by the lane coefficient, that is, 0.347938, and the T-statistical value, that  is, 3.302404, which  is  higher than the t-critical  value, which  is 1.96.  Thus,  it
can be inferred that the better the implementation of the asta brata leadership the better the
employee  creativity  will  be,  meaning  that  the asta  brata  leadership  significantly
contributes to creativity can be evidenced. Creativity  Y1  turns  out  to  positively  and  significantly  contribute  to  Innovation
Y2. The result of the data analysis shows that the lane coefficient is 0.261187 and that the T-statistics value  is equal to 2.418521, which is lower than the T-critical value, which is
1.96.  Such  a  result  of  examination  indicates  that  the  better  the  creativity,    the  better  the innovation  will  be.  Thus,  hypothesis  4  in  which  it  was  stated that  creativity  significantly
affected creativity can be evidenced. The Structural Empowerment X1 turns out to positively but insignificantly affect
Innovation Y2, as can be identified from the lane coefficient, which is 0.024062, and the T-Statistical  value,  which  is  equal  to  0.256907,  which  is  lower  than  the  T-critical  value,
which is 1.96. Thus, hypothesis 5 in which it was stated that the structural empowerment significantly affected innovation cannot be evidenced.
The  Psychological  Empowerment  X2  positively  and  significantly  contributes  to Innovation  Y2,  as  shown  by  the  lane  coefficient  value,  which  is  0.334554  and  the  T-
statistical  value, that  is, 3.492114, which  is  higher than the T-critical  value, that  is, 1.96. Thus,  hypothesis  6  in  which  it  was  stated  that  the  psychological  empowerment
significantly affected innovation can be evidenced. The
Asta  Brata  leadership  X3  positively  and  significantly  contributes  to Innovation  Y2.  Based  on  the  result  of  data  analysis  obtained  from  the  lane  coefficient
value,  which  is  0.374291,  and  the  T-statistical  value,  which  is  3.458552  and  higher  than the T-critical value, which is 1.96, hypothesis 7, in which it was stated that the
Asta Brata leadership significantly affected innovation can be evidenced.